CEO Morning Brief

Sisters in Islam Hails Big Victory Following Apex Court Decision on Fatwa

edgeinvest
Publish date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025, 11:26 AM
edgeinvest
0 32,731
TheEdge CEO Morning Brief
Photo by Patrick Goh/The Edge

KUALA LUMPUR (June 19): Sisters in Islam (SIS) welcomed Thursday’s landmark decision in reaffirming the supremacy of the Federal Constitution, the rule of law, and the accountability of all state institutions — including religious authorities.

In a statement, SIS said this was not just a victory for the organisation, but a win for all Malaysians who believe in due process, democratic oversight, and the inclusive spirit of Islam.

“The court's recognition — that fatwas can, and must, be subjected to legal scrutiny — ensures that no institution is above the law, and that all Malaysians — regardless of belief — have recourse when their rights are infringed.

“For over a decade, SIS has been labelled as 'deviant' for advocating justice and equality in Islam. Today’s ruling affirms that our struggle is protected under the fundamental liberties provisions guaranteed to all citizens by the Federal Constitution,” the statement said.

SIS added that the idea that principles such as justice, compassion, dignity, differences of opinion are foreign to Islam is a distortion of the faith’s rich intellectual and juristic heritage.

“We reiterate that our struggle was never an attack on Islam or its authorities. Instead, it was a principled legal challenge to a process that lacked transparency, natural justice, and fairness.

“SIS strongly believes that when a country uses Islam as a source of law, policy, and practice, and the outcomes discriminate against women and violate our fundamental liberties, we as citizens have the right to seek judicial review.”

This case, SIS added, is not about Islam, but about public law and public policy that must pass the test of public scrutiny.

Thursday’s decision, it said, is a milestone in ensuring that religious authorities remain accountable to constitutional values and do not wield power unchecked.

“We thank our legal team, supporters, and members of the public who have stood by us throughout this long legal journey. We now look forward to continuing our work — grounded in Islamic principles and human rights standards — towards building a more just, compassionate, and inclusive society for all, and above all, Muslim women,” they said.

In a majority decision on Thursday, the Federal Court ruled that SIS as a company or organisation cannot be considered as deviant, as they are not “persons professing the religion of Islam”.

However, the apex court did not rule on the fatwa declaring liberal and plural thinking as being deviant and those who adopt it should repent, so this still stands, as it is within the state’s purview.

Muslim lawyers clarify fatwa on liberalism and pluralism not affected

Meanwhile, the Malaysian Muslim Lawyers Association said several media reports writing that the Federal Court decision had fully invalidated the 2014 Selangor fatwa on liberalism and pluralism were incorrect and confusing, and did not represent the full grounds.

Its president, Muhamad Hisham Marzuki, said the apex court did not invalidate the fatwa, and said the court in fact validated the fatwa, in that any individual who holds liberal and pluralist views is considered to be deviant and going against Islamic teachings.

He further added that the fatwa said any individual who adopts liberalism and pluralism needs to repent and return to the true path.

“The setting aside is only on SIS as a company, organisation, or institution, the seizure and banning of publication, and directing the Malaysia Communication and Multimedia Commission to bar [SIS’] social posts,” Hisham said.

He further explained the court’s grounds, that a person professing the religion of Islam does not apply to SIS as it is a company and not a person (natural person) or artificial person.

“The court explained that as a company, it is a made-up entity which does not have a capacity to perform the five pillars of Islam. A company does not have the capacity to do this and also repent,” he said.

Hisham also explained the fatwa has no jurisdiction to bar publications or to erase social postings, as that is within the federal agencies’ jurisdiction under the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 and the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998.

Hisham said the Federal Court verified that the fatwa regarding the belief of Muslims is valid and enforceable, and the cancellation only applies on matters pertaining what is within the federal and state jurisdiction.

“We hope that the media is able to report the court decision in an accurate and holistic manner for society’s understanding,” he added.

Source: TheEdge - 20 Jun 2025

More articles on CEO Morning Brief
BRICS Ties Driven by Trade, Not Politics, Says Miti After Trump Tariff Threat

Jul 08, 2025

Malaysia's engagement with BRICS focuses on trade and development, maintaining independence from political alignments amid US tariff threats, ensuring economic growth and partnerships.

Rubio to Make Trip to KL as Tariffs Deadline Looms

Jul 08, 2025

Marco Rubio's first trip to Asia as Secretary of State focuses on trade and security, addressing concerns over impending tariff increases from the Trump administration.

MACC Files Forfeiture Application Against Ismail Sabri, Political Secretary Over RM169 Mil Cash

Jul 08, 2025

The MACC has filed to forfeit currencies owned by former PM Ismail Sabri Yaakob amid ongoing corruption investigations, highlighting efforts to combat financial misconduct in Malaysia.

PKR MPs Led by Rafizi Call for Royal Commission of Inquiry on Judicial Appointments

Jul 08, 2025

PKR lawmakers demand a Royal Commission of Inquiry into judicial appointment allegations, citing procedural violations that threaten judicial independence and public trust.

Walk for Judicial Independence Scheduled for July 14, Sanctioned by Bar Council

Jul 08, 2025

Lawyers in Malaysia are organizing a Walk for Judicial Independence to protest the government's failure to extend the terms of key judicial leaders, raising concerns over judicial vacancies.

Company Directors Can be Held Liable for EPF Debts If Company Not Named, Says Apex Court

Jul 08, 2025

The Federal Court rules that company directors can be held liable for unpaid EPF debts, emphasizing their joint responsibility under Section 46 of the EPF Act.

Malaysian Tech Stocks, Builders Fall Amid Reports of Draft AI Restriction, US Policy Uncertainties

Jul 08, 2025

Malaysian tech and construction stocks drop as US draft rule restricts AI chip exports to Malaysia and Thailand, raising concerns over the impact on local industries.

Malaysia's Digital Economy Pulls RM29.5 Bil in 2Q FDI, With Data Centres Driving Surge

Jul 08, 2025

Malaysia's Digital initiative sees a 125% investment surge to RM29.47 billion in Q2 2025, driven by data centres and cloud computing, boosting job creation and digital economy.

Govt Expected to Slow Bond Issuance in Next Six Months With Eye on Fiscal Target

Jul 08, 2025

Malaysia's government bond issuance is expected to slow as the government targets a narrower budget deficit, while demand remains strong amid potential monetary policy shifts.

Lotte Chemical Titan Inks RM12.7b Ethylene Supply Deal With Related Indonesian Firm

Jul 08, 2025

Lotte Chemical Titan engages in a $2.99 billion ethylene supply deal to enhance polyethylene production, ensuring sustainable feedstock and cost efficiency amid financial challenges.

Discussions
Be the first to like this. Showing 1 of 1 comments

ahmad1992

So basically, they are still deviants, because the court ruled that deviants are not applied to a "company" but "individuals".

Remember guys, SIS claimed " was never an attack on Islam or its authorities", but many of their statement is against Islam because they do not refer to proper scholars both religion & otherwise.

A simple logic. If SIS truly is based on Islam, the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (MAIS) is also based on Islam.

If anybody did a simple fact check & research, MAIS has no interest to be against the SIS' efforts because their goals are aligned.

MAIS' contribution in those regards are a lot. What we read in the media are the "gaps" that filled by SIS. Just like any huge organisation, there will be gaps.

SIS just needs to properly work with MAIS & ask for guidance on areas where they are lacking.

Simply put, you want to comment engineers that built a bridge, but...
1) You are not an engineer
2) You do not refer to an engineer
3) You only play legal/controversial sentiment so that you appear "right" to the laymen

It is totally fine to make some issues go viral so that it gets the proper attention, but do it justly & professionally.

Common sense guys.... put aside religion, we all know many2 Muslims (Malay, Chinese, Indians & others) is against injustice. We all condemn together if anybody did wrong. Let it be politicians, religious figures, tycoons & small time criminals or troublemakers.

I grew up in a western household in KL, loved & explored Japanese culture then questioned my religion during adolescence, experience living in the south & then east coast of Malaysia. Thankfully I get to have Chinese & Indian best friends & colleagues. I ended up not only learning about Islam from the western world, middle east & then in Malaysia, but also other religions.

SIS definitely doesn't properly & professionally represent Islam like the proper religious figures that are respected by both Muslims & non-Muslims globally.

I am not exaggerating when I say it is a very, very, very nuanced subject that — especially & unfortunately — the media, is not the right place to get your info from. But then again, it is a starting point for many that are sincere to change their views about Islam.

I suppose it is just like investing. Yes, you take note what the newspaper say. But after that, you need to investigate yourself further.

Ask the right people, make sure they are reliable. Read the reports, but you first need to learn how to understand the reports. These things requires hours, days, weeks if not months of research. Even then, you can still be wrong.

Now imagine a religion that claims the be the "perfect" guide that covers beyond finance.

It's like instead of doing a research on a single company, now you're studying for CFA that requires years of proper study.

Unfortunately some (loud) netizens doesn't convey & portray Islamic issues properly. Not all Malaysian Muslims study Islam properly or even study at all. The anti-Muslim comments & clickbait article titles doesn't help either.

Keep in mind, this applies to news outlet/NGOs that are representing Islam as well. And yes, internally, Muslims do voice out against other Muslims for misrepresenting other religions or race because it is against Islamic teaching to do so.

Only on extreme cases do we have to call out others as deviants, even then we have to be just. Because in Islam, we are to not judge someone because we do not know what is in their hearts. Unless they show & prove it through action or words.

SIS goals & the help they did is indeed in align with Islamic teachings. It is the teaching or certain comments they brought that are at times way above their knowledge & expertise that they made a mistake.

I'm not even kidding when I say some of SIS' Islamic interpretation is rejected by 99.999% of Muslims & non-Muslims that learnt about Islam. That includes many liberal & progressive women.

Anyways, I know a lot of younger generation non-Muslim Malaysians are much more aware of this, but I still feel it is a much needed reminder & discussion.

I've learnt that the reason why it is a "sensitive" topic is because some people are ignorant about their own belief (religion/politics/culture). It feels so easy having a talk with someone from different beliefs when they are aware of the reality of their own beliefs.

Peace. 🖖

1 week ago

Post a Comment