Followers
0
Following
0
Blog Posts
0
Threads
2,144
Blogs
Threads
Portfolio
Follower
Following
2020-12-13 14:14 | Report Abuse
2020-12-13 14:07 | Report Abuse
Am really glad you guys are finally getting the whole picture. Thank you all.
2020-12-13 14:05 | Report Abuse
Keyman, obviously the IB's don't pay enough to hire professionals.They pay peanuts to get monkeys like you to work.
Short selling was banned EXCEPT for "PERMITTED SHORT SELLING". Permitted short sellers are IB's. Bursa very clearly states the reson too:
To allow them to conduct Market Making activity. However, they don't say that Manipulation is not allowed :)
2020-12-13 13:36 | Report Abuse
WOW !!!
101 Mllion Shares Net Short Sold as of Friday Closing ?
JP Morgue is definitely cadaver
https://www.bursamalaysia.com/misc/missftp/sblnt/NetShortPosition20201211.pdf
2020-12-13 13:36 | Report Abuse
WOW !!!
101 Mllion Shares Net Short Sold as of Friday Closing ?
JP Morgue is definitely cadaver
https://www.bursamalaysia.com/misc/missftp/sblnt/NetShortPosition20201211.pdf
2020-12-13 13:35 | Report Abuse
WOW !!!
101 Mllion Shares Net Short Sold as of Friday Closing ?
JP Morgue is definitely cadaver
https://www.bursamalaysia.com/misc/missftp/sblnt/NetShortPosition20201211.pdf
2020-12-13 13:34 | Report Abuse
WOW !!!
101 Mllion Shares Net Short Sold as of Friday Closing ?
JP Morgue is definitely cadaver
https://www.bursamalaysia.com/misc/missftp/sblnt/NetShortPosition20201...
2020-12-13 13:32 | Report Abuse
WOW !!!
101 Mllion Shares Net Short Sold as of Friday Closing ?
JP Morgue is definitely cadaver
https://www.bursamalaysia.com/misc/missftp/sblnt/NetShortPosition20201211.pdf
2020-12-13 12:02 | Report Abuse
A company that reports higher Profit than its Revenue. WOW
2020-12-13 11:24 | Report Abuse
woah, must be big target. Shows the IB is set lose a ton of money
2020-12-13 11:21 | Report Abuse
stockraider, how many words is your target for you to get paid ?
2020-12-13 10:11 | Report Abuse
I hope atleast now you realise the whole system is rigged. Take the fight to their turf.
2020-12-13 09:31 | Report Abuse
JPMorgans holding percentages are % of their own portfolio. Not % ownership of the company. The world would be a better place without crooks and Bursa would be a much better place without JP Morgan, Macquarie and their ilk
2020-12-13 00:03 | Report Abuse
IB dogs alert
2020-12-13 00:02 | Report Abuse
Wow so desperate these IB dogs
2020-12-12 23:37 | Report Abuse
Notice the desperation of the IB's ? Must be paying a good packet to these barking dogs
2020-12-12 23:07 | Report Abuse
stockraider, our team includes data Analysts who are very capable of scraping you and your ilk out of your misery of trying too hard to convince people that JP Morgan and Macquarie are right. DO NOT MAKE US DO THAT.
2020-12-12 23:05 | Report Abuse
There is no excuse to allow Funds and Investment Banks to continue making money while retail investors lose their hard earned money and livelihood. Retailers invested in Glove stocks based on very fundamental strength of the industry and they were right. Investment Banks have made plenty of money all these years sucking the retailers dry. Enough is enough. Time for a change.
2020-12-12 21:30 | Report Abuse
abang, why do you doubt ? All Investment Banks have plenty of Call Warrants. The ones on Glove companies are at very low exercise prices.
2020-12-12 21:28 | Report Abuse
Brilliant assessment buddy. This manipulation needs to stop. Why is it that the system is designed to favour only the Investment Banks in every sense of the word? There needs to some regulation to atleast make it seem like a level playing field for the retail investors.
2020-12-12 21:20 | Report Abuse
Engineering, never thought of that :)
2020-12-12 21:17 | Report Abuse
That creep gemfinder is a paid IB stooge
2020-12-12 21:16 | Report Abuse
gemfinder, why ? History not relevant ? Character is formed by making a habit of doing things.
2020-12-12 20:29 | Report Abuse
In 2008, JP Morgan was the first in line for a bailout for their own misdeeds
2020-12-12 20:28 | Report Abuse
gemfinder, funny, I thought fish can only live in water
2020-12-12 20:27 | Report Abuse
In 2008, JP Morgan was the first in line for a bailout for their own misdeeds. Need we sat more ?
2020-12-12 20:15 | Report Abuse
Go check before you speak
2020-12-12 20:14 | Report Abuse
No foreign markets have Structured Warrants. Some have Contract For Difference. Why can't the IB call it that ? No balls ? But they are banned in many countries, including the USA.
2020-12-12 20:05 | Report Abuse
The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)
In the Money:
https://imgur.com/cEk679H
Out of Money:
https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ
It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.
Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.
https://imgur.com/zPEaNub
The point here is simple.
1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.
2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.
3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.
4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"
In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. What kind of an investment
platform is this ?
To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"
FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere?
My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.
It's up to you !
2020-12-12 20:04 | Report Abuse
Just stopping Structured Warrants is good enough. Atleast assets will be priced fairly.
2020-12-12 20:00 | Report Abuse
The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)
In the Money:
https://imgur.com/cEk679H
Out of Money:
https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ
It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.
Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.
https://imgur.com/zPEaNub
The point here is simple.
1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.
2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.
3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.
4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"
In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).
To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"
FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?
From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.
My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.
DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?
It's up to you !
2020-12-12 19:55 | Report Abuse
The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)
In the Money:
https://imgur.com/cEk679H
Out of Money:
https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ
It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.
Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.
https://imgur.com/zPEaNub
The point here is simple.
1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.
2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.
3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.
4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"
In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).
To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"
FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?
From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.
My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.
DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?
It's up to you !
2020-12-12 19:54 | Report Abuse
The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)
In the Money:
https://imgur.com/cEk679H
Out of Money:
https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ
It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.
Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.
https://imgur.com/zPEaNub
The point here is simple.
1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.
2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.
3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.
4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"
In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).
To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"
FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?
From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.
My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.
DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?
It's up to you !
2020-12-12 19:54 | Report Abuse
Take it up with the authorities. If everyone speaks up, some changes can be expected.
I am sure the valuations of the companies will be substantially different without these paper thrash.
2020-12-12 19:52 | Report Abuse
The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)
In the Money:
https://imgur.com/cEk679H
Out of Money:
https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ
It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.
Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.
https://imgur.com/zPEaNub
The point here is simple.
1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.
2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.
3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.
4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"
In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).
To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"
FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?
From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.
My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.
DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?
It's up to you !
2020-12-12 19:51 | Report Abuse
The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)
In the Money:
https://imgur.com/cEk679H
Out of Money:
https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ
It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.
Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.
https://imgur.com/zPEaNub
The point here is simple.
1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.
2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.
3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.
4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"
In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).
To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"
FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?
From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.
My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.
DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?
It's up to you !
2020-12-12 19:51 | Report Abuse
To be fair the Investment Bank's,the Structured Warrants on the Glove companies were a Really Bad Judgement call. Un-expected. Whatever it is, they are the death on investors. Imagine the huge sums of money the IB's are sucking out of the investors.
2020-12-12 19:48 | Report Abuse
The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)
In the Money:
https://imgur.com/cEk679H
Out of Money:
https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ
It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.
Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.
https://imgur.com/zPEaNub
The point here is simple.
1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.
2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.
3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.
4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"
In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).
To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"
FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?
From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.
My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.
DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?
It's up to you !
2020-12-12 19:48 | Report Abuse
The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)
In the Money:
https://imgur.com/cEk679H
Out of Money:
https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ
It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.
Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.
https://imgur.com/zPEaNub
The point here is simple.
1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.
2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.
3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.
4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"
In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).
To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"
FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?
From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.
My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.
DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?
It's up to you !
2020-12-12 19:48 | Report Abuse
The following is a list of CFD's ('Structured Warrants' as they are called ONLY in Malaysia)
In the Money:
https://imgur.com/cEk679H
Out of Money:
https://imgur.com/KVsaLxJ
It does'nt take a rocket scientist to figure that the Share price
of THE ASSET (The Underlying Share) will be close to if not less than
the Exercise Price of the Warrant at expiry.
Historical data clearly shows that 95-98% of the investors lose money
in CFD's. In fact. most issuer's around the world have this statement
as a Disclaimer. 2 Pages of a Macquaire Issue Document can be viewwed
in the following link. 2nd page contains all the DISCLAIMERS.
https://imgur.com/zPEaNub
The point here is simple.
1. CFD's have ONE CERTAIN result. The issuer wins.In 95-98% of the cases
the holder of these warrants at expiry lose ALL their investment.
2. Warrants, by themselvews, have ZERO VALUE. They require an
Underlying Asset.
3. The issuers are permitted by law to hedge n the asset without disclosure.
4. The issuers are permitted to short-sell he asset when short-selling
was banned on KLSE. The authorities call them "Permitted Short-sellers"
In all of the above, the investor has NO SAY. While doing all of the above, the ISSUER ensures that the price of the Actual Asset (The Share) is unjustifiably within the Exercise value of the Warrant (That really has no value).
To top it all, the SC says "An informed investor is a protected investor"
FYI, CFD's on Equity are banned in several countries including the USA.
They are permitted on Indexes and Currency. Why are they banned elsewhere? The warrants they say are "Cash Settled". European Style more so :). Just like the casino.You call this investment ?
From time to time, you have the very same issuers of the warrants issuing Target Prices (THEIR target price) to conveniently suit them.
My only intention is to make people think about the wisdom in such
speculative instruments. As if speculation on a REAL ASSET itself was not enough.
DO WE STILL NEED STRUCTURED WARRANTS ?
It's up to you !
2020-12-12 19:12 | Report Abuse
JP Morgan Malaysia contact:
teen.fai.lee@jpmorgan.com / mun.w.thong@jpmorgan.com
Ask them what they meant.
2020-12-12 19:02 | Report Abuse
2 Points :
1. Why on earth did Top Glove issue a 2:1 Bonus if their share price was only going to be RM 3.5 ?
2. JP MORGUE obviously thinks very highly of themselves and very poorly of the Investors in Malaysia to assume that the investors will swallow their vomit whenever they decide to spit it. Bit***s
2020-12-12 12:16 | Report Abuse
stockraider, go brush your teeth
2020-12-12 11:53 | Report Abuse
'Contracts For Difference' are issued on INDEXES & CURRENCY World over.
Only Futures & Options are issued on Equity. There is a difference. In Futures & Options the Underlying Asset (The Share) is actually delivered. In CFD's it's a Cash Settlement.
Like a Casino. Does the Casino Pay you in Cards ? Spades, Clubs, Hearts, Diamonds ?
Stock: [SUPERMX]: SUPERMAX CORPORATION BHD
2020-12-13 14:15 | Report Abuse
https://news.bitcoin.com/after-the-boss-calls-bitcoin-a-fraud-jp-morgan-buys-the-dip/
More Juice