@dragon328 you claimed that I have "not been able to come out with any specific point to support your view that the offer price of RM2.70 is good". @observatory, you claimed "I've repeatedly asked you to show your valuation. We can compare notes."
It should be obvious to level headed observers, none of my posts so far contained any personal opinion on fairness of offer price. I have not even started.
Since you claim that you want to compare notes, so far I was merely posting questions about validity of some of your own claims and gave my reason for each question. I think some of your claims are biased, promote fake news, or based on false info.
But to avoid my question you now create new false claims to imply I am avoiding discussion and speaking for Scientex? Are you trying to monopolise the main narrative here? Then call me sensitive while defending your own position?
It sound fishier now.
I can only "assure" that I am highlighting specific issue in your claims. You can verify.
I have not finished. More coming. I am slow and but try to be detailed.
@observatory your question "why jumping to the conclusion that I'm accusing Scientex manipulating account?". I admit it was my mistake read wrongly, sorry. But why I say that?
Recap what you say "Just when I got the time to reply, he has deleted his own comment. whether argument in favour of offeror or aggrieved minority. no need to keep creating new user accounts for that purpose".
You are still implying I am creating new accounts and "delete my own messages" "for purpose of "arguing in favour of Scientex". @dragon328 go further to claim "anti_colonialists and Investor420 seem to be speaking for Scientex".
You can read my original post and substitute this corrected statement. But note it does not change my main view that you are jumping at opportunity to create perception of an attempt to sway opinion and manipulate user accounts.
@observatory, your question "do you have strong ties with Scientex?"
I clearly stated in my first post that I am an observer. That include commenting on posts that I think are distorted.
I also read your comments that you are "retail investor of Daibochi". I do not need to repeat my own position many times like you. To me it achieves nothing.
Stock: [SCIPACK]: SCIENTEX PACKAGING (AYER KEROH) BERHAD
2021-10-01 18:50 | Report Abuse
@dragon328 you claimed that I have "not been able to come out with any specific point to support your view that the offer price of RM2.70 is good". @observatory, you claimed "I've repeatedly asked you to show your valuation. We can compare notes."
It should be obvious to level headed observers, none of my posts so far contained any personal opinion on fairness of offer price. I have not even started.
Since you claim that you want to compare notes, so far I was merely posting questions about validity of some of your own claims and gave my reason for each question. I think some of your claims are biased, promote fake news, or based on false info.
But to avoid my question you now create new false claims to imply I am avoiding discussion and speaking for Scientex? Are you trying to monopolise the main narrative here? Then call me sensitive while defending your own position?
It sound fishier now.
I can only "assure" that I am highlighting specific issue in your claims. You can verify.
I have not finished. More coming. I am slow and but try to be detailed.
@observatory your question "why jumping to the conclusion that I'm accusing Scientex manipulating account?". I admit it was my mistake read wrongly, sorry. But why I say that?
Recap what you say "Just when I got the time to reply, he has deleted his own comment. whether argument in favour of offeror or aggrieved minority. no need to keep creating new user accounts for that purpose".
You are still implying I am creating new accounts and "delete my own messages" "for purpose of "arguing in favour of Scientex". @dragon328 go further to claim "anti_colonialists and Investor420 seem to be speaking for Scientex".
You can read my original post and substitute this corrected statement. But note it does not change my main view that you are jumping at opportunity to create perception of an attempt to sway opinion and manipulate user accounts.
@observatory, your question "do you have strong ties with Scientex?"
I clearly stated in my first post that I am an observer. That include commenting on posts that I think are distorted.
I also read your comments that you are "retail investor of Daibochi". I do not need to repeat my own position many times like you. To me it achieves nothing.