Pang72, what's your view on directors selling?

Directors have been selling. Is this a bad sign?

Hi Chon99, you are a big advocate for this stock. I am not sure it's a good sign when the directors sell lots of their shares not long after IPO. Do they believe and support this stock?

Can go above 2?

Thanks Teslax. Can you shade some light?

Hi Vince5, can you advice why this counter can go up above 1.93? It seems the price moves up a lot this morning. Thanks

Brilliant

TG got it's negative publicity since last July and it has not stopped. It seems TG never learned. With all the money, TG could have hired better HR, PR, Risk & Control and legal professionals. TG seems to have a useless management team.

Incredible and very detailed analysis.

Ben Tan, you are an incredible analyst and always provide us very good information. Appreciate and thanks so much for your generous sharing.

Tan Sri should sue LYL for defamation.

bisonBull, Excellent write up. Can't wait for your Part 2

Bravo Ben Tan. Excellent write up. Please continue to keep up with your great work.

So no matter how much you scream does not make sense. As long as someone lending gloves shares to someone to short sell, the gloves shares will continue to press down.

Guess MY market is the only market when posted billion profit, share price comes down. Why? You have someone lending shares to someone to short sell and press down the market

Posted by wbwanabe > Jan 27, 2021 2:25 PM |

TG should proceed with law suits against all these malicious news. If what is written is based on facts and merits, then that is not a problem but there have been many articles written recently that purposely put TG in a bad light. Should they take such a drastic step, it may prevent further unsubstantial allegations from all these vested media.
*********************
Agree . TG having to put up defense many times, It's time for TG to go for the offensive- law suit. Else any Tom, Dick and Harry could keep walking all over TG

Can anything credible or clean comes out of AmBank/AmInvest? Of course not.

How can Jeffrey Ng such bird brain be employed by JPM? What does this tells about JPM !

Short-seller, where is your sting?

May I know why short-sellers concentrate on TG and Super and not others?

Here’s some info from the UK government website:

1. The vaccine is not safe for pregnant women or women planning on becoming pregnant within a few months of taking the vaccine
2) The vaccine is not safe for those that are immuno suppressed
3) No testing has been done to determine any long-term side effects
4) No testing has been done to determine side effects if taken with long term medications
5) It is unknown if the vaccine will cause infertility
6) Taking the vaccine will not stop you spreading the virus but will only reduce your symptoms (for years the doctors told us to rest, take paracetamol and drink plenty of fluids to achieve the same result)
7) You can't breastfeed if you have had the vaccine
8)The vaccine has not been tested on children and may not be suitable for young persons under the age of 16
9) The vaccine is only 95% effective....meaning 5% of people that had the vaccine still had severe covid19 symptoms....the demograph and outcome of those 5% of people are being withheld...
10) Average age of death of persons in UK over past 10 years - 81years old....Average age of death of persons dying with/from Covid19 in 2020 - 82 years old
11) If the mortality rate of 0.3% is unacceptable for covid19 virus....why is 5% now an acceptable rate for vaccine failure?
12) If the vaccine is safe....why do the government and manufacturers accept no responsibility for death or injury resulting from the vaccine?
now before you say this cant be true all this is on gov website here
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR2L52Cv7dyCPr9ZNAxw3aH933qaWXBW9Sc0_BGsU7w5TxOqQER0owFxbkI

Here’s some info from the UK government website:

1. The vaccine is not safe for pregnant women or women planning on becoming pregnant within a few months of taking the vaccine
2) The vaccine is not safe for those that are immuno suppressed
3) No testing has been done to determine any long-term side effects
4) No testing has been done to determine side effects if taken with long term medications
5) It is unknown if the vaccine will cause infertility
6) Taking the vaccine will not stop you spreading the virus but will only reduce your symptoms (for years the doctors told us to rest, take paracetamol and drink plenty of fluids to achieve the same result)
7) You can't breastfeed if you have had the vaccine
8)The vaccine has not been tested on children and may not be suitable for young persons under the age of 16
9) The vaccine is only 95% effective....meaning 5% of people that had the vaccine still had severe covid19 symptoms....the demograph and outcome of those 5% of people are being withheld...
10) Average age of death of persons in UK over past 10 years - 81years old....Average age of death of persons dying with/from Covid19 in 2020 - 82 years old
11) If the mortality rate of 0.3% is unacceptable for covid19 virus....why is 5% now an acceptable rate for vaccine failure?
12) If the vaccine is safe....why do the government and manufacturers accept no responsibility for death or injury resulting from the vaccine?
now before you say this cant be true all this is on gov website here
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR2L52Cv7dyCPr9ZNAxw3aH933qaWXBW9Sc0_BGsU7w5TxOqQER0owFxbkI

Ken Frazier, CEO of the world's leading vaccine producer, the pharmaceutical company Merck & Co., in an interview with Professor Tsedal Neeley, from Harvard Business School, recalled that the fastest vaccine ever brought to market was medicine. from Merck against mumps, it took about four years!

- Merck's vaccine for Ebola took five and a half years and was only approved in Europe this month.

- The tuberculosis vaccine took 13 years! Rotavirus 15 years! and chickenpox 28 years !.

- Frazier explained that the vaccine development process takes a long time because it requires rigorous scientific evaluation. In the case of Covid, "we don't even understand the virus itself or how the virus affects the immune system ..."

- "No one knows for sure if any of these vaccine programs will produce a vaccine like this or not. What worries me most is that the public is so eager, so desperate to get back to normal, that they are pushing us [into the industry pharmaceutical] to move things faster and faster ”, he warned.

- "There are many examples of vaccines in the past that stimulated the immune system but did not provide protection. And, unfortunately, there are some cases where they not only did not provide protection, but helped the virus to invade the cell because the vaccine was incomplete ... ". Regarding its immunogenic properties, we have to be very careful, "said Frazier.

- Ultimately, "if a vaccine is to be used in billions of people, it is better to know what that vaccine does ...".

- "When people tell the public that there will be a vaccine by the end of 2020, for example, I think they do the public a disservice. We don't want to rush the vaccine before we have rigorous science.

- We have seen in the past, for example, with swine flu, that this vaccine has done more harm than good. We don't have a great history of introducing vaccines quickly in the midst of a pandemic. We have to take that into account ... ", reflected the CEO.

- In the last quarter of the last century, only 7 new vaccines were developed, 4 of them by Merck, against pathogens for which there were previously in the vaccine.

- For Frazier, the announcement of the arrival of a vaccine leads politicians and the population to reduce their attention with the virus.

- "There are seven thousand five hundred million people on the planet now. And we have never had a vaccine that has been used in a population of this size ...", said the executive.

- Frasier explained that it will be necessary to solve not only the problem of manufacturing on a scale that meets this number of people, but also to find ways to distribute the drug, particularly in areas of the world where people cannot afford the vaccine and also where the challenge of reaching those in need is greater.

- "We need politicians who have the will and integrity to tell people the truth ...", said the CEO of Merck.

- "And when you think about sending the children back to school, we will have to find a way to do it safely because the parents are arrested if the children are at home."

- "We must find a way to open schools, not to mention the fact that remote learning does not work for all children ...", said Frasier.

° Source: https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/merck-ceo-ken-frazier-speaks-about-a-covid-cure-racism-and-why-leaders-need-to-walk-the-talk

° I share an opinion on the prospect of a vaccine that guarantees protection against Covid.

° Note: HIV is another example: 40 years and no vaccine.

Ken Frazier, CEO of the world's leading vaccine producer, the pharmaceutical company Merck & Co., in an interview with Professor Tsedal Neeley, from Harvard Business School, recalled that the fastest vaccine ever brought to market was medicine. from Merck against mumps, it took about four years!

- Merck's vaccine for Ebola took five and a half years and was only approved in Europe this month.

- The tuberculosis vaccine took 13 years! Rotavirus 15 years! and chickenpox 28 years !.

- Frazier explained that the vaccine development process takes a long time because it requires rigorous scientific evaluation. In the case of Covid, "we don't even understand the virus itself or how the virus affects the immune system ..."

- "No one knows for sure if any of these vaccine programs will produce a vaccine like this or not. What worries me most is that the public is so eager, so desperate to get back to normal, that they are pushing us [into the industry pharmaceutical] to move things faster and faster ”, he warned.

- "There are many examples of vaccines in the past that stimulated the immune system but did not provide protection. And, unfortunately, there are some cases where they not only did not provide protection, but helped the virus to invade the cell because the vaccine was incomplete ... ". Regarding its immunogenic properties, we have to be very careful, "said Frazier.

- Ultimately, "if a vaccine is to be used in billions of people, it is better to know what that vaccine does ...".

- "When people tell the public that there will be a vaccine by the end of 2020, for example, I think they do the public a disservice. We don't want to rush the vaccine before we have rigorous science.

- We have seen in the past, for example, with swine flu, that this vaccine has done more harm than good. We don't have a great history of introducing vaccines quickly in the midst of a pandemic. We have to take that into account ... ", reflected the CEO.

- In the last quarter of the last century, only 7 new vaccines were developed, 4 of them by Merck, against pathogens for which there were previously in the vaccine.

- For Frazier, the announcement of the arrival of a vaccine leads politicians and the population to reduce their attention with the virus.

- "There are seven thousand five hundred million people on the planet now. And we have never had a vaccine that has been used in a population of this size ...", said the executive.

- Frasier explained that it will be necessary to solve not only the problem of manufacturing on a scale that meets this number of people, but also to find ways to distribute the drug, particularly in areas of the world where people cannot afford the vaccine and also where the challenge of reaching those in need is greater.

- "We need politicians who have the will and integrity to tell people the truth ...", said the CEO of Merck.

- "And when you think about sending the children back to school, we will have to find a way to do it safely because the parents are arrested if the children are at home."

- "We must find a way to open schools, not to mention the fact that remote learning does not work for all children ...", said Frasier.

° Source: https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/merck-ceo-ken-frazier-speaks-about-a-covid-cure-racism-and-why-leaders-need-to-walk-the-talk

° I share an opinion on the prospect of a vaccine that guarantees protection against Covid.

° Note: HIV is another example: 40 years and no vaccine.

Posted by Agjl > Nov 30, 2020 3:51 PM | Report Abuse

Look at banks, electronics, consumer stocks share price all under selling pressure....

And its a shame that those keep bashing companies with earning visibility foe the next 6-9 mths with solid growth and huge cash inflow.....its a shame!!

Agil- absolutely agree with you.

Pfizer's "vaccine" is not really a vaccine. It merely reduces the symptoms. It is like taking cough syrups to prevent cough and cold from getting worse? No wonder the CEO offloaded his shares

Check out the attached link

https://time.com/5913113/covid-19-vaccine/

Pfizer's "vaccine" is not really a vaccine. It merely reduces the symptoms. It is like taking cough syrups to prevent cough and cold from getting worse? No wonder the CEO offloaded his shares

Check out the attached link

https://time.com/5913113/covid-19-vaccine/

November 17, 2020

Pfizer and Moderna COVID Vaccine Results NOT based on Peer-Reviewed Science – ZERO Liability to Companies if Vaccine Kills or Injures due to FDA Fast-track Approval

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

VAXXED film producer Polly Tomney and attorney Mary Holland of Children’s Health Defense discuss the two most recent COVID vaccine press releases from Pfizer and Moderna which both claimed over “90% effective” and just what this means.

Because these vaccines are expected to apply for FDA fast-track approval due to the COVID “emergency,” they do not go through the same peer-reviewed process, and if the vaccines end up injuring or killing anyone, they are immune from any legal liability.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/pfizer-and-moderna-covid-vaccine-res...

November 17, 2020

Pfizer and Moderna COVID Vaccine Results NOT based on Peer-Reviewed Science – ZERO Liability to Companies if Vaccine Kills or Injures due to FDA Fast-track Approval

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

VAXXED film producer Polly Tomney and attorney Mary Holland of Children’s Health Defense discuss the two most recent COVID vaccine press releases from Pfizer and Moderna which both claimed over “90% effective” and just what this means.

Because these vaccines are expected to apply for FDA fast-track approval due to the COVID “emergency,” they do not go through the same peer-reviewed process, and if the vaccines end up injuring or killing anyone, they are immune from any legal liability.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/pfizer-and-moderna-covid-vaccine-results-not-based-on-peer-reviewed-science-zero-liability-to-companies-if-vaccine-kills-or-injures-due-to-fda-fast-track-approval/

Agree. That's why all retail investors should not buy warrants

GiantPanda, I agree with all your comments about structure warrants.

@Yitths, can you please include me in your private chat . I don't know why I can't get in anymore. Thanks.

Is TG doing share buy back at 9.42?

I wonder whether that infamous Macquarie analyst has been fired. Does anybody knows?

May I know what happened to the private chat forum? I can't seem to get in anymore.

May I know what happened to the private chat forum? I can't seem to get in anymore.

Glove counters should stop the IB from issuing warrants.

IB warrant business making money out of the ignorant of the investors. They get big fat bonus and laugh all the way to the bank.

IB warrant business making money out of the ignorant of the investors. They get big fat bonus and laugh all the way to the bank.

If you are not familiar how warrant's pricing works, stay away. I used to work in one of the biggest IB in Malaysia. I was monitoring their warrant business. The way they manipulate the market makes your jaw drop. The traders put in up buy and sell trades to create active transaction impression. They can easily make than 25-50 millions in one day.

If you are not familiar how warrant's pricing works, stay away. I used to work in one of the biggest IB in Malaysia. I was monitoring their warrant business. The way they manipulate the market makes your jaw drop. The traders put up buy and sell trades to create active transaction impression. They can easily make 25-50 millions in one day.

This article " There's Company Research Downgrade and then there is the (Aisayman!!!) "Company Research Downgrade" - Salvador Dali" by Tan KW is very well written and is so hilarious. Bravo Tan KW. This shows that MacQuarie has below standard/quality analysts. MacQuearie Research is a laughing stock of the market.

Mcquarie just shoot it's own face.

AmBank Research has hidden agenda.

Bravo KYY.

@Gaussian, "Let China approve the vaccine fast and kill all the Chinese". Very sick comment from you. Shame on you.

GiantPanda, very well said

Thanks sifu freetospeak.

@yttihs, please include me too. Thanks

@yttihs, pls include me too. Thanks