10 bagger. I would expect Pohuat to deliver PBT above RM 16 million as the margin increase in tandem with USD strengthen against RM unless its sales volume drops below RM 110 million.
Not easy to achieve EPS 10 cents. If the PBT above RM 16 million, it's very likely profit would grow for another 2 more quarters provided sales volume and forex remain intact at least.
Read the AR in detail .. impressive! However, I found out the properties hold by company have not been re-value for long time... why? Any taikor can advice whether this is comply to accounting standard in Malaysia?
We should challenge the management in the coming AGM, the NTA of the company is way under declared which is not fair to minority shareholders ... any taikor please advice.
sometimes NTA is not the only way to reflecting share price..for eg. Pohuat factory is to produce goods to sell..the value of the factory is not that important.so the operation of the factory is more important in this case...In contrast for property sector..the NTA is including their landbank..so NTA will be more relevant to the business because property company can sell the land for earning or for better development...u cant expect pohuat sell the factory for earning right?
Of course I understand. However it is management responsibility to update regularly the company asset to shareholders. More than 90M plant & properties had not been revalued for more than 15 years ... this is not fair to minority shareholders who trade the share without updated information.
pohuat is not property company therefore do not need to waste money to revalue asset. share price is strong rely on profitability. if formula might be price = NTA + brand + profitability. Today cruise has sail. lucky i am come back with small fund to pohuat.
1. my point is good corporate governance is essential for the healthy development of KLSE listed companies.
2. This is what written in the KLSE Accounting Guideline. 3-5 years of revaluation is sufficient. Po Huat did not revalue more than 15 years which is beyond the guideline. That part we should ask for clarification from Management. ----------------------------------------------------------------- The frequency of revaluations depends upon the movements in the fair values of the items of property, plant and equipment being revalued. When the fair value of a revalued asset differs materially from its carrying amount, a further revaluation is necessary. Some items of property, plant and equipment may experience significant and volatile movements in fair value thus necessitating annual revaluation. Such frequent revaluations are unnecessary for items of property, plant and equipment with only insignificant movements in fair value. Instead, revaluation every three or five years may be sufficient. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 3. http://www.masb.org.my/pdf.php?pdf=!masb15.pdf&file_path=pdf page 13
I just read into detail the company annual report. I also notice that the company did not revalue its properties since acquisition. The last revaluation was dated 1999. As far as accounting technical, the company is allowed to do that under MFRS 116 para 29 where the company is allowed to choose cost method or revaluation method. Poh Huat decided to choose cost method in this case during the effective of the MFRS 116. The company main properties are in Muar and Vietnam. I do not know the property in Muar, but I do know that Vietnam property has increase "a lot" for the past 10 years. Based on its annual report disclose of Vietnam property of RM45m, assume double up, then we can expect the market value could be RM50m or 23 sen per share. Its Muar landed properties also around RM50m, and assume 50% mark-up toward market value or RM25m, then total group increase in valuation will be 35 sen. I don't think it is a concern to revalue or maintain its cost. Why need to pay unnecessary valuation fee at shareholder expenses ? Valuation in Vietnam could be expensive too, and gain from valuation could be subject to income tax. Most importantly, the company must be able to generate sufficient income using the properties and facilities to distribute the shareholder and capital expenditure.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Up_down
4,346 posts
Posted by Up_down > 2017-03-06 20:59 | Report Abuse
10 baggage sifu. My wild guess....Potential good QR plus Nice TA chart equal to Price taking off soon. :D