Posted by qqq47660 > 2024-07-22 14:41 | Report Abuse

rich and poor is form by history and temporary.

China is poor in 1949 but got potential.

Can you see China's potential in 1949?

if you can, You are smart

if you cannot, you are just normal and ordinary.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-07-22 19:08 | Report Abuse

The notion that "rich and poor is formed by history and temporary" is a simplistic view that fails to account for the complex and entrenched systems of economic disparity that persist over time. Historical factors certainly contribute to the distribution of wealth, but these disparities are perpetuated through systemic inequalities in education, employment opportunities, and social mobility. Wealth often consolidates through generational inheritance, where the affluent can provide their descendants with better resources, networks, and opportunities, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of privilege. Conversely, the poor face structural barriers that inhibit their ability to ascend economically, such as inadequate access to QUALITY education, CORRUPT discriminatory hiring practices, and limited access to capital due to PUBLIC FUND LEAKAGE. Just like the hiring and placement of multi-layered little napoleans in every gomen department, institution and ministry, these structural issues are deeply rooted and not easily resolved by itself without real effort. Often, simpletons only seen the final changes, but fail to appreciate the underlying heroic process.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-07-23 14:16 | Report Abuse

Problem with narrow mindedness of a significant portion of the society

Arguing against the demand that no compromise should be given to donations from beer companies involves addressing several key points:

### Economic Impact
1. **Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Contributions**: Many companies, including beer companies, engage in CSR activities to give back to the community. These donations fund essential services such as healthcare, education, and disaster relief, which benefit society at large.
2. **Economic Growth**: Beer companies contribute significantly to the economy through job creation, taxes, and local investments. Banning their contributions could harm economic stability and reduce available funding for social programs.

### Ethical and Social Considerations
1. **Neutrality of Funds**: The source of donations should not automatically disqualify them if they are used for positive social outcomes. Rejecting these funds purely based on the company's industry can be seen as a form of bias.
2. **Community Benefit**: Many communities benefit from donations made by beer companies, especially in times of crisis. Disallowing these contributions could deprive vulnerable groups of much-needed support.

### Counterproductive Outcomes
1. **Reduction in Charitable Contributions**: If beer companies are prohibited from donating, the overall pool of charitable funds may decrease. This reduction can negatively impact social services and community development projects.
2. **Inefficiency in Resource Utilization**: By refusing donations from specific industries, organizations might spend more time and resources seeking alternative funding sources, which could be less efficient and delay important initiatives.

### Real-world Examples
1. **Case Studies**: Numerous case studies show how beer companies' donations have positively impacted communities. Highlighting these examples can demonstrate the tangible benefits of accepting such contributions.
2. **Global Practices**: In many countries, beer companies are recognized for their positive contributions to society. Adopting a more inclusive approach aligns with global best practices and encourages responsible corporate behavior.

### Practical Solutions
1. **Regulated Acceptance**: Instead of outright rejecting donations, implementing strict guidelines and transparency measures ensures that the funds are used ethically and effectively.
2. **Public Awareness Campaigns**: Educating the public on the positive impacts of these donations can shift the narrative and reduce irrational opposition.

By considering these points, it becomes clear that an uncompromising stance against beer company donations is irrational and counterproductive, ultimately hindering societal progress and development.

Posted by qqq47660 > 2024-07-23 15:50 | Report Abuse

votes is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-07-24 07:48 | Report Abuse

The argument that young children's minds intoxicated by fundamentalism is not better than the analogy of grown-up minds intoxicated by alcohol hinges on several key points.

1. **Impaired Judgment**: Both situations result in impaired judgment. Fundamentalism can limit children's ability to think critically and objectively, just as alcohol impairs an adult's ability to make sound decisions.

2. **Influence on Behavior**: Just as alcohol can lead to erratic and harmful behavior in adults, fundamentalism can instill rigid, intolerant, and sometimes extreme behaviors in children. Both conditions can lead to actions that are harmful to themselves and others.

3. **Long-term Impact**: The effects of both can be long-lasting. Chronic alcohol use can lead to lasting physical and mental health issues. Similarly, early indoctrination into fundamentalism can lead to lifelong difficulties in accepting diverse perspectives and adapting to a rapidly changing world.

4. **Social Consequences**: Both intoxication scenarios can lead to social problems. Alcoholism can strain relationships and disrupt families, while fundamentalism can create societal divisions, intolerance, and conflict.

5. **Loss of Potential**: Alcohol addiction can rob individuals of their potential, career opportunities, and personal growth. Similarly, fundamentalism can restrict a child's educational and personal development, limiting their ability to reach their full potential.

6. **Dependency**: Just as alcohol can create a dependency that is hard to break, fundamentalist indoctrination can create a psychological dependency on rigid beliefs and authority figures, making it difficult for individuals to think independently and question their surroundings.

In summary, both scenarios involve a form of intoxication that impairs judgment, influences behavior negatively, has long-term impacts, leads to social issues, results in a loss of potential, and creates dependency. Therefore, exposing young children to fundamentalist ideologies is as detrimental as an adult being addicted to alcohol.

Posted by subwayzzz > 2024-07-24 09:06 | Report Abuse

totally worth a read!

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-07-26 09:07 | Report Abuse

Arguably, nothing could be worse than misusing of fund to fuel fundamentalism among young children. Funding and spreading fundamentalism, characterized by a strict adherence to specific theological doctrines often in reaction against modernist theories, has profoundly detrimental effects on societies, making it one of the worst uses of resources. Such funding fosters intolerance and extremism, promoting an "us versus them" mentality that leads to social fragmentation, sectarian conflicts, and the suppression of religious, cultural, and intellectual diversity essential for a progressive society.

Fundamentalism stifles the exchange of ideas and mutual respect, creating an environment of suspicion and hostility- see what happened in supposedly and rationally "non-issue" cases like kk socks and vern shoes. Additionally, it impedes progress by advocating for outdated educational practices that reject scientific advancements and critical thinking, hindering intellectual growth and innovation.

This regression leaves societies ill-equipped to deal with modern challenges and results in economic stagnation and poverty, as businesses avoid investing in regions plagued by instability and regressive policies. The threat to human rights is significant, as many fundamentalist movements impose severe restrictions on nonbelievers', outgroup's, minors' and women's rights and freedoms, perpetuating gender inequality and discrimination while suppressing freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly. This suppression leads to persecution of dissenters and those who question the prevailing ideology.

Global security risks also escalate as funding fundamentalism can lead to the radicalization of individuals who may resort to violence, vigilantism and even terrorism , posing a significant threat to global security through terrorist activities and destabilizing entire regions, leading to conflicts and wars. Such instability has far-reaching consequences for global peace and security.

From a moral and ethical perspective, investing in fundamentalism represents a gross misallocation of resources that could be better used for proper and productive education, up-to-date healthcare, and poverty eradication. It prioritizes dogma over human welfare, contradicting the ethical responsibility of individuals and nations to promote peace, tolerance, and understanding. Funding fundamentalism contributes to a more divided and violent world, undermining social cohesion and impeding progress. Instead of fueling fundamentalism, resources should be directed towards initiatives that promote education, tolerance, innovation, and peace, thereby contributing to a more just and prosperous world. By doing so, we can foster intellectual growth, economic development, gender equality, and global security, ensuring a brighter future for all.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-07-26 21:57 | Report Abuse

The use of fundamentalism as a tool to create an illusion of progress and improvement can set in motion a vicious cycle that is detrimental to a nation's socioeconomic health. Here's a detailed argument outlining this cycle:

### Illusion of Progress Through Fundamentalism

1. **Promoting Fundamentalism**: Fundamentalist ideologies often promise a return to traditional values and an idealized past, which can resonate deeply in times of uncertainty or perceived moral decline. Leaders who champion these ideologies claim to bring moral and societal improvements.

2. **Insignificant Progress**: The "progress" promoted by fundamentalism is often superficial, focusing on symbolic changes rather than substantive improvements in quality of life or economic conditions. This can involve strict social policies or public displays of piety that do not translate into actual development.

### Empowering Misuse of Public Funds

3. **Misallocation of Resources**: With public attention focused on religious or ideological purity, scrutiny of financial management wanes. Leaders can divert public funds to projects that support their fundamentalist agenda or enrich themselves and their cronies under the guise of these projects.

4. **Squandering Natural Resources**: The nation's natural resources may be exploited irresponsibly to generate quick revenue that funds these superficial projects. This short-term approach prioritizes immediate gains over sustainable management, leading to long-term economic and environmental degradation.

### Perpetuating Poverty and National Debt

5. **Economic Mismanagement**: Misuse of public funds and irresponsible resource exploitation lead to economic inefficiency and corruption. The lack of genuine economic development initiatives means that poverty persists or worsens, as the benefits of natural resource exploitation are not equitably distributed.

6. **Increasing National Debt**: To maintain the facade of progress and keep the populace placated, the government may take on increasing levels of debt. Loans are used to fund unproductive projects or cover budget shortfalls created by corruption and mismanagement.

### Weakening National Currency

7. **Currency Devaluation**: Persistent economic mismanagement, rising debt levels, and lack of investor confidence result in the devaluation of the national currency. This devaluation further exacerbates poverty as the cost of imports rises, leading to higher prices for goods and services.

### Divide and Divert Attention Through Apartheidism

8. **Social Division**: To maintain control and divert attention from economic failures, leaders may resort to apartheid-like policies, deepening societal divisions based on race, religion, or ethnicity. This divisive strategy ensures that the populace is too preoccupied with infighting to unite against the ruling elite.

9. **Diversion Tactics**: Apartheidism and other forms of social division serve as effective tools to divert public attention from the underlying issues of corruption, economic mismanagement, and poverty. By fostering a climate of fear and mistrust among different groups, the government maintains its grip on power.

### Perpetuation of the Cycle

10. **Cycle Reinforcement**: The continued use of fundamentalism and divisive tactics ensures that the underlying issues of poverty, corruption, and economic mismanagement remain unaddressed. As the economic situation worsens, the government increasingly relies on these same tactics to maintain control, perpetuating the cycle.

In conclusion, the use of fundamentalism to create an illusion of progress enables the misuse of public funds and justifies the squandering of natural resources. This leads to perpetuated poverty, increasing national debt, and a weakened currency. By dividing society through apartheid-like policies, the government diverts attention from its failures, ensuring the continuation of this destructive cycle.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-07-27 07:56 | Report Abuse

Defining failure of education policies: The irrelevance of national schools

Focusing on banning alcohol promotion instead of empowering responsible drinking through quality education represents a failure of schooling. Bans do not address the root cause of alcohol misuse and often lead to unintended consequences like black markets and increased allure. Comprehensive education fosters informed decision-making, critical thinking, and long-term behavioral change, preparing young people to handle real-world situations responsibly. Resources spent on enforcement could be better used in developing educational programs that promote moderation and safety. Education tailored to cultural contexts is more relevant and effective than blunt bans, respecting individual autonomy and promoting personal responsibility. Prioritizing education over bans creates a well-informed and responsible society, enhancing the overall effectiveness of schooling.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-07-27 10:35 | Report Abuse

Fundamentalist indoctrination in schools can lead to the development of rigid, simplistic thinking in adults, akin to the adage "when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail." This educational approach emphasizes strict adherence to a particular set of beliefs without encouraging critical thinking, questioning, or understanding of diverse perspectives.

1. **Stunted Critical Thinking**: Fundamentalist indoctrination discourages students from questioning or critically examining the beliefs they are taught. This results in adults who lack the ability to think deeply or critically about issues, leading to superficial and often flawed conclusions.

2. **Lack of Adaptability**: Such an education fosters a mindset that is resistant to change or new information. As the world evolves, these individuals struggle to adapt, clinging to outdated beliefs and practices. This rigidity can hinder personal growth and societal progress.

3. **Oversimplification of Complex Issues**: Complex social, political, and ethical issues are often reduced to black-and-white terms. Adults educated in this manner tend to see the world in absolutes, leading to polarized thinking and difficulty in understanding nuanced viewpoints.

4. **Increased Intolerance**: Fundamentalist indoctrination often promotes an us-vs-them mentality, where those who do not share the same beliefs are viewed with suspicion or hostility. This can result in increased intolerance and a lack of empathy towards others, harming social cohesion and cooperation.

5. **Perpetuation of Non-Issues**: These adults may fixate on non-issues or misidentify problems, seeing threats or moral decay where there are none. This distracts from addressing real and pressing issues, wasting resources and energy on battles that do not contribute to genuine progress.

By promoting a more open, critical, and inclusive educational approach, schools can help cultivate mature, adaptable adults capable of nuanced thinking and constructive engagement with the world's complexities.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-07-28 08:05 | Report Abuse

The spiraling down phenomenon where the poor vote for religious promises of a heavenly afterlife while the government exploits them by keeping them poor and uneducated is a deeply concerning cycle. Breaking this cycle requires a concerted effort to promote education, critical thinking, and economic opportunity, coupled with political reform that ensures transparency and accountability. By addressing the root causes of poverty and promoting intellectual and economic empowerment, society can move towards a more equitable, progressive and promising future.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-07-29 13:07 | Report Abuse

With more little napoleans, an overabundance of laws and restrictions have several detrimental effects on society:

1. Increased Poverty
"The more laws and restrictions there are, The poorer people become."

Bureaucratic Burden: Excessive regulations can create a heavy bureaucratic burden on individuals and businesses, leading to increased costs and inefficiencies. Small businesses, in particular, may struggle to comply with complex legal requirements, stifling entrepreneurship and economic growth.
Economic Inequality: Overregulation often benefits those who can afford to navigate the legal complexities, usually large corporations and the wealthy, while disadvantaging the poor and small business owners. This exacerbates economic inequality and limits social mobility.
2. Social and Political Unrest
"The sharper men’s weapons, The more trouble in the land."

Militarization and Violence: An environment of stringent laws and heavy-handed enforcement can lead to militarization, where authorities and civilians arm themselves excessively, resulting in increased violence and social unrest.
Oppression and Rebellion: Authoritarian regimes often use strict laws to control and suppress the population. This can lead to resistance and rebellion, as people fight against perceived injustices and oppression.
3. Unintended Consequences of Innovation
"The more ingenious and clever men are, The more strange things happen."

Unforeseen Problems: Highly innovative and clever solutions can sometimes lead to unintended and unpredictable consequences. For example, technological advancements can create new ethical dilemmas, security vulnerabilities, and environmental challenges that existing laws are ill-equipped to handle.
Moral and Ethical Erosion: In a society that overly rewards cleverness and ingenuity, individuals may prioritize personal gain over communal well-being, leading to unethical behavior and a breakdown of social trust.
4. Rise in Crime and Corruption
"The more rules and regulations, The more thieves and robbers."

Criminalization of Minor Offenses: When there are too many rules, even minor infractions become criminalized, leading to an increase in so-called "criminal" behavior. This can overwhelm legal systems and criminalize ordinary citizens for minor or victimless offenses.
Corruption and Bribery: Extensive regulations create more opportunities for corruption and bribery. Officials who have the power to enforce or waive these regulations may exploit their position for personal gain, leading to a more corrupt and unjust society.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-07-30 18:36 | Report Abuse

What children can learn from quality education?

In the human body, several alcohol species are naturally synthesized through various biochemical processes. These include:

### 1. **Methanol**
- **Source**: Methanol is produced in small amounts during the metabolism of certain foods and beverages, particularly those containing pectin, such as fruits and vegetables.
- **Metabolism**: Methanol is metabolized in the liver by alcohol dehydrogenase to formaldehyde and then to formic acid, both of which are toxic. However, the levels produced naturally are typically very low and not harmful.

### 2. **Ethanol**
- **Source**: Ethanol can be produced in the gut through fermentation by intestinal microbiota, especially when certain carbohydrates are fermented.
- **Metabolism**: Ethanol is primarily metabolized in the liver by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) enzymes. It is first converted to acetaldehyde and then to acetic acid.

### 3. **Glycolaldehyde and Ethylene Glycol**
- **Source**: Ethylene glycol is not naturally produced in the body but can be metabolized to glycolaldehyde through enzyme action if ingested.
- **Metabolism**: Glycolaldehyde is further metabolized to glycolic acid, glyoxylic acid, and oxalic acid. These metabolites are toxic, and ingestion of ethylene glycol can be life-threatening.

### 4. **Glycerol (Glycerin)**
- **Source**: Glycerol is a naturally occurring alcohol that forms the backbone of triglycerides (fats) and phospholipids. It is released during the breakdown of these lipids.
- **Metabolism**: Glycerol can be converted into glucose via gluconeogenesis in the liver or used in glycolysis to produce energy.

### 5. **Inositol (Cyclohexanehexol)**
- **Source**: Inositol is a sugar alcohol that is a structural component of cell membranes and is involved in signaling pathways.
- **Metabolism**: Inositol can be synthesized from glucose-6-phosphate and is involved in the regulation of several cellular processes, including insulin signaling and lipid metabolism.

### 6. **Sorbitol (Glucitol)**
- **Source**: Sorbitol is formed from glucose by the enzyme aldose reductase.
- **Metabolism**: Sorbitol can be further converted into fructose by sorbitol dehydrogenase. It is part of the polyol pathway, which becomes significant in conditions like diabetes, where high glucose levels lead to increased sorbitol production, potentially causing osmotic stress and tissue damage.

### 7. **Cholesterol**
- **Source**: Cholesterol, a sterol (steroid alcohol), is synthesized in the liver and other tissues from acetyl-CoA through the mevalonate pathway.
- **Function**: Cholesterol is a critical component of cell membranes, a precursor for steroid hormones, bile acids, and vitamin D synthesis.

### 8. **Retinol (Vitamin A)**
- **Source**: Retinol is derived from dietary beta-carotene and other carotenoids.
- **Metabolism**: Retinol can be oxidized to retinal, which is important for vision, and retinoic acid, which is involved in gene expression and cellular differentiation.

### 9. **Ubiquinol (Coenzyme Q10)**
- **Source**: Ubiquinol is the reduced form of coenzyme Q10, synthesized in the body from tyrosine and mevalonate.
- **Function**: It is essential for electron transport in the mitochondrial respiratory chain and acts as an antioxidant.

These naturally occurring alcohols play vital roles in various biochemical and physiological processes, from energy metabolism and cellular signaling to structural functions and detoxification pathways.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-07-31 21:10 | Report Abuse

While third world like kucingasia busy quarrelling about beer companies supporting schools, world big cat lion Singapore has moved on to passport-less airport

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-08-02 22:39 | Report Abuse

In essence, fundamentalists can be seen as suffering from Peter Pan syndrome because they resist adapting to a changing world, prefer simplistic answers to complex questions, avoid broader responsibilities, live in a nostalgic fantasy, see the world in childlike dichotomies, and resist personal growth. These traits keep them in a state of emotional and intellectual immaturity, hindering their ability to fully engage with and contribute to the broader society.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-09-14 17:41 | Report Abuse

The spiraling down phenomenon where the poor vote for religious promises of a heavenly afterlife while the government exploits them by keeping them poor and uneducated is a deeply concerning cycle. Breaking this cycle requires a concerted effort to promote education, critical thinking, and economic opportunity, coupled with political reform that ensures transparency and accountability. By addressing the root causes of poverty and promoting intellectual and economic empowerment, society can move towards a more equitable and progressive future.