Posted by hollandking > 2018-03-02 18:10 | Report Abuse

The consequence of removing the 2 terms limit is very serious. Even the powerful men before him didn't do so. Is really a very bad move to remove the 2 terms. Even vladimir putin didnt do so. The 2 terms limit is there for very good reason. To prevent dictatorship and deep rooting of corruptions
The fact that this man is trying to removed the 2 terms limits when his predecessors didn't proved that there's a ? mark on this person.

I'm not saying he is a bad person, but let's suppose if he is a good man. BUT what about his future successors? Can anyone guarantee there won't be any problem?
Let's look at an example, Bo Xilai, if you look at what this man did, you'll be shocked by what he did. Let's say suppose if he wasn't found guilty and remained in power and moved to the highest in the hierarchy, and the 2 terms limit was removed? What would happened? Bo Xi Lai is an example , but are there more?
China itself is a big super power, any dictatorship or ambitious type of leaders would have grave consequences to the world especially the neighbours unlike small countries. Historically, if you look at China's history, it has its share of ambitious type of leaders and what did the leaders do? China has got another problem, medias controlling.