Tea, coffee or money?

The argument that caffeine, a stimulant in coffee, can prevent dementia is supported by various studies suggesting potential neuroprotective effects.

1. **Epidemiological Studies**: Several population-based studies have found a correlation between regular coffee consumption and a reduced risk of developing Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia. For instance, a study published in the "Journal of Alzheimer's Disease" found that moderate coffee consumption was associated with a lower risk of developing dementia in later life.

2. **Caffeine's Neuroprotective Effects**: Caffeine, the primary psychoactive substance in coffee, has been shown to have neuroprotective properties. It acts as an adenosine receptor antagonist, which means it can block adenosine receptors in the brain. Adenosine is involved in promoting sleep and relaxation, and its receptors' blockade can increase alertness and wakefulness. More importantly, this blockade is thought to reduce inflammation and protect against neuronal damage.

3. **Reduction in Amyloid Plaques**: Some research suggests that caffeine might help reduce the buildup of beta-amyloid plaques, a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. Animal studies have shown that caffeine administration can reduce the levels of these plaques in the brain, which is a significant factor in the prevention of Alzheimer's.

4. **Antioxidant Properties**: Coffee contains antioxidants, such as polyphenols, which can help reduce oxidative stress in the brain. Oxidative stress is a major contributor to the development of neurodegenerative diseases, including dementia. The antioxidants in coffee can help neutralize free radicals and protect brain cells from damage.

5. **Improved Cognitive Function**: Regular coffee consumption has been linked to better cognitive function in older adults. Studies have shown that caffeine can improve various cognitive abilities, including memory, attention, and executive function, which are critical in maintaining cognitive health and potentially delaying the onset of dementia symptoms.

6. **Long-Term Observational Studies**: Long-term studies, like the one conducted by the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Dementia (CAIDE) study, have observed that individuals who consumed coffee at midlife had a significantly lower risk of developing dementia and Alzheimer's disease later in life compared to non-coffee drinkers.

Tea, particularly green and black tea, is rich in antioxidants like catechins and polyphenols, which play a significant role in protecting against kidney damage. Here are several key points to support this argument:

1. **Reduction of Oxidative Stress:** Oxidative stress, caused by an imbalance between free radicals and antioxidants in the body, is a major factor in kidney damage. The antioxidants in tea neutralize free radicals, reducing oxidative stress and thereby protecting kidney cells from damage.

2. **Anti-inflammatory Effects:** Chronic inflammation is another contributor to kidney damage. The polyphenols in tea have potent anti-inflammatory properties, which can help reduce inflammation in the kidneys and prevent further damage.

3. **Improved Blood Pressure Control:** High blood pressure is a leading cause of kidney damage. Studies have shown that the consumption of tea, particularly green tea, can help lower blood pressure, reducing the strain on the kidneys and preventing damage.

4. **Protection against Toxins:** Certain toxins, such as those from medications or environmental pollutants, can cause kidney damage. The catechins in tea have been shown to offer a protective effect against these toxins, helping to preserve kidney function.

5. **Enhanced Kidney Function:** Regular consumption of tea has been associated with improved kidney function. For instance, green tea has been shown to reduce proteinuria (excess protein in urine) and improve the filtration capacity of the kidneys.

6. **Prevention of Kidney Stones:** Tea, particularly green tea, has been found to inhibit the formation of kidney stones. The antioxidants in tea alter the crystallization process, making it less likely for kidney stones to form.

By incorporating tea into one's diet, individuals can leverage these antioxidant properties to protect their kidneys from various forms of damage, promoting overall kidney health and function.

Sunway 2.0?

Still cheap.....huat huat one

>90% traders eventually lose money over the years-decades. This is why

Queuing for my tickets to watch the upcoming lion circus show.....hehe

Apartheidism, defined as a system of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination, is one of the worst forms of moral and humanism violation.

1. **Denial of Basic Human Rights**: Apartheid denies individuals their basic human rights solely based on race or ethnicity. This includes the right to access to certain universities and employment/promotion opportunity. Such systemic exclusion violate the sense of moral, nobility and humanism.

2. **Perpetuation of Inequality**: By design, apartheid enforces and perpetuates inequality. It creates and maintains an unjust hierarchy where one group is considered superior and the other inferior, leading to widespread social and economic disparities that causes disunity.

3. **Psychological Harm**: Apartheid inflicts deep psychological wounds issues in the society, compromising harmony.

4. **Social Division and Conflict**: Apartheid fosters division and animosity between different racial groups. By institutionalizing segregation, it creates a society rife with mistrust, resentment, and often violence, leading to long-term social instability and conflict.

5. **Violation of Ethical Principles**: Apartheid stands in stark opposition to fundamental ethical principles such as justice, equality, and respect for human dignity. It represents an extreme form of moral failure by institutionalizing the belief that some human beings are inherently worth less than others.

6. **Global Condemnation**: The global community widely recognizes apartheid as a grave moral wrong. Historical examples, particularly in South Africa, have led to international sanctions, widespread condemnation, and efforts to dismantle such systems, underscoring its universal recognition as a profound injustice.

7. **Long-term Damage**: The effects of apartheid extend far beyond the period of its enforcement. The societal scars, economic damage, and entrenched prejudices it leaves behind can take decades, if not centuries, to heal, impacting multiple generations.

In essence, apartheidism's systematic denial of fundamental human rights, perpetuation of deep social and economic inequalities, and long-lasting harmful effects on individuals and society make it one of the worst forms of moral violation. Its comprehensive assault on human dignity and justice places it among the most reprehensible practices in human history.

This is a Tenbagger. Just lock the tickets in the safe box. And don't monitor

Just bought back and huat straightaway

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 3 days ago | Report Abuse

I'm back

Apartheidism, defined as a system of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination, is one of the worst forms of moral and humanism violation.

1. **Denial of Basic Human Rights**: Apartheid denies individuals their basic human rights solely based on race or ethnicity. This includes the right to access to certain universities and employment/promotion opportunity. Such systemic exclusion violate the sense of moral, nobility and humanism.

2. **Perpetuation of Inequality**: By design, apartheid enforces and perpetuates inequality. It creates and maintains an unjust hierarchy where one group is considered superior and the other inferior, leading to widespread social and economic disparities that causes disunity.

3. **Psychological Harm**: Apartheid inflicts deep psychological wounds issues in the society, compromising harmony.

4. **Social Division and Conflict**: Apartheid fosters division and animosity between different racial groups. By institutionalizing segregation, it creates a society rife with mistrust, resentment, and often violence, leading to long-term social instability and conflict.

5. **Violation of Ethical Principles**: Apartheid stands in stark opposition to fundamental ethical principles such as justice, equality, and respect for human dignity. It represents an extreme form of moral failure by institutionalizing the belief that some human beings are inherently worth less than others.

6. **Global Condemnation**: The global community widely recognizes apartheid as a grave moral wrong. Historical examples, particularly in South Africa, have led to international sanctions, widespread condemnation, and efforts to dismantle such systems, underscoring its universal recognition as a profound injustice.

7. **Long-term Damage**: The effects of apartheid extend far beyond the period of its enforcement. The societal scars, economic damage, and entrenched prejudices it leaves behind can take decades, if not centuries, to heal, impacting multiple generations.

In essence, apartheidism's systematic denial of fundamental human rights, perpetuation of deep social and economic inequalities, and long-lasting harmful effects on individuals and society make it one of the worst forms of moral violation. Its comprehensive assault on human dignity and justice places it among the most reprehensible practices in human history.

In the first quarter of 2024, FPI reported a revenue of RM153.9 million and a net profit of RM32.4 million, resulting in an EPS of 12.69 sen. And the EPS stays above 10 Sen after another QR

Have they caught the accomplice who signed his appointment letter?

Posted by DickyMe > 43 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Philosophy applied is "AS LONG AS YOU ARE NOT CAUGHT,.....

Bonus, next?

Huat ar

Tu bawah akta money laundering

Yup, done. Prolonged bull market, where excessive optimism and speculative behavior lead to a sharp and often unexpected downturn.

When the bull market "dies," it often does so dramatically. The sudden realization that prices are overvalued leads to a swift and severe market correction or crash.

Sabar....

Why say sour?

Yup, I'm supposed to be back collecting bit by bit

Nice...

Criminal breach of public trust to disregard general order

A bankrupt individual is much more susceptible to corruption due to financial pressures. Entrusting them with significant responsibilities and access to public funds increases the risk of corrupt practices, further jeopardizing the integrity of government operations.

Start collecting....hehe

A bankrupt individual is much more susceptible to corruption due to financial pressures. Entrusting them with significant responsibilities and access to public funds increases the risk of corrupt practices, further jeopardizing the integrity of government operations.

Fasten safety belt ya, guys

Huat ar

TP 4.00 Inari menari

Using public funds to hire a bankrupt individual for a key government position is not only legally and ethically indefensible but also undermines public trust, increases the risk of corruption, and represents a gross misuse of resources.

Prolonged bull market, where excessive optimism and speculative behavior lead to a sharp and often unexpected downturn.

When the bull market "dies," it often does so dramatically. The sudden realization that prices are overvalued leads to a swift and severe market correction or crash. This phase is characterized by:
- **Panic Selling**: Investors rush to sell off their holdings to cut losses, exacerbating the downward spiral.
- **Volatility**: Market volatility spikes as prices swing wildly, reflecting uncertainty and fear.
- **Liquidity Issues**: During a crash, liquidity can dry up, making it harder to sell assets without significantly impacting prices.

The transition from euphoria to panic can be emotionally devastating. Investors who were caught up in the bull market’s rise may face significant financial losses, leading to a loss of confidence and increased market skepticism.

The phrase "bull dies in euphoria" underscores the importance of:
- **Risk Management**: Investors need to be mindful of market cycles and avoid excessive risk-taking during periods of euphoria.
- **Valuation Awareness**: Paying attention to asset valuations and economic fundamentals can help avoid investing at the peak of a bubble.
- **Emotional Discipline**: Maintaining emotional discipline and avoiding herd behavior can mitigate the impact of market downturns.

No, 3.30

Irreparable damage

Allowing a bankrupt individual to hold a key government position sets a dangerous precedent. It lowers the standards for public office eligibility, potentially opening the door for other unsuitable candidates. This can lead to a deterioration of governance quality and public sector performance over time.

Got turbulence kah? Anyone got heart attack?

Posted by Junx Leow

Landing again

Delayed take off....by almost a week

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 6 days ago | Report Abuse

Boarding time, guys! CHeck in.................................

Need more power. Guys, throw in your bungalows, mansions and castles

Lai.....lai.....lai........

Overbought

Richer in cash. Decent dividend coming. TP 3.30.

The group is implementing an effective recovery strategy to enhance its production, which includes cost control measures and a replanting program. However, the industry will still face challenges due to global economic conditions and the declining prices of commodities.

Sabar

Huat ar

Irreparable damage

Allowing a bankrupt individual to hold a key government position sets a dangerous precedent. It lowers the standards for public office eligibility, potentially opening the door for other unsuitable candidates. This can lead to a deterioration of governance quality and public sector performance over time.

Uitm's reputation

Hiring a bankrupt to hold a key position in government service is wrong for obvious reasons:

1. **Legal and Ethical Violations**: Public service positions, especially key ones, often require the utmost integrity and adherence to legal standards. A bankrupt individual is legally restricted in many jurisdictions from holding certain public offices. Hiring such a person disregards these legal stipulations and undermines ethical governance principles.

2. **Trust and Credibility**: Public trust in government institutions is paramount. Employing a bankrupt individual in a key position severely undermines public confidence. It signals a tolerance for financial irresponsibility and potential mismanagement, eroding the credibility of the institution and its ability to manage public resources effectively.

3. **Risk of Corruption**: A bankrupt individual may be more susceptible to corruption due to financial pressures. Entrusting them with significant responsibilities and access to public funds increases the risk of corrupt practices, further jeopardizing the integrity of government operations.

4. **Misuse of Public Funds**: Public funds are meant for the public good and must be used responsibly. Hiring a bankrupt individual represents a gross misuse of these funds, as it prioritizes individual interests over the collective welfare. This decision could lead to inefficient or corrupt management of resources, ultimately harming the public.

5. **Precedent Setting**: Allowing a bankrupt individual to hold a key government position sets a dangerous precedent. It lowers the standards for public office eligibility, potentially opening the door for other unsuitable candidates. This can lead to a deterioration of governance quality and public sector performance over time.

6. **Accountability and Responsibility**: Government officials are expected to be accountable and responsible stewards of public resources. A bankrupt individual has already demonstrated a significant lapse in financial management, raising serious concerns about their ability to fulfill these responsibilities effectively.

In conclusion, using public funds to hire a bankrupt individual for a key government position is not only legally and ethically indefensible but also undermines public trust, increases the risk of corruption, and represents a gross misuse of resources. Such actions compromise the integrity and efficiency of public service, making it an inexcusable and criminally wrong decision.

Hiring a bankrupt to hold a key position in government service is inexcusably wrong for obvious reasons:

1. **Legal and Ethical Violations**: Public service positions, especially key ones, often require the utmost integrity and adherence to legal standards. A bankrupt individual is legally restricted in many jurisdictions from holding certain public offices. Hiring such a person disregards these legal stipulations and undermines ethical governance principles.

2. **Trust and Credibility**: Public trust in government institutions is paramount. Employing a bankrupt individual in a key position severely undermines public confidence. It signals a tolerance for financial irresponsibility and potential mismanagement, eroding the credibility of the institution and its ability to manage public resources effectively.

3. **Risk of Corruption**: A bankrupt individual may be more susceptible to corruption due to financial pressures. Entrusting them with significant responsibilities and access to public funds increases the risk of corrupt practices, further jeopardizing the integrity of government operations.

4. **Misuse of Public Funds**: Public funds are meant for the public good and must be used responsibly. Hiring a bankrupt individual represents a gross misuse of these funds, as it prioritizes individual interests over the collective welfare. This decision could lead to inefficient or corrupt management of resources, ultimately harming the public.

5. **Precedent Setting**: Allowing a bankrupt individual to hold a key government position sets a dangerous precedent. It lowers the standards for public office eligibility, potentially opening the door for other unsuitable candidates. This can lead to a deterioration of governance quality and public sector performance over time.

6. **Accountability and Responsibility**: Government officials are expected to be accountable and responsible stewards of public resources. A bankrupt individual has already demonstrated a significant lapse in financial management, raising serious concerns about their ability to fulfill these responsibilities effectively.

In conclusion, using public funds to hire a bankrupt individual for a key government position is not only legally and ethically indefensible but also undermines public trust, increases the risk of corruption, and represents a gross misuse of resources. Such actions compromise the integrity and efficiency of public service, making it an inexcusable and criminally wrong decision.

I'll be back soon....

A "tenbagger" is a stock that increases in value tenfold. Lynch encourages investors to look for small, fast-growing companies with the potential to become much larger over time. These stocks can provide significant returns if identified early.

**Ignore the Market Noise**: Avoid being swayed by market trends, economic forecasts, and daily stock price movements. Focus on the fundamentals of the companies you invest in, rather than trying to predict market directions in fortnight.

Posted by GoHaiDuongGo > 9 hours ago | Report Abuse

EngPro- Let’s see what happen next, say a fortnight from today 😀

Inflation kah?

Posted by hsong > 1 hour ago | Report Abuse

Insas is like i capital years back under valued. Now price has gone up so much. In a bull market Insas should be worth much more than now with its listed shares skyrocketing

Sad as I always believe every child deserves quality education of the 21st Century

Complaints about Tby Schools in Malaysia, specifically regarding incompetent teachers, educators, and administration staff, have surfaced from various reviews and discussions among parents and students.

1. **Unqualified Teachers**: At Tby International School, Setia Eco Park in Shah Alam, a significant number of teaching staff were reported to be unqualified, which has led to inadequate teaching and poor academic outcomes. This lack of qualification among teachers is a major concern for parents, who feel that the quality of education is compromised.

2. **Poor Administration and Management**: The administration at Tby Schools has been criticized for its handling of extra-curricular activities and parent relations. Activities are often poorly run unless they have external coaches, and there is a noticeable lack of engagement and responsiveness from the administration regarding parental concerns. Parents have also noted that the school forces them to buy unnecessary books and spend heavily on private tuition due to insufficient classroom teaching.

3. **Lack of Discipline and System**: At Tby Schools Setia Eco Gardens in Johor Bahru, parents have expressed disappointment with the lack of discipline and a proper system within the school. Despite attempts to provide feedback, their concerns were often ignored by the school administration.

4. **Fee Structure Issues**: Another issue raised is the inconsistency in the fee structure, with annual increases that are not communicated transparently. This has added to the frustration of parents who already feel they are not getting value for their money.

These complaints highlight significant areas of concern regarding the competence and management within Tby Schools, affecting both the academic experience and overall satisfaction of parents and students.

Recent developments indicate strong interest and potential investment, particularly from Chinese backers​ (Just International)​.Once completed, the Kra Canal landbridge could significantly impact Malaysian ports.

Category: Tenbagger

1. Sendai
2. Topglove
3. YTL
4. Ytlp
5. Notion
6. Vstec
7. Dufu
8.

Also read this book: Stock Market- The Main Source of Stress, Cancer & Heart Attack
(By Engfit)

There has been clear-cut criminal document faking in causing the downfall of Serba Dinamik Berhad on Bursa KLSE:

1. **Audit Discrepancies**: The crisis began with KPMG, Serba Dinamik's external auditor, identifying discrepancies in the company's financial statements. KPMG flagged over RM 4.54 billion worth of transactions that were unverified, indicating potential misreporting or fraud.

2. **Regulatory Investigations**: Following KPMG's findings, the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) launched an investigation into Serba Dinamik. The SC's probe was aimed at determining the accuracy and validity of the company's financial disclosures and documents.

3. **Legal Actions and Charges**: In November 2021, the SC charged Serba Dinamik, its CEO Datuk Dr. Mohd Abdul Karim Abdullah, and several other executives with submitting false information to Bursa Malaysia. These charges imply that documents submitted by Serba Dinamik to the stock exchange were intentionally falsified.

4. **Impact on Shareholders**: The financial irregularities and subsequent investigations led to a severe loss of confidence among investors. This loss of confidence was reflected in the plummeting share prices, eroding substantial shareholder value and leading to the company's downfall.

5. **Court Proceedings and Evidence**: The ongoing court proceedings and evidence presented further substantiate the allegations of document falsification. Testimonies and forensic audits are likely to reveal more details on how financial documents were manipulated.

6. **Corporate Governance Failures**: The case highlights significant failures in corporate governance within Serba Dinamik. The lack of internal controls and oversight allowed for the potential faking of documents to go unchecked for a considerable period.

7. **Repercussions on the Market**: The scandal has had broader implications for the Malaysian stock market, raising concerns about corporate transparency and accountability. It underscores the necessity for stringent regulatory oversight to prevent similar incidents in the future.

These points collectively demonstrate that the downfall of Serba Dinamik Berhad was precipitated by clear instances of criminal-cum-immoral document faking.