While science avoids claiming absolute certainty about what is true, it excels at identifying what is false.

No, true science avoids claiming absolute certainty because the nature of scientific inquiry is inherently tentative and open to revision. Science operates through observation, experimentation, and evidence, all of which can improve over time, leading to refinements in understanding or entirely new perspectives. However, science can often tell with almost absolute certainty what is false by disproving hypotheses through empirical testing and evidence.

Posted by Sslee > 1 minute ago | Report Abuse

Science at best can give you a clear cut right and wrong answer.
But in real life things are not as simple as right or wrong so be pragmatism in seeking truth from facts.

It's high time for the young generation to take criticism as a necessary path to progress: Science is about challenging ideas, not attacking individuals. By subjecting hypotheses to scrutiny and encouraging open debate, science refines and improves knowledge. This is not badmouthing; it is a constructive process that values truth over ego, collaboration over conflict. Badmouthing stifles progress by focusing on individuals rather than ideas, while science advances through critical thinking, open-mindedness, and continuous questioning. The ultimate goal of science is to uncover truth, and that can only be achieved by subjecting all ideas—no matter how established or cherished—to rigorous scrutiny.

The resistance to dogma in science encourages ongoing dialogue, which drives progress, rather than personal attacks that aim to shut down debate.

Rejection of Certainty: True science avoids claiming absolute certainty. It is always open to being challenged and revised in light of new evidence. This constant questioning is not about badmouthing but about humility in the face of complexity.

Science stands in contrast to dogma, which resists change and criticism. In dogmatic systems, questioning established ideas is seen as a threat, and dissent is often met with personal attacks or dismissal. Science, however, encourages questioning as a means of achieving a deeper understanding.

Science thrives on its iterative nature—each new piece of evidence, whether it supports or contradicts current ideas, is valuable. The process of refining and updating theories based on new data is how science progresses. This iterative process is fundamentally incompatible with badmouthing, which seeks to tear down rather than build up.

And now the shift from soul-based consciousness to the emergent theory of consciousness of the physically evolving brain

Refining Ideas: Many scientific breakthroughs have arisen from failed experiments or the realization that existing theories were incomplete or incorrect. For example, the shift from Newtonian physics to Einstein’s theory of relativity was not an attack on Newton but an evolution in understanding.

Badmouthing, by contrast, is about denigrating individuals, often based on personal grudges or emotional reactions. Science, by nature, rejects such behaviors because they do nothing to advance the pursuit of knowledge.

Focus on Ideas, Not Individuals: The scientific community is careful to critique ideas and results, not the people behind them. When scientists argue against a theory, they are addressing the methodology, data, or logic, not engaging in personal attacks. In fact, many scientists work collaboratively, challenging each other’s ideas in the pursuit of better answers.

Without it, science would stagnate, relying on unchallenged assumptions rather than constantly pushing the boundaries of knowledge.

Thie whole process isn’t about badmouthing any caveman's age claimant - it’s about ensuring that the conclusions drawn are valid and can be trusted to be conveyed to the young ones

The scientific method demands open-mindedness and the willingness to revise or discard even deeply held ideas if evidence contradicts them. This is not a form of antagonism or bad-mouthing, but a commitment to truth over personal belief or dogma.

Every groundbreaking theory—whether Newton’s laws, Darwin’s theory of evolution, or Einstein’s theory of relativity—was subjected to rigorous debate and scrutiny before being accepted by the scientific community.
Unlike badmouthing, where the intent is often to undermine or humiliate, the critique in science is designed to strengthen ideas by addressing their limitations and proposing improvements. Without science many parts of the world would still live in darkness. And many children's brain development would be compromised.

According to Prophet Popper, falsifiability is the idea that for a hypothesis to be scientific, it must be testable and capable of being proven wrong. This principle encourages scientists to challenge ideas and find weaknesses in them, not out of malice, but as a way of advancing understanding.

One of the hallmarks of science is peer review and open criticism of ideas. This is not an attack on the individuals proposing these ideas, but a way to test, refine, and improve theories. Every hypothesis must withstand scrutiny and be open to falsification. The entire scientific process depends on the willingness to challenge prevailing assumptions to uncover the truth.

Wake up! At its core, science operates through a rigorous process of inquiry, skepticism, and continuous questioning, with the aim of improving understanding and advancing knowledge. To conflate this with badmouthing—an attack on individuals or ideas based on malice or personal bias—completely misunderstands the nature of scientific inquiry.

Unlike PAS, science is fundamentally about challenging ideas to make progress, not about badmouthing, slandering or discrediting others for personal or political gain.

Talking about science, not bad mouthing

Soul? The idea that consciousness can exist without a functioning brain is not supported by scientific evidence. All available data suggest that consciousness is deeply tied to the brain’s physical processes. The fallacy lies in assuming that consciousness is an independent entity when it is, in fact, an emergent property of brain activity. Whether through clinical evidence, evolutionary theory, or neuroscientific research, the physical brain is shown to be essential for generating and maintaining consciousness. Attempts to separate the two introduce speculative and unsupported claims that fail to account for the wealth of evidence linking consciousness to neural function.

Brain Evolution: Higher-order consciousness, including self-awareness, appears in species with highly developed brains, like humans, primates, and some mammals. As the brain evolved more complex structures, such as the prefrontal cortex, consciousness emerged as a way to process information, anticipate outcomes, and navigate complex social environments.

Split-Brain Experiments: In patients who have undergone corpus callosotomy (a procedure to sever the connection between the two brain hemispheres), their consciousness appears to split. Each hemisphere seems to have its own distinct awareness, pointing again to the role of the brain in generating unified conscious experience.
If consciousness were not dependent on brain function, we would not expect such profound changes in memory, identity, and awareness with changes in brain structures.

Evidence from Coma and Brain Death
Clinical cases of coma and brain death illustrate the direct relationship between the brain’s functioning and consciousness:

Coma: When certain brain regions are damaged, particularly those involved in arousal and awareness, people fall into comas, where they lose consciousness. These states are reversible in some cases, demonstrating the dependence of consciousness on specific neural activity.
Brain Death: In cases of brain death, where all brain activity ceases, there is no recovery of consciousness. Brain-dead individuals cannot think, feel, or perceive.

Occam’s Razor: The principle of Occam’s Razor suggests that the simplest explanation that accounts for all the evidence is usually the best. The evidence overwhelmingly supports the view that consciousness is a product of physical brain processes. Introducing a non-physical, supernatural, or extra-brain consciousness adds unnecessary complexity to the explanation without empirical support.

These findings suggest that consciousness is inextricably linked to brain function. If certain parts of the brain are damaged or non-functional, consciousness is altered or lost, implying that the brain is necessary for its generation.

Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Modern neuroscience has identified brain networks closely tied to conscious experience, such as the Default Mode Network (DMN) and the Global Neuronal Workspace (GNW). Functional MRI (fMRI) and other brain imaging techniques show that specific patterns of neural activity correlate with various states of consciousness, such as wakefulness, attention, and self-awareness.

They are not foolish. Consciousness is a product of the brain’s physical processes. This is based on extensive evidence that changes in brain structure and function directly impact conscious experience.

Shut Down Billion-Dollar Paper Mills—No More Wastage, No More Excuses

This is not just a problem of unemployment—it is a symptom of broader dysfunction in governance. Without decisive action, we risk perpetuating a system that continues to churn out graduates with no future, deepening the cycle of poverty and regional inequality. It is time to stop wasting public funds, stop diverting resources from job creation, and refocus on policies that ensure every graduate has a path to meaningful employment.

We demand a new approach—one that prioritizes job creation, local industry support, and a rational education policy that produces graduates in fields where there is actual demand. We say NO to the overproduction of graduates and NO to the blind allocation of resources. The future of our youth and our regions depends on making the right decisions now.

Good opportunity for psychologists to conduct research on this cohort: If indoctrinated children begin to explore universalism or evolutionary science, they may feel guilt or shame for questioning the religious teachings they grew up with. This emotional distress is exacerbated by the fear of betraying their faith or family values. Such internal conflicts can lead to long-term psychological issues, including depression, anxiety, or identity crises, especially if they are torn between adhering to their upbringing and embracing new evidence-based ideas.

Mismanagement of Public Funds: What’s worse is that this dysfunction is being propped up by the mismanagement of public funds. Billions of ringgits are diverted into higher education programs that offer no tangible return on investment for students or society. Taxpayer money is being funneled into an education system that produces an oversupply of graduates with limited job prospects, while essential job creation efforts remain underfunded. This is nothing short of a diversion of public funds—money that should have been used to stimulate regional industries and generate jobs for local communities is instead fueling an unsustainable graduate pipeline.

This type of financial mismanagement represents a gross betrayal of the public trust. In Kelantan, Terengganu, and Pahang, local governments are failing to invest in infrastructure, job creation, and vocational training that could help diversify the economy and provide meaningful employment. Instead, we see funds diverted toward producing more and more graduates, with no regard for their future.

A Crisis Manufactured by Irresponsible Leaders and Poor Leadership: The Higher Education Ministry, in collaboration with state governments, should have acted as the gatekeeper, ensuring that educational institutions align their output with actual market demand. Instead, they have facilitated a crisis. The figures speak for themselves: between 200,000 to 350,000 graduates are produced each year, while fewer than 50,000 skilled jobs are created annually in the East Coast region. This is not mere inefficiency—it is a scandal. Thousands of young, hopeful graduates are left with nothing but empty promises and the cruel reality of unemployment or underemployment.

Where is the accountability? Where is the leadership that is supposed to guide educational and economic policy? This imbalance reflects a complete breakdown of communication between academic institutions, industries, and local communities. It shows a failure to anticipate market needs, resulting in an influx of graduates forced to migrate for opportunities or settle for jobs well below their skill levels. This migration drains regional talent, exacerbating economic disparity, and deepens the socioeconomic divide.

It is time to hold the state governments of east coast, and the Ministry of Higher Education accountable for a systemic failure that has plagued the East Coast for far too long. The overproduction of graduates far outstripping the number of skilled jobs available is not merely a lapse in planning—it is a monumental blunder in workforce management that borders on negligence. For years, there has been an unrestrained increase in university intakes without regard for the realities of the job market. This reckless expansion has led to a cascade of wasted human potential and economic instability. Enough is enough.

The World Bank report on Malaysia paints a truly inspiring picture of government efficiency in the East Coast—Kelantan, Terengganu, and Pahang. Over five glorious years from 2018 to 2023, fewer than 50,000 highly skilled jobs were created annually. Yet, with remarkable foresight, the Ministry of Higher Education churned out between 200,000 to 350,000 graduates each year, competing fiercely for these jobs. Clearly, we are witnessing the art of overproduction perfected.

One of the reasons behind successful ISIS recruitment......................................................

ZERO overseas medical treatments for government officials......................until all B40 gets a medical insurance card

Impaired Critical Thinking and Cognitive Flexibility
Indoctrination often involves presenting a rigid, unquestionable belief system, which can lead to the suppression of critical thinking skills. From a young age, children's brains are highly plastic, meaning they are adaptable and shaped by their environment. However, when they are exposed to rigid, dogmatic thinking:

Prefrontal Cortex Development: This part of the brain is responsible for higher-order functions such as reasoning, problem-solving, and decision-making. Indoctrination can impede the development of the prefrontal cortex by discouraging questioning and critical analysis, leading to reduced cognitive flexibility.
Neuroplasticity: The brain's ability to adapt and change based on new information may be hindered. When children are taught to accept beliefs without questioning, they are less likely to engage with diverse perspectives or revise their opinions in light of new evidence.

Reinforcement of Fear-Based Responses
Fundamentalist indoctrination often employs fear, guilt, or the threat of punishment to enforce obedience and conformity. This can lead to the hyperactivation of the amygdala, the brain’s fear center, and result in a heightened sensitivity to perceived threats:

Chronic Stress and Fear: Fear-based teachings can result in long-term changes in the brain. Children exposed to constant fear of hell, punishment, or other threats may develop an overactive stress response. This can lead to chronic anxiety and stress disorders later in life.
Fight-or-Flight Response: Frequent activation of the amygdala can cause the brain to become overly focused on immediate threats, narrowing the ability to engage in abstract thinking, creative problem-solving, or long-term planning.

Stunted Emotional Development
Indoctrination often involves strict emotional control, particularly by limiting expressions of doubt, anger, or rebellion. This can inhibit the development of emotional regulation and empathy:

Limited Emotional Range: By discouraging children from expressing their true feelings, fundamentalist systems can prevent them from developing emotional intelligence—the ability to understand and regulate their emotions and the emotions of others.
Suppression of Empathy: In cases where indoctrination teaches exclusionary or "us versus them" mentalities (e.g., labeling outsiders or non-believers as evil), it can blunt the development of empathy and compassion toward others, reinforcing rigid social divisions.

Overactivation of Reward Systems for Conformity
Many indoctrination systems use rewards for conformity and obedience, whether it's praise from religious authorities, the promise of an afterlife, or social inclusion. This can lead to overreliance on extrinsic motivation, affecting the brain’s reward pathways:

Dopaminergic Reward Systems: The brain’s reward system, which involves dopamine, can become tied to compliance rather than curiosity, creativity, or independent thought. When children learn that rewards come from conforming to strict norms, they may develop a dependency on external validation rather than pursuing intrinsic goals based on curiosity or self-motivation.
Decreased Autonomy: This conditioning of the reward system can create adults who struggle to make independent choices, always seeking approval from authority figures or adhering rigidly to predefined rules.

Reduction of Exposure to Diverse Ideas
Indoctrination often isolates children from ideas and perspectives that contradict the doctrine being taught. This lack of exposure to diverse viewpoints can stunt intellectual and psychological growth:

Decreased Gray Matter Growth: Studies have shown that people who are more open to novel experiences tend to have more developed gray matter, which is associated with cognitive function and processing power. When children are shielded from diverse ideas, their ability to process complex information and appreciate nuance may be diminished.
Echo Chamber Effect: When only one perspective is presented, children may internalize an "echo chamber" mentality, where they are unable to recognize or tolerate dissenting opinions. This can foster cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias, where they only seek information that reinforces pre-existing beliefs.

Development of Authoritarian Personality Traits
Indoctrination in fundamentalist settings often promotes absolute obedience to authority figures, whether religious leaders, parents, or other symbols of power. This can contribute to the development of authoritarian personality traits:

Rigid Thinking and Intolerance for Ambiguity: Children who grow up in environments where questioning authority is discouraged are more likely to adopt rigid, black-and-white thinking. They may become intolerant of ambiguity or complexity, seeing the world in terms of simple moral dichotomies (good vs. evil, believer vs. non-believer).
Submission to Authority: Repeated conditioning to obey authority figures without question can also make children more vulnerable to manipulation and control by charismatic leaders or authoritarian figures in adulthood.

Interference with Identity Formation
Indoctrination can interfere with the healthy development of a child’s sense of self, making it difficult for them to explore their personal beliefs, values, and goals:

Stunted Personal Exploration: Fundamentalism often discourages personal exploration and self-discovery, as it imposes a pre-defined set of values and beliefs. This can prevent children from developing a strong, autonomous identity and make them more prone to feelings of confusion or insecurity later in life.
Cognitive Dissonance: When children grow older and encounter ideas that conflict with their indoctrinated beliefs, they may experience cognitive dissonance—a mental discomfort caused by holding contradictory beliefs. If their foundational beliefs are too rigid, this dissonance can lead to internal conflict, anxiety, or even trauma.

Social and Relational Deficits
Indoctrination, especially when it involves strong "us versus them" thinking, can limit social development by isolating children from those who hold different beliefs:

Social Isolation: Children who are raised in rigid fundamentalist environments may be discouraged from forming relationships with people outside their group. This can lead to social isolation and difficulties in developing friendships, partnerships, or working relationships with people who hold different perspectives.
Lack of Conflict Resolution Skills: If children are taught that dissent is wrong, they may struggle to navigate conflicts in healthy ways. This can lead to either avoidance of conflict altogether or the use of authoritarian tactics (such as coercion or aggression) to resolve disagreements.

While religious or ideological belief systems can offer comfort, community, and a sense of meaning, the process of indoctrination—particularly when it involves fundamentalism—can impair critical cognitive and emotional development in young children. These negative changes can persist into adulthood, affecting their ability to think critically, empathize, and function in a complex and diverse world. Therefore, fostering environments that encourage open inquiry, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence is essential to protect the brain's development and allow children to reach their full potential.

In fact, to live eternally is the real suffering paradoxically!! As the trueest ever prophet says, "To live eternally is to suffer indefinitely!".......................hehe

Prophet Dickens expresses the correct idea that, just as we did not suffer or feel anything before birth, death might bring a similar state of peaceful nothingness, free from suffering.

Budget 2025: Focus on Tangible Welfare
In a world facing immense economic, environmental, and social challenges, public funds should be concentrated on tangible, real-world solutions that address the needs of all citizens. Spending money on religiosity—while it may cater to certain spiritual needs—does not alleviate the very real struggles of the high cost of living. Instead, it detracts from more pressing issues like poverty, inequality, and sustainability. Public spending must be guided by principles of justice, equality, and long-term social benefit, ensuring that every dollar spent improves the lives of the people it serves.

Many modern constitutions emphasize the separation of religion and state, precisely because mixing the two often results in unequal distribution of power and resources. In such systems, the state’s role is to provide for the material well-being of its citizens, while religion’s role is personal and spiritual. Spending public funds on religion blurs this separation and may undermine the principles of:

Democracy
Equality
Universal human rights

Vernacular vs national schooling -Risk of Social Fragmentation: In societies with multiple religious beliefs, public spending on religious activities can deepen divisions and cause social fragmentation. Religious spending may appear as favoritism toward certain groups while excluding others. This can lead to a sense of alienation among minorities and marginalized groups, fostering resentment and even social unrest. Governments must be careful to:

Promote unity and commonality
Strengthen civic identity over religious identity
Ensure equality of opportunity, not favor specific religious communities
Public funds should be used to bring people together, through investment in common goods like education, public health, and infrastructure—areas where all benefit equally, regardless of their religious background.