@observatory you claimed "a big part of Daibochi's growth come from Mega acquisition". What is your intention are you trying to discredit Scientex role that improved Daibochi performance?
While ignoring fact that @dragon328 make false claim that Scientex did not improve Daibochi performance? Are you condoning false claim to suit your agenda to sway shareholders?
(Note you already said you are biased, Scientex unfair, and hope other shareholders follow you)
Your reply raises question if you work together with @dragon328. Since you claim "(partly due to the pandemic situation)" what is your intention to say "partly" when the pandemic is main reason?
Daibochi performance improved under Scientex until the pandemic hit most companies in the world. Whether Mega or not the fact is Daibochi performance magically shoot up to RM47 million for 2 years under Scientex and win-win for all. Is it your intention to discredit Scientex role and say partly due to bad management?
After that you go further say Mega "mostly plateaued profit in 8 to 9 quarters" to support your bias view or condone false claims by @dragon328 that Scientex did not improve Daibochi.
So much confusion just to hide fact that Daibochi can only grow after 2018 because Scientex came in?
Careful camouflaged punches to support agenda and unfairness story that seem to made from air. Or to confuse shareholders to feed greed and biased agenda?
You claimed "compulsory acquisition is dead now anyway", in other words everyone is safe, Scientex already forced to make higher offer and you win.
But you go further attack Scientex, discredit their role to improve Daibochi, attempt sway public opinion that Scientex is unfair. And condone false claim to support your agenda, ironic and contradict your own claim of passionate about fairness.
With similar bias post and hidden punches at Scientex, active discussion of Apollo blog (note you are the first to announce the blog here) and camouflaged as intention for greater good, raises question if you and @dragon328 are working together for someone?
You claimed "rest assure I'm no mole of Apollo". Why sudden need to assure others when clearly mere assurance and post history is not valid proof?
I said in earlier posts on other issue everything seem fishy. Shareholders beware. Signs of web of collusion and avoid swayed by master puppeteers.
Stock: [SCIPACK]: SCIENTEX PACKAGING (AYER KEROH) BERHAD
2021-10-01 14:46 | Report Abuse
@observatory you claimed "a big part of Daibochi's growth come from Mega acquisition". What is your intention are you trying to discredit Scientex role that improved Daibochi performance?
While ignoring fact that @dragon328 make false claim that Scientex did not improve Daibochi performance? Are you condoning false claim to suit your agenda to sway shareholders?
(Note you already said you are biased, Scientex unfair, and hope other shareholders follow you)
Your reply raises question if you work together with @dragon328. Since you claim "(partly due to the pandemic situation)" what is your intention to say "partly" when the pandemic is main reason?
Daibochi performance improved under Scientex until the pandemic hit most companies in the world. Whether Mega or not the fact is Daibochi performance magically shoot up to RM47 million for 2 years under Scientex and win-win for all. Is it your intention to discredit Scientex role and say partly due to bad management?
After that you go further say Mega "mostly plateaued profit in 8 to 9 quarters" to support your bias view or condone false claims by @dragon328 that Scientex did not improve Daibochi.
So much confusion just to hide fact that Daibochi can only grow after 2018 because Scientex came in?
Careful camouflaged punches to support agenda and unfairness story that seem to made from air. Or to confuse shareholders to feed greed and biased agenda?
You claimed "compulsory acquisition is dead now anyway", in other words everyone is safe, Scientex already forced to make higher offer and you win.
But you go further attack Scientex, discredit their role to improve Daibochi, attempt sway public opinion that Scientex is unfair. And condone false claim to support your agenda, ironic and contradict your own claim of passionate about fairness.
With similar bias post and hidden punches at Scientex, active discussion of Apollo blog (note you are the first to announce the blog here) and camouflaged as intention for greater good, raises question if you and @dragon328 are working together for someone?
You claimed "rest assure I'm no mole of Apollo". Why sudden need to assure others when clearly mere assurance and post history is not valid proof?
I said in earlier posts on other issue everything seem fishy. Shareholders beware. Signs of web of collusion and avoid swayed by master puppeteers.