Pls peopel here..give full support to chong..even he stealing..we dont know..we dont care As long he can borrow money from bank and pay us dividen..i happy
Alice.. saya support Prtasco! Tapi EPS PE NTA semua turun sampai hampil semua negative liao saya takut orang cakap saya gila tipu! How ahh? Buy buy buy!
Tey Por Yee and his magical arms length deal with Protasco As the countdown to next week’s Protasco EGM continues, here are some interesting points to ponder for shareholders who may want to consider why Tey Por Yee should be kicked out from Protasco’s board.
Actually all those who have dealings with the Tey Por Yee syndicate and also the public at large should take note of this cautionary tale.
Just to go back a little Tey Por Yee had in 2012 brought to the attention of Protasco a deal to invest in an oil and gas venture in Indonesian concern PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia (PT ASI).
As part of the deal some RM50 million was paid upfront, and as collateral shares in a seemingly unrelated Indonesian company PT Inovisi was pledged as collateral to Protasco.
It should be noted that all this while the Protasco board (the innocent members of the board that is) thought they were dealing with Indonesian companies and businessmen.
Tey Por Yee was allegedly arms length away from the deal. His only interest or so he was to lead the board to believe was with Protasco benefiting from the deal.
Now back to the PT Inovisi shares pledged for the deal. These shares were in the name of Acclaim Investments, a company registered in the BVI with a paid up capital of US$100.
It has now emerged that Acclaim Investments was set up in 2009 with just two shareholders. Guess who? Tey Por Yee with 85 shares and his sidekick Ooi Kok Aun with 15 shares.
(As for February 6, 2014 these two men now no longer own any shares in Acclaim. It is now 100 per cent held by one Lim Sue Fern)
Plus the fact that Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kok Aun also own or have beneficial interests in the various companies with interests in the PT Slavic deal one can now see this tangled web that the two men spun to entangle Protasco and ultimately receive US$27 million in a deal which has just fallen apart.
So not bad lah this magician. He has got the US$27 million, Protasco has lost the money and there’s no deal on the table any more.
You can draw your own conclusion as to who got cheated and who was the victim of what can only be called a giant scam.
So who do you think you would vote out of Protasco’s board?
Its ok ..kalau 10 tahun berturut turut..loss and borrow money to pay dividen ..how I ada sikit saja lot potato..ops sorry..its protasco is it U minority happy with dividen only.. If u want dividen..come i tlg masuk asb
Lack of Integrity is the main culprit . The company should retrieve all the money paid as the agreement was terminated. Should not write off the deposit sum as it will jeopardize the share price as the EGM and Court case are still pending.Do not let off the hook and declare them bankrupt under1965 campany act.SC MUST STEP IN TO FACILITATE TOGETHER WITH SSM.Thiis will serve as a deterrent for other directors to serve in best interest of the company and hence protect the investor from the larger public.
The Edge, KiniBiz and The Star are actively writing about Protasco these days, and one can't blame them. There is a mud-slinging match going on between Tey and Chong, which is always good for some interesting news, that is what people like to read. Finally details (some unconfirmed) have been revealed in these articles, details that should have been revealed by Protasco itself a long time ago.
One important question in all of this is, which party is right?
But at least as important is the question: where is and was the transparency in all of this?
The deal in question started almost two years ago, and the official news as revealed by Protasco has been very, very limited, and most of it very much delayed.
January 2013 I wrote "Protasco's Puzzling Purchase" in which I asked the following questions:
Protasco does not seem to have relevant experience in the notoriously difficult oil and gas industry, why does it want to take so much risk, especially in Indonesia with poor corporate governance? PT ASI is only a few months old: "PT ASI was incorporated in Indonesia on 6 September 2012 as a private limited company". PT ASI only has one director who hardly owns any shares. No background of this director is given. The vendor is 99% owned by Anglo Slavic Petrogas Ltd, a company registered in the British Virgin Islands, no background is given, a search on the internet returns nothing; who is behind this company, what is their track record? The company structure of PT ASI owning part of PT FAS owning PT Haseba is rather artificial, why is such a difficult construction chosen? Who are the minority shareholders of PT FAS and PT Haseba? On the signing of the S&P, Protasco will pay RM 50 million cash, why so much? This is about 30% of the total amount, much higher than normal in comparable deals. On November 1, 2012 PT ASI signed a S&P agreement to buy an additional 46% of PT FAS. What was the price paid for that stake? Why does Protasco not wait until this deal is panned out? And further on: ..... the production agreement will expire in 2014 (next year!) and it is not sure if PT Haseba is able to negotiate a new contract, and if so under what conditions. Why buy into a company with so much uncertainty? "The KST Field was founded in 1972 and operated by PT Pertamina Doh Nad Sumbangut until 1997. Thereafter, in 2004, Pertamina awarded PT Haseba a 10-year PMP Agreement for KST Field.". Why the gap of seven years? Also, this field seems to be pretty old, often yields are not that great in old fields. Why can't Protasco give some production numbers for KST Field? Why are no preliminary results for 2012 given? At least the half year numbers should be made available? And why are all the financial statements not audited? What are the results for PT FAS for the last three years?
Most of these questions are now, almost two years later, still never dealt with.
Soon shareholders have to vote in two subsequent EGMs on the directorship of Tey, Ooi and Chong.
But based on what information, if so much is still never revealed?
The winner in the on-going battle will be a bruised winner. And lots of doubt will continue as long as the air is not properly cleared.
The other directors (especially the independent ones) of Protasco also should evaluate the corporate governance standards of the company. A big improvement is urgently needed.
And then there is still another matter. How much of the money paid by Protasco can be recovered? Shares of Indonesia listed PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk were held in trust, but the share price has tanked recently.
Protasco has initiated legal proceedings to reclaim the money, but court cases in Malaysia (when appealed) can easily take ten years to conclude. And in this case two other countries are involved, Indonesia and the British Virgin Isl
The company in dire need of strong and credible leadership at the moment.The founder should be given an upper hand as helm the company for many years unless the financial results deteriorate severely.
The past records talk louder as the founder diversified into many sectors with lucrative returns.The company had in the past ventured into unchartered business territories but still but still manage to overcome by mitigating the impact.But this time it should be a short term pain and more cautious in the future. The two culprits must be charged by Macc to undertake the prosecution process together with the commercial unit of the. PDRM.
How come u blame these people..u say that u are so good in business Where your due diligence..this is not monkey business Now, u want to blaming other people
Si Chong tu mata merah...nampak tpy diversified ke property business dlm 2 tahun boleh dapat projek besar dan bagus. Kalau keadaan berterusan, dia akan diganti oleh tpy. Si Chong punya mentality ialah can't compete with him, remove him quickly.
Alice, TPY & OKA dah lama tak balik Nexgram liao. Mereka sibuk sisi. You boleh cari mereka di sini, tapi bukan di Nexgram forum! You start the argument at there you must leave there first mah then I also leave here loh! Fairly?
poor fools deceived by Tey and Ooi.. I pity your naivete. Dato Sri Chong founded this company and built it to where it is now after decades of hardwork and commitment.. Young punk Tey enter into the foray only a year and already caused so much ruckus. Those siding him.. I hope you're all his cronies otherwise I'd question if you have any form of intelligence
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Bjcorp
42 posts
Posted by Bjcorp > 2014-11-26 18:03 | Report Abuse
Chong so generous? Lol lol lol lol. Stolen billion ringgit for his boss scare people know. Generous stealing? Minority will find out and hang him!