use the same price, better buy marco, at least a net cash company and every year dividend.
i just comment, do not own any marco and asiapac(use to own many years ago, also due to the revaluation which made the QR profit 1000%)

revenue keep dropping , liability keep increasing,
without land revaluation, this counter may not able to continue get loan from finance institutes.
if not mistaken when they did the same way back in 2015, the price was at 0.40.

already 29th day still cannot publish QR, dare not put hope in this quarter.

i suggest lion ind chang the name to khatu ind.

khatu, what else counter you leave comments besides LIONIND ?

khatu,please rest more.else this forum one day will become khatuun blog

below term appear in Q2 & Q3 QR,
"Bank balance held as security values (50'000'000) "
is that BG reserve for STAR ??

and don't use margin account.

i believe so,but he advised not to exceed 10% in the port folio.
he also didn't ask anchovies to SaiLang...

he said cut win, not cut loss, the price bought last time must be 3.28 X 1.3,, therefore it's a cut from "win".

RainT,
maybe thats the reason even it's to raise 20% tariff yet it's still unable to stimulate both the price and volume

yet their dividend payout remain low, slightly higher than FD.

look at their net cash in the past few years, increase to more than 30 cents now.

i3lurker, thanks for the BG explanation.
can you further elaborate the LAD that appear in the past few QR's ?
i posted it before but do not get the answer.

luan luan kong

at such low mother price 0.455 ,it has to gain 100% then only the warrant can breakeven.
37% subsription rate , mean still many people confident on this counter.

at this price really nothing to worry,
to what extend it will fall ?
if buy because of the IPP, then must prepare to wait till another 1~2 yrs.
i hv no choice cause buy above RM1, hold is the choice.
those major shareholders & those subscribe at previous 2 Right issue is even injured...

impairment lost 1.5billion but cash increased 2.0billion , can avoid heavy tax.

anyone able to explain the relation between LAD and STAR bank guarantee ? is it the same thing or later it will still have to vomit another 50M next year after their last appeal.

the warrant issue is totally a farce, since they know the QR is bad and yet they insist to issue the warrant.

suspected uncle offended some big guns .
whatever counter he touch, all go down like no tomorrow.
it can't be so many coincident.
just my 2cents

does it mean if hold the warrant, by 6-Dec have to pay 25cents ?

next quarter will still show a good result with the final compensation from insurance ,
afterthat got to base on the real business.
one thing out of surprise is at least
share holders get some token (1 cent dividend)

mainly affected by retail business, if not the profit should be better..

how to attract people to buy its warrant when price drop below 0.89 ?

80mil received and already reflected in Q2 report, another 35mil received in Oct, so Q3 will not have any compensation from insurance, will only reflected in Q4.
correct me if i'm wrong.

159million is total & most of it already reflected in the past 2Q report,
the balance is only 44mils..

license from 120mil to 150 mil per annum is just a mere 30 mil increase,
and gaming tax from 25% to 35% is another 10% increase which will take away 16% of profit.
share price drop more than 33% is not logic at all,
but share price usually won't go by logic,
that's why only 5% people make profit by trading shares.

can someone explain the different between RM16M provision of LAD & the RM50M bank guarantee in the recent QR ??

the warrant is like toilet paper base on existing share price..

trapped at jaks & lion 90k & 80k shares each...at 0.985 both.
have to keep for years...

this share just ask money via right issue 2 yrs ago... where got dividend to pay??

when share price reach 0.005, then the common step will be consolidation, 10 into 1 or 20 into 1, with that can last for another few years.

hope this time Mr. Toh not sell again..

without insurance compensation this Q will still see red

with us & china fighting, and malaysia's election coming, every penny stock also go south..
everywhere can find stock with good DV and low PE.

before Q1'17 results announce, everyone predict it will go beyong RM2,
then it dropped from RM1.65 to RM1.27 eventhough with better YOY result published...
so on what basis you say TP2.88 ?

most probably it will only reflect on Q1'18's report, just like the previous 2 land sold in Q3 not reflect in Q3'17's report.

earn 1.8 cent & pay dividend 5 cents , cash on hand only 4 cents, borrow again lah , if not how to pay dividend

how can the board approve such dividend since the company debt still more than 70cents per share ??
kill the goose to get egg.
luckily EPF cut loss early early..

2 cents dividend given after get the money from right issue, existing share holder's share price dive from 0.35 to 0.2 without getting anything f they didn't exercise their right by putting more money.

before the right issue, price in 2014, 2015, 2016 keep dropping from 60cents to recent 20cents.
if i hold this share 5 years, i earn 10cents interest but the share price depreciate 40cents.

another thing is very strange -
net cash per share is far more than the share price but the price still remain low.
something very fishy.

sooner or later drop back to 1 cent , then consolidate again.

company debt is too high...,
today if 80% of share sold , still not enough to pay off the loan.

unlike Notion and Dufu, mother are tie up with too many CW.
i think this is the mail reason it can't move further.

pls run before the QR publish.

good news,
government need not keep on inject money , and proton can get a chance to change.

before 2014 it was gem especially with 10%+ dividend yield.
those bought above RM0.20 in 2014 still suffer paper loss until today.

BN Menang, can still find the investor hope for 2016 during year 2015 ?

only malaysia government interested to buy everything at ridiculously expensive price just like those cases reveal at the auditor general report every year.

that time the net cash per share was 22cents. i bought at 0.05.
after hold for 2 months it become 0.04,
so i asked myself,
possible for someone selling something with 22cents inside at price 4cents each ?
then i cut loss...