i am not the slightest bit acquainted with any of the aforesaid parties.
and i am also not personally offended.
but i find it offensive for such things to be happening and so i say it like i see it.

@Sslee, you did not step on any part of me or belongings of mine at all, do not worry. but you are stepping and spitting on someone's grave.

your motives of this post are particularly obvious and it is nothing to do with the deceased, do not deny it. you are just cunningly taking the opportunity to pick your fight and expose and condemn people; but this is done at the expense of the deceased. the very same deceased you are purportedly honorably fighting for.

as you have written- you are so keen to stop all the nonsense (whatever it may be and whoever it concerns, i actually dgaf). yet you are making a public post in relation to it (bear in mind, the post is even only 1/10 about the deceased and 9/10 about some other people, what a joker. even in your latest comment you are putting out as much as you can about your 'favorite' people)

i cant really be bothered to write any more longer than this because it is very pathetic to entertain you.

what a hypocrite and opportunist you are. if you really want to stop this whole optimus thing just leave it be. instead you post this in the name of 'defending' the deceased but in actual fact, you are trying to defend OTB and attack KYY. you are no better than qqq3. worse actually. you are probably the new lowest of the lowest.

in your own words:-
"You are the most disgusting and utterly distasteful person"

@leek on top of the fact that the whole chain of logic is fundamentally wrong

@leek, do you realize your whole speculation is based off your objective interpretation that he seems 'calm'? very ridiculous proposition, i cant be bothered even.

@leek can you explain why? or do you just choose to feel conned?

trust me, we bought since 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.7.

we are the true supporters. you merely achieved your goal to enter cheap at 1.47 after all the badmouthing. and 5k only? cheap

CharlesT , you do realize its always you and zoozooka and little Beary that always talk amongst yourselves right? nobody really entertain you guys except yourselves lmao.

A+ for effort though. good boy

is this your kindergarden rhyme homework? quite a fail


Posted by Beary > Mar 15, 2018 09:11 AM | Report Abuse

All koonies beware.

Jaks is another Sendai in the making.

Oldman went berserk last night.

Chasing and beating his dog with his tongkat.

He said dog year brings him bad luck.

He couldn't sleep and ate 3 pineapples through the night.

oh look, our little friend Beary is finally back

but i give credit to Beary. instead of playing computer games at home while his mother is not watching, he is busy on i3 forum and trying hard to earn some extra cash to buy ice cream. good job

so Beary, did you get kooned or are you trying to koon others?


Beary Who says I have no vested interest?

I am queueing to buy at 50sen.
12/03/2018 10:45

Beary got kooned very badly. thats why he is so salty and hating on KYY so much. he's been making a joke against himself all this while. haahahaha

exactly why you are talking down jaks :)

you have no vested interest in jaks

yet you are here every single day to shoot it down

what does that tell me?

are you all forgetting that this whole star issue is motivated by political agendas? does not matter whether star has a reasonable ground to initiate the claim or not (they prob dont). they just wanna do it to shake things up for KYY

cockraider's view is biased too because he lost his house from KYY's selldown

i think KYY just wanted to excite you guys but leave you all with blue balls. are you guys ok? hahaha

when i say 'government influence' i am already referring to 'malaysia boleh'

maybank has huge government influence over it. the other banks do not

for those still holding jaks, dont let the bad market sentiment fool you

@samuelluke. you never seen? take a look at all the 990 counters red today. what a joker.

what KYY is doing is actually UNDENIABLY beneficial to every shareholder, regardless whether it is short or long term. its chaos in itself but does not produce a chaotic outcome

either way, i dont see why it is so bad to be invested in JAKS as of now as all the naysayers are proposing it to be.

@albukhary do you really think KYY will announce such a move without already securing it? possible but i doubt. if albukhary is right, then it is a good thing for us small shareholders because of the coming short term gains as theorized. logically, everyone should be jumping aboard JAKS now and get out before it goes downhill. if he is wrong, it is still a good thing because KYY being in for the long run while also being personally invested to this extreme extent will also ensure performance of JAKS.

zoozooka you have been declared an idiot, please keep quiet.

@xyxy8. Nobody thinks you are wrong. In fact, everyone knows you are right including the loser commenters here. They actually in fact, realise the potential of jaks. They were just trying to get in at low price. Now they are regretting.

Raider has been shouting around here to say that china funds and IBs are causing the fall in HY share price. He still believes in HY’s potential and is begging ppl to hold and buy. But at Jaks counter, he is shouting that Jaks will fall drastically because KYY is starting to promote it and therefore, as ‘evidenced’ in HY counter, jaks will now start falling too. He is taking advantage of ppl’s false sentiment against KYY for his own benefit. The situation is very clear. He is stuck in HY at high price and at a paper loss. At the same time, he has come to realize through KYY that Jaks is an amazing counter and that he has missed the boat for Jaks. Such contradictory and inconsistent statements surely shows his intentions and character.

beautiful rebound for the many naysayers here.

and volume

does anyone know any reason for the drop?

@husbandd. i think you're not being logical yourself. it does not matter AT ALL if a company is itself extraordinarily good / bad UNLESS a collective amount of people share the same view to head in one same direction i.e. up or down. stock trading is a game of persuading others of your view using legit stats and information. I think that it is a very simple and common understanding amongst traders? No one disputes the intentions of anyone promoting a stock especially if you use legit information and statistics. I think it would be worse/fishier when you are promoting for a stock to go down, particularly because it naturally means you don’t own any shares in it and would not have an interest in it.

can i ask anyone why blocks are done? and by whom? i see it all the time but dont understand it