KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 13, 2014:

Lawyers for Liberty’s Afiq M. Noor has questioned whether Selangor Menteri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim acted constitutionally or on his own when he fired six of his state executive councillors (exco).

Citing Article 53 (2) B of the state constitution, Afiq, in his commentary piece, said it stated that the Sultan has to elect not more than ten and not less than four assemblymen to be state executive councillors on advice of the Menteri Besar.

“Based on these provisions, the power to elect state exco members falls upon the Sultan on advice of the Menteri Besar.

“Article 53(7) then stated that the state excos will hold their positions as long as the Sultan wishes and the exco members and Menteri Besar can resign whenever they want,” said Afiq.

“Khalid always said his removal had to be done in accordance with the state constitution, but he was clearly wrong and acted against the constitution when he fired his six exco members,” said Afiq.

Afiq said only the Sultan could fire the exco members, adding that although the state constitution does not specifically mention the power to sack them, Article 53(7) was sufficient.

“In addition to that, Section 47 of the Interpretation Act 1948 and 1967 (Act 338) states that anyone who is lawfully given the power to appoint also has the power to dismiss or suspend.

“Khalid is only responsible for advising the Sultan and nothing more,” he added, stating that the state constitution was not very different from the Federal Constitution in the same respect.

Article 43(5) of the Federal Constitution states that all ministers, apart from the Prime Minister, hold their positions at the pleasure of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and their appointments can only cancelled by the King on advice of the Prime Minister.

In the case of the federal government, the Prime Minister only advises the King and the revoking of the appointments is done by the latter, Afiq stated.

“I think Khalid needs to realise that the six who were sacked were state exco members and not government ministers,” he added.

Yesterday, an embattled Khalid sacked six of the state’s exco members from the DAP and Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR).


Read more: http://www.therakyatpost.com/news/2014/08/13/selangor-mb-acted-state-constitution/#ixzz3AHkeMWQJ

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 13, 2014:

Lawyers for Liberty’s Afiq M. Noor has questioned whether Selangor Menteri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim acted constitutionally or on his own when he fired six of his state executive councillors (exco).

Citing Article 53 (2) B of the state constitution, Afiq, in his commentary piece, said it stated that the Sultan has to elect not more than ten and not less than four assemblymen to be state executive councillors on advice of the Menteri Besar.

“Based on these provisions, the power to elect state exco members falls upon the Sultan on advice of the Menteri Besar.

“Article 53(7) then stated that the state excos will hold their positions as long as the Sultan wishes and the exco members and Menteri Besar can resign whenever they want,” said Afiq.

“Khalid always said his removal had to be done in accordance with the state constitution, but he was clearly wrong and acted against the constitution when he fired his six exco members,” said Afiq.

Afiq said only the Sultan could fire the exco members, adding that although the state constitution does not specifically mention the power to sack them, Article 53(7) was sufficient.

“In addition to that, Section 47 of the Interpretation Act 1948 and 1967 (Act 338) states that anyone who is lawfully given the power to appoint also has the power to dismiss or suspend.

“Khalid is only responsible for advising the Sultan and nothing more,” he added, stating that the state constitution was not very different from the Federal Constitution in the same respect.

Article 43(5) of the Federal Constitution states that all ministers, apart from the Prime Minister, hold their positions at the pleasure of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and their appointments can only cancelled by the King on advice of the Prime Minister.

In the case of the federal government, the Prime Minister only advises the King and the revoking of the appointments is done by the latter, Afiq stated.

“I think Khalid needs to realise that the six who were sacked were state exco members and not government ministers,” he added.

Yesterday, an embattled Khalid sacked six of the state’s exco members from the DAP and Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR).


Read more: http://www.therakyatpost.com/news/2014/08/13/selangor-mb-acted-state-constitution/#ixzz3AHkeMWQJ

13/08/2014 23:15

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 13, 2014:

Lawyers for Liberty’s Afiq M. Noor has questioned whether Selangor Menteri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim acted constitutionally or on his own when he fired six of his state executive councillors (exco).

Citing Article 53 (2) B of the state constitution, Afiq, in his commentary piece, said it stated that the Sultan has to elect not more than ten and not less than four assemblymen to be state executive councillors on advice of the Menteri Besar.

“Based on these provisions, the power to elect state exco members falls upon the Sultan on advice of the Menteri Besar.

“Article 53(7) then stated that the state excos will hold their positions as long as the Sultan wishes and the exco members and Menteri Besar can resign whenever they want,” said Afiq.

“Khalid always said his removal had to be done in accordance with the state constitution, but he was clearly wrong and acted against the constitution when he fired his six exco members,” said Afiq.

Afiq said only the Sultan could fire the exco members, adding that although the state constitution does not specifically mention the power to sack them, Article 53(7) was sufficient.

“In addition to that, Section 47 of the Interpretation Act 1948 and 1967 (Act 338) states that anyone who is lawfully given the power to appoint also has the power to dismiss or suspend.

“Khalid is only responsible for advising the Sultan and nothing more,” he added, stating that the state constitution was not very different from the Federal Constitution in the same respect.

Article 43(5) of the Federal Constitution states that all ministers, apart from the Prime Minister, hold their positions at the pleasure of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and their appointments can only cancelled by the King on advice of the Prime Minister.

In the case of the federal government, the Prime Minister only advises the King and the revoking of the appointments is done by the latter, Afiq stated.

“I think Khalid needs to realise that the six who were sacked were state exco members and not government ministers,” he added.

Yesterday, an embattled Khalid sacked six of the state’s exco members from the DAP and Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR).


Read more: http://www.therakyatpost.com/news/2014/08/13/selangor-mb-acted-state-constitution/#ixzz3AHkeMWQJ

White hammer and black hammer formation for two consecutive days after downtrend since June 30 2014 with Technical Indicators at oversold status could possibly indicate trend reversal in the near if not immediate future.

Malaya became self governing after it gained independence ONLY in 1957.
Historically, none of the states forming the Federation of Malaysia had parliaments before independence, save for Sarawak which have its own Council Negri which enabled local participation and representation in administrative work since 1863. Although the British colonial government had permitted the forming of legislative councils for Malaya, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak, these were not the supreme makers of law, and remained subordinate to the British High Commissioner or the Rajah, in case of Sarawak.

The Reid Commission, which drafted the Constitution of Malaya — Malaya gained independence in 1957, ahead of the other states that would later form Malaysia – modelled the Malayan system of government after that of Britain's, with a bicameral parliament, one house being directly elected, and the other being appointed by the King – just like the British House of Commons and House of Lords. Originally Parliament met at the former headquarters building of the Federated Malay States Volunteer Force on a hill near Jalan Tun Ismail (Maxwell Road). The Senate of Dewan Negara met in a hall on the ground floor and the Dewan rakyat met in the hall on the first floor[1] With the completion of Parliament House in 1962, comprising a three-storey main building for the two houses of Parliament to meet, and an 18-storey tower for the offices of Ministers and members of Parliament, both houses moved there.

In 1963, when Malaya, Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore merged to form Malaysia, the Malayan Parliament was adopted for use as the Parliament of Malaysia. Under the 1957 Constitution of Malaya, most Senators were elected by the state assemblies to provide representation of state interests; the 1963 Constitution of Malaysia saw each state receiving two members, with the rest (including members for federal territories) being appointed by the King on the advice of the Cabinet.[2] When Singapore seceded from Malaysia in 1965, its legislative assembly became Parliament, and it ceased to be represented in the Parliament of Malaysia.

Malaya became self governing after it gained independence ONLY in 1957.
Historically, none of the states forming the Federation of Malaysia had parliaments before independence, save for Sarawak which have its own Council Negri which enabled local participation and representation in administrative work since 1863. Although the British colonial government had permitted the forming of legislative councils for Malaya, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak, these were not the supreme makers of law, and remained subordinate to the British High Commissioner or the Rajah, in case of Sarawak.

The Reid Commission, which drafted the Constitution of Malaya — Malaya gained independence in 1957, ahead of the other states that would later form Malaysia – modelled the Malayan system of government after that of Britain's, with a bicameral parliament, one house being directly elected, and the other being appointed by the King – just like the British House of Commons and House of Lords. Originally Parliament met at the former headquarters building of the Federated Malay States Volunteer Force on a hill near Jalan Tun Ismail (Maxwell Road). The Senate of Dewan Negara met in a hall on the ground floor and the Dewan rakyat met in the hall on the first floor[1] With the completion of Parliament House in 1962, comprising a three-storey main building for the two houses of Parliament to meet, and an 18-storey tower for the offices of Ministers and members of Parliament, both houses moved there.

In 1963, when Malaya, Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore merged to form Malaysia, the Malayan Parliament was adopted for use as the Parliament of Malaysia. Under the 1957 Constitution of Malaya, most Senators were elected by the state assemblies to provide representation of state interests; the 1963 Constitution of Malaysia saw each state receiving two members, with the rest (including members for federal territories) being appointed by the King on the advice of the Cabinet.[2] When Singapore seceded from Malaysia in 1965, its legislative assembly became Parliament, and it ceased to be represented in the Parliament of Malaysia.

By taking more time to make a decision, Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad said his party has given enough rope for Selangor Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim to “hang himself".

LET US GET BACK TO FIRST BASIC PRINCIPLES.
Based on First principles, IT WAS THE SELANGOR RAKYAT DECISION POWER THAT DECIDED THAT PAKATAN RAKYAT FORMS THE STATE GOVERNMENT.

The state constitution is vey clear that the WINNING majority party forms the state government as Malaysia practices PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY.

The winning majority party was the PAKATAN RAKYAT parties comprising of PKR, PAS and DAP

The state constitution is very clear that the WINNING MAJORITY PARTY SHALL DECIDE ON WHO SHALL BE THE MENTRI BESAR as MALAYSIA practices PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY since gaining independence.

LIKEWISE UMNO DECIDES ON WHO SHALL BE THE PRIME MINISTER OF MALAYSIA AFTER THE LAST GEN ELECTION.

LET US OBSERVE NOW WHAT MB KHALID HAD DONE AFTER HE WAS SACKED FROM PKR
MB Khalid had willfully disrespected the decision of the Rakyat for a Pakatan Rakyat state government. The Pakatan Rakyat government comprise of PAS,PKR and DAP in the state exco including the Mentri Besar position.

EMBATTLED MB KHALID IS NOW PARTYLESS. HE ONLY REPRESENT HIMSELF. HE DOES NOT HAVE A PARTY.

By clinging to the MB position, Embattled MB Khalid's actions had usurped the POWER of the Selangor Rakyat decision for a PAKATAN RAKYAT government in Selangor state

MB Khalid had WILFULLY decided that HE IS ABOVE THE RAKYATS POWER WHICH HAD PUT HIM IN THAT POSITION IN THE FIRST PLACE

Any party or parties who now support the embattled Khalid continued existence would be perceived as NOT RESPECTING PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY AS PRACTISED BY MALAYSIA SINCE INDEPENDENCE and NOT RESPECTING THE DECISION OF THE RAKYAT OF SELANGOR FOR A PAKATAN RAKYAT GOVERNMENT

CONCLUSION
KHALID HAD SHOWN NO RESPECT AND HAD IGNORED THE SELANGOR RAKYAT DECISION FOR A PAKATAN RAKYAT GOVERNMENT
KHALID HAD WILFULLY AND DELIBERATELY HIJACKED DEMOCRACY.
KHALID HAD WILFULLY AND DELIBERATELY HIJACKED THE SELANGOR STATE GOVERNMENT FROM PAKATAN RAKYAT

QUESTIONS:
WHAT IS KHALID REAL MOTIVE IN HIJACKING DEMOCRACY AND HIJACKING THE SELANGOR STATE GOVERNMENT LED BY PAKATAN? WHY IS HE BEHAVING IN SUCH DISGRACEFUL MANNER TOTALLY DEVIOD OF AN IOTA OF MARUAH?

DOES ANY PERSON/PERSONS OR POLITICAL PARTY/PARTIES WANT TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH KHALID AND CONSEQUENTLY BE SEVERELY TAINTED ALONGSIDE THE UNPRINCIPLED KHALID WHO HAD WILFULLY AND DELIBERATELY HIJACKED DEMOCRACY AND HIJACKED THE SELANGOR STATE GOVERNMENT LED BY PAKATAN?

WHOEVER SUPPORTS KHALID NOW BY FIRST PRINCIPLES ARE SHOWING NO RESPECT FOR PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY, SHOWS NO RESPECT FOR DECISION ALREADY MADE BY THE SELANGOR RAKYAT FOR A PAKATAN RAKYAT STATE GOVERNMENT.

By taking more time to make a decision, Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad said his party has given enough rope for Selangor Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim to “hang himself".

LET US GET BACK TO FIRST BASIC PRINCIPLES.
Based on First principles, IT WAS THE SELANGOR RAKYAT DECISION POWER THAT DECIDED THAT PAKATAN RAKYAT FORMS THE STATE GOVERNMENT.

The state constitution is vey clear that the WINNING majority party forms the state government as Malaysia practices PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY.

The winning majority party was the PAKATAN RAKYAT parties comprising of PKR, PAS and DAP

The state constitution is very clear that the WINNING MAJORITY PARTY SHALL DECIDE ON WHO SHALL BE THE MENTRI BESAR as MALAYSIA practices PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY since gaining independence.

LIKEWISE UMNO DECIDES ON WHO SHALL BE THE PRIME MINISTER OF MALAYSIA AFTER THE LAST GEN ELECTION.

LET US OBSERVE NOW WHAT MB KHALID HAD DONE AFTER HE WAS SACKED FROM PKR
MB Khalid had willfully disrespected the decision of the Rakyat for a Pakatan Rakyat state government. The Pakatan Rakyat government comprise of PAS,PKR and DAP in the state exco including the Mentri Besar position.

EMBATTLED MB KHALID IS NOW PARTYLESS. HE ONLY REPRESENT HIMSELF. HE DOES NOT HAVE A PARTY.

By clinging to the MB position, Embattled MB Khalid's actions had usurped the POWER of the Selangor Rakyat decision for a PAKATAN RAKYAT government in Selangor state

MB Khalid had WILFULLY decided that HE IS ABOVE THE RAKYATS POWER WHICH HAD PUT HIM IN THAT POSITION IN THE FIRST PLACE

Any party or parties who now support the embattled Khalid continued existence would be perceived as NOT RESPECTING PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY AS PRACTISED BY MALAYSIA SINCE INDEPENDENCE and NOT RESPECTING THE DECISION OF THE RAKYAT OF SELANGOR FOR A PAKATAN RAKYAT GOVERNMENT

CONCLUSION
KHALID HAD SHOWN NO RESPECT AND HAD IGNORED THE SELANGOR RAKYAT DECISION FOR A PAKATAN RAKYAT GOVERNMENT
KHALID HAD WILFULLY AND DELIBERATELY HIJACKED DEMOCRACY.
KHALID HAD WILFULLY AND DELIBERATELY HIJACKED THE SELANGOR STATE GOVERNMENT FROM PAKATAN RAKYAT

QUESTIONS:
WHAT IS KHALID REAL MOTIVE IN HIJACKING DEMOCRACY AND HIJACKING THE SELANGOR STATE GOVERNMENT LED BY PAKATAN? WHY IS HE BEHAVING IN SUCH DISGRACEFUL MANNER TOTALLY DEVIOD OF AN IOTA OF MARUAH?

DOES ANY PERSON/PERSONS OR POLITICAL PARTY/PARTIES WANT TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH KHALID AND CONSEQUENTLY BE SEVERELY TAINTED ALONGSIDE THE UNPRINCIPLED KHALID WHO HAD WILFULLY AND DELIBERATELY HIJACKED DEMOCRACY AND HIJACKED THE SELANGOR STATE GOVERNMENT LED BY PAKATAN?

WHOEVER SUPPORTS KHALID NOW BY FIRST PRINCIPLES ARE SHOWING NO RESPECT FOR PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY, SHOWS NO RESPECT FOR DECISION ALREADY MADE BY THE SELANGOR RAKYAT FOR A PAKATAN RAKYAT STATE GOVERNMENT.

I m waiting for Michael Jackson dari BURSA to sing lagu kini yg terhebat....
"ITS STILL NOT TOO LATE WITH INSTACOM, BABY INSTACOM ITS STILL NOT TOO LATE.."
Michael Jackson dari Bursa, u kat mana? eh dah tunggu u lama KOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOK

I am long PARKSON as I went in at RM 2.32 to RM 2.40 !! Just got share dividend!!! I am gonna ride PARKSON as long as UPTREND IS INTACT!!!

lagu rentak terhebat untuk Michael Jackson dari BURA,
IT IS STILL NOT TOO LATE WITH INSTACOM, INSTACOM ITS NOT TOO LATE!! KOKOKOKOKOKOKOKOK!!!

Michael Jackson dari BURSA, U boleh dance to the music "BEAT IT BURSA WITH INSTACOM". I dah berikan u hint dulu!!! kokokokokokok

IN LIFE ONE MUST GO BACK TO BASIC FIRST PRINCIPLES AND RELY ON BASIC FIRST PRINCIPLES FOR DECISION MAKING.

Tan Sri Khalid was the CHOSEN candidate by Pakatan to be the Mentri Besar. Pakatan has the right to decide who is Mentri Besar as Pakatan had won the majority of ADUN seats. The State constitution is very clear on this matter. The majority party , PAKATAN RAKYAT parties, form the state government. THE MAJORITY PARTY DECIDES ON WHO SHALL BE THE MENTRI BESAR.

Based on first principle, Khalid became Mentri Besar because Pakatan decided to nominate him for the second term. The SULTAN approved PAKATAN choice of Khalid as Mentri Besar.

Now after he had been sacked and is PARTYLESS, he turned around and says that
-NOW SELANGOR STATE GOVT IS TAN SRI KHALID GOVERNMENT AS HE ADVISED THE SULTAN THAT HE HAD MAJORITY SUPPORT
- NOW MAJORITY OF 32 ADUNS HAD SIGNED SD STATING THAT THEY SUPPORT AZIZAH BEING THE NEXT MENTRI BESAR.
- KHALID EVEN HAD THE AUDACITY TO SAY HE ONLY NEED 4 EXCO MEMBERS TO RUN THE STATE GOVT. THIS SAYS ALOT OF HIS MANAGEMENT STYLE!!
- IS HE A DICTATOR OR AN INCLUSIVE MENTRI BESAR? HIS PAST ACTIONS AND HIS RECENT STATEMENT OF LATE SHOWED THAT HE DID NOT PRACTISE INCLUSIVE GOVERNMENT.
- WHY HAD KHALID PRACTICED A DICTATORIAL STYLE OF GOVERNING? WHAT IS HIS REAL MOTIVE IN DOING SO?
- HAS ANYONE SEEN HIM CAMPAIGNING NATIONWIDE FOR PAKATAN RAKYAT DURING THE LAST GENERAL ELECTION?
-HOW MUCH VALUE HAD KHALID ADDED TO PAKATAN ALL THESE YEARS? WHY DID HE RUN AWAY FROM IJOK? WHAT HAS HE GOT TO HIDE?
- DID KHALID BACK UP HIS INFO WITH REAL FACTS ON MAJORITY SUPPORT BY ADVISING THE SULTAN THAT HE HAD MAJORITY SUPPORT? WHAT IS THE BASIS OF HIS ADVISE TO THE SULTAN THAT HE HAD MAJORITY SUPPORT? WHERE IS THE WRITTEN DOCUMENTS BY THE MAJORITY OF ADUNS WHO SUPPORTED KHALID?
-HAS KHALID DELIBERATELY MISLED THE SULTAN?
-HAS HE USURPED THE RAKYATS DECISION POWER BY DECLARING THAT SEALANGOR GOVT NOW IS KHALID GOVT?
- WHAT IS THE BASIS OF KHALIDS CLAIM THAT THE SELANGOR STATE GOVERNMENT IS NOW KHALIDS GOVERNMENT?
-IF PAKATAN HAD NOT CHOSEN HIM TO BE MENTRI BESAR, CAN KHALID BE MENTRI BESAR FOR SECOND TERM?
-WHO IS HE TRYING TO CON?
-DOES'NT KHALID HAD AN IOTA OF MARUAH or SELF RESPECT.
-KHALID STILL HAS TIME TO REDEEM HIMSELF AND TO REDEEM HIS MARUAH AND IT IS BEST ADVISED THAT KHALID APOLGIZE TO THE RAKYAT, ACCEPT THE NEXT CHOSEN MENTRI BESAR AND THEREAFTER GRACEFULLY STEP DOWN AND EXIT THE POLITICAL SCENE AS HE HAD THOROUGHLY DISGRACED HIMSELF.

UNDENIABLE FACT IS KHALID IS NOW ONE INDEPENDENT ADUN WHO OBTAINED HIS MENTRI BESAR POSITION BECAUSE PAKATAN HAD CHOSEN HIM AFTER THE SELANGOR STATE GENERAL ELECTIONS WHEN HE WAS A PKR PARTY MEMBER.

Khalid now has NO PARTY. HE IS JUST ONE INDEPENDENT ADUN WHO HAD BEEN SACKED FROM PKR. IF HE HAS ANY MARUAH LEFT ,HE SHOULD JUST RESIGN AND WELCOME IN AZIZAH AS THE NEXT MENTRI BESAR.

SO IT IS UP TO THE PAKATAN RAKYAT TO DECIDE ON WHO SHALL BE THE NEXT MENTRI BESAR OF SELANGOR. There is no necessity for a fresh state election as it a pure waste of public funds and it is better to employ the funds for state projects that yield benefit for the rakyat in Selangor.

IN LIFE ONE MUST GO BACK TO BASIC FIRST PRINCIPLES AND RELY ON BASIC FIRST PRINCIPLES FOR DECISION MAKING.

Tan Sri Khalid was the CHOSEN candidate by Pakatan to be the Mentri Besar. Pakatan has the right to decide who is Mentri Besar as Pakatan had won the majority of ADUN seats. The State constitution is very clear on this matter. The majority party , PAKATAN RAKYAT parties, form the state government. THE MAJORITY PARTY DECIDES ON WHO SHALL BE THE MENTRI BESAR.

Based on first principle, Khalid became Mentri Besar because Pakatan decided to nominate him for the second term. The SULTAN approved PAKATAN choice of Khalid as Mentri Besar.

Now after he had been sacked and is PARTYLESS, he turned around and says that
-NOW SELANGOR STATE GOVT IS TAN SRI KHALID GOVERNMENT AS HE ADVISED THE SULTAN THAT HE HAD MAJORITY SUPPORT
- NOW MAJORITY OF 32 ADUNS HAD SIGNED SD STATING THAT THEY SUPPORT AZIZAH BEING THE NEXT MENTRI BESAR.
- KHALID EVEN HAD THE AUDACITY TO SAY HE ONLY NEED 4 EXCO MEMBERS TO RUN THE STATE GOVT. THIS SAYS ALOT OF HIS MANAGEMENT STYLE!!
- IS HE A DICTATOR OR AN INCLUSIVE MENTRI BESAR? HIS PAST ACTIONS AND HIS RECENT STATEMENT OF LATE SHOWED THAT HE DID NOT PRACTISE INCLUSIVE GOVERNMENT.
- WHY HAD KHALID PRACTICED A DICTATORIAL STYLE OF GOVERNING? WHAT IS HIS REAL MOTIVE IN DOING SO?
- HAS ANYONE SEEN HIM CAMPAIGNING NATIONWIDE FOR PAKATAN RAKYAT DURING THE LAST GENERAL ELECTION?
-HOW MUCH VALUE HAD KHALID ADDED TO PAKATAN ALL THESE YEARS? WHY DID HE RUN AWAY FROM IJOK? WHAT HAS HE GOT TO HIDE?
- DID KHALID BACK UP HIS INFO WITH REAL FACTS ON MAJORITY SUPPORT BY ADVISING THE SULTAN THAT HE HAD MAJORITY SUPPORT? WHAT IS THE BASIS OF HIS ADVISE TO THE SULTAN THAT HE HAD MAJORITY SUPPORT? WHERE IS THE WRITTEN DOCUMENTS BY THE MAJORITY OF ADUNS WHO SUPPORTED KHALID?
-HAS KHALID DELIBERATELY MISLED THE SULTAN?
-HAS HE USURPED THE RAKYATS DECISION POWER BY DECLARING THAT SEALANGOR GOVT NOW IS KHALID GOVT?
- WHAT IS THE BASIS OF KHALIDS CLAIM THAT THE SELANGOR STATE GOVERNMENT IS NOW KHALIDS GOVERNMENT?
-IF PAKATAN HAD NOT CHOSEN HIM TO BE MENTRI BESAR, CAN KHALID BE MENTRI BESAR FOR SECOND TERM?
-WHO IS HE TRYING TO CON?
-DOES'NT KHALID HAD AN IOTA OF MARUAH or SELF RESPECT.
-KHALID STILL HAS TIME TO REDEEM HIMSELF AND TO REDEEM HIS MARUAH AND IT IS BEST ADVISED THAT KHALID APOLGIZE TO THE RAKYAT, ACCEPT THE NEXT CHOSEN MENTRI BESAR AND THEREAFTER GRACEFULLY STEP DOWN AND EXIT THE POLITICAL SCENE AS HE HAD THOROUGHLY DISGRACED HIMSELF.

UNDENIABLE FACT IS KHALID IS NOW ONE INDEPENDENT ADUN WHO OBTAINED HIS MENTRI BESAR POSITION BECAUSE PAKATAN HAD CHOSEN HIM AFTER THE SELANGOR STATE GENERAL ELECTIONS WHEN HE WAS A PKR PARTY MEMBER.

Khalid now has NO PARTY. HE IS JUST ONE INDEPENDENT ADUN WHO HAD BEEN SACKED FROM PKR. IF HE HAS ANY MARUAH LEFT ,HE SHOULD JUST RESIGN AND WELCOME IN AZIZAH AS THE NEXT MENTRI BESAR.

SO IT IS UP TO THE PAKATAN RAKYAT TO DECIDE ON WHO SHALL BE THE NEXT MENTRI BESAR OF SELANGOR. There is no necessity for a fresh state election as it a pure waste of public funds and it is better to employ the funds for state projects that yield benefit for the rakyat in Selangor.

IN LIFE ONE MUST GO BACK TO BASIC FIRST PRINCIPLES AND RELY ON BASIC FIRST PRINCIPLES FOR DECISION MAKING.

Tan Sri Khalid was the CHOSEN candidate by Pakatan to be the Mentri Besar. Pakatan has the right to decide who is Mentri Besar as Pakatan had won the majority of ADUN seats. The State constitution is very clear on this matter. The majority party , PAKATAN RAKYAT parties, form the state government. THE MAJORITY PARTY DECIDES ON WHO SHALL BE THE MENTRI BESAR.

Based on first principle, Khalid became Mentri Besar because Pakatan decided to nominate him for the second term. The SULTAN approved PAKATAN choice of Khalid as Mentri Besar.

Now after he had been sacked and is PARTYLESS, he turned around and says that
-NOW SELANGOR STATE GOVT IS TAN SRI KHALID GOVERNMENT AS HE ADVISED THE SULTAN THAT HE HAD MAJORITY SUPPORT
- NOW MAJORITY OF 32 ADUNS HAD SIGNED SD STATING THAT THEY SUPPORT AZIZAH BEING THE NEXT MENTRI BESAR.
- KHALID EVEN HAD THE AUDACITY TO SAY HE ONLY NEED 4 EXCO MEMBERS TO RUN THE STATE GOVT. THIS SAYS ALOT OF HIS MANAGEMENT STYLE!!
- IS HE A DICTATOR OR AN INCLUSIVE MENTRI BESAR? HIS PAST ACTIONS AND HIS RECENT STATEMENT OF LATE SHOWED THAT HE DID NOT PRACTISE INCLUSIVE GOVERNMENT.
- WHY HAD KHALID PRACTICED A DICTATORIAL STYLE OF GOVERNING? WHAT IS HIS REAL MOTIVE IN DOING SO?
- HAS ANYONE SEEN HIM CAMPAIGNING NATIONWIDE FOR PAKATAN RAKYAT DURING THE LAST GENERAL ELECTION?
-HOW MUCH VALUE HAD KHALID ADDED TO PAKATAN ALL THESE YEARS? WHY DID HE RUN AWAY FROM IJOK? WHAT HAS HE GOT TO HIDE?
- DID KHALID BACK UP HIS INFO WITH REAL FACTS ON MAJORITY SUPPORT BY ADVISING THE SULTAN THAT HE HAD MAJORITY SUPPORT? WHAT IS THE BASIS OF HIS ADVISE TO THE SULTAN THAT HE HAD MAJORITY SUPPORT? WHERE IS THE WRITTEN DOCUMENTS BY THE MAJORITY OF ADUNS WHO SUPPORTED KHALID?
-HAS KHALID DELIBERATELY MISLED THE SULTAN?
-HAS HE USURPED THE RAKYATS DECISION POWER BY DECLARING THAT SEALANGOR GOVT NOW IS KHALID GOVT?
- WHAT IS THE BASIS OF KHALIDS CLAIM THAT THE SELANGOR STATE GOVERNMENT IS NOW KHALIDS GOVERNMENT?
-IF PAKATAN HAD NOT CHOSEN HIM TO BE MENTRI BESAR, CAN KHALID BE MENTRI BESAR FOR SECOND TERM?
-WHO IS HE TRYING TO CON?
-DOES'NT KHALID HAD AN IOTA OF MARUAH or SELF RESPECT.
-KHALID STILL HAS TIME TO REDEEM HIMSELF AND TO REDEEM HIS MARUAH AND IT IS BEST ADVISED THAT KHALID APOLGIZE TO THE RAKYAT, ACCEPT THE NEXT CHOSEN MENTRI BESAR AND THEREAFTER GRACEFULLY STEP DOWN AND EXIT THE POLITICAL SCENE AS HE HAD THOROUGHLY DISGRACED HIMSELF.

UNDENIABLE FACT IS KHALID IS NOW ONE INDEPENDENT ADUN WHO OBTAINED HIS MENTRI BESAR POSITION BECAUSE PAKATAN HAD CHOSEN HIM AFTER THE SELANGOR STATE GENERAL ELECTIONS WHEN HE WAS A PKR PARTY MEMBER.

Khalid now has NO PARTY. HE IS JUST ONE INDEPENDENT ADUN WHO HAD BEEN SACKED FROM PKR. IF HE HAS ANY MARUAH LEFT ,HE SHOULD JUST RESIGN AND WELCOME IN AZIZAH AS THE NEXT MENTRI BESAR.

SO IT IS UP TO THE PAKATAN RAKYAT TO DECIDE ON WHO SHALL BE THE NEXT MENTRI BESAR OF SELANGOR. There is no necessity for a fresh state election as it a pure waste of public funds and it is better to employ the funds for state projects that yield benefit for the rakyat in Selangor.

AyamTua, If one keep on going through life blaming others for being duped into making decision then he must bear the consequence of his decision for allowing himself to be duped.

Why do I say that?

The basic principle in life is you must make and take decision and once you had taken decision you must be accountable for your decision taken whatever consequence that may arise. If you start to blame others for duping you then you are at fault for allowing others to dupe you and how would anyone improve his skillsets if he keeps on blaming other and not really ask -
-How have I erred?
-How can I improve?
-What must I do to improve?

If the blaming mindset keep on repeating, How can any person really IMPROVE his/her skillsets, his/her values in life??

Don't worry JTIASA..I have not forgotten you JTIASA..I shall wait for you at RM 2.00 or below. If not I shall see u above RM2.00. OK JTIASA???

AhSookAhSook,
Was it a sale to other third party of just transfer from one company to the other which Tan Sri Nathan owns?

Pursuant to Paragraph 14.08 (d) of the Main Market Listing Requirements of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad, the following Director has dealt in the securities of EVERSENDAI CORPORATION BERHAD as set out in Table 1 hereunder.

Shares transfer from Maybank Nominees (Tempatan) Sdn Bhd - Pledged Securities Account for Vahana Holdings Sdn Bhd ("Vahana Holdings") to Vahana Holdings. Vahana Holdings is a company in which Tan Sri Nathan a/l Elumalay is the major shareholder.

This announcement is dated 6 August 2014

anbz, The general principle in life is a person must take responsibility and be accountable for the decisions that he/she makes. However it is the responsibility of the decision maker to exercise due diligence of care in risk management analysis before he/she makes that decision. Every decision maker has their own investment skillsets and again different risk profile. So the first responsibility that anyone who wants to invest in the stock market is:
- Do I have the basic investment skillsets or not
- If I do not have the investment skillset, then how can I improve my investment skillsets
- Once you have attained the basic investment skillsets, the next question that everyone has to ask and decide for themselves is what is my risk profile
-Is your risk profile vey high, high, medium, low or you just don't want to take risk
- the next decision that you as an investor has to make is "How much capital that I will allocate to invest in stocks?"
-If you know that there is a risk that the stock price may also go down then do u just blindly gear up and buy the stocks in big quantities or you prefer to limit your investment exposure to that stock?
- Having decided on the above, do u just go and mortgage your house to buy shares? I will definitely not do so but will you do so?
- The stock market has lots of risks which can hurt your investment capital but there is also opportunity where you can grow your investment capital.
-have you asked yourself why there are some people who can make money from stock market whereas there are also others who make losses?
-For those who were successful have you ever asked yourself why they are successful? what are the causal and contributory factors that make them successful?
-For those people who make losses, have you ever thought whether it is just "BAD LUCK" or "POOR INVESTMENT SKILLS and/or NO UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR OWN RISK PROFILE AND THE CONSEQUENT EFFECTS OF YOUR RISK PROFILE ON YOUR INVESTMENT CAPITAL OR JUST PURE RAW GREED?" .
-No one including you and uncle Koon can always make the right call within a short time period

So if you go forth in life blaming others for decision you make yourself which had gone sour then you got to grow up and take responsibility and be accountable for the decision you make yourself as other people can advise you but you have to decide for yourself n not blame others.

BE A MAN, TAKE DECISION YOURSELF AND HOLD YOURSELF ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE DECISIONS THAT YOU HAD TAKEN. IF YOU CANNOT DO SO THEN YOU ARE JUST A BOY WHO HAD NOT GROWN UP !!!

OK OK OK OK
AyamTua= Michael Jackson of BURSA!! KOKOKOKOK now singing

Beat It!!
Don't stop till u get enough!!
Sharing the love!!

AyamTua, U just received a new very prestigious title.......

KING EAH ..HAHAHAHAHA

Next stock to terbang is an undervalued blue chip stock called INSTACOM!!!!!

PLEASE BUY AT YOUR OWN RISK OK?? HAHAHAHA

EAH dah terbang melangit!!! hahahahah

matakuda oh matakuda,
Why r u so angry and possess a vendetta against uncle Koon? In investment one must take responsibility for one's investment decision but of course before one takes the decision to invest one must do due diligence in researching the stock fundamentals, its technical readings and ask around from other people on their views on certain stocks. Once you had performed an objective analysis and a systematic thinking process on what is fair value then one makes the decision to invest.

If I do recollect correctly, Uncle Koon made a call to buy JTiasa in i3 thread when Jtiasa was around RM 2.00 or slightly below. I had owned Jtiasa even before uncle Koon made the call but I had already sold off before the last corporate exercise went ex. I started to nibble Jtiasa when it hit the lowest way before uncle Koon made the call.

In my investment mindset, I WILL NEVER BLAME ANY PERSON WHO RECOMMENDS A BUY CALL OR SELL CALL OR HOLD CALL. I ALWAYS MAKE MY OWN CALL BASED ON FA & TA PRINCIPLES. YOU AS AN INVESTOR IS UTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE AND ACCOUNTABLE FOR YOUR DECISION TAKEN. PLEASE STOP BLAMING OTHERS, BLAME YOURSELF, TAKE RESPONSIBILITY AND ASK YOURSELF "HOW CAN I IMPROVE FURTHER ON MY INVESTMENT SKILLSETS, IMPROVE ON INVESTMENT DISCIPLINE IN ORDER TO IMPROVE ON MY WINNINGS.

Please try to control your emotions although it may not be easy but if you are self perceptive over this, you surely can bring your emotions under control.

nordimohd, With your disciplined investment decision making, u will win for sure.

nordimohd, U r very disciplined, very fundamental driven & very systematic investor long term investor. I salute you!!!

Very Hi Volume Hi Closing price with firming BULLISH undertone augurs very well for EAH

Congrats to all of u who got in during past 2 months!! Blue skies and sunny days ahead. Of course need intermittent rain to cool the heat down just a little bit!!!

Now this boring stock is starting to excite a little bit. Cant wait to see how exciting this stock will become hahahaha

MBSB fundamentals is Good and its price will slowly inch upward from now onward. Its PE will be rerated slowly upward till conclusion of restructuring

Sendai is a buy and then hold around this price level as the upside can be quite significant once the new biz in lift boats and jack up rigs gets going . I m looking at 2nd half 2015 for Sendai to deliver the results.

Chart is already overbought. Price had run ahead of fundamentals. One should be selling out if price goes higher, not buying!!! Moreover rights@ 50 cents means good margins at these prices in 3.5 months!!

The pennant flag formation for instacom ends today!!! Price will up from now onward!!

U trade with certain % but hold the other %. That is my investment style. U have your own style and others have other ways as well. Sometimes need some excitement lah in boring stocks!! I have already sold certain % at 2.60 so anything below 2.60 is good price to go in.

My friends are already waiting with huge bullets to whack in when price hit RM 2.10 and below

The last price down to RM 2.04 was on 31/12 2014 with Volume transacted at 7.96 million shares. The fundamentals for Jtiasa now compared to 31/12/2014 had improved further. Whether can repeat price down to RM 2.04 is highly debatable. Let's wait and see. Patience is great to have now!!

have sold what I wanted to sell above above 2.60. Now waiting to collect more at 2 and below. If it does not drop to 2 and below then I will buy in at higher price as the fundamental will improve tremendously in 2015 onward when the additional palm oil mills are working full time plus more maturing acreages plus Timber sales.

If one has no position then it would be advisable to start nibbling as one can never be too sure that price can hit RM 2 and below. Chart is looking oversold now. The best time to buy is when price drop to lowest with high volume. How much is lowest price? I cannot tell but the market will tell u when there is abnormally high volume down. Right now volume is small for the price regression and I have doubts whether price can really hit RM2 and below with such low volume now.

Below RM 2.00

Don't worry..just be patient...just wait and let them throw down more before u start to buy in SLOWLY!!!

Who ever has the patience to start collecting slowly now will be smiling in 2015!!!!

Can start to buy in slowly now!! Chart looking oversold!!!

It appears that there is a concerted effort to push price down with low volumes. Just be patient and wait for the right buying price!!

Both mother and son moving..SYABAS!!

Recurring income means owning assets that give recurring income every year over the useful life or income generation life of the assets. For example:
- Power stations gives recurring income as long as the assets owned produce and sell power
- Toll roads that gives recurring income within the toll concession period
- property reits
- mall owners
- Tower reits
- Property owners that lease out its properties to earn steady rental income
- any assets that generate income for the owner over the income generation life of the assets

The EKVE will have recurring losses at least for the first couple of years(if not longer) after it was commissioned

Sendai's new biz focus into lift boats and jack up rigs is a gamechanger for the company. It is worth to invest in Sendai now as there is little downside risk but tremendous upside gain once the CEO who is owner cum operator drives up the new biz in lift boats and jack up rigs. The CEO has a good strategic biz mindset and he has the passion plus drive to drive up the lift boats and jack up rigs biz.

One can never be 100% sure what the support level for CPO is..it may be RM 2,000/tonne or it may not. One must be flexible and not be tunnel visioned!!

fortunebullz,If you think it is low, it may go lower. I wait for Mr Market to justify the the appropriate support levels. Just be patient.

Based on last reported FY 2012 and FY 2013 and Q1 2014 EPS value, the EPS dilution due to recent corporate exercise are as follows:

EPS 2012= 6.75 cents = 3.857 cents (after recent 6 rights for 8 mother share)
EPS 2013= 2 cents = 1.142 cents (after recent 6 rights for 8 mother share)
EPS Q1 2014= 1.62 cents= 0.925 cents (after recent 6 rights for 8 mother share)

fortunebullz, Have you factored in recent corporate exercise and past bonus, rights etc (past dilutive actions in EPS)in the EPS that you had stated above?

EPS 2012= 6.75 cents = 3.857 (after recent 6 rights for 8 mother share)
EPS 2013= 2 cents = 1.142 (after recent 6 rights for 8 mother share)

ayamtua, When the big bull run comes and it looks like its coming in the medium term, all your penny stocks will cross RM 1.00