@observatory, read your new comments and invitation to discussion, interesting views, I do not entirely disagree, but for discussion sake will post contrarian view, after replying some your earlier comments.
@observatory, do not see need to confirm my position to you again, as not verifiable even if I confirmed or denied your question, it achieves nothing.
I clearly state in first post that I am observer, that implies own belief of independence and level head to have discussions, without serving anyone interest as claimed by some proven fraudster or liar here.
Will not claim to be unbiased. You also announced your bias, and I agree without some bias there is no discussion.
Note my posts that seem "attacking" are actually for specific claims that I think are distorted, promote fake news, or based on false info. You can verify. I do not think they were driven by emotions.
Anyway nice to see some level headed discussion returning.
@observatory, better disclosure of my position, is I agree more with @iknownuts, it considers risk management, instead of your posts that feel more bias to best scenario projection and application of fairness which is flimsy and subjective. Discuss our reasoning in next posts? Much later.
Stock: [SCIPACK]: SCIENTEX PACKAGING (AYER KEROH) BERHAD
2021-10-02 16:05 | Report Abuse
@observatory, read your new comments and invitation to discussion, interesting views, I do not entirely disagree, but for discussion sake will post contrarian view, after replying some your earlier comments.
@observatory, do not see need to confirm my position to you again, as not verifiable even if I confirmed or denied your question, it achieves nothing.
I clearly state in first post that I am observer, that implies own belief of independence and level head to have discussions, without serving anyone interest as claimed by some proven fraudster or liar here.
Will not claim to be unbiased. You also announced your bias, and I agree without some bias there is no discussion.
Note my posts that seem "attacking" are actually for specific claims that I think are distorted, promote fake news, or based on false info. You can verify. I do not think they were driven by emotions.
Anyway nice to see some level headed discussion returning.
@observatory, better disclosure of my position, is I agree more with @iknownuts, it considers risk management, instead of your posts that feel more bias to best scenario projection and application of fairness which is flimsy and subjective. Discuss our reasoning in next posts? Much later.