Followers
0
Following
0
Blog Posts
0
Threads
13
Blogs
Threads
Portfolio
Follower
Following
2017-11-15 16:31 | Report Abuse
Spidy sifu - your own statement "this is becaused of the share down trending...". this is the catch, it is not moving in correct direction & you are in the leverage instrument.
2017-11-15 14:31 | Report Abuse
my apologies that I confused you. What I'm trying to explain is this
From C7 issues to C11 issues
a) C7 - Strike Price = RM 3.8 , ratio = 3:1 , listed 18/7/2017
b) C9 - Strike Price = RM 3.78, ratio = 4:1 , listed 27/7/2017
c) C8 - Strike Price = RM 3.58 , ratio = 4:1, listed 27/7/2017
d) C10 - Strike Price = RM 3.50 , ratio = 3:1, listed 12/10/2017
e) C11 - Strike Price = RM 3.30 , ratio = 1.75:1, listed 25/10/2017
whenever there is a new SW issue listed, when the strike price getting lower & lower & ratio become lesser & lesser compared to the earlier available listing, it implies the underlying not moving at the correct direction.
this is the informal type screening.
what you stated on the strike price & ratio have been fixed the moment the SW issued and won't change unless there is a corporate exercise is true, nothing wrong. Only I'm trying to screen across each issues .
2017-11-15 14:07 | Report Abuse
don't think about the movement SW, think about the underlying movement first. Even though analysts are giving a reasonable TP for underlying , if the water level not tested, it is risky....
at the moment, the underlying movement yet to be tested with the strong catalyst.
you look at all the SWs issued.....the exercise price are getting lower & lower, the ratio getting more & more sensitive.....this is not a good indicators...
at the moment, the only play you are expecting is the technical rebound, which in my opinion is a risky type of play
2017-10-09 15:02 | Report Abuse
not the typo errors....hmmn
my apology for the assumption
2017-10-09 14:21 | Report Abuse
don't type so fast & post so fast.... relax.....
correction to your PetronM to HY. Got 2 occurrences.
2017-10-09 13:26 | Report Abuse
sorry
18 Mar 2014 , Disposed 11,627,300 units, closed at 6.25. Should be off market transaction as well.
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/21-Mar-2014/308748_2576152776.jsp
With the big chunk offset each another for 29/1/2014 & 18/3/2014, the cost should be around 8.16-8.82 range estimation.
2017-10-09 13:14 | Report Abuse
6.50 to 8.50, got 30% capital gain.
2017-10-09 13:05 | Report Abuse
Posted by Alex Foo > Oct 8, 2017 09:59 PM | Report Abuse
i will really laugh if asb sells at 8, and then buy back later at 9.
i suggest asb, if they ever read i3, to park all their lot at 8.68.
btw, anyone can check what's the entry price of asb? possible to trace?
.................................................
@ Alex
29 Jan 2013 , Acquired 98,600 units. Closed at 8.16
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/05-Feb-2013/276399_851619940.jsp
30 Jan 2013 , Acquired 250,000 units. Closed at 8.17
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/05-Feb-2013/276398_851619938.jsp
31 Jan 2013 , Acquired 21,200 units. Closed at 8.20
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/06-Feb-2013/276541_3107139033.jsp
6 Feb 2013 , Acquired 250,000 units. Closed at 8.17
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/08-Feb-2013/379580_507756942.jsp
20 & 22 Feb 2013 , Acquired 250,000 units. Closed at 8.18 & 8.20
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/01-Mar-2013/278410_2194207971.jsp
26 & 27 Feb 2013 , Acquired 700,000 units. Closed at 8.30 & 8.30
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/01-Mar-2013/278410_2194207971.jsp
1 Mar 2013 , Acquired 120,500 units. Closed at 8.82
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/07-Mar-2013/278909_2977660683.jsp
14 Mar 2013 , Acquired 500,000 units. Closed at 8.44
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/20-Mar-2013/280087_613883861.jsp
15 Mar 2013 , Acquired 100,000 units. Closed at 8.45
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/22-Mar-2013/280431_3261124226.jsp
28 Mar 2013 , Acquired 392,300 units. Closed at 8.52
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/28-Mar-2013/280900_3113701768.jsp
9 May 2013 , Acquired 835,700 units. Closed at 8.35
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/16-May-2013/285147_3158342718.jsp
29 Jan 2014 , Acquired 12,107,200 units. Closed at 6.49. * Volume did not match the market transaction. This was off-market transaction.
https://klse.i3investor.com/insider/substantialShareholder/4324/04-Feb-2014/305192_1537675643.jsp
Bulk volume transacted at RM 6.49 29 Jan 2014 - off market.
2017-10-08 10:01 | Report Abuse
They are contractor / builder for EHV / HV transmission niche market.
I personally won't categorize them under power sector but instead construction sector.
2017-10-08 09:56 | Report Abuse
positive bias....after 15 months of incubation period post bonus issue , share split & private placement in between July 2016.
my personal opinion, with the high net operation margin , serving the project loan should not be an issue.
https://markets.ft.com/data/equities/tearsheet/financials?s=PESTECH:KLS
expecting the awarded contracts to translate into better earning FY18 & FY19
2017-10-08 08:32 | Report Abuse
I doubt it would materialize in short span of time for EWB + Sime Property. Sime Property going to demerge from Sime end of the year, post demerger immediately merge with EWB? It doesn't sound very feasible in my opinion.
Merging of SPSetia with Sime Property sound more realistic but it would not be in the picture in near term. SP have just swallowed I&P ( with strategic landbanks ) and need time to digest it.
2017-10-07 15:43 | Report Abuse
I think it was the KRR's oversea operation (SGP, IDN ) the culprit for the losses. Local KRR's previously still recording profits...
That was the past. Beginning this month, the KRR's menu have been updated, the pricing strategy is closer / matching the competitors. Maybe it might bring positive development in the future.
Prior to this, the pricing strategy was very lousy....totally no match to the close competitors Nando's
Want to say affordable.....with RM 30-40 per meal, totally cannot beat McD, KFC, Texas Chicken with pricing of RM 10-15. ( different range )
With RM 30-40 per meal previously c/w drink, you can have a lot of alternative options out there and the immediate competitor Nando's beaten KRR in clean sweep with attractive loyalty program.
2018-06-13 21:09 | Report Abuse
i contribute 1 also