.
DON'T YOU GUYS THINK IT IS BEST JUST TO KEEP SILENT ?

NOT TO POST ANYMORE COMMENTS !

LET CALVIN WRITE WHATEVER HE WANT, WE JUST KEEP SILENT, NO REPLY !

LET HIM TALK HIMSELF, SYIOK HIMSELF !
.

.
Calvin, seems like you either don't understand english or selectively answer what I worry about with bina puri.

Even with Mrt4,5,6...etc whatever, could bina puri have the ability to increase their profit margin ?

##But, the bottom line is their bottom line, the profit attributed to our share owner is substantially paired down despite the already so thin profit margin they would have for us.##

Please make a comparison with gkent and gadang and bina puri, see what is their profit margin like ?

If you keep mentioned about intrinsic value, why not hard sell TANCO ?

Calvin you got it or not ?
.

.
Calvin, like I said earlier, nothing so excited to shout about, with only 6% effective stakes in this project !

However, I have full confident with bina puri to execute the job successfully. Look at their completed projects over the year I don't see any problem with them to execute it in time.

But, the bottom line is their bottom line, the profit attributed to our share owner is substantially paired down despite the already so thin profit margin they would have for us.

Calvin you got it or not ?
.

.
Calvin, if looking for high value in assets, why didn't you hard sell TANCO ?
Market cap only 20+m but with over 300 acres of land at port dickson valued at over 200m ?
.

.
@HighRiskInvestor
I would certainly wanted to know how is bina puri get the arrangement done this time around.

Over the years, bina puri has proof to us they have the ability to secure mega projects, but they has not proof to us their ability to increase the profit margin.
Worse still, I didn't know why is the net profit attributed so little to the equity share owner ?
Look at the latest quarterly result, net profit 6.58m but attribute only 0.9m to equity share owner.

Can someone here enlighten me ?
.

.
15B over 10 years for 50% is 750m.
Bina puri hold only 12% of ideal heights therefore it came to 90m only.
.

Actually nothing much to shout about! If the whole development undertaken by ideal heights then it only contribute 90m per year to bina puri.

Well said Adam Khoo, I bought from 60+ cents and average down to 30+ cents. Attended twice the agm at selayang, went many times to main place, still I could not be sure to cut loss or hold on for it. As I tell Calvin, welcome on board...but...to wonderland or holland ?

Ok. Thanks Calvin noted that!

.
Calvin, please post the proof here to justify what you said of 205m. Thanking in advance.
.

.
Calvin, 33% of 205m is about 70m , don't mislead people here !
.

.
Calvin, I have remind you twice !
Bina Puri ONLY HAS 33% stakes in USJ main place mall.

I really doubt your credential and integrity should you keep repeating to mislead peoples here !
.

funda, steel tower were constructed mainly by steel I-beams not rebar.

Calvin, welcome on board...to wonderland or holland ?

.

Calvin, it is normal when substantial shareholders sold their shares with profit taking. But, if not one but two very substantial shareholders has sold theirs at a loss mean they see something we don't see.

.

Please also take notice that Jentera Jati once a largest shareholders has paired down their stakes from over 20% to less than 10% !

And, another prominent business man owned company Bumimaju Mawar has also sold their stakes from over 19% in year 2010 to almost 0% ( not even appeared in the 30 largest shareholders list ) !!

I believe we should also asked ourself why should we buy into Bina Puri if the riched has sold their's at loss ?

.

Jentera Jati once a largest shareholders has paired down their stakes from over 20% to less than 10% !

And, another prominent business man owned company Bumimaju Mawar has also sold their stakes from over 19% in year 2010 to almost 0% ( not even appeared in the 30 largest shareholders list ) !!

I believe we should also asked ourself why should we buy into Bina Puri if the riched has sold their's at loss ?

Please also take notice that Jentera Jati once a largest shareholders has paired down their stakes from over 20% to less than 10% !

And, another prominent business man owned company Bumimaju Mawar has also sold their stakes from over 19% in year 2010 to almost 0% ( not even appeared in the 30 largest shareholders list ) !!

I believe we should also asked ourself why should we buy into Bina Puri if the riched has sold their's at loss ?

Calvin the more you said the more I feel not comfortable holding this counter....even I had hold it for more than 2 years...

How many times I need to remind that bins puri only has about 33% stake in usj main place mall.

Calvintaneng fyi Bina Puri only controlled about 33% stake of USJ Main Place.
How many shares you owned despite heavily promoting this counter here ?

"They" can't sell any if the public don't buy at 4/4.5/5 cents. DBE par value is at 1 cent, therefore it is not impossible if this counter keep on selling down to 2 cents for RCN at 1 cent.

It is still unclear to the public that whether CJ Korea wanted to have controlling stake or just be an investor while helping them to synergize their logistics arm in Malaysia.

folks, bear in mind this announcement is not take over the WHOLE company, it is merely buy and sell portion of the company shares, meaning to say the buyer and seller can agreed at whatever price they found suit BUT NOT necessary offer the same to others shareholder.

pat the RCN is taken by singapore company Advance Capital not Taiwanese

satha44 @ your 2c is the new target price...

99plus how do you know 32m one shot ?

@radzi******** talk, very simple.

*********************************************************************************
1) Don't catch falling knife !
2) Buy when others are fear !

Which one prevail ?

A big clap ! Should learn from you to tabulate the calculation, see next quarter result who would be more accurate :)

Their RCN is issue at 0.032 only, I believed not many peoples here noticed...or pretending not noticed.

You know what ? Since when the management said the company will loss money ?
Did you guys ever go and taste yourself the new harumi fried chicken ? Then decide yourself is the company really got that potential to explode ?

感谢无私分享 !!

My view, somehow different, I think the insider has knew q2 result were not as expected, and therefore they goreng the price up today, hopefully could attract buying volume in the next few days so that they are able to sell theirs at higher before the q2 result released.

以債養債繼續Revolving credit .... ??!! 原来Revolving credit是用来以債養債的，哈哈哈哈....

Fortunebullx it seems very obvious to me that you must study what the meaning of hedging on commodity...

227k x 4 quarters = 908k while the current market capitalization of 55M is at approximately PE 60 !!

Chan Sifu are you telling us you are God ?

How on earth peoples still trying to out guess the share price by all these junk !?

同意 bsngpg !

You are asking the answer. Perhaps.

kakatuah, they could issue 200M right shares @ RM0.10 or they can issue 100M right shares @RM0.20 both are generate the same sum of money. It is interesting to see what happened next ?

If buy at 20 sen and sell at 17 sen calculate how much is the loss ?

I didn't see the logic here, restricted shares has been issue at 0.10 and it all known by us, yet still there are peoples buying above 0.20 ??!! Are we all stupid ??

I bought XOX at middle of Aug and I remembered at that time the market cap is only around 20M+, I have sold it with a little profit by Nov.

If I remembered the share price correctly, market cap should be around 30M+ if basing on 10 sen share price prior to restricted issues shares. So, for XOX share price to be same as 30M+ market cap, the share price shall be around 0.085 !

Correct me please if I'm wrong.

kclee, mind to share what is your opinion towards the impact or influences on the profit of AirAsia due to AirAsia-X losses and do you believed after so many quarters AirAsia-X would still have good chances to make good profit ?

Try Nikkei 225 index from 1998 until today ... ...

Dear Mr.Koon, by far this is the most valuable article I read and learned among all other's you been wrote. Thanks !

No doubt proton's quality is still not so comparing with some of the models but as a Malaysian shall we only think about how bad it is ? or shall we think about how to support it ?

I remembered 4 years ago when I was at Seoul I can see most of the Korean driving Korean car either they are Hyundai or Kia or other's, did they always complaining ? Some might said nowadays the Korean car is superbly built but if not supported by their peoples buying their car since long ago how could they achieved what they are today ?

The intention of setting up national car is good but the accomplishment is just involved too many challenge and sadly to me that after so many years proton still has long way to go...

I personally think the intention of Tun is good... however, after so many years we just can not achieved to the expected level...