这也意味着因有此死忌, 此后没有买家是会愚蠢的去收购利兴。www.liihen.com

麻坡木匠们也尽责的遵从 1965年大马公司法令第 135条向大马股票交易所申报他们的股权变动。可是正因为他们有心似的隐瞒了其中一些魔鬼细节, 才进而演变为警察总部在 2013年一个案件的重点...
www.liihen.com

稍安勿躁, 等着瞧

It is a steal really at present price of $ 1.37 with PE 3.91x and NTA $ 2.24, but why nobody is buying as depicted by the daily volume for the last 2 months? Go ask the carpenters if the books are really what it is. Just wait patiencely before the big bomb explodes any time soon

Court case on going. Talk is easy by some people : " I would be happy to offer to buy the whole Liihen for RM1.00 a share", show us the money first!

@candygirl, yes, story may be long ago, but the fact that you keep reading those articles to keep abreast with the news means you are in fear! So much so that your paranoia wanted the activists to stop publishing and posting further comments, I have nothing to say but a real pity to you.

蔴坡木匠们投鼠忌器, 而不敢贼喊捉贼....
A thief is always a thief, no matter after how many years!


Read more on www.liihen.com for the evidences

水能载舟, 亦能覆舟。蔴坡木匠们亦不能在这顶峰RM 6.80的价位暴泻事件下独善其身...they will get you!

Read why on www.liihen.com

yap teik choon is not a market player lah

that shows investors have lost faith in this counter

魔鬼的细节果然是隐身於这些看似毫无異状的文告中
www.liihen.com

为何利兴董事局甘冒上被檢控的風險而不断的向大马股票交易所发布一連串虚假和具误导性的公司文告.....www.liihen.com

<1.00

大茶饭

sory wrong thread

看來这些乾坤大挪移的动作还只算是前菜, 后头应该是还有另一场的大茶饭....
www.liihen.com

那班木匠的葫芦里到底是在卖些什么膏药
www.liihen.com

那班木匠的葫芦里到底是在卖些什么膏药
www.liihen.com

(吉隆坡7日讯）盛资（SERSOL，0055，创业板）股价近期大跌，今日遭马交所发出“不寻常市场活动”（UMA）质询。
一名技术分析员指出，卖压没有缓和的迹象，股价可能进一步下跌，技术上可能回调至20仙水平。该股在6月28日时报20仙。

for me, 70sen!

1.78 to 1.90? i will put my $ elsewhere

sephiroth, your wish may come true soon....but perhaps you should be looking at sub Rm 1 :D

...为什么一份看似再也普通不过的不寻常股市活动(Unusual Market Action 或简称UMA)的大马股票交易所公司文告能导致利兴的股价在两个月之内翻了一翻呢?

i wouldn't bet on it

文章一出, 小投资者马上出货。明哲保身, 上策上策!

word is that some traders in HL are selling big soon

为什么事发超过了九年才報案去揭发此弊案呢? .....该名股票经纪一定是掌握了2004年当时一些不可告人的内幕.....

事实證明, 森美蘭州警察總部商业罪案調查局已拍板决定立案深入調查利兴!

...虽然此弊案已经发生超过了九年之久, 但諸位不要忘记, 在我国法律之下刑事责任的追究权是不受时间所限制的.....

利兴2004年之風云系列 (第二篇) 丈二金剛 
read it on www.liihen.com

利兴2004年之風云系列 (第二篇) 丈二金剛
read it on www.liihen.com

利兴2004年之風云系列 (序幕篇) 猎寇行动
available on

http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/liihen/37799.jsp

another dull day for this stock....

selling 7300@1.43

Selling 5000 @ 1.44

we walk the talk and you talk2 only

selling 100 at 1.45. Go buy since you like it so much...

Haha child play. Cant even sense the imminent danger

another 5k at 1.45 now... 3.07pm

I am starting to sell now....2.51pm

LIIHEN只做了一天(25.9.2013)的好孩子, 今天又故態重萌, 被爆出又隐瞒小股东另一事件, 这次是被公司委员会(Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia 简称SSM)立案調查!

詳情已在http://www.liihen.com/news-flash.html 被公开. 唉, 这些大水牛怎么这么顽固, 像25.9.2013事件只有被人揭發後才來挽救公司形象, 这公司的誠信真是有很大的疑问啊.

頑固硬颈的蔴坡大水牛终於低下头, 即时向大马交易所報导重要资讯, 这是利兴股东權益维护群的一个功勞和肯定. 要是没有他们在督促着利兴董事, 那班大水牛肯定继续他们一直以来的"陳倉暗渡" 与 "闭门造車", 把我们这一群小股东骗得就骗, 蓋得就蓋.

在此我们应当向这一群在利兴股东權益维护群后的人士致於谢意. 要是没有你们的默默耕耘和付出, 不时提供那些内幕和黑幕, 我们就真的"股在且夕"了!

詳情請看http://www.liihen.com/news-flash.html

Originally posted by alwong1111

Dear Sensemaker,

After reading through your lengthy comments which were premised undoubtedly on many bare speculations and assumptions, I would like to raise a few pointers here just to share with our fellow investors on Lii Hen :

1) It may be true that the 10+ commentators may know each other just like yourself and Jenny6088, going by the Q & A and interval time between you two. A lot of investors and remisiers do use the forum as a mean of market communication besides Facebook or Whatsapp. I myself is one. Therefore your speculation that the 10+ commentators may be originated from a same person may be a little bit far fetched, solely based on your assumption of interval time between their comments.

2) I do not buy your suggestion that those who have lost bitterly in 2004 wanted to see Lii Hen shares price crashed. Intention and ability to do a thing is entirely 2 different things. I mean to do that they would first need to build some substantial shareholdings before they can call the shot in the market to depress the price. Based on the names that appeared in www.liihen.com shareholding lists, I cannot find their names or anything close to that in the latest Annual Report 2012.

3) Consequently your next allusion that they are the one who dumped Lii Hen shares after the Q2 result was announced cannot stand. In furtherance thereof, your suggestion that they may be collecting now that the price has been smashed is pure fiction of your creation.

4) Your fourth possibility that the remisier is trying to incriminate the 2 directors in order to vindicate himself from the SC charge is a total utterance of the wildest imagination. Based on the articles and evidences adduced thus far in www.liihen.com, the remisier was lodging a complaint on allegation of Fraud/Criminal breach of trust/Forgery against Tan Bee Eng and Chua Lee Seng to the Police. I cannot see the relationship between the remisier's charge and the offences under the Penal Code. Market manipulation is under the purview of SC while the Penal Code is under the Police. How can he vindicates himself from a charge by the SC through the Police?

5) While the timing of the setting up of the website coincided with the slump in Lii Hen shares price, I actually was very happy that a shareholder activists movement was established as a watchdog over Lii Hen. FYI, this may be the very first shareholder activist in Malaysia and I will encourage and welcome with my open arms to others with the same noble intention in upholding a minority shareholder's rights. I would encourage you to look at Carl Icahn's story as a shareholder activist and how all of us maybe benefitted potentially by having this movement.

6) FYI the Board Charter inclusion on all issuers are now a requirement of the SC and Bursa.

7) Your conclusion that Mohd Qari Ahmad as the Chairman of Lii Hen was not re-elected by the largest shareholder (Assets Muar Sdn. Bhd) in the AGM because of his handling of a shareholder compromised your fairness in your view. FYI, Mohd Qari Ahmad ("MQA") was not re-elected because he is the partner of the remisier charged by SC. Please be guided that MQA took Lii Hen to listing in early 2000 and has since been a director of Lii Hen until this June 25. The "Muar carpenters" crucified MQA because of his partnership with Dato' Goh the remisier. And what could be a better platform to do it than in AGM? Their English may not be good but I would give them 100% for strategy plotting.

MQA is the most educated in the board of Lii Hen and highly qualified as an accountant and a former merchant banker. He is also the only Bumiputra in the board. For whatever reasons there maybe for the Muar carpenters to cut him lose from Lii Hen, brace yourself now as there will be more explosive evidences of malpractice and wrongdoings coming your way!

8) I must admit that based on the surface financials of Lii Hen with a PE of 3.61x and a NTA of RM 2.24 a share, Lii Hen does look a very compelling stock to buy with a steady dividend payouts. But one must asks seriously this : as FBMKLCI is at the historical high now, why is Lii Hen still trading at RM 1.45 a share today, a whopping 35% discount to its NTA? The meagre traded volume says it all.

In conclusion, there is no major buyer trying to accumulate a position to takeover Lii Hen as you had speculated. To harp on this will be a wild goose chase. At best, these are retail investors nibbling occasionally. Anyway, Lii Hen with 60m shares in issue may be just too small a fly to even interests the institutions to start looking at it.

LOOK OUT tonight for www.liihen.com all shareholders must read

留意明天的www.liihen.com 有大課题

真的是可喜可贺.....唉....

www.liihen.com 美国有London Whale, 我们也有Bangsar Whale, 真是Malaysia Memang BOLEH!

天曉得他们是不怕死还是不識字, 硬硬来http://liihen.blogspot.com/2013/09/another-disdain-and-violation-of-rules.html

真敢死http://liihen.blogspot.com/2013/09/another-disdain-and-violation-of-rules.html

卑鄙手段又一明證http://liihen.blogspot.com/2013/09/another-disdain-and-violation-of-rules.html