Posted by Mazda8 > 2017-04-13 06:12 | Report Abuse
同意 A) 和 B).
2 和3, 问题是现在是4位乘客空出位给internal staff. 当2和3理由不成立,航空公司利用4来对待乘客是滥权了,就不成立了 .
No result.
1
2
3
TA Sector Research
4
Koon Yew Yin's Blog
5
Good Articles to Share
Le Pen makes new threat to withdraw support for French government
6
Good Articles to Share
7
Good Articles to Share
US lawmakers say Hong Kong is becoming hub for financial crime — report
8
Good Articles to Share
Global airfares set to rise yet again in 2025, Amex report says
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Vc Looi
232 posts
Posted by Vc Looi > 2017-04-12 22:24 | Report Abuse
1. 事件涉嫌种族歧视吗? why no ? 调查发现美联航筛选超卖座位乘客是根据“ internal algorithm”电脑算法,用电脑找出最后4位购票的人做为超卖乘客(而不是传言中购买最便宜机票的4位).....
照您专业的判断是电脑找出人来被打咯 。。问题是如果电脑找出的人是美裔是否也一样被打 ? 你算什么律师 ?