Followers
0
Following
0
Blog Posts
0
Threads
629
Blogs
Threads
Portfolio
Follower
Following
2016-03-26 14:08 | Report Abuse
story to wriggle his way out of the situation.
For a while his parents believed him. Until he got caught red-handed one day. Then, his father had no choice but to punish him. If we hoped that would beat some sense and decency into him, we were sadly mistaken.
He took his bad habits with him to school. Already skilled at telling lies and manipulating people, he began cheating his classmates. The sums ranged from a few ringgit to hundreds of ringgit. The figures may seem small to some, but for a young schoolboy, the sum is enormous. As usual, his long-suffering father had to clear his debts and try to redress the damage done to his victims.
At age sixteen, Tey por yee had to audacity to go to his uncle’s house to borrow money. He said he needed RM2,000.00 because his father was sick and desperately needed the money for an operation. Believing his lies totally, the uncle gave it to him. His family never lived down the humiliation when the truth came out.
Since young, he has always been obsessed with money. Even when he had a lot of it, it was never enough. He wanted more and more. Never mind if it was obtained in a deceitful manner, just as long as he got what he wanted. It only goes to show that he is not only a pathological liar, but a pathological thief as well. With hundreds of millions already stashed away in private bank accounts, more than he can ever spend in ten lifetimes, he still remains greedy for more. So greedy that he is willing to lie, cheat and steal to achieve his end.
2016-03-26 14:06 | Report Abuse
Let recap:
- the owners of pt haseba are herman koswara and benny tjokro. Both signed agreements with tey por yee and the transaction were secured with inovisi's shares where ooi kock aun sits as finance director and actually is inovisi's ultimate shareholders.
- pt asu and pt asi are the owners of pt haseba. The director and commisioner of pt asu and pt asi, i.e. Tjoe Yudhis, Dedi Francis and Edward Farolan are nominees of tey and ooi.
- the transaction between protasco and pt asu to buy pt asi's stakes in pt fas was secured with inovisi's shares. The shares were deposited to acclaim, a company established by tey and ooi, and on paper is run by Seh Poh Yee's wife.
- the website of pt asu is registered under a company which shares the same address as nexgram. Which company is a subsidiary of inovisi.
- tey and ooi have the power over pt gold child, pt nusantara rising rich, fast global, pt asu as evident from the fact that they are able to move around the money paid from protasco to pt asu and gold child which ended up in rs mahaniaga, dato chong's company as a repayment for the loan provided by dato chong so tey and ooi could finalize the deal to buy stakes in protasco.
Everything linked up to tey and ooi LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 14:05 | Report Abuse
Bonus round.
24 Oct 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee via Global Cap Venture signed Term Sheet with Herman Koswara, the controlling shareholders of PT Fas. The purpose of the term sheet is to acquire project kuala simpang timur oil field. It is agreed that Larry will purchase Herman's shares priced at IDR 6billion (Larry has only paid IDR 3billion).
1 November 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee and Benny Tjokro agreed on how to move forward with handling over Benny's shares at PT Fas, i.e. Tey Por Yee paid the operational costs of PT Haseba as of the date of the agreement and Larry Tey Por Yee take over Benny's debt at Mayapada Bank in the amount or IDR 23 Billion (both conditions are not fulfilled). However in the said date Larry already received the shares of PT Fas belonged to Benny Tjokro. Tey put the shares in PT Asi.
28 December 2012: Larry Tey Por Yee sold his shares to Protasco Berhad in the amount of USD 55million without notifying Herman and Benny.
21 May 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee sent a forged invitation for egms of PT Haseba which will be held at the office of Djamkk Asmur, the public notary in Aceh.
14 August 2013: to pay his debt to Benny, Larry wired in IDR 5billion and put Inovisi's shares as a guarantee. Few month later when Larry is in default; Benny attempted to execute the block of Inovisi's shares and finds that the value has dropped to a meager 10% of its initial value.
23 August 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee changed the directors and commisioners of PT Haseba based on the illegal egms.
24 February 2014 Herman Koswara and Benny Tjokro lodged police report against Larry Tey Por Yee alleging that he forged Herman and Benny's signature and defrauded them.
1 April 2014 Benny Tjokro through it vehicle PT Dayasakti Putradharma filed lawsuit against PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia at south jakarta district court.
25 April 2014 Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama filed lawsuit against PT Green Pine, Jerry Djajasaputra, PT Equator Securities and PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk arguing that it had invested IDR 125billion in PT Inovisi which was guaranteed by a block of Inovisi's shares. But it had not seen any profit and when they attempted to cash in on the shares, it shares dropped significantly.
11 December 2014 Benny Tjokro and Larry Tey signed settlement agreement in which Larry agreed to pay IDR 18billion, at the latest 28 January 2015. Up to this day Larry failed to honor this settlement agreement.
8 July 2015 The court ruled in favour of Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama and order Inovisi to pay IDR 200billion.
15 July 2015 Indonesian police raided the office of PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk.
December 2015 PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk closed down it business without prior notice to the investors and employees after failing to pay rent and utilities to Patra Jasa's building management. It management went hiding.
LOL LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 14:03 | Report Abuse
TeyPuki Investigations to proceed despite the company withdrawing Ire-Tex offer
ALTHOUGH the takeover offer Nexgram Holdings Bhd made on Ire-Tex Corp Bhd is now off the table, it has not stopped regulators from pursuing their investigations on the former’s past dealings.
On Thursday, Nexgram turned things around by announcing its intention to withdraw its takeover offer on one-stop packaging service provider Ire-Tex. This came a day after it said it would take steps to bring in a special auditor to determine the veracity of some of its assets.
Yesterday, Nexgram also announced that its due diligence committee had taken heed of concerns made by regulators and followed up with a visit to Indonesia, where some of the questionable transactions are said to have transpired.
“The Nexgram board had formed the view that such observations appear to potentially point to inconsistencies with regards to details of certain assets with the Nexgram group,” the statement said.
Following this, Nexgram said it had formed a special committee comprising of four directors of which two are independent, to take necessary steps to address the matter, which include the appointment of a special auditor.
Still, if any evidence suggests Nexgram has not carried out its responsibilities towards shareholders, the company could face sanctions from the regulators, and depending on the severity, it could face criminal prosecutions, insiders say.
The Nexgram saga started after it launched a takeover offer on Ire-Tex last November, which was to be satisfied through issuance of new Nexgram shares.
According to its website, Nexgram says it is a multinational conglomerate involved in the telco, security and surveillance, software development, property development, industries, business advisories and investment activities sectors.
Its rationale to take over Ire-Tex was so it could continue its diversification by tapping into manufacturing and industrial segments.
StarBizWeek earlier reported that regulators had concerns over the takeover due to the veracity of certain assets in Nexgram.
However, it had insufficient grounds to disrupt the offer and continued to follow up on its leads.
Following this, Nexgram posted its offer document on Dec 11, 2015.
It is understood that both the Securities Commission and Bursa Malaysia met with the advisors and a representative of Nexgram’s board to request the verification of certain alleged bank balances by an independent accountant.
However, soon after, through Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of some of its subsidiaries, which according to the SC, were the subject of enquiry.
At the same time, Nexgram made some more changes in the company.
On Jan 14, the company announced that its co-founder Datuk Tey Por Yee (pic) had resigned as executive director to “pursue his personal interest and goals”.
Since his resignation, Nexgram has six directors left sitting on its board.
Interestingly, Tey has not sold off his stake in Nexgram. According to Bursa filings, Tey’s stake stands at 23.4%.
This led to the SC choosing to invoke its powers under the Capital Markets Securities Act (CMSA) under Section 217 to issue a public statement on its concerns relating to those assets, a first for the SC.
This course of action is seen as a rarity even in other countries, says a source.
The SC had issued the public statement on Jan 15, stating that Nexgram’s disposal of certain assets “delays and obstructs the ongoing enquiries by the SC and Bursa Malaysia”.
Since Nexgram was seen as being “uncooperative” in bringing in a special auditor to independently verify the value of its assets, Bursa had all this while held back on the greenlight for Nexgram’s circular to its shareholders related to the Ire-Tex deal.
This meant that Nexgram had not been able to call for an EGM to vote on the takeover proposal, which in turn could have led to the offer lapsing.
On Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of its subsidiaries – Nexgram Resources Sdn Bhd, Godynamic Investments Ltd and PT Semesta Tirta Antara Raya (through Godynamic) – which are believed to be the subject of the regulators’ enquiries.
Although it is not too clear which assets showed some red flags, it is worth taking a look at Nexgram’s balance sheet.
In its financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2014, the company had RM84.5mil in cash balances. However in the following year, a majority of that cash seemed to be reflected in as inventories. Its inventories moved from zero to RM89.8mil in the following financial year while its cash balances fell to RM31.1mil.
Sources say enquiries by the regulators are focused on the paper and cash trail of how those inventories were built up.
2016-03-26 14:01 | Report Abuse
Investigations to proceed despite the company withdrawing Ire-Tex offer
ALTHOUGH the takeover offer Nexgram Holdings Bhd made on Ire-Tex Corp Bhd is now off the table, it has not stopped regulators from pursuing their investigations on the former’s past dealings.
On Thursday, Nexgram turned things around by announcing its intention to withdraw its takeover offer on one-stop packaging service provider Ire-Tex. This came a day after it said it would take steps to bring in a special auditor to determine the veracity of some of its assets.
Yesterday, Nexgram also announced that its due diligence committee had taken heed of concerns made by regulators and followed up with a visit to Indonesia, where some of the questionable transactions are said to have transpired.
“The Nexgram board had formed the view that such observations appear to potentially point to inconsistencies with regards to details of certain assets with the Nexgram group,” the statement said.
Following this, Nexgram said it had formed a special committee comprising of four directors of which two are independent, to take necessary steps to address the matter, which include the appointment of a special auditor.
Still, if any evidence suggests Nexgram has not carried out its responsibilities towards shareholders, the company could face sanctions from the regulators, and depending on the severity, it could face criminal prosecutions, insiders say.
The Nexgram saga started after it launched a takeover offer on Ire-Tex last November, which was to be satisfied through issuance of new Nexgram shares.
According to its website, Nexgram says it is a multinational conglomerate involved in the telco, security and surveillance, software development, property development, industries, business advisories and investment activities sectors.
Its rationale to take over Ire-Tex was so it could continue its diversification by tapping into manufacturing and industrial segments.
StarBizWeek earlier reported that regulators had concerns over the takeover due to the veracity of certain assets in Nexgram.
However, it had insufficient grounds to disrupt the offer and continued to follow up on its leads.
Following this, Nexgram posted its offer document on Dec 11, 2015.
It is understood that both the Securities Commission and Bursa Malaysia met with the advisors and a representative of Nexgram’s board to request the verification of certain alleged bank balances by an independent accountant.
However, soon after, through Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of some of its subsidiaries, which according to the SC, were the subject of enquiry.
At the same time, Nexgram made some more changes in the company.
On Jan 14, the company announced that its co-founder Datuk Tey Por Yee (pic) had resigned as executive director to “pursue his personal interest and goals”.
Since his resignation, Nexgram has six directors left sitting on its board.
Interestingly, Tey has not sold off his stake in Nexgram. According to Bursa filings, Tey’s stake stands at 23.4%.
This led to the SC choosing to invoke its powers under the Capital Markets Securities Act (CMSA) under Section 217 to issue a public statement on its concerns relating to those assets, a first for the SC.
This course of action is seen as a rarity even in other countries, says a source.
The SC had issued the public statement on Jan 15, stating that Nexgram’s disposal of certain assets “delays and obstructs the ongoing enquiries by the SC and Bursa Malaysia”.
Since Nexgram was seen as being “uncooperative” in bringing in a special auditor to independently verify the value of its assets, Bursa had all this while held back on the greenlight for Nexgram’s circular to its shareholders related to the Ire-Tex deal.
This meant that Nexgram had not been able to call for an EGM to vote on the takeover proposal, which in turn could have led to the offer lapsing.
On Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of its subsidiaries – Nexgram Resources Sdn Bhd, Godynamic Investments Ltd and PT Semesta Tirta Antara Raya (through Godynamic) – which are believed to be the subject of the regulators’ enquiries.
Although it is not too clear which assets showed some red flags, it is worth taking a look at Nexgram’s balance sheet.
In its financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2014, the company had RM84.5mil in cash balances. However in the following year, a majority of that cash seemed to be reflected in as inventories. Its inventories moved from zero to RM89.8mil in the following financial year while its cash balances fell to RM31.1mil.
Sources say enquiries by the regulators are focused on the paper and cash trail of how those inventories were built up.
2016-03-26 13:59 | Report Abuse
Lookie, lookie....ooi kock aun was handcuffed. I have to compliment him. At least he did not hide his face like tey por yee LOL LOL LPL
http://www.hmetro.com.my/node/112179
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MFukVxP8Nks
Now, let wait if anyone here could get me picture or video of the chongs and handcuff LOL LOL LOL LOL
Anyone with a half of brain also know tey and ooi's companies are their alter ego mah...are you brain dead or what? LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 13:58 | Report Abuse
At age seven, tey por hee was already showing signs of what he was destined to be: a thief and a liar. Ten sen, twenty sen, fifty sen…all would disappear “mysteriously” from his families drawers, savings and piggy banks. Later, bigger sums would go missing, from his father’s wallet to his mother’s purse. Tey would be placed at the scene of the crime but he always had an excuse or story to wriggle his way out of the situation.
For a while his parents believed him. Until he got caught red-handed one day. Then, his father had no choice but to punish him. If we hoped that would beat some sense and decency into him, we were sadly mistaken.
He took his bad habits with him to school. Already skilled at telling lies and manipulating people, he began cheating his classmates. The sums ranged from a few ringgit to hundreds of ringgit. The figures may seem small to some, but for a young schoolboy, the sum is enormous. As usual, his long-suffering father had to clear his debts and try to redress the damage done to his victims.
At age sixteen, Tey por yee had to audacity to go to his uncle’s house to borrow money. He said he needed RM2,000.00 because his father was sick and desperately needed the money for an operation. Believing his lies totally, the uncle gave it to him. His family never lived down the humiliation when the truth came out.
Since young, he has always been obsessed with money. Even when he had a lot of it, it was never enough. He wanted more and more. Never mind if it was obtained in a deceitful manner, just as long as he got what he wanted. It only goes to show that he is not only a pathological liar, but a pathological thief as well. With hundreds of millions already stashed away in private bank accounts, more than he can ever spend in ten lifetimes, he still remains greedy for more. So greedy that he is willing to lie, cheat and steal to achieve his end.
2016-03-26 13:57 | Report Abuse
Let's recap shall we:
- the owners of pt haseba are herman koswara and benny tjokro. Both signed agreements with tey por yee and the transaction were secured with inovisi's shares where ooi kock aun sits as finance director and actually is inovisi's ultimate shareholders.
- pt asu and pt asi are the owners of pt haseba. The director and commisioner of pt asu and pt asi, i.e. Tjoe Yudhis, Dedi Francis and Edward Farolan are nominees of tey and ooi.
- the transaction between protasco and pt asu to buy pt asi's stakes in pt fas was secured with inovisi's shares. The shares were deposited to acclaim, a company established by tey and ooi, and on paper is run by Seh Poh Yee's wife.
- the website of pt asu is registered under a company which shares the same address as nexgram. Which company is a subsidiary of inovisi.
- tey and ooi have the power over pt gold child, pt nusantara rising rich, fast global, pt asu as evident from the fact that they are able to move around the money paid from protasco to pt asu and gold child which ended up in rs mahaniaga, dato chong's company as a repayment for the loan provided by dato chong so tey and ooi could finalize the deal to buy stakes in protasco.
Everything linked up to tey and ooi LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 13:55 | Report Abuse
Bonus round.
24 Oct 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee via Global Cap Venture signed Term Sheet with Herman Koswara, the controlling shareholders of PT Fas. The purpose of the term sheet is to acquire project kuala simpang timur oil field. It is agreed that Larry will purchase Herman's shares priced at IDR 6billion (Larry has only paid IDR 3billion).
1 November 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee and Benny Tjokro agreed on how to move forward with handling over Benny's shares at PT Fas, i.e. Tey Por Yee paid the operational costs of PT Haseba as of the date of the agreement and Larry Tey Por Yee take over Benny's debt at Mayapada Bank in the amount or IDR 23 Billion (both conditions are not fulfilled). However in the said date Larry already received the shares of PT Fas belonged to Benny Tjokro. Tey put the shares in PT Asi.
28 December 2012: Larry Tey Por Yee sold his shares to Protasco Berhad in the amount of USD 55million without notifying Herman and Benny.
21 May 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee sent a forged invitation for egms of PT Haseba which will be held at the office of Djamkk Asmur, the public notary in Aceh.
14 August 2013: to pay his debt to Benny, Larry wired in IDR 5billion and put Inovisi's shares as a guarantee. Few month later when Larry is in default; Benny attempted to execute the block of Inovisi's shares and finds that the value has dropped to a meager 10% of its initial value.
23 August 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee changed the directors and commisioners of PT Haseba based on the illegal egms.
24 February 2014 Herman Koswara and Benny Tjokro lodged police report against Larry Tey Por Yee alleging that he forged Herman and Benny's signature and defrauded them.
1 April 2014 Benny Tjokro through it vehicle PT Dayasakti Putradharma filed lawsuit against PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia at south jakarta district court.
25 April 2014 Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama filed lawsuit against PT Green Pine, Jerry Djajasaputra, PT Equator Securities and PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk arguing that it had invested IDR 125billion in PT Inovisi which was guaranteed by a block of Inovisi's shares. But it had not seen any profit and when they attempted to cash in on the shares, it shares dropped significantly.
11 December 2014 Benny Tjokro and Larry Tey signed settlement agreement in which Larry agreed to pay IDR 18billion, at the latest 28 January 2015. Up to this day Larry failed to honor this settlement agreement.
8 July 2015 The court ruled in favour of Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama and order Inovisi to pay IDR 200billion.
15 July 2015 Indonesian police raided the office of PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk.
December 2015 PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk closed down it business without prior notice to the investors and employees after failing to pay rent and utilities to Patra Jasa's building management. It management went hiding.
LOL LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 13:53 | Report Abuse
TeyPuki Monday, 18 January 2016 | MYT 11:15 PM
Nexgram in the dark on various aspects of its proposed share sale
KUALA LUMPUR: Nexgram Holdings Bhd, which plans to sell its 69.6% stake in Godynamic Investments Ltd (GIL) to Vast Wealth Management Corp for RM34.8mil, does not have information on details such as who Vast Wealth’s shareholders are.
The company, whose businesses range from IT services provision to property development, told Bursa Malaysia that it also currently did not know how the disposal of its stake in the mobile application service subsidiary would affect the group’s earnings per share, net assets per share and gearing.
Nor does it know the expected gains or losses to the group arising from this proposed sale, which was announced last week.
Replying to Bursa’s query, Nexgram said it would submit details on various questions asked by the regulator “in due course once the information is available.”
On Jan 12, Nexgram announced the disposal of the entire stake in GIL, which owns 84% in Indonesia-based mobile application service/mobile security operations.
In the notice, the company said the GIL group had been making losses for the financial years 2012 to 2014. In the 2015 financial year it made an after-tax profit of RM3.5mil, but Nexgram said this was mainly due to the implementation of a cost-cutting strategy which it is not expected to benefit from anymore due to the tougher business environment.
“The proposed disposal will enable Nexgram to focus on other existing profitable business segments, e.g. property and trading of surveillance equipment,” it said.
Nexgram, via unit Nextnation Network Sdn Bhd, had boosted its stake in GIL from 51% to 69.6% less than a year ago (in April 2015).
It paid RM18.53mil for the additional 18.6% stake. Based on this purchase price, the entire 69.6% stake was valued at RM69.3mil at the time of purchase.
On Friday last week the SC expressed reservations on Nexgram’s takeover of Ire-Tex Corp Bhd - another company linked to Datuk Tey Por Yee - following an ongoing probe into the sale of Nexgram’s subsidiaries, including GIL.
Nexgram shares fell 1 sen to close at 7.5 sen on Monday, with 34.499 million shares changing hands.
---
Well, i can say this much, Tey and Ooi's company in indonesia (inovisi) also answered "this don't know that don't know" when being probed by the indonesian with regard to it corporate action and disposal of assets LOL LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 13:42 | Report Abuse
Nexgram in the dark on various aspects of its proposed share sale
KUALA LUMPUR: Nexgram Holdings Bhd, which plans to sell its 69.6% stake in Godynamic Investments Ltd (GIL) to Vast Wealth Management Corp for RM34.8mil, does not have information on details such as who Vast Wealth’s shareholders are.
The company, whose businesses range from IT services provision to property development, told Bursa Malaysia that it also currently did not know how the disposal of its stake in the mobile application service subsidiary would affect the group’s earnings per share, net assets per share and gearing.
Nor does it know the expected gains or losses to the group arising from this proposed sale, which was announced last week.
Replying to Bursa’s query, Nexgram said it would submit details on various questions asked by the regulator “in due course once the information is available.”
On Jan 12, Nexgram announced the disposal of the entire stake in GIL, which owns 84% in Indonesia-based mobile application service/mobile security operations.
In the notice, the company said the GIL group had been making losses for the financial years 2012 to 2014. In the 2015 financial year it made an after-tax profit of RM3.5mil, but Nexgram said this was mainly due to the implementation of a cost-cutting strategy which it is not expected to benefit from anymore due to the tougher business environment.
“The proposed disposal will enable Nexgram to focus on other existing profitable business segments, e.g. property and trading of surveillance equipment,” it said.
Nexgram, via unit Nextnation Network Sdn Bhd, had boosted its stake in GIL from 51% to 69.6% less than a year ago (in April 2015).
It paid RM18.53mil for the additional 18.6% stake. Based on this purchase price, the entire 69.6% stake was valued at RM69.3mil at the time of purchase.
On Friday last week the SC expressed reservations on Nexgram’s takeover of Ire-Tex Corp Bhd - another company linked to Datuk Tey Por Yee - following an ongoing probe into the sale of Nexgram’s subsidiaries, including GIL.
Nexgram shares fell 1 sen to close at 7.5 sen on Monday, with 34.499 million shares changing hands.
---
Well, i can say this much, Tey and Ooi's company in indonesia (inovisi) also answered "this don't know that don't know" when being probed by the indonesian with regard to it corporate action and disposal of assets LOL LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 13:40 | Report Abuse
Bonus round.
24 Oct 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee via Global Cap Venture signed Term Sheet with Herman Koswara, the controlling shareholders of PT Fas. The purpose of the term sheet is to acquire project kuala simpang timur oil field. It is agreed that Larry will purchase Herman's shares priced at IDR 6billion (Larry has only paid IDR 3billion).
1 November 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee and Benny Tjokro agreed on how to move forward with handling over Benny's shares at PT Fas, i.e. Tey Por Yee paid the operational costs of PT Haseba as of the date of the agreement and Larry Tey Por Yee take over Benny's debt at Mayapada Bank in the amount or IDR 23 Billion (both conditions are not fulfilled). However in the said date Larry already received the shares of PT Fas belonged to Benny Tjokro. Tey put the shares in PT Asi.
28 December 2012: Larry Tey Por Yee sold his shares to Protasco Berhad in the amount of USD 55million without notifying Herman and Benny.
21 May 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee sent a forged invitation for egms of PT Haseba which will be held at the office of Djamkk Asmur, the public notary in Aceh.
14 August 2013: to pay his debt to Benny, Larry wired in IDR 5billion and put Inovisi's shares as a guarantee. Few month later when Larry is in default; Benny attempted to execute the block of Inovisi's shares and finds that the value has dropped to a meager 10% of its initial value.
23 August 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee changed the directors and commisioners of PT Haseba based on the illegal egms.
24 February 2014 Herman Koswara and Benny Tjokro lodged police report against Larry Tey Por Yee alleging that he forged Herman and Benny's signature and defrauded them.
1 April 2014 Benny Tjokro through it vehicle PT Dayasakti Putradharma filed lawsuit against PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia at south jakarta district court.
25 April 2014 Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama filed lawsuit against PT Green Pine, Jerry Djajasaputra, PT Equator Securities and PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk arguing that it had invested IDR 125billion in PT Inovisi which was guaranteed by a block of Inovisi's shares. But it had not seen any profit and when they attempted to cash in on the shares, it shares dropped significantly.
11 December 2014 Benny Tjokro and Larry Tey signed settlement agreement in which Larry agreed to pay IDR 18billion, at the latest 28 January 2015. Up to this day Larry failed to honor this settlement agreement.
8 July 2015 The court ruled in favour of Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama and order Inovisi to pay IDR 200billion.
15 July 2015 Indonesian police raided the office of PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk.
December 2015 PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk closed down it business without prior notice to the investors and employees after failing to pay rent and utilities to Patra Jasa's building management. It management went hiding.
LOL LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 13:38 | Report Abuse
Let's recap shall we:
- the owners of pt haseba are herman koswara and benny tjokro. Both signed agreements with tey por yee and the transaction were secured with inovisi's shares where ooi kock aun sits as finance director and actually is inovisi's ultimate shareholders.
- pt asu and pt asi are the owners of pt haseba. The director and commisioner of pt asu and pt asi, i.e. Tjoe Yudhis, Dedi Francis and Edward Farolan are nominees of tey and ooi.
- the transaction between protasco and pt asu to buy pt asi's stakes in pt fas was secured with inovisi's shares. The shares were deposited to acclaim, a company established by tey and ooi, and on paper is run by Seh Poh Yee's wife.
- the website of pt asu is registered under a company which shares the same address as nexgram. Which company is a subsidiary of inovisi.
- tey and ooi have the power over pt gold child, pt nusantara rising rich, fast global, pt asu as evident from the fact that they are able to move around the money paid from protasco to pt asu and gold child which ended up in rs mahaniaga, dato chong's company as a repayment for the loan provided by dato chong so tey and ooi could finalize the deal to buy stakes in protasco.
Everything linked up to tey and ooi LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 13:37 | Report Abuse
Lookie, lookie....ooi kock aun was handcuffed. I have to compliment him. At least he did not hide his face like tey por yee LOL LOL LPL
http://www.hmetro.com.my/node/112179
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MFukVxP8Nks
Now, let wait if anyone here could get me picture or video of the chongs and handcuff LOL LOL LOL LOL
Anyone with a half of brain also know tey and ooi's companies are their alter ego mah...are you brain dead or what? LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 13:36 | Report Abuse
Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun were also notorious for not paying their rentals, to the point that their landlords had to threaten legal action and resort to cutting off the utilities to get what was owed to them.
Worse off were their suppliers, of whom many had to suffer the bitterness of bankruptcy because tey and ooi refused to pay them their dues. Tragically, one of them even committed suicide because of bad debts, courtesy of Dato’ Tey Por Yee and Dato' Ooi Kock Aun.
This was not the only blood on his hands. He used a friend, Dedi Francis from Indonesia, to stand as a nominee for Tey and Ooi. When the loyal Dedi pressed for payment on company debts to incurred by Tey and Ooi's manipulative schemes, he was given the runaround. Time finally ran out for Dedi. Desperate, with his back to the wall and creditors all around him, Dedi almost took his own life but was able to be brought to hospital by his family on time.
2016-03-26 13:36 | Report Abuse
At age seven, tey por hee was already showing signs of what he was destined to be: a thief and a liar. Ten sen, twenty sen, fifty sen…all would disappear “mysteriously” from his families drawers, savings and piggy banks. Later, bigger sums would go missing, from his father’s wallet to his mother’s purse. Tey would be placed at the scene of the crime but he always had an excuse or story to wriggle his way out of the situation.
For a while his parents believed him. Until he got caught red-handed one day. Then, his father had no choice but to punish him. If we hoped that would beat some sense and decency into him, we were sadly mistaken.
He took his bad habits with him to school. Already skilled at telling lies and manipulating people, he began cheating his classmates. The sums ranged from a few ringgit to hundreds of ringgit. The figures may seem small to some, but for a young schoolboy, the sum is enormous. As usual, his long-suffering father had to clear his debts and try to redress the damage done to his victims.
At age sixteen, Tey por yee had to audacity to go to his uncle’s house to borrow money. He said he needed RM2,000.00 because his father was sick and desperately needed the money for an operation. Believing his lies totally, the uncle gave it to him. His family never lived down the humiliation when the truth came out.
Since young, he has always been obsessed with money. Even when he had a lot of it, it was never enough. He wanted more and more. Never mind if it was obtained in a deceitful manner, just as long as he got what he wanted. It only goes to show that he is not only a pathological liar, but a pathological thief as well. With hundreds of millions already stashed away in private bank accounts, more than he can ever spend in ten lifetimes, he still remains greedy for more. So greedy that he is willing to lie, cheat and steal to achieve his end.
2016-03-26 13:34 | Report Abuse
Yeah....and lookie here...On Feb 2, 2016, the Indonesian SC decided to extend the suspension of PT Inovisi's counter citing their failure to submit audited annual report to the SC LOL LOL
http://redaksi.co.id/47427/otoritas-bursa-lanjutkan-suspensi-4-saham.html
The management of PT Inovisi would not be able to produce such report as currently they went hiding like the slimey mice they are LOL LOL
Inovisi also failed to pay the annual listing fee:
http://economy.okezone.com/read/2016/03/24/278/1344702/bei-perpanjang-suspensi-7-emiten-nakal
Can't pay rent and can't pay annual fee? that is the fate of nexgram. Believe that LOL LOL
Speaking of which....anyone got the update on Nexgram's special committee report on Gold Dynamic and PT STAR? No news? Obviously since both are fictitious company owned by Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun...
http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2016/01/22/nexgram-sets-up-special-committee-to-address-possible-inconsistencies/
Any news on this so called nexgram venture to property in Fiji? LOL LOL LOL
http://www.bursacommunity.com/t22326-nexgram-ventures-into-property-development-in-fiji
Another fictitious project from yours truly: Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun.
Prior to it demise, the management of PT Inovisi also made numerous announcement on such and such projects or this and that acquisitions, which now we know it fictitious LOL LOL...
Ooo..and blessed are your eyes because they see and your ears because they hear. The heart of the people here has become dull. With their ears they scarcely hear and they have closed their eyes, otherwise with their heart, eyes and ears they will understand that ne
2016-03-26 13:22 | Report Abuse
Yeah....and lookie here...On Feb 2, 2016, the Indonesian SC decided to extend the suspension of PT Inovisi's counter citing their failure to submit audited annual report to the SC LOL LOL
http://redaksi.co.id/47427/otoritas-bursa-lanjutkan-suspensi-4-saham.html
The management of PT Inovisi would not be able to produce such report as currently they went hiding like the slimey mice they are LOL LOL
Inovisi also failed to pay the annual listing fee:
http://economy.okezone.com/read/2016/03/24/278/1344702/bei-perpanjang-suspensi-7-emiten-nakal
Can't pay rent and can't pay annual fee? that is the fate of nexgram. Believe that LOL LOL
Speaking of which....anyone got the update on Nexgram's special committee report on Gold Dynamic and PT STAR? No news? Obviously since both are fictitious company owned by Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun...
http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2016/01/22/nexgram-sets-up-special-committee-to-address-possible-inconsistencies/
Any news on this so called nexgram venture to property in Fiji? LOL LOL LOL
http://www.bursacommunity.com/t22326-nexgram-ventures-into-property-development-in-fiji
Another fictitious project from yours truly: Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun.
Prior to it demise, the management of PT Inovisi also made numerous announcement on such and such projects or this and that acquisitions, which now we know it fictitious LOL LOL...
Ooo..and blessed are your eyes because they see and your ears because they hear. The heart of the people here has become dull. With their ears they scarcely hear and they have closed their eyes, otherwise with their heart, eyes and ears they will understand that ne
2016-03-26 13:19 | Report Abuse
Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun were also notorious for not paying their rentals, to the point that their landlords had to threaten legal action and resort to cutting off the utilities to get what was owed to them.
Worse off were their suppliers, of whom many had to suffer the bitterness of bankruptcy because tey and ooi refused to pay them their dues. Tragically, one of them even committed suicide because of bad debts, courtesy of Dato’ Tey Por Yee and Dato' Ooi Kock Aun.
This was not the only blood on his hands. He used a friend, Dedi Francis from Indonesia, to stand as a nominee for Tey and Ooi. When the loyal Dedi pressed for payment on company debts to incurred by Tey and Ooi's manipulative schemes, he was given the runaround. Time finally ran out for Dedi. Desperate, with his back to the wall and creditors all around him, Dedi almost took his own life but was able to be brought to hospital by his family on time.
2016-03-26 13:17 | Report Abuse
Lookie, lookie....ooi kock aun was handcuffed. I have to compliment him. At least he did not hide his face like tey por yee LOL LOL LPL
http://www.hmetro.com.my/node/112179
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MFukVxP8Nks
Now, let wait if anyone here could get me picture or video of the chongs and handcuff LOL LOL LOL LOL
Anyone with a half of brain also know tey and ooi's companies are their alter ego mah...are you brain dead or what? LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 13:16 | Report Abuse
Let's recap shall we:
- the owners of pt haseba are herman koswara and benny tjokro. Both signed agreements with tey por yee and the transaction were secured with inovisi's shares where ooi kock aun sits as finance director and actually is inovisi's ultimate shareholders.
- pt asu and pt asi are the owners of pt haseba. The director and commisioner of pt asu and pt asi, i.e. Tjoe Yudhis, Dedi Francis and Edward Farolan are nominees of tey and ooi.
- the transaction between protasco and pt asu to buy pt asi's stakes in pt fas was secured with inovisi's shares. The shares were deposited to acclaim, a company established by tey and ooi, and on paper is run by Seh Poh Yee's wife.
- the website of pt asu is registered under a company which shares the same address as nexgram. Which company is a subsidiary of inovisi.
- tey and ooi have the power over pt gold child, pt nusantara rising rich, fast global, pt asu as evident from the fact that they are able to move around the money paid from protasco to pt asu and gold child which ended up in rs mahaniaga, dato chong's company as a repayment for the loan provided by dato chong so tey and ooi could finalize the deal to buy stakes in protasco.
Everything linked up to tey and ooi LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 13:15 | Report Abuse
So much anger....how to achieve transcendental awareness and happiness?
Let me assist you in understanding Godynamic Investment Ltd- GIL a BVI (British Virgin Islands) an offshore company.
As rightly pointed out GIL is and has always been an integral part of Nexgram (51% owned) since inception and perhaps packaged in for Nexnation's listing on Mesdaq back in 2004.To all effects and purposes TPY is the CEO and/or COO.GIL is also the vehicle for most of TPY's forays in Indon.
So the question that goes a begging is any transaction between GIL and/or Nexgram are Related party Transactions that TPY should NOT forget to mention.
The accounts for GIL be it at company or group should be very clear to TPY;he cannot be excused from making such elementary mistakes OR now he is laying blame on the auditor,CFO or accountant.So the statements to Bursa for one to be true the other has to be false.
That is a facepalm and contemptuous to Bursa.
When GIL makes such purchases or sales,are the monies equitably apportioned(51% cost and profits)
Those are questions shareholders should pose to TPY
hmmm ...why rant when I am assisting you???
DRwarrant: you are right FD would actually yield a better rate of return,whether taken from 2004 or 2014.
bye!!, gotta play wei chi with Kong Ming ......
2016-03-26 13:15 | Report Abuse
So much anger....how to achieve transcendental awareness and happiness?
Let me assist you in understanding Godynamic Investment Ltd- GIL a BVI (British Virgin Islands) an offshore company.
As rightly pointed out GIL is and has always been an integral part of Nexgram (51% owned) since inception and perhaps packaged in for Nexnation's listing on Mesdaq back in 2004.To all effects and purposes TPY is the CEO and/or COO.GIL is also the vehicle for most of TPY's forays in Indon.
So the question that goes a begging is any transaction between GIL and/or Nexgram are Related party Transactions that TPY should NOT forget to mention.
The accounts for GIL be it at company or group should be very clear to TPY;he cannot be excused from making such elementary mistakes OR now he is laying blame on the auditor,CFO or accountant.So the statements to Bursa for one to be true the other has to be false.
That is a facepalm and contemptuous to Bursa.
When GIL makes such purchases or sales,are the monies equitably apportioned(51% cost and profits)
Those are questions shareholders should pose to TPY
hmmm ...why rant when I am assisting you???
DRwarrant: you are right FD would actually yield a better rate of return,whether taken from 2004 or 2014.
bye!!, gotta play wei chi with Kong Ming ......
2016-03-26 13:13 | Report Abuse
Bonus round.
24 Oct 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee via Global Cap Venture signed Term Sheet with Herman Koswara, the controlling shareholders of PT Fas. The purpose of the term sheet is to acquire project kuala simpang timur oil field. It is agreed that Larry will purchase Herman's shares priced at IDR 6billion (Larry has only paid IDR 3billion).
1 November 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee and Benny Tjokro agreed on how to move forward with handling over Benny's shares at PT Fas, i.e. Tey Por Yee paid the operational costs of PT Haseba as of the date of the agreement and Larry Tey Por Yee take over Benny's debt at Mayapada Bank in the amount or IDR 23 Billion (both conditions are not fulfilled). However in the said date Larry already received the shares of PT Fas belonged to Benny Tjokro. Tey put the shares in PT Asi.
28 December 2012: Larry Tey Por Yee sold his shares to Protasco Berhad in the amount of USD 55million without notifying Herman and Benny.
21 May 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee sent a forged invitation for egms of PT Haseba which will be held at the office of Djamkk Asmur, the public notary in Aceh.
14 August 2013: to pay his debt to Benny, Larry wired in IDR 5billion and put Inovisi's shares as a guarantee. Few month later when Larry is in default; Benny attempted to execute the block of Inovisi's shares and finds that the value has dropped to a meager 10% of its initial value.
23 August 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee changed the directors and commisioners of PT Haseba based on the illegal egms.
24 February 2014 Herman Koswara and Benny Tjokro lodged police report against Larry Tey Por Yee alleging that he forged Herman and Benny's signature and defrauded them.
1 April 2014 Benny Tjokro through it vehicle PT Dayasakti Putradharma filed lawsuit against PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia at south jakarta district court.
25 April 2014 Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama filed lawsuit against PT Green Pine, Jerry Djajasaputra, PT Equator Securities and PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk arguing that it had invested IDR 125billion in PT Inovisi which was guaranteed by a block of Inovisi's shares. But it had not seen any profit and when they attempted to cash in on the shares, it shares dropped significantly.
11 December 2014 Benny Tjokro and Larry Tey signed settlement agreement in which Larry agreed to pay IDR 18billion, at the latest 28 January 2015. Up to this day Larry failed to honor this settlement agreement.
8 July 2015 The court ruled in favour of Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama and order Inovisi to pay IDR 200billion.
15 July 2015 Indonesian police raided the office of PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk.
December 2015 PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk closed down it business without prior notice to the investors and employees after failing to pay rent and utilities to Patra Jasa's building management. It management went hiding.
LOL LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 13:12 | Report Abuse
At age seven, tey por hee was already showing signs of what he was destined to be: a thief and a liar. Ten sen, twenty sen, fifty sen…all would disappear “mysteriously” from his families drawers, savings and piggy banks. Later, bigger sums would go missing, from his father’s wallet to his mother’s purse. Tey would be placed at the scene of the crime but he always had an excuse or story to wriggle his way out of the situation.
For a while his parents believed him. Until he got caught red-handed one day. Then, his father had no choice but to punish him. If we hoped that would beat some sense and decency into him, we were sadly mistaken.
He took his bad habits with him to school. Already skilled at telling lies and manipulating people, he began cheating his classmates. The sums ranged from a few ringgit to hundreds of ringgit. The figures may seem small to some, but for a young schoolboy, the sum is enormous. As usual, his long-suffering father had to clear his debts and try to redress the damage done to his victims.
At age sixteen, Tey por yee had to audacity to go to his uncle’s house to borrow money. He said he needed RM2,000.00 because his father was sick and desperately needed the money for an operation. Believing his lies totally, the uncle gave it to him. His family never lived down the humiliation when the truth came out.
Since young, he has always been obsessed with money. Even when he had a lot of it, it was never enough. He wanted more and more. Never mind if it was obtained in a deceitful manner, just as long as he got what he wanted. It only goes to show that he is not only a pathological liar, but a pathological thief as well. With hundreds of millions already stashed away in private bank accounts, more than he can ever spend in ten lifetimes, he still remains greedy for more. So greedy that he is willing to lie, cheat and steal to achieve his end.
2016-03-26 13:10 | Report Abuse
Investigations to proceed despite the company withdrawing Ire-Tex offer
ALTHOUGH the takeover offer Nexgram Holdings Bhd made on Ire-Tex Corp Bhd is now off the table, it has not stopped regulators from pursuing their investigations on the former’s past dealings.
On Thursday, Nexgram turned things around by announcing its intention to withdraw its takeover offer on one-stop packaging service provider Ire-Tex. This came a day after it said it would take steps to bring in a special auditor to determine the veracity of some of its assets.
Yesterday, Nexgram also announced that its due diligence committee had taken heed of concerns made by regulators and followed up with a visit to Indonesia, where some of the questionable transactions are said to have transpired.
“The Nexgram board had formed the view that such observations appear to potentially point to inconsistencies with regards to details of certain assets with the Nexgram group,” the statement said.
Following this, Nexgram said it had formed a special committee comprising of four directors of which two are independent, to take necessary steps to address the matter, which include the appointment of a special auditor.
Still, if any evidence suggests Nexgram has not carried out its responsibilities towards shareholders, the company could face sanctions from the regulators, and depending on the severity, it could face criminal prosecutions, insiders say.
The Nexgram saga started after it launched a takeover offer on Ire-Tex last November, which was to be satisfied through issuance of new Nexgram shares.
According to its website, Nexgram says it is a multinational conglomerate involved in the telco, security and surveillance, software development, property development, industries, business advisories and investment activities sectors.
Its rationale to take over Ire-Tex was so it could continue its diversification by tapping into manufacturing and industrial segments.
StarBizWeek earlier reported that regulators had concerns over the takeover due to the veracity of certain assets in Nexgram.
However, it had insufficient grounds to disrupt the offer and continued to follow up on its leads.
Following this, Nexgram posted its offer document on Dec 11, 2015.
It is understood that both the Securities Commission and Bursa Malaysia met with the advisors and a representative of Nexgram’s board to request the verification of certain alleged bank balances by an independent accountant.
However, soon after, through Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of some of its subsidiaries, which according to the SC, were the subject of enquiry.
At the same time, Nexgram made some more changes in the company.
On Jan 14, the company announced that its co-founder Datuk Tey Por Yee (pic) had resigned as executive director to “pursue his personal interest and goals”.
Since his resignation, Nexgram has six directors left sitting on its board.
Interestingly, Tey has not sold off his stake in Nexgram. According to Bursa filings, Tey’s stake stands at 23.4%.
This led to the SC choosing to invoke its powers under the Capital Markets Securities Act (CMSA) under Section 217 to issue a public statement on its concerns relating to those assets, a first for the SC.
This course of action is seen as a rarity even in other countries, says a source.
The SC had issued the public statement on Jan 15, stating that Nexgram’s disposal of certain assets “delays and obstructs the ongoing enquiries by the SC and Bursa Malaysia”.
Since Nexgram was seen as being “uncooperative” in bringing in a special auditor to independently verify the value of its assets, Bursa had all this while held back on the greenlight for Nexgram’s circular to its shareholders related to the Ire-Tex deal.
This meant that Nexgram had not been able to call for an EGM to vote on the takeover proposal, which in turn could have led to the offer lapsing.
On Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of its subsidiaries – Nexgram Resources Sdn Bhd, Godynamic Investments Ltd and PT Semesta Tirta Antara Raya (through Godynamic) – which are believed to be the subject of the regulators’ enquiries.
Although it is not too clear which assets showed some red flags, it is worth taking a look at Nexgram’s balance sheet.
In its financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2014, the company had RM84.5mil in cash balances. However in the following year, a majority of that cash seemed to be reflected in as inventories. Its inventories moved from zero to RM89.8mil in the following financial year while its cash balances fell to RM31.1mil.
Sources say enquiries by the regulators are focused on the paper and cash trail of how those inventories were built up.
2016-03-26 13:09 | Report Abuse
Nexgram in the dark on various aspects of its proposed share sale
KUALA LUMPUR: Nexgram Holdings Bhd, which plans to sell its 69.6% stake in Godynamic Investments Ltd (GIL) to Vast Wealth Management Corp for RM34.8mil, does not have information on details such as who Vast Wealth’s shareholders are.
The company, whose businesses range from IT services provision to property development, told Bursa Malaysia that it also currently did not know how the disposal of its stake in the mobile application service subsidiary would affect the group’s earnings per share, net assets per share and gearing.
Nor does it know the expected gains or losses to the group arising from this proposed sale, which was announced last week.
Replying to Bursa’s query, Nexgram said it would submit details on various questions asked by the regulator “in due course once the information is available.”
On Jan 12, Nexgram announced the disposal of the entire stake in GIL, which owns 84% in Indonesia-based mobile application service/mobile security operations.
In the notice, the company said the GIL group had been making losses for the financial years 2012 to 2014. In the 2015 financial year it made an after-tax profit of RM3.5mil, but Nexgram said this was mainly due to the implementation of a cost-cutting strategy which it is not expected to benefit from anymore due to the tougher business environment.
“The proposed disposal will enable Nexgram to focus on other existing profitable business segments, e.g. property and trading of surveillance equipment,” it said.
Nexgram, via unit Nextnation Network Sdn Bhd, had boosted its stake in GIL from 51% to 69.6% less than a year ago (in April 2015).
It paid RM18.53mil for the additional 18.6% stake. Based on this purchase price, the entire 69.6% stake was valued at RM69.3mil at the time of purchase.
On Friday last week the SC expressed reservations on Nexgram’s takeover of Ire-Tex Corp Bhd - another company linked to Datuk Tey Por Yee - following an ongoing probe into the sale of Nexgram’s subsidiaries, including GIL.
Nexgram shares fell 1 sen to close at 7.5 sen on Monday, with 34.499 million shares changing hands.
---
Well, i can say this much, Tey and Ooi's company in indonesia (inovisi) also answered "this don't know that don't know" when being probed by the indonesian with regard to it corporate action and disposal of assets LOL LOL LOL LOL
26/03/2016 10:49
2016-03-26 11:36 | Report Abuse
Yo monde my man, Am on a mission from kamma to punish tey por yee and ooi kock aun..
2016-03-26 10:52 | Report Abuse
Welcome back Dato Larry Tey Por Yee.
Told you I could do this whole day and all year long LOL LOL LOL...
2016-03-26 10:49 | Report Abuse
Monday, 18 January 2016 | MYT 11:15 PM
Nexgram in the dark on various aspects of its proposed share sale
KUALA LUMPUR: Nexgram Holdings Bhd, which plans to sell its 69.6% stake in Godynamic Investments Ltd (GIL) to Vast Wealth Management Corp for RM34.8mil, does not have information on details such as who Vast Wealth’s shareholders are.
The company, whose businesses range from IT services provision to property development, told Bursa Malaysia that it also currently did not know how the disposal of its stake in the mobile application service subsidiary would affect the group’s earnings per share, net assets per share and gearing.
Nor does it know the expected gains or losses to the group arising from this proposed sale, which was announced last week.
Replying to Bursa’s query, Nexgram said it would submit details on various questions asked by the regulator “in due course once the information is available.”
On Jan 12, Nexgram announced the disposal of the entire stake in GIL, which owns 84% in Indonesia-based mobile application service/mobile security operations.
In the notice, the company said the GIL group had been making losses for the financial years 2012 to 2014. In the 2015 financial year it made an after-tax profit of RM3.5mil, but Nexgram said this was mainly due to the implementation of a cost-cutting strategy which it is not expected to benefit from anymore due to the tougher business environment.
“The proposed disposal will enable Nexgram to focus on other existing profitable business segments, e.g. property and trading of surveillance equipment,” it said.
Nexgram, via unit Nextnation Network Sdn Bhd, had boosted its stake in GIL from 51% to 69.6% less than a year ago (in April 2015).
It paid RM18.53mil for the additional 18.6% stake. Based on this purchase price, the entire 69.6% stake was valued at RM69.3mil at the time of purchase.
On Friday last week the SC expressed reservations on Nexgram’s takeover of Ire-Tex Corp Bhd - another company linked to Datuk Tey Por Yee - following an ongoing probe into the sale of Nexgram’s subsidiaries, including GIL.
Nexgram shares fell 1 sen to close at 7.5 sen on Monday, with 34.499 million shares changing hands.
---
Well, i can say this much, Tey and Ooi's company in indonesia (inovisi) also answered "this don't know that don't know" when being probed by the indonesian with regard to it corporate action and disposal of assets LOL LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 10:48 | Report Abuse
2. Berdasarkan hasil dengan pendapat antara bursa dan perseroan pada 6 Mei 2015, pihak auditor perseroan (KAP Jamaludin, Ardi, Sukimto, dan rekan) menyampaikan bahwa perseroan/auditor adanya kesalahan penyajian pada LK 31 Desember 2013 namun tidak segera menyampaikan keterbukaan informasi atau revisi LK. Mohon disampaikan alasannya. "Perseroan hanya menemukan kesalahan pada bagian rumus perhitungan Aktiva Tetap dan telah melaporkan kepada auditor. Perseroan menyerahkan keputusan revisi kepada auditor."
3. Apakah perseroan sebelumnya menyadari adanya kesalahan penyajian LK 31 Maret 2014 dan 30 Juni 2014? Apabila ya mohon disampaikan latar belakang perseroan tidak segera menyampaikan keterbukaan informasi ataupun menyampaikan revisi LK yang telah dipublikasikan. "Perseroan tidak menyadari adanya kesalahan penyajian LK per 31 Maret 2014 dan 30 Juni 2014."
4. Apakah perseroan yakin tidak terdapat salah saji pada LK 2012, 2011, dan 2010? "Ya, perseroan yakin tidak terdapat salah saji pada LK 2012, 2011, dan 2010."
5. Mohon disampaikan daftar transaksi pada perseroan yang bersifat afiliasi selama 3 tahun terakhir. - PT Graha Tunas Makmur, anak usaha yang menyewakan ruang kantor ke perseroan. - PT Andaman Lestari Multikreasi, anak usaha yang menyediakan tenaga kerja. - PT Greenpine, pemegang saham yang memberi pembiayaan untuk operasional.
6. Nama KAP yang akan melakukan audit LK per 31 Desember 2014? "Perseroan sedang dalam proses penunjukan KAP baru dan akan diputuskan minggu ini."
Terkait Pengendalian Internal Perseroan
1. Mohon penjelasan mengenai pelaksanaan separation of duties atau pemisahan fungsi/tugas keuangan sebagai pengendali internal di perseroan? "Saat ini, pada intinya hanya terdapat pemisahan tugas antara bagian finance dan accounting. Separation of duties yang lebih maju akan dilakukan seiring dengan restrukturisasi perusahaan."
2. Apakah perseroan punya fungsi Internal Audit ? Apabila ya mohon disebutkan: a. Jumlah personel Internal Audit: 1 b. Nama karyawan yang bertugas di bagian Internal Audit: Tyty Chandra. "Sejalan dengan rencana restrukturisasi yang segera akan dilakukan, tim internal audit akan pula dikembangkan dan difungsikan seusia peraturan yang berlaku guna meningkatkan tata kelola perusahaan (corporate governance). Perubahan struktur Internal Audit akan kami laporkan kepada otoritas dan publik."
3. Mohon dapat disampaikan jumlah dan hasil rapat komite audit perseroan selama 3 tahun terakhir. "Komite Audit melakukan rapat reguler, tapi perseroan belum mendapatkan detail lengkap pada hari pengumpulan laporan ini. Hasil rapat yang sudah 22 April 2015, hasilnya adalah perlunya edaran ke anak perusahaan terkait batas waktu pengumpulan laporan keuangan. Hasil rapat 10 September 2014, hasilnya perlunya komunikasi intensif antara dewan komisaris dan dewan direksi terkait rencana setiap aksi korporasi”. (net/lhl/k15)
2016-03-26 10:48 | Report Abuse
PERDAGANGAN saham PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk (INVS) masih dihentikan sementara (suspend) alias dibekukan. PT Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) sudah berkali-kali menyurati perusahaan investasi tersebut.
Otoritas pasar modal itu sudah melayangkan berbagai pertanyaan kepada Inovisi, mulai dari soal pelanggan dan pemasok utama, sampai laporan kinerja keuangan perusahaan.
Berbagai pertanyaan interogasi itu tertuang dalam surat Bursa Nomor S-01264/BEI.PG/05-2015 yang dikirimkan pada 15 Mei 2015. Inovisi pun membalas surat ini pada 20 Mei 2015.
Surat tersebut dibuka kepada publik di laporan keterbukaan informasi BEI, seperti dikutip Rabu (27/5). Berikut ini isi tanya-jawab antara BEI dan Inovisi dalam surat balasan perusahaan.
Terkait Pelanggan dan Pemasok Utama Perseroan
1. Identitas mengenai pelanggan dan pemasok utama (pelanggan pemasok dengan nilai melebihi 10 persen dari jumlah pendapatan bersih) Perseroan sebagai berikut:
a. PT Indomax Mediacom (IM)
b. PT Media Artha Raya Semesta (MARS)
c. PT Semesta Tirta Antara Raya (STAR)
d. PT Fantasi Artis Media Entertainment (FAME)
e. PT Funmobi Nusantara (FN)
"Informasi ini tidak dapat kami sampaikan kepada publik dan jawaban kami kirimkan kepada bursa dalam format cetak," kata Corporate Secretary Inovisi, Dwiwati Riandhini, dalam surat tersebut.
2. Apakah pelanggan dan pemasok utama perseroan di atas merupakan satu grup perusahaan? Apabila ya, mohon disampaikan struktur perusahaan dalam grup perseroan tersebut. "Tidak."
3. Apakah pelanggan dan sama lain utama perseroan di atas memiliki hubungan afiliasi satu sama lain? Apabila ya, disampaikan sifat hubungan afiliasi pada masing-masing perusahaan tersebut. "Tidak."
4. Apakah terdapat karyawan yang bekerja merangkap pada beberapa perusahaan pelanggan atau pemasok utama di atas? Mohon jelaskan alasan perangkapan pekerjaan tersebut (jika ada). "Perseroan tidak mengetahui apakah terdapat karyawan yang bekerja merangkap pada beberapa perusahaan pelanggan atau pemasok utama perusahaan."
5. Berdasarkan kondisi per 30 September 2014, apakah perseroan punya piutang macet? Dari pelanggan utama di atas. Apabila ya, mohon dapat disebutkan. "Jawaban terlampir."
Terkait Inovisi Selaku Induk Perusahaan
1. Mohon disampaikan struktur organisasi lengkap perseroan. "Perseroan saat ini tengah dalam proses penggantian manajemen inti, termasuk dewan komisaris dan direksi dan akan membentuk tim restrukturisasi.
2. Berdasarkan laporan keuangan dan kontrak yang disampaikan, perseroan selaku induk menjual beberapa jasa kepada pelanggan utama antara lain: a. InoConnect Bandwidth Optimizer. b. IP Interconnection. c. SpeedMessanger (Tier I Messaging and VAS Messaging). d. InoConnect VAS Messaging.
Mohon disampaikan
a. Nama bagian/divisi. b. Lokasi atau alamat operasional bagian yang dimaksud. c. Jumlah karyawan. d. Rincian nama karyawan dan kepala bagian. "Informasi ini tidak dapat kami sampaikan kepada publik dan jawaban kami kirimkan kepada bursa dalam format cetak," kata Corporate Secretary Inovisi, Dwiwati Riandhini, dalam surat tersebut.
3. Apakah selama 3 tahun terakhir perseroan (selaku induk saja) menjual produk sejenis di atas selain kepada IM, MARS, dan Star? Apabila ya, mohon disebutkan nama pelanggan perseroan. "Ya, nama pelanggan perseroan PT Nextnation Prisma."
4. Mengingat tingginya jumlah pengaduan dari publik mengenai ketersediaan Corporate Secretary dalam hal menanggapi pertanyaan pemegang saham maupun publik, mohon disampaikan nomor contact person Corporate Secretary yang dapat dihubungi pemegang saham atau investor. "Nomor telepon kantor 021-52901316/52901317."
5. Apakah perseroan memiliki keterkaitan manajemen atau pemegang saham dengan: a. PT Royal Trust Futures. b. Renewable Power Indonesia Tbk (dulu PT Katarina Utama Tbk). "Tidak, perseroan tidak memiliki keterkaitan manajemen atau pemegang saham dengan PT Royal Trust Futures dan Renewable Power Indonesia Tbk."
Terkait Laporan Keuangan
1. Berdasarkan hasil dengan pendapat antara bursa dan perseroan pada 11 Februari 2015, perseroan menyampaikan dan menyadari adanya kesalahan penyajian pada laporan keuangan (LK) per 30 September 2014 namun tidak segera menyampaikan keterbukaan informasi atau revisi LK. Mohon disampaikan alasannya. "Perseroan sedang melakukan revisi dan berencana menyampaikan revisi tersebut kepada bursa begitu laporan selesai."
2016-03-26 10:47 | Report Abuse
Investigations to proceed despite the company withdrawing Ire-Tex offer
ALTHOUGH the takeover offer Nexgram Holdings Bhd made on Ire-Tex Corp Bhd is now off the table, it has not stopped regulators from pursuing their investigations on the former’s past dealings.
On Thursday, Nexgram turned things around by announcing its intention to withdraw its takeover offer on one-stop packaging service provider Ire-Tex. This came a day after it said it would take steps to bring in a special auditor to determine the veracity of some of its assets.
Yesterday, Nexgram also announced that its due diligence committee had taken heed of concerns made by regulators and followed up with a visit to Indonesia, where some of the questionable transactions are said to have transpired.
“The Nexgram board had formed the view that such observations appear to potentially point to inconsistencies with regards to details of certain assets with the Nexgram group,” the statement said.
Following this, Nexgram said it had formed a special committee comprising of four directors of which two are independent, to take necessary steps to address the matter, which include the appointment of a special auditor.
Still, if any evidence suggests Nexgram has not carried out its responsibilities towards shareholders, the company could face sanctions from the regulators, and depending on the severity, it could face criminal prosecutions, insiders say.
The Nexgram saga started after it launched a takeover offer on Ire-Tex last November, which was to be satisfied through issuance of new Nexgram shares.
According to its website, Nexgram says it is a multinational conglomerate involved in the telco, security and surveillance, software development, property development, industries, business advisories and investment activities sectors.
Its rationale to take over Ire-Tex was so it could continue its diversification by tapping into manufacturing and industrial segments.
StarBizWeek earlier reported that regulators had concerns over the takeover due to the veracity of certain assets in Nexgram.
However, it had insufficient grounds to disrupt the offer and continued to follow up on its leads.
Following this, Nexgram posted its offer document on Dec 11, 2015.
It is understood that both the Securities Commission and Bursa Malaysia met with the advisors and a representative of Nexgram’s board to request the verification of certain alleged bank balances by an independent accountant.
However, soon after, through Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of some of its subsidiaries, which according to the SC, were the subject of enquiry.
At the same time, Nexgram made some more changes in the company.
On Jan 14, the company announced that its co-founder Datuk Tey Por Yee (pic) had resigned as executive director to “pursue his personal interest and goals”.
Since his resignation, Nexgram has six directors left sitting on its board.
Interestingly, Tey has not sold off his stake in Nexgram. According to Bursa filings, Tey’s stake stands at 23.4%.
This led to the SC choosing to invoke its powers under the Capital Markets Securities Act (CMSA) under Section 217 to issue a public statement on its concerns relating to those assets, a first for the SC.
This course of action is seen as a rarity even in other countries, says a source.
The SC had issued the public statement on Jan 15, stating that Nexgram’s disposal of certain assets “delays and obstructs the ongoing enquiries by the SC and Bursa Malaysia”.
Since Nexgram was seen as being “uncooperative” in bringing in a special auditor to independently verify the value of its assets, Bursa had all this while held back on the greenlight for Nexgram’s circular to its shareholders related to the Ire-Tex deal.
This meant that Nexgram had not been able to call for an EGM to vote on the takeover proposal, which in turn could have led to the offer lapsing.
On Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of its subsidiaries – Nexgram Resources Sdn Bhd, Godynamic Investments Ltd and PT Semesta Tirta Antara Raya (through Godynamic) – which are believed to be the subject of the regulators’ enquiries.
Although it is not too clear which assets showed some red flags, it is worth taking a look at Nexgram’s balance sheet.
In its financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2014, the company had RM84.5mil in cash balances. However in the following year, a majority of that cash seemed to be reflected in as inventories. Its inventories moved from zero to RM89.8mil in the following financial year while its cash balances fell to RM31.1mil.
Sources say enquiries by the regulators are focused on the paper and cash trail of how those inventories were built up.
2016-03-26 10:46 | Report Abuse
PETALING JAYA: Following the unprecedented action by the Securities Commission (SC) to disclose questionable actions by Nexgram Holdings Bhd, the regulator’s next course of action is a thorough investigation into the money trail relating to the RM84.5mil cash balance that had previously existed in the company, sources said.
This investigation will entail, among others, answers from directors, advisors and auditors of Nexgram, which is involved in software and property.
It is learnt that the authorities are looking at the dealings involving three subsidiaries of Nexgram and if the decision to divest them went to the board.
“The three subsidiaries were already the subject of investigations by the authorities in the capital markets. Knowing that, how did the planned divestments get done?” asked a corporate lawyer. The type of action taken will depend on the findings of the investigation by the regulators.
To recap, last Friday, the SC invoked its powers under Section 217(4)(b) of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (CMSA) by issuing a public statement in relation to a proposed takeover of Ire-Tex Corp Bhd by Nexgram, to be funded by the latter’s shares.
The SC’s concerns had related to the value of the assets of Nexgram, noting that the actions of Nexgram to dispose of some of its subsidiary companies “delays and obstructs the ongoing enquiries by the SC and Bursa Malaysia.”
According to sources, both the SC and Bursa had concerns about Nexgram, following the latter’s service of its notice to takeover Ire-Tex last November.
At some point in their investigations, both regulators agreed that there were sufficient grounds for Bursa to require Nexgram to provide verification on the existence of certain assets belonging to these subsidiaries.
It is also understood that as part of the initial investigation into Nexgram, the SC and Bursa had met with the advisors and a representative of the board of Nexgram to request the verification of certain alleged bank balances by an independent accountant.
The trigger point for the SC to take action under Section 217 of the CMSA was the company’s decision to dispose the relevant subsidiaries.
The type of actions of the regulators in this case will depend on when the outcome of their investigations are, which is also a complicated matter as it involves bank accounts and other transactions in Indonesia.
Depending on the timing of the findings, the SC could file for an injunction to stop the offer from proceeding or leave the offer to lapse. This is because Bursa has already notified Nexgram through its advisors that it will not clear the circular to shareholders and thus an EGM cannot be held for Nexgram shareholders to vote on matter, and this in turn would lead to the offer lapsing.
“The combined efforts of the SC and Bursa are ensuring that the shareholders of the target company, namely Ire-Tex, are not in danger of receiving payment in shares that may have a questionable value,” explained the corporate lawyer.
The SC raised eyebrows at the value of Nexgram that was sitting on a cash balance of RM84.5mil as at April 30, 2014. Its accounts showed that in the following financial year, most of that cash looked like it had been converted into inventories.
The company could have used the cash to purchase inventories, indicative by the accounts which showed inventories move from zero to RM89.8mil as at 2015. At the same time, cash balances fell to RM31.1mil. Sources said the SC’s enquiries could have centred around the paper and cashtrail of how those inventories were built up.
The case involving Nexgram has drawn attention to one businessman in particular, Datuk Tey Por Yee, who on Jan 14, resigned as executive director to “pursue his personal interest and goals”. Since his resignation, Nexgram has six directors left sitting on its board.
The rare statement by the SC sent Nexgram’s shares reeling to as low as 7.5 sen yesterday, representing an 11.76% drop.
The stock saw 34.5 million shares exchange hands. The shares closed at 8.5 sen last Friday.
Tey was also involved in the Protasco Bhd boardroom tussle, which saw him together with director Ooi Kock Aun voted out of the board at an EGM.
This came after allegations of a questionable investment in an Indonesian oil and gas company.
Meanwhile, in a related development, Nexgram shed some additional details about its plans to sell its entire 69.6% stake in Godynamic Investmentd Ltd for RM34.8mil on Jan 12.
This was in response to a query by the stock exchange.
Nexgram said while proceeds from the disposal would be used to pay for the 51% stake in Transeaways Shipping Sdn Bhd, which was announced on Jan 14, the company was “unable to quantify the exact amount” to be utilised for the planned acquisition.
=====
Wow, unprecedented LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 10:45 | Report Abuse
Nexgram’s change of auditors raises a lot of questions
WHO says minority shareholders are a helpless lot? How can that be true when a person with a minuscule number of shares in a listed company became the only one to nominate the new external auditors for the company? And he didn’t even have to explain why he did so.
He just threw out the name of the accounting firm and came up with a proposed resolution to be tabled at an extraordinary general meeting.
It was then up to the board of directors to assess the suitability of the firm. The board decided that the appointment of the new auditors was in the best interest of the company and its shareholders, and thus recommended that shareholders at the EGM vote for the proposed change of auditors. The shareholders did as advised.
Take a bow, Ko Boon Leong of Setapak, Kuala Lumpur. If there were such a thing as the Tiny-but-Mighty Corporate Player of the Year Award, you’d likely be a top candidate for 2015.
Then again, an accolade like that shouldn’t be given away cheaply. There should be diligent scrutiny. Let’s go over the story and raise questions when necessary.
But first, the reason this has come up is because the auditors appointed last year now wants to step down, after less than six months in that role. Accounting firm CHI-LLTC explained that its workforce had shrunk recently and it therefore couldn’t handle the increasing work arising from the listed company’s “recent expansion plan”.
The listed company is Nexgram Holdings Bhd, which has been in the news lately after the Securities Commission had issued a public statement on Jan 15 regarding the company’s offer to buy all the securities of Ire-Tex Corp Bhd. It was revealed that three subsidiaries of Nexgram are the focus of ongoing enquiries by the SC and Bursa Malaysia. On Thursday, Nexgram applied for consent from the SC to withdraw the offer for the Ire-Tex securities.
Back to the replacement of auditors last year. On July 8, Ko sent a letter to Nexgram to nominate CHI-LLTC as the new auditors, taking over from SJ Grant Thornton. He also offered a draft resolution for the proposed change.
According to the letter, Ko had 1,333 Nexgram shares. That’s almost nothing compared with the company’s 1.88 billion issued shares. Nevertheless, as a shareholder, he’s entitled to nominate the auditors, according to the Companies Act.
But why him? And why make the nomination at that point, when there had been no disclosure regarding a need to change auditors?
Based on announcements made through the stock exchange, the first time the investing public had any idea Nexgram was switching auditors was on July 20, when the company issued a notice of the EGM to consider the proposed change of auditors. The notice mentioned the resignation of SJ Grant Thornton, and yet, Nexgram hadn’t announced that development.
The relevant details only emerged the next day with the release of the circular to shareholders. Some of the fresh information certainly deserves greater attention.
In late June, SJ Grant Thornton told the Nexgram board that the fee for the 2015 audit would be increased from RM200,000 to RM500,000. The accounting firm said the hike was because it classified the 2015 audit as high-risk and would therefore need to use more resources for the job.
The high-risk classification is the result of “significant changes in the level of activities in the Nexgram group” and the Audit Oversight Board’s review of Nexgram’s 2014 audit files, which led to the requirement for additional work to be performed during the 2015 audit.
The board met on July 8 and agreed to reject the fee revision, describing it “not sensible and totally unreasonable”. On the same day, the board received Ko’s letter nominating CHI-LLTC as the new auditors and alluding to SJ Grant Thornton’s resignation.
But Nexgram received SJ Grant Thornton’s letter of resignation only on July 15, after the board had written to the firm on July 10 to say it wouldn’t accept the new audit fee.
In its circular to shareholders, Nexgram says it received Ko’s notice of nomination in “anticipation of the outcome of the negotiation with SJ Grant Thornton”.
That bit of pretzel logic can only trigger questions. How did Ko know about the directors’ stand on the higher audit fee? In fact, how is he — a person with merely 1,333 Nexgram shares — even aware of the fee revision? How and why has he chosen CHI-LLTC as the standby auditors out of the more than 50 other accounting firms in Malaysia that are registered as auditors of listed companies?
And why didn’t the nomination come from somebody else, say, Datuk Tey Por Yee, who was then Nexgram’s CEO and MD, and also a substantial shareholder?
According to the circular to shareholders, the board reviewed CHI-LLTC’s fee and engagement proposal, and after consulting the audit committee, it decided that the firm’s proposal was reasonable and cost-effective.
2016-03-26 10:44 | Report Abuse
Bonus round.
24 Oct 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee via Global Cap Venture signed Term Sheet with Herman Koswara, the controlling shareholders of PT Fas. The purpose of the term sheet is to acquire project kuala simpang timur oil field. It is agreed that Larry will purchase Herman's shares priced at IDR 6billion (Larry has only paid IDR 3billion).
1 November 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee and Benny Tjokro agreed on how to move forward with handling over Benny's shares at PT Fas, i.e. Tey Por Yee paid the operational costs of PT Haseba as of the date of the agreement and Larry Tey Por Yee take over Benny's debt at Mayapada Bank in the amount or IDR 23 Billion (both conditions are not fulfilled). However in the said date Larry already received the shares of PT Fas belonged to Benny Tjokro. Tey put the shares in PT Asi.
28 December 2012: Larry Tey Por Yee sold his shares to Protasco Berhad in the amount of USD 55million without notifying Herman and Benny.
21 May 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee sent a forged invitation for egms of PT Haseba which will be held at the office of Djamkk Asmur, the public notary in Aceh.
14 August 2013: to pay his debt to Benny, Larry wired in IDR 5billion and put Inovisi's shares as a guarantee. Few month later when Larry is in default; Benny attempted to execute the block of Inovisi's shares and finds that the value has dropped to a meager 10% of its initial value.
23 August 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee changed the directors and commisioners of PT Haseba based on the illegal egms.
24 February 2014 Herman Koswara and Benny Tjokro lodged police report against Larry Tey Por Yee alleging that he forged Herman and Benny's signature and defrauded them.
1 April 2014 Benny Tjokro through it vehicle PT Dayasakti Putradharma filed lawsuit against PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia at south jakarta district court.
25 April 2014 Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama filed lawsuit against PT Green Pine, Jerry Djajasaputra, PT Equator Securities and PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk arguing that it had invested IDR 125billion in PT Inovisi which was guaranteed by a block of Inovisi's shares. But it had not seen any profit and when they attempted to cash in on the shares, it shares dropped significantly.
11 December 2014 Benny Tjokro and Larry Tey signed settlement agreement in which Larry agreed to pay IDR 18billion, at the latest 28 January 2015. Up to this day Larry failed to honor this settlement agreement.
8 July 2015 The court ruled in favour of Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama and order Inovisi to pay IDR 200billion.
15 July 2015 Indonesian police raided the office of PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk.
December 2015 PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk closed down it business without prior notice to the investors and employees after failing to pay rent and utilities to Patra Jasa's building management. It management went hiding.
LOL LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 10:43 | Report Abuse
KUALA LUMPUR: A former company director claimed trial in a Sessions Court in Ampang here to charges of cheating the board of directors, making false declarations and committing criminal breach of trust (CBT) involving more than RM80mil.
Datuk Ooi Kock Aun, 49, allegedly cheated Protasco Bhd’s board of directors and its officers by voluntarily hiding information that he had direct involvement with PT Anglo Slavic Utama, a company which was incorporated in Indonesia.
His action had caused Protasco’s board of directors and its officers to enter into an investment agreement on oil and gas in Indonesia with PT Anglo Slavic Utama, with Protasco buying 63% of PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia valued at US$22mil (RM68,393,170).
The offence was allegedly committed at Protasco’s office at Level 2 of the Corporate Building Unipark Suria, Jalan Ikram-Uniten in Kajang between Nov 2012 and Jan 30, 2014.
Ooi, who is now a businessman, faces a second charge of making false declaration to the Commissioner for Oath that he did not have any link with PT Anglo Slavic Utama, any of its directors or shareholders when he knew that he actually had interest in the company.
The offence allegedly took place at Wern Li Morsingh commissioner for oath’s office in Fraser Business Park at 50-3A, Jalan Metro Pudu, Off Jalan Yew on July 25, 2014.
He claimed trial to a third charge of committing CBT on the PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia’s property for RM16,250,000 at the CIMB Islamic Bank Berhad in Menara Southern Bank, No 83 Medan Setia 1, Plaza Damansara, Bukit Damansara on Feb 4, 2014.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Datin Nurshuhaida Zainal Azahar offered bail at RM1mil in one surety for all charges.
Nurshuhaida also urged the court to order Ooi to surrender his passport.
Ooi’s counsel Edmund Bon, in asking for a lower bail, said his client was least likely to abscond as he has cooperated with the police throughout the investigation.
Bon said Ooi has a wife and four children and he was a well-respected individual in the accounting field.
Judge Suraiya Mustafa Kamal fixed bail at RM1mil in one surety for all charges and also ordered Ooi to surrender his passport. The court also fixed Feb 26 for mention.
2016-03-26 10:43 | Report Abuse
If the members of nexgram's special committee really are independent, then they will report back the following:
- pt star owned by tey por yee and ooi kock aun.
- dedi francis used to work in pt star and report directly to tey por yee.
- gold dynamic owned by tey por yee and ooi kock aun.
- dedi francis is a director at pt gold dynamic, the subsidiary of gold dynamic.
- dedi francis is a commisioner of pt anglo slavic utama.
- dedi francis is a nominee of tey por yee and ooi kock aun.
LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 10:42 | Report Abuse
So much anger....how to achieve transcendental awareness and happiness?
Let me assist you in understanding Godynamic Investment Ltd- GIL a BVI (British Virgin Islands) an offshore company.
As rightly pointed out GIL is and has always been an integral part of Nexgram (51% owned) since inception and perhaps packaged in for Nexnation's listing on Mesdaq back in 2004.To all effects and purposes TPY is the CEO and/or COO.GIL is also the vehicle for most of TPY's forays in Indon.
So the question that goes a begging is any transaction between GIL and/or Nexgram are Related party Transactions that TPY should NOT forget to mention.
The accounts for GIL be it at company or group should be very clear to TPY;he cannot be excused from making such elementary mistakes OR now he is laying blame on the auditor,CFO or accountant.So the statements to Bursa for one to be true the other has to be false.
That is a facepalm and contemptuous to Bursa.
When GIL makes such purchases or sales,are the monies equitably apportioned(51% cost and profits)
Those are questions shareholders should pose to TPY
hmmm ...why rant when I am assisting you???
DRwarrant: you are right FD would actually yield a better rate of return,whether taken from 2004 or 2014.
bye!!, gotta play wei chi with Kong Ming ......
2016-03-26 10:40 | Report Abuse
Lookie, lookie....ooi kock aun was handcuffed. I have to compliment him. At least he did not hide his face like tey por yee LOL LOL LPL
http://www.hmetro.com.my/node/112179
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MFukVxP8Nks
Now, let wait if anyone here could get me picture or video of the chongs and handcuff LOL LOL LOL LOL
Anyone with a half of brain also know tey and ooi's companies are their alter ego mah...are you brain dead or what? LOL LOL LOL
2016-03-26 10:39 | Report Abuse
By Meena Lakshana / theedgemarkets.com | March 15, 2016 : 4:05 PM MYT
KUALA LUMPUR (March 15): Nexgram Holdings Bhd confirmed today that its joint venture with Asdion Bhd with regard to a mixed development project has hit a snag, because the Sepang Municipal Council (MPS) has rejected the development order (DO) for the project.
To recap, Asdion had inked a joint venture agreement with Top Valley Properties Sdn Bhd on Feb 12, 2015 to participate in the development of the project known as Selangor Project.
Asdion paid RM6 million to Top Valley to be used solely towards settlement of the purchase consideration of the parcel of leasehold agricultural Malay reserve land, and will entitle the company to share expected economic benefits and profits arising from the development and sale of the Selangor Project with Top Valley.
On Dec 22 2014, Top Valley had entered into an off-take agreement with Nexgram Land Sdn Bhd and MyAngkasa Bina Sdn Bhd, whereby MyAngaksa would buy the project from Top Valley and Nexgram Land (as developer) for RM297.4 million.
In a filing with Bursa Malaysia today, Nexgram said it had received a letter from Top Valley on March 8, disclosing that MPS had rejected the DO.
"Nexgram Land was informed that in view of the failure in obtaining the DO on time, the landowner of the Selangor Project has terminated the sales and purchase agreement with Top Valley," the filig read.
"Top Valley is currently in the midst of exploring all possible viable options, including sourcing of an alternative suitable land, while continuing negotiation with the land owner for resubmission of the DO.
"The company will make the necessary announcement on further development of the matter, in due course," it added.
Yesterday, Asdion also announced via a filing to Bursa Malaysia that based on a letter received from Top Valley on March 8 as well, Top Valley is in the process of re-negotiating terms and timelines for new DO submission.
The Selangor Project, comprising three tower blocks with a total of 659 units of service apartments and 10 units of commercial and retails hops, was to be developed on a 2.154ha piece of agricultural leasehold Malay reserve land in Kg. Limau Manis, Dengkil in the Sepang district, with the lease period expiring on Feb 3, 2104.
Asdion had said it was venturing into the project as a means to diversify its earnings base and reduce its dependence on its existing business of software development, as well as information communication technology and related services.
The deal is a related party transaction, as Tey Por Yee is a common major shareholder of both Nexgram and Asdion (with direct interests of 11.52% and 22.01% respectively), while See Poh Yee is a common director of both companies.
2016-03-26 10:38 | Report Abuse
Tey Por Yee goes bankrupt since his assets and bank accounts were freezed by authorities, so he start to sell his stakes in numerous companies LOL LOL LOL
KUALA LUMPUR (March 9): Datuk Tey Por Yee is no longer a substantial shareholder in Practice Note 17 company Malaysia Pacific Corp Bhd (MPCorp), with the disposal of 650,000 shares in the company.
In a filing to Bursa Malaysia today, MPCorp announced that Tey, 40, had sold 447,000 shares on March 1 and subsequently 203,000 shares on the next day. His total shareholdings in the company shrunk to 14.35 million shares, or a 4.99% stake.
Tey emerged as a substantial shareholder in MPCorp in mid-July 2014 after his purchase of 15 million shares in the company, or a 5.21% stake.
Recently, Tey has been on a divestment spree. Apart from MPCorp, he has sold shares in several companies, namely Nexgram Holdings Bhd, Asdion Bhd and Ire-Tex Corp Bhd.
MPCorp's share price closed unchanged at 18.5 sen today, with a market capitalisation of RM53.22 million.
2016-03-26 10:37 | Report Abuse
Looks like tey trying to hide his assets should the court finds him guilty LOL LOL LOL...
KUALA LUMPUR: Businessman Datuk Tey Por Yee has sold his entire 24.82% shareholding in Asdion Bhd through off-market trade, while transferring his shareholding in Ire-Tex Corp Bhd to his younger brother Por Chen.
In a filing with Bursa Malaysia, Asdion said Por Yee made the disposal of the 24.82 million shares in the company in an off-market transaction on Feb 25, but did not disclose the transacted price.
Last Friday, The Edge Financial Daily reported that Asdion saw the same number of shares traded off market at 27 sen, a sharp discount of 38.64% over the then-closing price of 44 sen.
In a separate filing yesterday, Ire-Tex disclosed that Por Chen emerged as a substantial shareholder through an off-market acquisition of 30.6 million shares, equivalent to a 22.96% stake, in the corrugated packaging services provider on Feb 24 as well.
Por Yee, 40, was formerly the non-executive director of construction and property group Protasco Bhd. On Jan 16, he claimed trial at the Ampang Sessions Court to two charges of cheating and perjury involving RM68 million.
2016-03-26 10:36 | Report Abuse
Wednesday, 3 February 2016 | MYT 8:14 PM
Former company director claims trial in cheating case involving RM80mil
BY MAIZATUL NAZLINA
KUALA LUMPUR: A former company director has been charged in the Sessions Court here with cheating the board of directors, making a false declaration and criminal breach of trust involving more than RM80mil.
Datuk Ooi Kock Aun, 49, was accused of cheating Protasco Bhd’s board of directors and its officers by withholding information that he had had direct involvement with PT Anglo Slavic Utama, a company incorporated in Indonesia.
His action resulted in Protasco entering in an investment agreement on oil and gas in Indonesia via the purchase of 63% of PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia valued at US$22mil (RM68,393,170) with PT Anglo Slavic Utama.
The payment for the purchase was made in stages into two bank accounts.
The offence, under Section 420 of the Penal Code for cheating, was allegedly committed at Protasco’s office at Level 2, Corporate Building Unipark Suria, Jalan Ikram-Uniten, Kajang, between November 2012 and Jan 30, 2014.
Ooi, who is now a businessman, faces a second charge of making a false declaration to the Commissioner for Oaths that he did not have any ties with PT Anglo Slavic Utama, its directors or shareholders when he knew that he indeed had an interest in the company.
The offence allegedly took place at Wern Li Morsingh commissioner for oaths office at Fraser Business Park in Jalan Metro Pudu, off Jalan Yew, on July 25, 2014.
The third charge reads that Ooi committed CBT involving PT Anglo Slavic property worth RM16,250,000 at CIMB Islamic Bank Bhd in Menara Southern Bank in Plaza Damansara, Bukit Damansara, on Feb 4, 2014.
Ooi claimed trial to the charges before Sessions judge Suraiya Mustafa Kamal.
DPP Nurshuhaida Zainal Azahar offered bail at RM1mil in one surety for all charges.
She also urged the court to impound Ooi’s passport and prevent him from approaching all prosecution witnesses.
Ooi’s counsel Edmund Bon, in asking for a lower bail, said his client had cooperated with police throughout the investigation.
He said Ooi had a wife and four children and he was a respected individual in the accounting field.
Suraiya fixed bail at RM1mil in one surety for all charges and ordered Ooi to surrender his passport and prohibited him from approaching prosecution witnesses.
The court fixed Feb 26 for mention.
2016-03-26 10:35 | Report Abuse
Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun were also notorious for not paying their rentals, to the point that their landlords had to threaten legal action and resort to cutting off the utilities to get what was owed to them.
Worse off were their suppliers, of whom many had to suffer the bitterness of bankruptcy because tey and ooi refused to pay them their dues. Tragically, one of them even committed suicide because of bad debts, courtesy of Dato’ Tey Por Yee and Dato' Ooi Kock Aun.
This was not the only blood on his hands. He used a friend, Dedi Francis from Indonesia, to stand as a nominee for Tey and Ooi. When the loyal Dedi pressed for payment on company debts to incurred by Tey and Ooi's manipulative schemes, he was given the runaround. Time finally ran out for Dedi. Desperate, with his back to the wall and creditors all around him, Dedi almost took his own life but was able to be brought to hospital by his family on time.
2016-03-26 10:35 | Report Abuse
At age seven, tey por hee was already showing signs of what he was destined to be: a thief and a liar. Ten sen, twenty sen, fifty sen…all would disappear “mysteriously” from his families drawers, savings and piggy banks. Later, bigger sums would go missing, from his father’s wallet to his mother’s purse. Tey would be placed at the scene of the crime but he always had an excuse or story to wriggle his way out of the situation.
For a while his parents believed him. Until he got caught red-handed one day. Then, his father had no choice but to punish him. If we hoped that would beat some sense and decency into him, we were sadly mistaken.
He took his bad habits with him to school. Already skilled at telling lies and manipulating people, he began cheating his classmates. The sums ranged from a few ringgit to hundreds of ringgit. The figures may seem small to some, but for a young schoolboy, the sum is enormous. As usual, his long-suffering father had to clear his debts and try to redress the damage done to his victims.
At age sixteen, Tey por yee had to audacity to go to his uncle’s house to borrow money. He said he needed RM2,000.00 because his father was sick and desperately needed the money for an operation. Believing his lies totally, the uncle gave it to him. His family never lived down the humiliation when the truth came out.
Since young, he has always been obsessed with money. Even when he had a lot of it, it was never enough. He wanted more and more. Never mind if it was obtained in a deceitful manner, just as long as he got what he wanted. It only goes to show that he is not only a pathological liar, but a pathological thief as well. With hundreds of millions already stashed away in private bank accounts, more than he can ever spend in ten lifetimes, he still remains greedy for more. So greedy that he is willing to lie, cheat and steal to achieve his end.
2016-03-25 16:41 | Report Abuse
LOL LOL LOL........Tey been dragging this counter since his trial is started.
Ooii....pumpkin, speaking of bribery:
Speaking of bribery, tey and ooi paid dirty lawyer to bribe indonesian police to bring charges against one of his nominee on ground of perjury. Idr 1billion went to a high rank officer and another idr 1billion goes to falsify forensics report to incriminate this nominee.
Despite paying off cops idr 2billion but tey and ooi efforts are in vain. In fact when this nominee lost his patient, he decided to make his counter attack and use the considerable resources, power and influences he have to teach tey and ooi a lesson of the danger in poking a sleeping lion. In fact, tey and ooi not only woken up the lion but the whole pride as well.
Not only tey and ooi's vicious attack is repelled, but inovisi, the once mighty stronghold of tey and ooi was destroyed to bits. It counter is suspended by indonesian sc; it office is raided by indonesian police and the public notary who made it possible for tey and ooi to establish many fictitious empty shell company is detained by the police. In the end, inovisi closed it business, and it managemen which all are tey and ooi's nominees went hiding into their rat hole LOL LOL LOL LOL
After the destruction of inovisi, jan adam tangkilisan and dedi francis contacted this former nominee to seek for truce and ask for a meeting. During the d-day, dedi francis who always bragged and acted like a hongkong triad chicken out and ran away from the scene when he saw the said nominee was protected by two indonesian special forces (kopassus). Jan adam followed suit after he was notified by dedi francis.
True story LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL....
2016-03-25 16:38 | Report Abuse
At age seven, tey por hee was already showing signs of what he was destined to be: a thief and a liar. Ten sen, twenty sen, fifty sen…all would disappear “mysteriously” from his families drawers, savings and piggy banks. Later, bigger sums would go missing, from his father’s wallet to his mother’s purse. Tey would be placed at the scene of the crime but he always had an excuse or story to wriggle his way out of the situation.
For a while his parents believed him. Until he got caught red-handed one day. Then, his father had no choice but to punish him. If we hoped that would beat some sense and decency into him, we were sadly mistaken.
He took his bad habits with him to school. Already skilled at telling lies and manipulating people, he began cheating his classmates. The sums ranged from a few ringgit to hundreds of ringgit. The figures may seem small to some, but for a young schoolboy, the sum is enormous. As usual, his long-suffering father had to clear his debts and try to redress the damage done to his victims.
At age sixteen, Tey por yee had to audacity to go to his uncle’s house to borrow money. He said he needed RM2,000.00 because his father was sick and desperately needed the money for an operation. Believing his lies totally, the uncle gave it to him. His family never lived down the humiliation when the truth came out.
Since young, he has always been obsessed with money. Even when he had a lot of it, it was never enough. He wanted more and more. Never mind if it was obtained in a deceitful manner, just as long as he got what he wanted. It only goes to show that he is not only a pathological liar, but a pathological thief as well. With hundreds of millions already stashed away in private bank accounts, more than he can ever spend in ten lifetimes, he still remains greedy for more. So greedy that he is willing to lie, cheat and steal to achieve his end.
2016-03-25 16:38 | Report Abuse
So much anger....how to achieve transcendental awareness and happiness?
Let me assist you in understanding Godynamic Investment Ltd- GIL a BVI (British Virgin Islands) an offshore company.
As rightly pointed out GIL is and has always been an integral part of Nexgram (51% owned) since inception and perhaps packaged in for Nexnation's listing on Mesdaq back in 2004.To all effects and purposes TPY is the CEO and/or COO.GIL is also the vehicle for most of TPY's forays in Indon.
So the question that goes a begging is any transaction between GIL and/or Nexgram are Related party Transactions that TPY should NOT forget to mention.
The accounts for GIL be it at company or group should be very clear to TPY;he cannot be excused from making such elementary mistakes OR now he is laying blame on the auditor,CFO or accountant.So the statements to Bursa for one to be true the other has to be false.
That is a facepalm and contemptuous to Bursa.
When GIL makes such purchases or sales,are the monies equitably apportioned(51% cost and profits)
Those are questions shareholders should pose to TPY
hmmm ...why rant when I am assisting you???
DRwarrant: you are right FD would actually yield a better rate of return,whether taken from 2004 or 2014.
bye!!, gotta play wei chi with Kong Ming ......
Stock: [NEXGRAM]: NEXGRAM HOLDINGS BERHAD
2016-03-26 14:15 | Report Abuse
Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun were also notorious for not paying their rentals, to the point that their landlords had to threaten legal action and resort to cutting off the utilities to get what was owed to them.
Worse off were their suppliers, of whom many had to suffer the bitterness of bankruptcy because tey and ooi refused to pay them their dues. Tragically, one of them even committed suicide because of bad debts, courtesy of Dato’ Tey Por Yee and Dato' Ooi Kock Aun.
This was not the only blood on his hands. He used a friend, Dedi Francis from Indonesia, to stand as a nominee for Tey and Ooi. When the loyal Dedi pressed for payment on company debts to incurred by Tey and Ooi's manipulative schemes, he was given the runaround. Time finally ran out for Dedi. Desperate, with his back to the wall and creditors all around him, Dedi almost took his own life but was able to be brought to hospital by his family on time.