Tobby;

A lot of write up and as usual most Malays will remain passive.

I will try to response and hope this exchange will give you another look what other Malays felt.

"To be honest , it was MCA that kept BN in existence back in the 90s."

What was the best choice  then ? DAP then was harping than that the non Malays were third class  citizen because of the special rights of the Malays and bumiputeras and PAS was looking more towards as Iran as the model for Islamic state. DAP cant talk with PAS and the best choice then for BN and rightly as MCA was part of BN since Alliance days they should become part of the government.It was not MCA that kept BN in existence, it was the only best choice then.The opposition then was non existent. Had MCA decided to join DAP then as opposition, Gerakan and PPP can easily takeover the MCA seats. So your theory, MCA that kept BN in existence is far from the truth.

" But UMNO warloards kept with " Tuan Melayu" sentiment!" .. What was the meaning of " ketuanan Melayu"? Article 153 in the constitution rightly spelled up the special rights of the Malays/ bumiputera , Raja raja Melayu and Islam. Because of these negotiations among the races before the independence, the politicians called it as 'social contract'  ; ie mass citizenships for the non Malays and special rights for the Malays the British granted this country independence.

And since independence until 1970, there was no affirmative action was formulated to address the economic imbalance among the races. Prior to 1970, 70 % of Division A government officers came from the non Malays. DEB was only formulated after May 13 1969 tragedy .

" Malaysia recognised as second most racist country".. I heard something worst actually, Malaysia claimed  being an " apartheid " country.  I do like those doubters to come and visit Malaysia to see for themselves in real how those minorities under " apartheid policy" like former blacks in  South Africa and Palestinians in Israel  had lived and compare against the minorities living standard  over here.

Tobby.
" Do you know it was Christianity and Islam that drove the Jews out from Israel " . Not correct. It was Babylonian and then Roman that destroyed the Jewish temple and drove the Jews out. This happened in 597BC and 70 AD. When Caliph Umar conquered Jerusalem in 637AD, he allowed Jews to stay in Jerusalem. In 1099 in the first Crusade, all inhabitants including Muslim, Jews and Eastern Christians were slaughtered by the Crusaders. When Saladin reconquered Jerusalem in 1187  he allowed the Jews to stay in Jerusalem.

Christianity were hard on the Jews because they blamed Jews for the killings of Jesus and there were many pogroms against them by Christian nations.

The Jewish culture reached their golden age under Muslim rule in Spain and Jews tend to seek refuge in Muslim countries when they were persecuted in Christian nations. The Muslim nations  started to persecute the Jews after 1945 in tit for tat when the Jews driven the Palestinians from their homeland with the formation of Israel. For your information, Amalekites, Cannanites, Hittites and many other tribes used to stay in the area before they were ethnically cleansed by the Jews. You should read the bible if you dont believe what I am saying.

Jesus ( pbuh)  did not denounce Judaism. In fact he followed Judaism law to the the letter. He observed sabbath, did not eat pork and was circumcised.

Muhammad ( pbuh) did not promoted hatred towards the Jews. Jewish prophets such as Moses ( pbuh) , Aaron ( pbuh) , Jesus ( pbuh) and Mary ( Jesus's mother) was respectfully mentioned in Quran many time more than  Muhammad ( pbuh) himself or his Arab ancestors. Jewish rabbis allowed Jews to enter mosque but they forbid them to enter church.

calvintaneng
You should ask the Jews what elohim mean. No sane  Jews will accept elohim mean plurality of Gods but instead it mean  majesty of God. Like Queen of England, when she adreessed the public, she always use "We" instead of I. Of elohim mean plurality of Gods definitely all the prophets will taught the same triune Gods but all of them taught a single God.

Early Christians were unitarians and after Paul, Jesus was raised up to the level of God. By 325 by the Nicean decree, holy ghost was raised to the level of God.


Matthew 28:18

1 john 5:7 KJV  had been removed in the latest edition and no bible version had included these verses.



elohim

calvintaneng
Trinity was not in the bible but was put in the bible but later on removed from the bible because bible scholars found the earlier version of Greek manuscript did not contained such verses.

As Trinity is a core doctrine of the Christians, how can you believed in this core doctrine if it was not mentioned in the bible. Instead there are many verses in the bible ( Old Testament and New Testament) that said the oneness of God. God's nature shouldnt change forever. If God is one during Adam's time, and Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Moses etc it cannot become a triune God during Jesus's time as Jesus himself said:-

Mark 12:29Jesus answered him, “The first of all the commandments is: ‘Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.

I am a Muslim and I respected Jesus ( pbuh) as a prophet but not as a God. Can any Christian explained why you regarded Jesus as a God while he prayed to another God and he had beginning and ending like human.

Can

hope the interim PM should be Tengku Razaleigh.. Experience and acceptable by many parties

Where is the skeptics of Myeg? Why they are silence now?

wow...myeg perform again today ...

sori 0.005 sen

mau naik 0.05 sen pun tunggu berminggu minggu

wow..today not many negative comments on myeg

go go Myeg

in the news TV3 tonight, someone is proposing for the govt to implement SST on the current GST platform..

MSC was created by Tun M.Alot of IT companies today thrived because of Tun M vision.

if Myeg was a one of success story of MSC, does it make sense for the creator of MSC (Tun M) to leave Myeg to die because of change in govrrnment.

Freetospeak;

Say with factlah; Myeg was one of the concession awarded in 1999 by Dr M as one of the flagship MSC application. It was one of the success story of MSC.

EPF was still buying Myeg on the 8th Mei 2018 n they start disposing after the election.

Jeffreyteck;

As far that I can remember ,in 1999 the concession for E-govt was given to 4 companies.

1.Myeg - local IT company with linked to BN
2.E-rilek - local IT company with link to Singapore
3.Myspeed - Pernec n Telekom Malaysia Joint Venture
4.PDX - local IT company with link to Singapore.

Only Myeg survive and thrive. These companies need to invest in e-services inrastructure n in return for the eservices, fee shall be collected from end users. The government facilitate the echo system and the government didnt pay for the infrastructure neither the government pay for these services but the govt benefitted from the profit tax made by these companies.It was a win-win business model.

I dont understand on some commentors view here , I think they are still in lynching mode and they are still in the euphoria of winning the election.If you are BN linked companies, once PH takeover, by all mean the BN linked companies shall be forced out of business no matter whether the said companies had resolved many issues faced by the government and the government gain yearly income from 26% of the company profitability.

Where do we stop our hatred.? First tackle those companies that have linked to BN until they are out of business.Second sack those civil servants that had supported BN until they have no income to support their family.Shame on PH supporters even though I am one them.

I think BN treat the opposition better while they are in power. I didnt see anyone get sacked in the government even though they had supported the opposition and neither I saw any businesses being denied any business opportunities even though they may had supported the opposition.

I hope common sense to prevail in the end. We must be mature and if we are on lynching mode, please remember that we may face the same retribution in future.

go myeg ...Yes

I think it is something to do with the territory claim limit as defined by UNCLOS. Territory claim limit will be different between island and rock that only appear in low tide.

The territory claim limit is yet to be negotiated between the two countries .

other share kena hit teruk.Myeg boleh tahan.Tengok besok macam mana.

Noah;

Jiwa pembankang memang macam tu.They will oppose everything from the government.I can recalled LKS opposed PLUS, Penang Bridge, KLIA, KLCC and Putra Jaya. Just imagine what will happen to our country , if all those projects were stopped because of LKS pressure.

I want a government that practise fairplay. No one can deny any one the opportunities from running a business ,participate in any tender called by the government and they shall be consider if they can offer competitive prices at the required quality and time irrespective of the person political affiliation.

The way I see here, some commenters are on lynching mode. They want to crucify those business that seem to have link to the old regime.. By doing so, it will stop those services currently used and had benefitted millions of Malaysians and will forced us the hassle of queuing at Post Office or JPJ and lost us a lot of productive time.I think the cost for the convenience is fair and for those that feel otherwise, there is always the alternative of free queing.Take your pick.

Relaks;

SST - Sales n Service Tax akan dikenakan pada pengusaha kilang / pengimpot dan kena bayar bila barang keluar dari kilang/port.Service Tax puka dikenakan untuk kategori perkhidmatan pada penerima perkhidmatan. (Eg perkhidmatan juruperunding)Setahu saya sistem SST dulu masih lagi manual dan berkemungkinan besar akan berlaku ketirisan utk kes SST tidak dituntut atau kes yg dituntut tapi tidak diremit pada LHDN.

GST - Good Service Tax akan dikenakan pada kesemua entiti dalam rantaian nilai (value chain) dari pembekal bahan asas 》 pengilang 》 wholesaler 》 retailer 》 pembeli termasuk juga syarikat sokongan seperti pengangkutan , perunding, pembekal sistem IT dan sebagainya GST adalah lebih menyeluruh dan tiap tiap entiti dalam rantaian nilai akan dikenakan kos tambahan sebanyak 6% dari kos penjualan. Tiap - tiap syarikat dalam rantaian nilai boleh menuntut 6% dari MOF cukai yg telah dibayar kepada pembekal.Data input kos dan kos output akan dimasukkan dalam sistem bila mana transaksi telah berlaku..Yg bagusnya sistem GST ni, kesemua data syarikat berkenaan kos input dan kos output akan disimpan dalam sistem dan ia akan memudahkan LHDN untuk mencari entiti yang under declare penjualan atau under declare profit. Untuk menokok tambah sistem GST untuk SST bukanlah satu sains roket.Hanya perlu tambah output data dengan Sales Tax pada pengilang dan Service Tax pada retailer dan juga pada pembekal kategori perkhidmatan yg dikenakan service tax.

Noah;

Dongle cost is about RM100 each. For 20,000 units the total cost will be about RM2Millions and since these are loose item,normally it will appear as Inventory n charged to PnL once the dongles were delivered to the end-users.

If they said that they have invested RM150M, the bulk of the cost should come from the GST core application and not dongle cost.If I were them instead of claiming RM150 Mil compensation , proposed SST module n by June 1 as companies need also to submit their input/ output data with zero GST , twig the system to flag companies under reporting their Sales n Profit . This will help the government to mitigate the loss in GST collections. At present, no one except Myeg can offer such services in Malaysia within the short time possible.Thus, it is not yet a lost cause for Myeg as they have the competitive advantages now over new entrants.

Noah;

For IT Capex, the depreciation period is about 5 years. Thus most likely their IT system has already mostly depreciated.That explain why their IT asset is minimal.

It is interesting to note that there are huge capital work in progress amounted to RM112Millions. My guts feeling they are building new IT systems for new source of Revenue stream. I may be wrong on this.

Noah;

It was not designed to be monopolised by Myeg. When the eservices was mooted as one of the 7 MSC flagship applications to be launched by Tun M in 1999 , in the echosytem there will be 3 information gateway providers (Myeg, Erileks, Myspeed) and one payment gateway provider. (PDX) and the three information gateway provideers fight on equal term.All the information gateway providers need to provide channel such as kiosk for the rakyat to access their services.

As the cost of eservices infrastructure were high and faced with low traction, many service providers could not sustain their business except Myeg. We shouldnt fault Myeg for their business acumen n sustainability in the business. You can ask Tony Pua..He used to run an MSC status IT company and failed.

Noah;

Anything wrong for Myeg with high profit margin.?For a company that has major market share with increasing recurring revenue figure, the profit margin of above 50% is normal.How much profit margin do you think for company the like of Microsoft,Apple,Jobstreet.com etc.Go figure.

The best thing for Myeg once their infrastructure and the eco system is in place,they only need to offer new services and get more transactions as their cost for new services will be minimal.They already have this competitive advantage.

To Myeg (if you are reading this);
1.The government will zerorised the GST on June 1.Look for opportunities to capitalise this and help the new government instead of fear of losing business.My view with zerorise GST, the wholesalers and retailers need also to submit the data on their input and output cost as usual.There are tonnes of data inside and government can check whether anyone under reporting their sales and profit.Integrate with LHDN and flag those under reporting their PnL for a fee.Govt will get more revenue from Income tax collection.
2.For SST, twig the current system and offer SST services too at minimal cost to the government.Government will be happy to have an integrated system .

sarcasm..he he

As far that I know the eservices infrastructure was borned by Myeg ..Why should the government invest again?

Frankly, I dont share the idea by some commenters that the government will take over the services offered by Myeg via government owned portal.The government of the day shall support other people doing business and not to compete with them.

My humble inputs - When Tun M mooted the idea of Multi media Super Corridor, his main intention was to encourage a lot of innovative services from small enterprises.Tun M realised innovation cannot happen in large companies and also in government departments.In small enterprise , innovation will be easier.For eg, Apple and Microsoft start with a two man company until they become a big company with billions of dollars of market capitalisation via innovation.

With sprouting of many ICT companies in 1999s via the launch of MSC,Tun M has to provide a sustainable eco sytem in order for the ICT companies to prosper.The business model then for these companies to build up the E services infrastructure at their own cost and their revenue will come from the transactions charged from the users.Life initially was difficult for the pioneers because of low transactions.Only Myeg survived and prospered.It was a win win business model.The government didnt incur large Capex cost, faster roll-out of innovative services, rakyat enjoy efficient e-services at affordable cost and recurring revenue to Myeg.In my case, for years I had been renewing my insurance n road tax and I had no complaint on their Myeg services and their charges.

One of the big challenge is to integrate with core IT systems owned by the several Government departments that were developed by different IT companies. There will be alot of hassle and red-tape.To mitigate this, Myeg was very smart by appointing someone who can have access to the government facility as chairman of the company. Thus , As Myeg roll-out more services and as they got more tractions, their profit margin and their profits grows.

My humble view, that Myeg can be the next Amazon for egovt services if their business plan was not hindered.With the change of federal government to Pakatan, it will be unlikely that Tun M will stop Myeg for one rudiculous factor - ie the Chairman was a senator linked with UMNO.Tun M is a visionary man and he look at the bigger picture.

P/S I am not an employee of Myeg but I do invest in Myeg shares.

I think many of commenters here over react on Myeg.My humble input.e- government was one of the 7 flagship applications endorsed by Tun M to be implemented in 1999.Part of the consortium to develop E-govt were Myeg, e-rileks,Myspeed as Information Gateway Providers while PDX was appointed as Payment Gateway Provider.Only Myeg survived and excelled.

Tun M mooted the idea for Multi Super Corridor in order to restructure the economy from manufacturing / agricultural based economy towards Information based economy which require less capital , less space, less human resource but bring better benefits in term of higher return and efficiency.In return, with higher profit, this will give IT personnel with higher compensation in line with Tun's Vision 2020.

Does it make any sense that Tun will kill Myeg, the company that Tun had awarded with the project in 1999 and one of the most success stories of MSC Status companies.Myeg successes were in line with Tun's vision 2020.My humble view, Tun's heart is still with Vision 2020 and once the dust is settled, he will focus to achieve on his vision.

I dont think PH government will disturb this company

myeg is one success story of msc ..initiated by Tun M, In the beginning there was 3 service providers similar to Myeg, only Myeg survived

jgn la jual AirAsia..Tony cakap akan naik ke RM6..I am still waiting.Pardon Tony, ok.Rafidah kan chairman AA

mana Goodcompanies and the rest of BN supporters ni? Rindu kat korang...Tau...

Antara "maruah" dan "rasuah"; Mana yg jadi pilihan?

9/5 Korea change their President on this Phillipine also change their President on this date, Malaysia will be third one ..

RABU...Rakyat Akan Buang UMNO

BN=Be End=Barang Naik=Batu Nisan

Betul..rakyat choose the party to govern.Kalau silap orang, we will be screwed.But at least ade chan to select orang lain masa PRU. Kalau dah kena goreng 2 tiga kali, amat bodohlah memilih orang yang sama.

"Screw me once, shame on you. Screw me twice, shame on me. Screw me three times, shame on both of us."

Vote BN n PAS=Selamatkan Najib, Vote PH=Selamatkan Malaysia, take your pick.

Goodcompanies FGV chairman and CEO was appointed by the PM. If these two have no experience running a plantation company, why appoint them in the first place and who is responsible for the blunder. When public money are involved, it is the duty of those in power to appoint competent officers to run the company in your behalf.Bukan begitu ke?

On AAX only this year the company has been making profit. In fact for your information, as far that I know that none of low cost long distance flight operator are making any money from the operation.I am sure AAX is still tuning to get the right business model and if they can repeat their good performance every quarter, their share price may increase.

Goodcompanies FGV chairman and CEO was appointed by the PM. If these two have no experience running a plantation company, why appoint them in the first place and who is responsible for the blunder. When public money are involved, it is the duty of those in power to appoint competent officers to run the company in your behalf.Bukan begitu ke?

On AAX only this year the company has been making profit. In fact for your information, as far that I know that none of low cost long distance flight operator are making any money from the operation.I am sure AAX is still tuning to get the right business model and if they can repeat their good performance every quarter, their share price may increase.

Robertpantai..Google "DOJ report 1MDB pdf" you will have access to the said report prepared by Department of Justice , United States of America.Download n read. Please also read the official response from the government on this matter.Use your brain to think and heart to feel n make your own conclusion. Every vote is important .

"A people that elect corrupt politicians, impostors,thieves and traitors are not victims...but accomplices." -George Orwell

Puva; If they have stolen, u think the current government would not capitalise and lock all of them in jail? Logic sikit Bro

Izo dan lain lain. Saya ambik satu scenario. Seorang bendahari masjid kerap klepet duit yg diamanahkan kepadanya menyebabkan operasi masjid terbantut sebab wang masjid sentiasa tidak mencukupi untuk menampung kos operasi masjid.
Dan anda sebagai ahli kariah masjid, apa yg perlu anda buat? 1.Biarkan saja dan harapkan masalah akan dapat diselesaikan dimasa datang.2.Buat usul buat siasatan dan memecat Bendahari tersebut sekiranya didapati bersalah.
Mana opsyen yg dipilih. Secara logiknya anda akan memilih Opsyen 2, kerana kalau Opsyen 1 yg dipilih, budaya klepet duit akan jadi norma dalam masyarakat dan ianya adalah mudarat dan akan merosakkan teras masyarakat. Kalau Opsyen 2 dipilih, bendahari masjid baru akan lebih berhati hati , lebih amanah kerana dah ada prosesnya untuk mengatasi orang yg klepet duit. Perjalanan operasi masjid akan menjadi lebih baik lagi dan kariah masjid akan berpuas hati.
Ambik contoh yg saya beri dan apply situasi kepada benda yg lebih besar, perbendaharaan negara.Logiknya sama.Semoga bermanafaat.

I am already retired and I am already lost the appetite to gather more wealth to sustain my lifestyle.My only concern will be the future of my children and my grandchildren.Will their lifes will be better off than the life that I have provided under the present circumstances.Or in future because of lack of opportunities in this beloved country, they have to source for works in other countries.This is not a remote possibility. My neighbour's son is already working in Australia as fruit picker.

Few years forward, I may be on my deathbed waiting for the time the angel of death to take my life. During the time of recollection at the deathbed, I does not want to be caught in a situation that I may have regretted that I did not do something that may change the situation today.If I have voted and changed the government today, the future can be better for my children.

Today, my conscience is very clear.I would vote for Pakatan Harapan.One vote for Pakatan Harapan will be one vote to save Malaysia. One vote for Barisan Nasional or PAS will be one vote to save Najib.See the big difference.

Leno;

Our value system has gone haywire.This country will go to the dogs if the value system is not fixed.Our future will be at stake.

Just imagine the scenario if it is the norm for our leaders to accept "donation" aka fraud aka bribe aka klepetrocacy .This will be followed by others down the rank.

Do you expect the current leaders in BN can reverse this. No way. Our only chance is to change the government. It is now or never.If we change to PH n if they dont deliver we can change back to BN.I am sure in 5 years they will become a better party.

TrulyInvest 93 years