a) Mr. Koon Yew Yin, holding 30 million shares which constitute slightly more than 10% of Xingquan's paid-up capital, b) Dato Koh Kin Lip (a major shareholder of Coastal Contracts and a savvy investor) c) Madam Lai Poh Lin (a director in IOI Corp) and d) New York Bank of Mellon (holding 8% of Xingquan)
A few points I would like to highlight to Mr Koon:
1) Its interest income does not reconcile with its cash pile, suggesting its cash likely being moved in and out before and after quarterly accounts closing.
2) Call warrants, free or otherwise, would be dilutive to mother shares. Mother share price would move down to the extent of the dilution, resulting in no gain no loss to the shareholders.
3) A company with RM462m cash is not small even in China. There is no excuse to sacrifice dividend. Opening own store is the way forward, yes, as entrance fee in big malls is expensive. But, it makes sense to do it incrementally and conservative to not burn too much cash on start-up costs too fast. Branding is important but if quality of its products is there, it will succeed. The fear of shareholders is they may drain away the cash on expansion capex and marketing expenses, without corresponding profit increase. If the biz is and will be under severe or cut-throat competition, it is better to close the biz and distribute all its assets back to its shareholders now.
4) Much smaller companies in China with good biz model could get bank loans in China. XQ has track record (unless its books are cooked) and big cash pile as security to get any bank loan it wants. They should use not more than half of the cash to get bank loans and the rest put in fixed deposits and give out dividend.
I am merely giving my perspective and I have spent 6 years working in commercial sector in China. I hope it helps.
seems like this ex gamuda boss is desperately selling off xing quan, so many hanky panky articles, at the end just to ask u buy some of his 30 million shares.
but, this company is very fishy.
but again, who knows how the share price will go in the coming days.
the best option is, i stay sideline and invest in other more mature stock.
If you read my article carefully, you will notice that I only made one statement which could mean that I believe the account is not cooked, but the rest of the article is merely the Chairman's explanation for not paying dividend. The only statement I made quote "One of the founders of the auditors S J Grant Thornton is my cousin, who is a chartered accountant and his son is the senior partner".
Like any serious investors, I also must made sure that the auditing company, the underwriter CIMB for the IPO and Mercury Securities Sdn. Bhd. who are recommending buy, are all trust worthy.
Can you believe the Chinese controlling shareholders could cook the books for the IPO and every year since IPO to deceive the auditors and the auditors and the few Malaysian directors could not detect?
AS I said Xinquan is my worst share investment in my life but I still have some hope. Share investment is always risky. Every smart investor has to balance the risk and reward whenever he decides to buy, sell or hold any share. In this case, I decide to hold and take the chance. In fact, I have given a large part of my holdings to my daughter and Grand Children.
Again I am not asking you to buy Xinquan and if you buy I am not responsible for your losses and I also do not want a share of profit.
It's not difficult to fool the underwriter or auditors by incorporating some reasonable creative elements in the system. Everything can be nicely prepared and tally each other. What can an external auditor do if they have obtained relevant evidences from the company and the audit job is done as stated in their SOP? Keep their mouth shut is the only way. In addition, the role of the external auditor is NOT detecting fraud.
You are a super investor because you know the tricks to make money from the stock market. It is similar to a businessmen in China, they know tricks and dare to execute it.
With such a huge amount of cash in bank, how the management can justify the interest received is reasonable.
If you read my article carefully, you will notice that I only made one statement which could mean that I believe the account is not cooked, but the rest of the article is merely the Chairman's explanation for not paying dividend. The only statement I made quote "One of the founders of the auditors S J Grant Thornton is my cousin, who is a chartered accountant and his son is the senior partner".
Like any serious investors, I also must made sure that the auditing company, the underwriter CIMB for the IPO and Mercury Securities Sdn. Bhd. who are recommending buy, are all trust worthy.
Can you believe the Chinese controlling shareholders could cook the books for the IPO and every year since IPO to deceive the auditors and the auditors and the few Malaysian directors could not detect?
I want to said that it can be possible..............look at Megan Media. The company making profits for 5 years above and with low PE making it attractive to investors even myself. But the problem is the $400 mil of Bond that was issued to finance purchase/expansion of plant and machinery that are not even physically existed. Only merely book entries. And the Auditors even not detected this until the share prices collapsed and the frauds uncover.
Therefore, this is a good lesson to learned not to trust companies that reporting profits but no dividends in stored for the shareholders.
Something is not right somewhere.
No amount of reputation of the Auditor's is in question here, no matter how well-known the auditing companies is concerned it all boils down to analysing the report well enough to warrant a investment in the company .
This is my own opinion after investing in a few China owned listed companies like XingGuan and CAP. CAP is still okay because their gives free warrant to mitigated my losses but XingGuan is totally unacceptable.
Seminar at 11am on 16th Feb Sunday at Ipoh St John Ambulance hall. I have rearranged the seating, now I can offer another additional 40 seats, totalling 220 seats. Those who are interested can write to me, especially those whom I have turned down. koonyewyin@gmail.com.
My Dad is a seasonal accouting veteran who have near to 40 years experience. He had told me it is no hard for him to fool the big 4's auditors! They will just send the fresh graduates who do not have much experience for auditing. The worst thing is the staff will change every year! According to him the SOP can't detect any wrong doing at all.
In this case they are so many redflags to show the company are problematic. Like warren said if you found you are digging hole, stop doing it.
I agreed with you Imenwe. Anyone can do some creative accounting treatment in the books without the auditors detected it. They audit on random basis and done by the junior staffs. So how do the top senior Auditor's knows about anything except signing and signified the reports for public disclosure.
So when Konn Yew Yin said that his cousin is in the top 4 Auditing firm and also a senior partner that audited XingGuan accounts and straight acknowledged it books is correct, i feel let down by his comments as a senior person in the corporate world.
I wouldn't invest in this share or any china share listed in bursa if I were u A company which is reluctant to reward its shareholders either it has cashflow issues or maybe they don't have no real profits . Eg their receivables is cooked to make it look good.. Secondly , I know china co are very low in transparency Even for china the growth rate is quite artificial They build roads and ghost cities which ppl don't need , so that their GDP growth looks good When u buy a company , u look at the product itself How many ppl actually buy their shoes ? Vs say Nike , reebork, or Adidas , Then u will know if it's waste of time to buy their shares Again : dont believe in financial advisors or analyst reports Sometimes they were ordered to write something good
You must be kidding for claiming everyone can do a creative without the detection from the auditor. Experience auditors are not easy to fool man. If an auditor has sufficient knowledge or experience in an industry, you can't bluff him easily. They are not so gullible.
Some of the other con co caught other than Megan media includes Transmile, patimas computers , etc Prior to being discovered as fraud they operates regularly and nobody know the hanky panky unless u are inside the company I was once inside patimas and long time ago, I saw what they did to "increase" revenue I know this company is fraudulent I can't state the reason here as its illegal just mentioning what they did u will be shock Today it's pending delisting hahaha
stock without dividen only good when one buy from below and keep moving up .. no dividend no matter how good is stock - people easily get bored and this will leave them without money to buy other stocks to counter many things as not many are lucky to buy low, sell high - 2cent kaki lima thoughts.
All these high profile irregularities are involved by a team of experts from various profession with extensive knowledge and experience in an industry. It's not a normal accountant can do it alone. The team knows where the loophole. How to cover this and that....
Most common tricks used by China-based companies (not just those listed overseas) to trick banks or shareholders:
The major shareholder may set up around 10 companies to buy from the company before selling off to external customers, and another 10 companies to sell to the company after buying from external suppliers. This way, reported sales, selling price, profit, production and purchase cost, cash and banks, accounts receivable and accounts payable of the company can be controlled at ease.
The flight risk is high. Overnight, the controlling shareholder may decamp and disappear into thin air, likely in overseas and no one can track him down, much less from Malaysia. The company may be left in the lurch with just factories, equipment, loads of bank borrowing and a long line of workers waiting for their salaries.
Chinese are too poor for too long. So, they would do almost anything for money. Overtime, their ethics should improve. With religions pretty much banned in China, the process may take longer than other countries. It is important therefore for China-based companies to pay decent, consistent dividend to show they want to be shareholders-oriented. Only then would they be worth considering for equity investment. There is no other way, as I see it.
With the company having 300~400 millions in cash..why the interest the company received in their book records was so small amount ?? Not even 1 million yearly??
The company did not deposits the cash in the financial firms?? They just carry their cash within their office or outlets ??
Logical thinking...pls...
Retail investors pls beware of...especially those china company.
Possible of earning peanut interest: 1. Keeping all cash in the office, outlets or factory. 2. Majority of the Debtors pay before ending of each quarter. It seems not reasonable after comparing with turnover. 3. Transfer cash outside company to do Ah Long business and bring back cash before ending of each quarter . 4. Cash balance is fabricated.
They have must have warehouses full of cash...... and pray that termites dont eat all thier money. hahaha.
Seriously there is like >50 china based companies already found to be fraud and cooking the books in the last 5-8 years. Especially US listed ones where they have activist shareholder looking for fraud.
Why not another one?
Seriously Mr. koon, you should make a trip to china and see if you can locate even 10 of the 100's of stores they claim to have. 30 million is no small change, if I am in your shoes, I will have already engaged a fraud accountant to do background check.
Another china co that looks fraudulent is CSL. Same case : claim to have plenty of cash But share price movement suggest otherwise Plenty of cash doesn't means it will be returned to shareholders While u are buying the shares for ur children , the directors are also there to ensure that their children get that cash Very seldom they will return the cash especially china co Even if they do maybe it's like 1 cents or less Which printing the dividend statement maybe more expensive If someone has 30 mil shares, he shld make more noise And threaten to dispose the share totally if no dividend at all See how the directors may panic if the share limit down
Also a real good company can get their financing for business by borrowing from the banks at low interest rather than ask money from shareholder or keeping the cash It is quite unusual for a cash rich company to be stingy on dividend Take for example a well manage company like Amway They give quarterly dividend as their cashflow is strong and in net cash position They don't go around telling strange tales eg they need the money etc as the company is a cash generating machine by itself Shld slowly cutloss on xingquan before they close down
Apart from asking the half past six mgmt to give warrants perhaps mr koon u can also ask them to do share buy back .. Since if they really have $1.50 per share there shldnt be any excuses Unless they don't think it's worth even $1.00 buck
D answer to d question if d major shareholder is capable of cooking d books wld b....... Has he lived thru d hardship of d old Communist era whr everybody was for himself. Tat kind of condition wld hv really hardened a man, and d worst kind of perpetrator is a victim turned perpetrator. A victim turned perpetrator is capable of anything, n he wld carry out his crime wit a vengeance n without remorse. Think Russian Mafia..... n u get d picture
On d other hand while one is claiming XQ was not big n is in fact empty... but at d same saying its banks hv colluded wit it wld beg d question.... Why did d banks want to confirm d fake cash balances wit them? Wat is in it for d banks???
Tak kira market hot ke market crisis ke, kalau silap pilih saham memang ikan masin betul. Ini contoh saham yang dalam list jangan beli sama sekali. China stocks dah ramai masuk parit.
delaying your mistakes/wrong judgement till your next generation and beyond doesnt make it a right judgement. why pass down obscure stocks to them? dump this lousy stocks n pick up some bank stocks for your grandchildren, for you may not want them to worry on their investment. or it may b non existence then. what about a cash call or 10 lot become 1 lot? do u not cut lost on your wrong judgement? after proven it wrong for so long. the fund can b re deploy in better places. u know of opportunity cost?
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Fat Cat Tim Buddy
2,340 posts
Posted by Fat Cat Tim Buddy > 2014-02-14 21:47 | Report Abuse
a) Mr. Koon Yew Yin, holding 30 million shares which constitute slightly more than 10% of Xingquan's paid-up capital,
b) Dato Koh Kin Lip (a major shareholder of Coastal Contracts and a savvy investor)
c) Madam Lai Poh Lin (a director in IOI Corp) and
d) New York Bank of Mellon (holding 8% of Xingquan)
BIG WATER FISHES... kikiki