Be the first to like this.
5 comment(s). Last comment by stockmanmy 2016-04-08 14:02
Posted by r°Moi > 2016-04-08 13:57 | Report Abuse
Long time supporter....
B.K. SIDHU the author and the biz editor... is the longest supporter of Tony
Posted by Icon8888 > 2016-04-08 13:57 | Report Abuse
Share 50 50 loh, I think thai is fair
Consumers have right, so do investors
Investors suffered when time was bad, they deserve to enjoy windfall when good time is back
After all, if split half half, consumers pay extra RM2 only.
------
It would also be unfair to pass on the higher costs to passengers. Airlines should absorb them, make the adjustments to their network and capacity, fly fuller planes, sweat their assets more, and cut costs elsewhere. They should not burden the passenger as they are at the centre of any airline business model.
Posted by stockmanmy > 2016-04-08 14:01 | Report Abuse
Sure is $4 only?
For all the radar and traffic control, it should be $40 average.
Posted by stockmanmy > 2016-04-08 14:02 | Report Abuse
Safety first.
$40 still affordable as flying is a luxury item.
No result.
1
2
3
4
5
6
BFM Podcast
7
BFM Podcast
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Icon8888
18,659 posts
Posted by Icon8888 > 2016-04-08 13:53 | Report Abuse
Not true. My study showed that Air Asia passed on very little to consumers through surcharge. The writer did not do his homework
--------
When crude oil prices were high, travellers were made to pay fuel surcharges. It took a long time before the charges were done away with.