Sunday, 1 November 2015
Description
|
Value
|
Criteria
|
Point
|
Price to Tangible Book Ratio
|
0.76*
|
< 1
|
5/5
|
Stock Valuation
|
CAPM => 2.90%
Return (2008-2014) =>11.63 %
Undervalue by 8.73%
|
CAPM < Return
|
4/5
|
Return on Asset
|
4.5*
|
> 0
|
4/5
|
Return on Common Equity
|
5.15*
|
> 0
|
5/5
|
Quick Ratio
|
0.95*
|
>1
|
2/5
|
Long term Debt / Total Capital
|
23.08*
|
<50%
|
4/5
|
Continue Dividend over Past 10 Years / Since Inception
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
2/2
|
Cash From Operation
|
Positive > 5 years
|
Positive
|
5/5
|
Total Point
|
|
|
31/37
|
PROS:
|
è Owned Midvalley Megamall and The Garden Mall which located in a logistic location between Bangsar, Kuala Lumpur and Petaling Jaya.
è Once the South Point completed there will be increase of revenue for IGB.
è 3 new hotel soft launch in 2015, these will increase the revenue of IGB.
è Most property development projects done by IGB is in Kuala Lumpur.
|
|
|
PROS:
|
è Dato’ Seri Robert Tan had managed IGB for 20 years and brings IGB to its current status.
|
|
CONS:
|
è The short term borrowing of IGB had increase significantly.
è RM 1,256,267,000 (78.9% of the total loan during in 5 year time) is going to be due in 2016.
è IGB cash reserve is insufficient to pay the RM 1,256,267,000 loan in 2016.
|
http://ivkls.blogspot.my/2015/11/stock-review-igb1597.html
Chart | Stock Name | Last | Change | Volume |
---|
Created by Tan KW | Nov 17, 2024
Created by Tan KW | Nov 17, 2024
Created by Tan KW | Nov 17, 2024
Created by Tan KW | Nov 17, 2024
chinwh9176
The borrowing of the IGB mainly is in the IGBREIT level. Below are the information of cash & borrowing of IGB & IGBREIT as at FY2014.
Cash(m) Debt(m) Net debt(m)
IGB - 1,100 (2,146) (1,046)
IGBREIT - 232 (1,223) (991)
From above, we can see that the net debt of IGB excluding IGBREIT is about 55m which is insignificant.
For IGBREIT, the borrowing of RM1.2b appears to be huge but it just represents about 25% of the market value of mid valley and garden combined and below the borrowing limit of REIT of 50% of its asset
The cash balance is not able to repay the borrowing when it due in FY16, but the company is most likely able to refinance its borrowing as it is charged against to Mid Valley mall which is a prime retail assets and provides a stable and recurring rental income of 300m pa and the interest payment is 55m pa and is just about 20% of its rental income.
2015-11-02 11:27