Yes!!. Company should be more open to reveal truth behind the sacking. Maybe they should work out something for the benifit of all shareholders instead of prefering to stay dumb.
Conflict of interest case? CBT case? Was there restitution of losses? Fact that firm action was taken notwithstanding sibling relationship with the MD shows a no-nonsense BOD. If true, shows evidence of good governance? Purely speculative.
the 2 directors of benalec acted as if they are the middle man..buy land from benalec with cheap price ..then sell it with higher price...benalec punya kerja ..sapi dapat untung...kan betul gua cakap...many more is not told
immediate catalyst will be if Vincent Leaw hires some professional directors with strong track record, to push towards the Tanjong Piai deal... if Pengerang/RAPID goes well during budget, then i foresee Ben may move a little too
So the Pengerang/Rapid project is directly correlate to Ben? Then it is good move to buy BEN now. anyhow 0.18 is still cheap. Im quite sure there will be good incentive for Pengerang/Rapid in upcoming budget.
Internal problem settle so concentrate on making money. Any Pengerang project Ben will be the first company to get the contract .. have to reclaim all land first before other company come in.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Harold Huong
1,036 posts
Posted by Harold Huong > 2013-10-15 13:25 | Report Abuse
Majority research house remain HOLD