The revenue and sales projection will be more complete if it can consider also the awarded projects between Q4 2015 and Q2 2016. Otherwise, this analysis is only updated until Q3 2015 conditions.
Total Value Date Receive LOA Date Commerce Date Completion Durations Remarks 1 Pavilion Hilltop, Mont Kiara fr CRCC 34,762,000.00 11/12/15 1/12/16 7/12/18 18 months 2 Rumah Selangorku Bdr Ulu Klang fr CRCC 116,400,000.00 12/8/15 1/18/16 7/1/17 18 months 3 1 Gateway Klang, Selangor fr CRCC 195,525,000.00 11/12/15 1/12/16 12/1/18 3 years 4 Neata Aluminium old orderbook as September 2016 351,753,000.00 11/12/15 Kemensah height (82.4mil),tamarind square(10.3mil),lumi tropicana (37.7mil), KL Gateway (15.4), Eclipse Residence (15mil) 5 Teras Millenium to Instacom for Telco Hub sites 29,000,000.00 11/12/15 1/12/16 8/12/16 7 months 6 Jointly Develop Kharisma Port Indonesia 1/15/16 No agreement sign 7 Desa Tasik Project fr Coneff Corp (2 block Commercial) 240,418,000.00 1/20/16 3/8/16 12/8/19 45 months 8 Desa Tasik Project fr Coneff Corp (24 storeys Condo ) 230,000,000.00 1/26/16 HOA status 9. PBT Engineering for Third Avenue Cyberjaya to Neata 22,500,000.00 4/4/16 4/4/16 9/4/17 17 months 10 V-Development fr Gated Housing Bdr Ulu Klang 15,000,000.00 4/4/16 7/1/16 2/1/18 18 months 11 Green Venture Chepor Hulu Kinta Project 90,000,000.00 4/26/16 HOA status 12 De Facto Wilayah Sultan Azlan Shah Hulu Kinta Project 160,000,000.00 5/5/16 HOA status 13 Goldenhill Accenture Genting Sempah pahang project 46,000,000.00 5/20/16 7/20/16 7/20/18 24 months 14 Kiara5 Development Kg Kayu Ara Sg buloh 25,000,000.00 6/23/16 8/23/16 2/23/18 18 months 15 Lim Hoo Seng Construction Lorong stonor project to Neata 12,800,000.00 6/23/16 6/30/16 5/1/19 35 months 16 Seni perspek Bandar tasik Amanjaya Daerah kinta 756,000,000.00 8/4/16 JCA status 17 Green Venture Wilayah Chepor Project 18storeys Apartment 100,000,000.00 8/19/16 24 months 18 Dazamega Mukim Hulu Kinta Project 600,000,000.00 9/1/16 48 months Total Project Pipeline that annouced in BursaMalaysia 3,025,158,000.00. HOA status
the 756m project is in Kinta. it was no.6 the JCA contract. I did not add it under the orderbook because it seems less certain to me. anyway, if you insists on including, 4 phases each phase RM189m over 36 months. eps will increase by 0.2c. if added to 2016 eps then fair value will be close to the current market price 18c
Jay can say anything but latest QR remain best way to judge not only Vivo but also all his stocks.
Posted by martinbartesque > Oct 27, 2016 10:14 PM | Report Abuse The revenue and sales projection will be more complete if it can consider also the awarded projects between Q4 2015 and Q2 2016. Otherwise, this analysis is only updated until Q3 2015 conditions.
just to clarify, I am forecasting merely based on secured contracts and doesn't include future potential job win because I don't want to simply guess in this soft property market. i just pointed out, to support its revenue and profit, how much new contract would Vivicom NEED to secure annually. and even by sustaining at this level valuation is not compelling
it is still a potential beneficiary under government affordable housing initiative but it seems a bit more niche in Perak, which could be limiting. overall like I highlighted a year ago, the company has good fundamentals but valuations are not very attractive
Vivo if you follow Triplc closely, you should realise that Triplc is now a concession biz as new construction contract haven't started. last quarter 25.5 sen was one off contract variation. if you read part 3 of my article and my comments you will know that I expected that
for Triplc, UiTM owes them RM42m a year for another 18 years. 18 x RM42m = RM756m. Net debt currently around RM300m plus a piece of land worth at least RM100m. Simple calculation already gives you more than RM500m. This haven't include the new RM600m Phase 3 contract. Phase 2 contract value ~RM250m, UiTM pays RM42m x 20 years, this round RM600m pay how much? I wouldn't be surprised if the payment could come close to RM2bn, albeit over a long period and new debts will need to be taken on
Dun simply talk here la..dare to email or publish in newspaper said vivo's contract are all fake... U all dun buy any vivo share n come here to mislead ppl Wat intention? Wan to collect lower?
kevin008 RM756m is just face value. it is not running at the same time. each phase is RM189 over 36 months. the impact on eps is so minimal mainly because of Vivocom's extremely large share base of >3bn
The Board of Director of Vivocom ("Board') is pleased to announce that its subsidiary company, Vivocom Enterprise Sdn Bhd (“VESB”), had on 30 May 2016 signed a letter of intent to cooperate (“LOI”) issued by Zhonghe Huaxing Development (M) Sdn Bhd ("Zhonghe Huaxing”) for the purposes of cooperating and collaborating on property development, construction, project management and other related activities in connection with property development and construction projects (“Proposed Cooperation”).
Reference is made to the announcement of the Company dated 15 January 2016 in relation to the proposed collaboration to jointly develop Kharisma port and integrated industrial and commercial development on the parcel of land held under HGU30, HGU 39 and HGU40 at JL. Suak Kandis, Desa Sakaen, Kecamatan Kumpeh Ulu, Desa Pudak, Desa Kemingking Dalam, Teluk Jambu, Kecamatan Marosebo, Jambi Province, Indonesia measuring approximately 2,155.52 hectare (“Proposed Collaboration”) through the consortium of Vivocom Enterprise Sdn Bhd (“VESB”), Pt. Kharisma Kemingking and Instacom Group Berhad (“Instacom”) (“The Parties”)
I don't see any news that say they are getting 1.3bn but we shall see. the thing about Vivocom, I'm not sure if they are too transparent or not transparent at all. They announced every single event, including HOA. but after the HOA lapsed, they didn't even make follow up announcement.
756m amanjaya in ipoh is all goverment project..the new bus stations and all the govt building there..most important there is a theme park will open soon there..
The LOI shall be effective on the date of signing and shall remain effective subject to termination by either party notifying of its intention to terminate in writing. The LOI serves only as a record of the parties’ intentions and does not constitute or create obligations under the Malaysian domestic law and will not give rise to any legal process and will not be deemed to constitute or create any legally binding or enforceable obligations, expressed or implied and neither party shall have any liability to the other party in respect of the same.
besides, everything is just speculation until Zhonghe actually pass some contract to Vivocom
for 15 Jan announcement, there's another follow up announcement on 19 Jan
The feasibility and due diligence study is expected to be completed within the next six (6) months. Thereupon, the definitive agreements are expected to be signed by the Parties within three (3) months after the finalization of the feasibility and due diligence study.
It's coming to Nov and nothing has materialised yet. It could well be a contract win or it could end up like other HOAs that silently lapsed. time will tell
I do not wish to argue. Jay do not even has proven facts any HOA is cancel. And are you sure your figure will match q3 n q4 result. Why guess and why not wait q3 to see result in your eye. I m not a short term trader neither contra player.
another thing that makes me uncomfortable is that all the analysts covering this stock seems to be making wildly guesses. First CIMB assumes FY17 revenue of RM3bn (which if average construction period is 2 year, company has to win >RM6bn contracts!?). Next if you look at MIDF, TP 63 sen based on 13x FY17EPS which in the report FY17 is 4c. 13 x 4 = 63? and the 4c is derived from net profit of RM111m, which is an eps of 3.2/3.4c depending if you use current share base or expanded share base. it would be unfair to blame the company on outsiders' incompetence, but from my experience, when analyst simply write usually someone paid them to...
no problem. thanks for all constructive comments. I know my approach may not to be everyone's liking but I believe that company AS IT IS, should have greater value than its market cap, without needing to look into crystal ball for the future. that would give you margin of safety at least when the "prospects" never materialise
down trend... From name Instacom change to Vivocom for what purpose ? Only one word from me, Malaysian is the most easiest people to forgot things in this world
I hope that everyone can keep their comments here civilised. don't simply accuse companies of fake contracts or con counter unless you can show evidence. if it's just your suspicion, please keep it to yourself. facts will prevail, so just stick to facts will do. thanks..
jay, you are assessing to the current instant of vivo of which it maybe true to the certain extent of the current situation but future prospect was not in the picture, thus there might not be 100 percent accurate in term of growth factor in vivo. anyhow well done. keep it up.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
greatful
1,644 posts
Posted by greatful > 2016-10-27 19:54 | Report Abuse
agreed.