yes wt222 is right...don't learn from an old man that like to "hit and run and not looking back" for 50 cents profit..after claiming 'the high potential/growth" stocks...same tactic...semua sudah tau dia punya style

no decimals no decimal no decimal...just whole numbers !!!

tipu pun tak pandai..tapi masih boleh tipu ramai orang..haha very weird

wowowowowo...u are right vaentec...for 18 consecutive quarters...all the earning per share are in

"Whole" numbers !!!! (in cents)

what is whole numbers?

= 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...

this must guiness world book of record !!!! cilaka mainland stock suka tipu!!!!

don't worry ..if patimas can be traded again ..u'll make so much money (if u bought it 1.5 cents and lower)...but if it becomes saag...just say good bye

i love u Ameera

that was Posted: 05 Jun 2013 http://akublogrssj.blogspot.com/2013/06/jobsjobstreetcom_6.html#4

now 2 feb 2014..haha

bought at 1.80 to 1.90...and want to sell at 2.50? manyak jahat wo

kikiki itu hari ramai ingat murah..rupanya lagi murah dia datang...kikiki

kikiki

may be can enter when it falls with small volume?

UM 1999

Deposits for the Group of approximately RM167,000 (2012: RM163,000) are held on lien for banking facilities
granted to a subsidiary.

just like i pasted before...u are right...silly me copied and pasted it right..but read it wrong...ok my mistake...

statitistic and calculus are easier...when i studied them before...don't know may be i'm becoming old already to learn...still want to learn...well math had nothing to do with bursa..this is actuary much more difficult

ok kcchong selesai masalah..only 3 problems now

1. esos
2. decreasing profit (also fimacorp with decreasing profit)
3. not enough upward force
----

kcchong...i'm sorry if my questions make u angry...don't get me wrong....it is ok if u want to scold me...i admit it i'm quite dumb....so don't get me wrong....if i'm a girl ..u would kiss u man...hehe...however i'm with u now...for kfima..theoretically...

not on board yet...waiting for my personal loan and lower/optimum price

so kcchong whatabout knusfor...just for discussion? using your 5 rules...of...forgot ...or any method?

someone is talking about valuegrowth..yet after seeing profit just about 50 cents..he will run..and will not come back after that...his habit i think...so value growth for him is just like a 50 cents profit after hard promotions (see s for plural..so many blogs created man..hahahaha) ...haha a habit u cannot hide

The most undervalued share I know

---

the funniest and most arrogant title ever in i3investor..hahaha..ask him ..how could he made the title without 'thinking'...????? ahahaha senile i guess

hahahah non stop promoting again and again to no avail

time to sell!!!

don't buy....latest quarter losses = 20m..still want to buy? under RM 1 is just near the corner

a non spac...with still not a profit to shout about...just expenses..so the risks have increased huh? hehe

wah calvin i thought my price is very cheap...and u give TP under 50 cents ...haha u are cleverer than me

zu...may i explain/guess to your question on why some big buying was happening in the trading?

one way to dispose in big quantity and at the same time the price wouldn't reduce so much is by buying at the same time..so as to build perception that the shares are in big demand....while the brokerage fee can negotiated to be almost zero....who else...OSK

if u give injection so as the nta of gpacket increases to 40 cents...and give them chance 5 more years to perform...i still think the nta will be negative then

my guess is the next bad financial results will come around 1 month...now nta=13 cents...may just get to 3 cents nta...very easy to derive this kind of expectation based on the history of miserably puan the confident con man..and helped by The Star..every year

semua orang pun kau flag...hehe loser counter

but sometimes instead of hit and run...being hit and had to stay freeze ..hehe

but now iris has more than just a goreng counter like it was in 2005..so right now...if the expectation is linear...it should move across 1.35 (must include some goreng also..hehe)

don't worry vinvin...in 2005...iris was 77 cents then it fell to 57 cents in a single day...and within 2 weeks ..it was RM1.35

yeah iris is at least 20 times better than gpacket...no need to calculate

i guess u are wrong calvin...this is a lender without any bank's license ..and their loan biz keeps increasing...still i dare not to enter...but anyone who have it at high price ..must hold

many people are absorbing the shares now because they feel 5% dividen is still decent...well u will not know how much dividen they might/able to give in the future...and the siam operation might gives to an overall bad result for zhulian

ccc5197 ...i guess the trading was an insider trading...why?

Date Open Range Close Change Volume
30/01/2014 3.12 3.05 - 3.17 3.11 -0.02 (0.64%) 2,115,300
29/01/2014 3.21 3.12 - 3.28 3.13 -0.05 (1.57%) 3,565,100
28/01/2014 3.32 3.18 - 3.39 3.18 -0.12 (3.64%) 3,870,500
27/01/2014 3.37 3.27 - 3.45 3.30 -0.13 (3.79%) 3,325,900
24/01/2014 3.56 3.35 - 3.60 3.43 -0.17 (4.72%) 8,400,200
23/01/2014 3.90 3.60 - 4.05 3.60 -1.01 (21.91%) 12,551,800
22/01/2014 4.70 4.60 - 4.70 4.61 -0.09 (1.91%) 261,700
21/01/2014 4.52 4.52 - 4.70 4.70 +0.21 (4.68%) 272,000
20/01/2014 4.49 4.27 - 4.50 4.49 -0.08 (1.75%) 457,200
16/01/2014 4.70 4.51 - 4.70 4.57 -0.18 (3.79%) 758,900
15/01/2014 4.85 4.65 - 4.85 4.75 -0.10 (2.06%) 1,172,300
13/01/2014 4.91 4.85 - 4.92 4.85 -0.09 (1.82%) 912,800
10/01/2014 4.93 4.91 - 4.95 4.94 +0.03 (0.61%) 107,500
----
see that from 13 to 20th january...(4 days in a row) it fell...yet on the 5th days (21th january) it went up by 21cents!!!...and the quarterly result was announced on 22th..it fell (don't know the announcement was made in the morning or after trading hours)...then fr 23rd until 30th (7 days in a row including 22th) it fell

well i guess many would expect that when it fell by huge RM 1.01..will be safer to enter ..because the fall is very huge (amid it has risen too high and too fast with low volume)..well wrong time to enter

brace yourself if it falls again by RM 1 in a single day...it can happen ..because it happened before on 23rd

macamana nak apply melalui MITI? ada links?tq

oh kc...could please study knusfor?...sorry i could not applied your too difficult method into my head..still learning...could u please

thanks kcchongnz for your reply...appreciate it much...but i guess i'm still dumb to digest it yet...could u please explain this:

annual report 2013:

in page 108:

"Deposits for the Group of approximately RM167,000 (2012: RM163,000) are held on lien for banking facilities
granted to a subsidiary. "

what does this means? does this means the loan for the subsidiary is around 167m?

which subsidiary is it?

is it a 100% owned?
if not ...it can't be right, isn't it?

why make a loan when u can pay cash ?

this is a malaysian company ma..not china-related liked csl or maxwell that borrow from banks with higher rates compared to deposits that yields with lower rates

--

one more thing:


Fixed deposits with licensed banks 253,148k (2013) and 250,228k (2012)

this is a very undervalued company as u said...so why only increase cash in bank bank by 3m?

and cash in hand also less by 1m...(refer page108)

i'm just asking u to diminish my doubts...

---
but i still hate the staffs with their esos...i believe this is one of the reasons why kfima cannot moves up..well u know the trading is so thin...so for how much thin the esos is being disposed..it makes a great impact.
---

tq for your willingness to teach me...i'm looking forward..always..but i always include doubts to be safer
---
my next question is...i read that your intrinsic value for kfima is RM 3.98

so what would be the intrinsic value of kfima for every 10 cents increase in fimacorp? sorry for asking

so have all the receivables , the loans , and many more have excluded while the intrinsic value of kfima being calculated...

gosh 90 cents cash..excluded the loans..haha

Posted by kcchongnz > Sep 7, 2012 06:02 PM | Report Abuse

What is the effect of a corporate exercise involving Kfima and Fimacorp? The following is just my speculation of the benefit of a possible privatization of Fimacorp by Kfima.
For year ended 31 March 2012, Kfima made a net profit of RM116.5 m. After provision of profit for minority interest in the amount of RM35.6 m, the net profit attributed to the shareholders is 80.9 m. This works out to be an earnings per share of 30.5 sen. If Kfima takes FimaCorp private and pays off the minority shareholders with cash, then all earnings of RM116.5 m of Kfima will belong to the equity holders of Kfima. This will boost the earnings per share of Kfima to 44 sen, or 44% more. The PE ratio of Kfima will be reduced to only 4.8 with its closing price of 2.13 on 7/9/12. Isn't it dirt cheap for a company with great historical and potential future earnings and cash flows and healthy balance sheet. Of course Kfima would have to come out with a sum of cash to pay off the minority shareholders of FimaCorp. How much is involved?
At the closing price of FimaCorp at RM6.15 on 7/9/12, its market capitalization is RM507 m. Hence Kfima has to come out with at least RM203 m to pay off the 40% minority shareholders in FimaCorp. Let us assume that Kfima pays a premium of 20%, or RM243 m. As at June 2012, Kfima has a net cash of 257 m. This means that Kfima can pay off the minority shareholders of Fimacorp at 20% above the market value of Fimacorp, and also pay off whatever debts now, Kfima is still in a net cash position.
Shouldn’t Kfima’s share price rise by 44% at least from RM2.13 now to RM3.07 with the rise of EPS of the same magnitude? Of course it is not necessary, but it may. Investment is not so simple as arithmetic. Alas, it is just some market talk about this Kfima corporate exercise. There is no confirmation from the company so far. However, my discount cash flows analysis shows that even without the corporate exercise, Kfima at its present form, it’s intrinsic value is still substantially above this RM3.07 we are talking about
----

lol...RM 167m of the cash still being pegged to a bank as to fulfill the conditions to loan approval for kfima subsidiaries...hahaha all talk about cash..big cash ..forced to be pegged...no expert in here saying about that...yeah me not an expert...but still me are the one detecting and saying this...lol

at the mercy of the majority shareholders?...just forget it...i believe the swings in the profit are well crafted by these scum directors...the swings are having too high amplitude..just can believe it...one moment made profit of 69m..and the year before loss 80m...hantu traps counter ma

sapa berani mati?

2.80 senang2 boleh dapat

wah PN17 u said u bought zhulian at RM3.60...and then on 29/01/2014 u asked why it shoot up...while the range that day was 3.12 - 3.28...while the day before it closed at 3.18...so at what shooting price from 3.19 to 3.28 ...price when posted your question?

i hope u sold at any price in that range..because now it is 3.11

well the cfo of pmcorp has just resigned ...wonder why

rhb said 20 cents..not 30 cents

wait under 6 or 5 ...tapperring is working

derive 236 from where? from your name 123?

1+2+3 = 6...haha

wah saufi and lassalian orang kesayangan MITI...kabel kuat selalu dapat..hampeh..sorry jealous and dengki..tak adil tak adil

risk trader u asked me if i missed the boat???

lol it's going down...and u asked me that? nasib baik i tak lemas...for sure i cannot swim..hehe

that was only an extended contract..lol...that's why it cannot move up...haha

careful near term TP < 80 cents

or make it < 70 cents

or with dow jones down by 150 points...latest

might be < 60 cents..haha what goes up...will eventually goes down

Due to the slow rollout of local O&G
fabrication projects in 9MFY14, Pantech’s domestic sales have reduced to 49%
of total sales (FY13: 60%). This was also evident from weaker trading revenue
in 9MFY14 (-22% YoY).
---
and TA also said all the above...

reduced is good heh?

Icon8888 ?

so TA TP from 1.42 now became 1.22 ...down by 20 cents...lol what kind of good news is that?

and the revenue...TA said...not me saying
FY12 434.6m
FY13 637.2m
FY14E 555.2m

decreasing? is that good also? weird weird

that was only an extended contract..lol...that's why i cannot move up...haha