When an employee exercise the ESOS option, he pay the exercise price and then get the number of shares. Hence there will be an increase of the total number of share and earnings per share will be diluted. The company receive the money for the exercise and hence get more cash. As the ESOS option is deep in the money and all employee will exercise them. These ESOS will definitely extract some value from the company. But as there is a limit of the ESOS given (max 3%), the value extracted is not much as compared to the total value of the company. I estimated from option pricing that the total value of the company will be only roughly about 17m.
The real problem is whether most employee will sell the exercised shares to the market as they will instantly make good profits. However, if they know the value of the company, at least the senior management who got the most of the ESOS should know, they may not sell with the present market price. This is just my opinion.
For shareholders like us, are we investing in the business or are we trading on the share price? It is a different perspective all together.
Usually Subur Rahmat buys 10k-20k shares each time. They have not even breach 100k shares before. This is the first time I see purchase in millions of units.
Either it is a typo or something compelling is coming. Subur Rahmat belongs to the controlling shareholder (Basir family).
The 1.48m shares bought by Subur Rahmat is definitely a cumulative amount over a period of time. I always think that if the major shareholders keep on buying the shares, there could only be one good reason; that they opine that the share price is under-valued. Who knows about the company better than the major shareholder cum the management? If I remember correctly, there is one forumer here named Najib Zamry who mentioned that a well known US funds (Templeton Emerging Market fund managed by Mark Mobius?) have been nibbling on this stocks too. I have not verified this. Hope someone in the know can throw some light. There are also cases which the management of the company keeps on saying the share price is undervalued and carries out share buyback with the limited cash available in the company but behind the back the major shareholder keeps on unloading his personal shares. This happens all the time in Bursa. So for small retail investors like us, you really have to do some homework to see which is the case here, is the stock really undervalued etc? Opportunity or threat, you have to take your own responsibility.
BHR enterprise - 56%, two Basir sister & Puan Sri Basir. (Controlling shareholder). The two Basir sisters are the director of the company.
Subur Rahmat - 7%, Belongs to the WIFE of the Basir brother who is not a director of the company. Subur Rahmat has been continuously raising the stakes from <2% in 2010, 3% in 2011 and now up to 5% in 2012 and now up to 7%.
gark, excellent information. This guy gark knows so much about Kfima. Of course happy to see this Najib back here. Somehow I always trust this NZ. Hope he doesn't bring us to Holland.
KCCHONG NZ, dun trust me as I can be a crook. Unless you believe that Kfima's NTA stood at 2.22 and the company is sitting at huge cash pile of RM250 million is fake, otherwise I can say that it will be another MBF Holdings in the making.
NZ, yeah you could be a crook. You go hiding very often. Ah, just kidding. Actually what attracts me is not its NTA, 250m cash, corporate exercise and whatnot. What attracts me about Kfima is its ability to produce huge amount of free cash flows. This FCF would have been able to sustain its business with the same profitability without having to leave the cash of 250m in its balance sheet. Meaning that Kfima could distribute all its 250m cash to its shareholders (yes, this cash is important), and still earn enough cash each year for regular dividends, buy some investments etc after maintaining its capital expenses for growth.
NZ just keeps quiet only but he reads the thread if not he would not answer promptly when Gark hit the right info. Anyway most of us here have faith in this stock, I'm sure it won't disappoint us, cheer !
Also encouraging that the CEO is not the owner of the company. He is being paid to run the company professionally 9to the tune of 1.5 mil p.a). If does not increase shareholder value, the Basir family is going to fire his @ss.
So the major shareholders and minority shareholders' interest are both aligned... very rare we have company the CEO who is not a majority shareholder.
oldman, nobody gonna give u buy call or whatever, because if it went down, you will blame us.. lol , but nonetheless , kfima is a good and above average company, that's all i can say.
actually i kind of skeptical about kfima, 1st , the manufacture business of government ' confidential document ' ?
what kind of confidential document is it actually? is it crony link business?
apart from this, it annual report does not state out what is their % holding on their subsidiaries and associated company.
i download their annual report from 2007 to the latest 1, and still cant find any info of it, this show how ' professional ' the company management really is.
and last but no least, kfima website look like a cheap late 90 porno website design, no offense , but it really is..
i guess, the statement above just reflect how much confidence i have on the company, although the number look good, but hey, detail is the devil.. :)
Security documents - Birth cert, Death Cert, Marriage Cert, Passport, Visas, Driving License, Government Certificates, University Certificates, Government Secret Reports, Government/GLC reports, Malaysian budget books, law books.
Also a 20% owned subsidiary Geisecke & Devrient prints Malaysian currency at it's secured Shah Alam plant.
Enough printing for you?
The annual reports list ALL it's subsidiaries and holding company (page 123-126, AR 2012), major ones (not 100% held) is the following :-
I also agree with fei mau, Kfima website sucks! Like porno ah? Some more like late 90s. How you know one? Why no naked women one? Aiyah, thinking about the nature of its business, is the prettiness of a company website for Kfima that crucial meh? Make money enough loh!
Confidential (and security) document? Money, bank cheques, forms and document used by security companies, etc? Why crony link business?
No % holding stated in their subsidiaries in their website? fei mau, you very serious in investment already loh. You asked about this at least three times already oh. I remember the last time you only interested in earnings (don't care if it is real or not) and must pay good dividends. Good on you. Yeah lah, hopeless lah, not shown in the company website. But is it a statutory requirement to have that? It is a statutory requirement to be reported in their annual reports. Go find out there lah. It is in note 38, 39 of the supplementary information in the annual report.
Yeah lah at least you recognize the numbers look good. That is what we want, isn't it?
wow.. thx gark for the info, appreciate that, the info it there, i never realized it, i guess this is because the presentation is lousy? just like it website design?
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
kcchongnz
6,684 posts
Posted by kcchongnz > 2013-03-07 15:40 | Report Abuse
When an employee exercise the ESOS option, he pay the exercise price and then get the number of shares. Hence there will be an increase of the total number of share and earnings per share will be diluted. The company receive the money for the exercise and hence get more cash. As the ESOS option is deep in the money and all employee will exercise them. These ESOS will definitely extract some value from the company. But as there is a limit of the ESOS given (max 3%), the value extracted is not much as compared to the total value of the company. I estimated from option pricing that the total value of the company will be only roughly about 17m.
The real problem is whether most employee will sell the exercised shares to the market as they will instantly make good profits. However, if they know the value of the company, at least the senior management who got the most of the ESOS should know, they may not sell with the present market price. This is just my opinion.
For shareholders like us, are we investing in the business or are we trading on the share price? It is a different perspective all together.