Yunnan the warrants were down because yesterday The Star reported that Mr Wong sold off 20% of pjdev. But later in the evening, Mr Ong surfaced to be the buyer for the 20% stake. It seemed that the transaction is a family internal arrangement ( btw, Ong and wong are brothers). So today the warrants could rebounce
Looked like something is brewing. Maybe they are closed to doing a corporate exercise
my view is that there will not be any privatization in the short term. This is because the major shareholders have been buying from market recently. If they follow up by announcing a take-over, the shares accumulation will be deemed as insider trading and they could go to jail.
wow then he sud offer at least 1.80 for us to surrender our shares in Pjdev cos 1.60 is too cheap and low...NTA for Pjdev is 2.12...Wah so cunning ah, they wanna privatise PJDEV when they know its business started to shine and huge projects rolling in...They are so greedy dun wanna share with public anymore when the good things come...Why last time dun wanna privatise???? WHY NOW???
2.00 and above is a fair price...tis is d first time pjdev risen so high...stagnant for more than 10 yrs with price below 1.00 though it was undervalued all the time...
The emergence of Tan Sri OLH has set the mkt talking about synergies btw PJD and OSKPROP. Some do not discount an eventual merger as Ong is a major shareholder of both companies.
PJD has in its book some parcels of land and building in KL that it had acquired as far back as 2001. Its Mon't Kiara projecy sits on 10 acres of freehold land acquired in 2001. At a net book value of RM85.6m, the cost works out to around RM90 psf.
PJD's HQ in Jalan Tun Razak has a net book value of RM116.21m. Acquired in 2006, its cost works out to just RM145 psf
According to the group's 2013 annual report, Swiss Garden Hotel and Residences(SGHR) in Kuantan has a net book value RM53.13m and SGHR in the heart of KL is booked at RM86.5m or RM252 psf. The latter freehold land would command a much higher price now
My key point here if the land bought in 2001 and 2006 and SGHR in Kuantan and especially KL is revalue in end 2013, the NAV will substantially shoot up from RM2.12
When he is interested to takeover this company, he wants it at low price. Thus he will not revalue the land and other assets so that lower price is offered without any question been asked. Thank you.
Moreover the high properties prices now might not be relevant to a property development company because you cannot be selling all your land bank and turned yourself into a cash rich PN17 company without a core business.
He will let PJDevp price drop as he is in no hurry as OSKP has lots of ongoing projects in Putra Jaya.
from my calculation RNAV of PJDEV is at least 2.80 and higher if u revalue its prime landbank and its investment properties namely swiss garden hotel asset...SO if Tan sri wanna acquire from us then he sud offer at leaaaassst 2.00+++...Nothing less than tat...1.60 is totally bullshit!!!
but if the takeover is unsuccessful,the prospect is even brighter as PJDEV is growing rapidly embarking on aggressive property launches in prime area...Net profit is expected to surge in coming months as their properties are selling like hot cake...PJDEV sud worth at least 1.80 by now...Tat y Tan Sri has emerged a major Shareholder of Pjdev pending a takeover exercise soon...
Posted by LuckyStorm > Nov 17, 2013 06:26 PM | Report Abuse
What if Pjdev take over oskprop with higher price? He will sacrifice shareholder's benefit for himself.
Ans : There is more value in PJD because it is grossly undervalued. It is better for majority shareholder to use OSKProp to take over PJD because OSKProp is fully valued at current price. A company to be taken over will show high volume transaction and more price movement. Hence PJD is more likely. Thank you.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Andy Kok
3 posts
Posted by Andy Kok > 2013-11-12 12:27 | Report Abuse
Thank you Mr Ooi for adding me.