The Magic Formula Investing Strategy
“The secret to successful investing is to figure out the value of something and then-pay a lot less”
Joel Greenblatt
The Little Book That Beats The Market
In his The Little Book that Beats the Market, Joel Greenblatt, a top-performing hedge fund manager since the 1980s, describes a Magic Formula to beat the market. The secret of his magic formula is actually no magic to it at all. It is basically “a long-term investment strategy designed to buy a group of above-average companies (High return of capital) when they are available at below-average prices (low EV/Ebit)”. How intuitive it is!
The concept is simple, the explanation is simple, but most important of all, the execution for investors is simple enough to do on their own. For more detail explanation of the Magic Formula of Greenblatt, refer to the link below:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_formula_investing
The key driving formulas used by Greenblatt for his Magic Formula are:
Performance of the Magic Formula in US
So how well the Magic Formula worked in the matured market of the United States? The table below shows that the Magic Formula outperformed the S&P500 by a wide margin for the 22 years from 1988 to 2009.
The Magic formula outperformed S&P 17 out of the 22 years and achieved a compounded annual growth of 23.8% as compared to the 9.6% of S&P. $10000 invested 22 years ago in 1988 has grown to 1.09m by the end of 2009, even after the US sublime crisis in 2008-2009. This is by no means a small feat.
Why does the Magic formula investing works?
In an efficient market like that of the US market, how come investors have the chance of buying good companies at low price and hence profit from the strategy? Below could be some of the reasons:
1. Most investors tend to avoid buying many of the biggest winners.
The market prices certain businesses cheaply for reasons that are usually very well-known. Whether you read the newspaper or follow the news in some other way, you’ll usually know what’s “wrong” with most stocks that appear at the top of the magic formula list. That’s part of the reason they’re available cheap in the first place! Most likely, the near future for a company might not look quite as bright as the recent past or there’s a great deal of uncertainty about the company for one reason or another. Buying stocks that appear cheap relative to trailing measures of cash flow or other measures (even if they’re still “good” businesses that earn high returns on capital), usually means you’re buying companies that are out of favour. These types of companies are systematically avoided by both individuals and institutional investors. Most people and especially professional managers want to make money now. A company that may face short-term issues isn’t where most investors look for near term profits. But many of these companies turn out to be the biggest future winners.
2. Investors tend to sell their good stocks after they underperform for some time.
Many investors dislike holding underperforming good stocks for a period of time and simply sell them, held more cash, and/or buy other more “exciting” stocks. It’s hard to stick to a seemingly good stock that’s not working for a little while.
3. Many Investors sell their good stocks after the market and their portfolio declined.
This is a similar story to #2 above. Investors don’t like to lose money. Beating the market by losing less than the market isn’t that comforting.
Since the Magic Formula worked in the more efficient market in the US, it should logically work better in a less efficient market as that of Bursa for the reasons below.
Use of the principles in Magic Formula investing in Bursa
So why don’t we use the Magic Formula’s principles to invest in Bursa? I seriously think we should if we wish to earn extra-ordinary return from Bursa. In fact we can make improvements to this proven strategy to enhance our winning chances with the following:
My investing experience in Bursa
I have been using the principles of The Magic Formula picking stocks for a couple of portfolios of stocks in Bursa with the modifications above. The first portfolio was set up on 21st January 2013 as shown in link below:
http://klse.i3investor.com/servlets/pfs/13147.jsp
Note that the returns of the stocks and portfolio as published in the website have not taken into account of dividends for all the stocks and bonus issues of 1:1 for Pintaras Jaya, prestariang and Jobstreet. The total return is shown in appendix.
The followings are the salient points about the performance of the portfolio as at 7th May 2014.
At the beginning of August 2013, another portfolio was set up, basically also using the modified Magic Formula. The portfolio only consists of two old stocks, Kumpulan Fima and Pintaras Jaya, and nine new stocks. The returns of the stocks and the portfolio is as shown in the link here.
http://klse.i3investor.com/servlets/pfs/21089.jsp
The followings are the salient points about the performance of the portfolio after 9 months as at 7t may 2014.
I have to admit that the holding periods may be too short to claim victory for my investment strategy in Bursa. I also acknowledge the role of luck could play an important part in the good return. However, it is hard for us to dismiss the probability that the extra-ordinary outperformance could also be due to the viability of the strategy of the Magic Formula.
So what do you think? Let’s do it with the Magic Formula!
Please contact me if you like to know more about the Magic Formula at
ckc13invest@gmail.com
KC Chong (7/5/14)
Table: Returns of Stocks and Portfolio set up on 21/1/2013
Date |
21/01/2013 |
7/05/2014 |
|
|
|
Stock Name |
Ref Price |
Price now |
Dividend |
Gain |
% gain |
Kfima |
2.02 |
2.32 |
0.08 |
0.380 |
18.8% |
Pintaras |
1.56 |
3.89 |
0.125 |
2.455 |
157% |
ECS |
1.06 |
1.36 |
0.1 |
0.400 |
37.7% |
Plenitude |
1.85 |
2.82 |
0.06 |
1.030 |
55.7% |
Jobstreest |
1.20 |
2.42 |
0.06 |
1.280 |
107% |
Pantech |
0.78 |
0.97 |
0.09 |
0.280 |
35.9% |
SKPRes |
0.34 |
0.345 |
0.025 |
0.030 |
8.8% |
NTPM |
0.47 |
0.855 |
0.05 |
0.435 |
92.6% |
Kimlun |
1.25 |
1.61 |
0.05 |
0.410 |
32.8% |
Prestariang |
0.605 |
1.94 |
0.13 |
1.465 |
242% |
|
|
||||
Average |
78.8% |
||||
FTSE Mid70 |
12294 |
13991 |
369 |
2066 |
16.8% |
KLSE |
1632 |
1860 |
49 |
277 |
17.0% |
Created by kcchongnz | Jan 22, 2024
Which to buy, Insas or Insas WC?
Created by kcchongnz | Jan 15, 2024
Created by kcchongnz | Jan 01, 2024
Created by kcchongnz | Dec 25, 2023
Created by kcchongnz | Oct 02, 2022
Posted by mflk331 > May 8, 2014 02:16 PM | Report Abuse
Very good article, can you share with us how you compute your data ?
I have done this for about two years already in i3investor.
I have started an online fee-based investment course with this theme of value investing which includes this Magic Formula Investing.
If you are interested, you can join us.
2014-05-08 18:37
Hi kcchongnz, I've been following your posting about 6 months and really appreciate your elaborate explanation on FA. I'm interested to join your course but do you accept someone who is a beginner in investing and a slow learner?
I believe your course have started, am I able still able to join or I there will be another round?
2014-05-08 23:20
Posted by chunghiung > May 11, 2014 10:44 PM | Report Abuse
Hi kcchongnz, please do some research on Malaysia Glove Companies. TQ
I believe this industry is highly researched by investment bankers and analysts. I am sure you can find many reports on this. They have all the information and they are the experts.
2014-05-12 18:29
Positive or negative changes under the individual variable items of the formula carries equal weight if not more important than the formula itself.
2014-05-13 14:58
Relatively High Payable or Receivable to Cash/Profit should be noted as well.
2014-05-13 15:07
what happen to year 2008 where Joel's fund shrink into Minion and underperform S&P a lot?
2014-09-06 09:02
hi Mr kcchongz.i appreciate your unselfishness to share your investment theory.
Recently i had confuse..
i know that the net working capital in magic formula that you use is receivable +inventories -payable.however question is
1)if in the properties company ,the development properties in progress is included?or else unbilled sales is included?
2)FOR PAYABLE-do you count it total liabilities or only account payable ?when i study the joel greenbalt book.it said excluded the interest bearing loan,whic mean exclued all the loan that have interest bearing.is it the short term loan and long term loan not included ?
appreciate your kindness reply
2014-11-24 18:17
Posted by Ivan Lim > Nov 24, 2014 06:17 PM | Report Abuse
hi Mr kcchongz.i appreciate your unselfishness to share your investment theory.
Recently i had confuse..
i know that the net working capital in magic formula that you use is receivable +inventories -payable.however question is
1)if in the properties company ,the development properties in progress is included?or else unbilled sales is included?
2)FOR PAYABLE-do you count it total liabilities or only account payable ?when i study the joel greenbalt book.it said excluded the interest bearing loan,whic mean exclued all the loan that have interest bearing.is it the short term loan and long term loan not included ?
appreciate your kindness reply
Buying great companies cheap. How can this not worked, in long term at least? Good to revive something good, isn't it?
Ivan, finance and investing is art, and I made a lot of personal judgment which are controversial. There is nothing right or wrong.
These are my judgemnt on your questions.
1) yes and yes
2)I follow Joel Greenblatt
2014-11-24 19:09
Hi KC,
May I know what software did you use to screen for the Magic Formula?
Thank you.
2015-07-13 17:23
Posted by LangeSohneGlashutte > Jul 13, 2015 05:23 PM | Report Abuse
Hi KC,
May I know what software did you use to screen for the Magic Formula?
Thank you.
The magic formula metrics of ROIC and earnings yield, Ebit/EV are not commonly available from any screen, I think. May be from overseas paid site like gurufocus. I do them "by hand".
2015-07-13 18:10
Hi KC Chong, I am not a finance nor accounting people but I am very keen to learn about applying Magic Formula to identify value stock that worth to take the risk to invest. I wonder whether you could provide me a simple example using actual Bursa counter to apply the Magic Formula. This would be a great help for me. Thanks!
2016-12-22 15:42
johnny cash
thanks for the info, it s very helpfull
2014-05-07 21:48