Nope. I dont Friend fishy guys...

Just follow the big investors...

I hope the Public wont get cheated

Tell me which point you hatr

I repeat:
Conclusion (another point)
1) no patents yet it’s called tech company
2) asking money to develop things - and no guarantee that it could be successfully commercialised
3) if fail - won’t get any thing - cos Ip are just papers
4) in the game of IOT - where giants like Google etc are competing
5) dropped nearly 70% from the peak and no one saw it as an opportunity
6) small tech companies usually disappear very fast

Anything contradicting

True solid gold

Read... n understand .... Many have lost...

Iot tech for precision farming ... arbb ... hehe.... sure after this copy the term

But all experts.... luckily they never used the term like precision farming

But I like the director face ... looks ok... But Company not Many PhD holders

I hate when companies con the Public

If all of u pandai ... sell n buy back at 8 cents

Whistleblower99 at least now u know .... arbb is basically only 8 cents

Liability also increased

Truth is truth. No international investors targetted this Company. It has been 8 quarters n going to be 9

Stampid54 think: Why international Fund managers never Buy? where as it is too cheap now? I know u r smart and u will Ignore anyone who is not smart like u... But by ignoring the decision of international investors... are u not loosing ?

As for now I follow the international Fund managers . Or should I follow stampid54? Coz he is important too... hehhe

Stampid54, no talent - How Many PhD holders in the r&d team ... (doesnt make sense to you)

If Its a great Company, Why did investors sell in droves

U invested, But no major Fund managers invested. Are you trying to say you are better than them.

Keyboard warriors ramai la

I wish too... but truth is truth. No major fund managers invested although prices dropping. New competitors will emerge soon. The company doesn’t have many phd holders. Most engineers from tepi Jalan university

Don’t invest brother ... past results don’t guarantee future results.... many have sold

Any major institution bought ?

Substantial shareholders sold ... why should I buy

Tech changes... don’t project future earnings using past performance... u need innovative products all the time ... blackberry/ Nokia / jelas Tak?

How many phds in the company

Arbb doesn’t even have proper IP

5G will change our lives but small tech players will come and go

The first question: who sold the shares? Must be substantial holders... they have first hand news.... then RI ... means what? Could be fishy right?

Don’t project past profits into the future .... tech companies like Nokia / blackberry/ etc nearly disappeared

I stick to my conclusions:

Conclusion (another point)
1) no patents yet it’s called tech company
2) asking money to develop things - and no guarantee that it could be successfully commercialised
3) if fail - won’t get any thing - cos Ip are just papers
4) in the game of IOT - where giants like Google etc are competing
5) dropped nearly 70% from the peak and no one saw it as an opportunity
6) small tech companies usually disappear very fast

Keyboard warrior contradicted ... habis sure kena

You should advice them...:

U mean the company news. The company wants to patent new stuff and you went against it?

If the right issue raised RM 50 mil, legal fees alone can take 20-30%

Conclusion: stay away from such companies. Tech companies require talent, legal expertise, money, ability to defend in case got sued, strong internet presence,

Example:

Apple has been awarded $2.3M in legal fees in a California court case. Apple and Cisco were sued over alleged patent infringements relating to point-to-point internet communications.

Just imagine legal fees alone could go to ten million ringgit. This is just legal fees.

That’s the real point jazz master

Patents are costly n no guarantee of commercialisation.... whether software or electronic solutions

So if invest in RI means smart? The company is trying to fish by saying they are going to patent new stuff. N u are saying not good to patent. How la?????

Jaznaster is slowly understanding

Right issue gone

Pandai:

And yet this company saying this:

ARB sets up R&D unit to commercialise research, patented technology

Risky business right.

The last point would bring down the shares to new lows

Sc also might investigate as it is a bit fishy

Conclusion (another point)
1) no patents yet it’s called tech company
2) asking money to develop things - and no guarantee that it could be successfully commercialised
3) if fail - won’t get any thing - cos Ip are just papers
4) in the game of IOT - where giants like Google etc are competing
5) dropped nearly 70% from the peak and no one saw it as an opportunity
6) small tech companies usually disappear very fast

Sell as percentage wise it is going to be worse

In tech business only those with strong capability, talent, funds, succeed. Even blackberry collapsed.

Conclusion:
1) no patents yet it’s called tech company
2) asking money to develop things - and no guarantee that it could be successfully commercialised
3) if fail - won’t get any thing - cos Ip are just papers
4) in the game of IOT - where giants like Google etc are competing
5) dropped nearly 70% from the peak and no one saw it as an opportunity

It has dropped more than 60% from the peak.... no one with the real money saw it as an opportunity....

Would u withdraw your savings and invest in their right issue? They will be experimenting on some tech.... it would b smarter to sell now ....

Smart and rich ppl will recognise opportunities faster... in this case this group didn’t. What does it tell u....