Now, from myside, i am left with the fuel costs of JAKS which will definitely (for certain) be higher than Vinh Tan 1 by 20% (due to efficiency difference between subcritical and supercritical coal fired boilers).
I am not sure how that will effect JAKS profitability compared to Vinh Tan 1 at the moment..
Thumbs Up & thank you both Icon8888 & DK66 for your timely & great articles in this time of anxiety about Jaks in the last 1-2 days ! Your articles have now increased my confidence ! My decision to dumb dumb hold pretty Ms Jaks is correct . I hope sifu OTB is reading your articles .
warrantKing, I share your thoughts. This is a straight forward profit forecast with very high reliability and accuracy. There is no need for complicated computations.
--------------------------- warrantKing DK66 bro,
Compare to others article which showing bundle of calculation , formula , and etc.
I think your article is most reliable source to project JAKS's coming EPS.
1. Yes, it will be reported as "share of profit in JV" in Jaks financial statement 2. Yes, the dividend may not be 196m. It maybe more or less depending on the need for cash reserve but it is not likely to be more than the free cash flow of 294m 3. No, profit is certainly 196m regardless of dividend distribution.
Thank you
--------------------- OTB Dear DK66, I am not an accountant, I need to understand the below questions.
1. Assume the earning of Hai Duong power plant is RM 196 million (30% stake). I believe this earning will be reported as "income from other investment" in Jaks financial report. Am I correct ?
2. This earning or income is channeled back to Jaks Resources Bhd as a form of dividend. This dividend amount may not equal to RM 196 million. The amount will be less than RM 196 million. Am I correct ?
3. If JHDP does not declare any dividend even the earning is RM 196 million. In this case, the "income from other investment" in Jaks financial report is zero. Am I correct ?
In the aforesaid circumstances, the EPS of Jaks cannot be based on RM 196 million. EPS will be lower or even equal to zero if there is no dividend declared by JHDP.
Hi, DK66, thanks very much for the earning insights. May I ask, if dividend pay out from JPHD to Jaks is much less than profit attributable to minority shareholder, how is it going to contribute positively to the free cash flow of Jaks? I raise this concern because the in your table showing Annual Report of China Southern Power Grid, under Vinh Tan 1 earning figures, seemed that after 1 year of COD, the minority share holder did not receive any dividend payout, could it be the same case to Jaks?
Hi there, I’m new and noob to the equity investment. Saw a lot of technical jargons and analysis on JAKS but not sure if I get the correct indication/ views. Power plant will be up and running by June and should contribute vastly to the company however to take note of the negative track records of the mgmt correct? Is it still a good time to enter or too high? Pls advise thanks!
Vinh Tan 1 achieved full COD in Nov 2018. There are initial cash reserve needs for bank installments (6 months as required by bankers), working capital, maintenance reserve, coal reserves etc. You will only see more aggressive dividend policy after all reserve requirements are met as seen in Mong Duong II.
I m sure it is not in the interest of the chinese partner to see idle funds remain in Vietnam. There is a shareholder's agreement between Jaks and its partner regarding control matters and dividend policy. I trust Andy to have his own interest at heart to see strong dividend distribution.
I believe Vinh Tan 1 will start to distribute dividend in 2020 which is similar to Mong Duong II
--------------- liewtz06 Hi, DK66, thanks very much for the earning insights. May I ask, if dividend pay out from JPHD to Jaks is much less than profit attributable to minority shareholder, how is it going to contribute positively to the free cash flow of Jaks? I raise this concern because the in your table showing Annual Report of China Southern Power Grid, under Vinh Tan 1 earning figures, seemed that after 1 year of COD, the minority share holder did not receive any dividend payout, could it be the same case to Jaks? 02/05/2020 12:38 AM
very good questions. I am very happy you ask the questions here
Posted by OTB > May 1, 2020 11:47 PM | Report Abuse
Dear DK66, I am not an accountant, I need to understand the below questions.
1. Assume the earning of Hai Duong power plant is RM 196 million (30% stake). I believe this earning will be reported as "income from other investment" in Jaks financial report. Am I correct ?
2. This earning or income is channeled back to Jaks Resources Bhd as a form of dividend. This dividend amount may not equal to RM 196 million. The amount will be less than RM 196 million. Am I correct ?
3. If JHDP does not declare any dividend even the earning is RM 196 million. In this case, the "income from other investment" in Jaks financial report is zero. Am I correct ?
In the aforesaid circumstances, the EPS of Jaks cannot be based on RM 196 million. EPS will be lower or even equal to zero if there is no dividend declared by JHDP.
Posted by DK66 > May 2, 2020 12:20 AM | Report Abuse
Dear OTB,
1. Yes, it will be reported as "share of profit in JV" in Jaks financial statement 2. Yes, the dividend may not be 196m. It maybe more or less depending on the need for cash reserve but it is not likely to be more than the free cash flow of 294m 3. No, profit is certainly 196m regardless of dividend distribution.
This article should attract more investor interest in jaks. Personally, I think there is no better way for providing a more convincing yet easy to understand profit forecast on JHDP.
On second thought, I feel ashamed to claim credit for this article.
The fact is I didn't perform any analysis in the article. I merely put Vinh Tan 1's results before you which could be easily done by anyone. Apart from the elaborative wordings, I didn't do much. The results of Vinh Tan 1 could speak for itself. I suppose that is why the article is very convincing.
Anyway, thanks for all the compliments which I feel I don't quite deserve.
In any case, I hope everyone can read this article and have a thought on this incredible opportunity.
An investor should assess the Vinh Tan 1 result to further understand the Jaks' prospects. Any decision should be made after an assessment rather than blame anyone when the price drop.
Which part of the article is sweet talk and untrue ? --------------------- HuatRex Sweet talk article. Lol. Attract more investors' interest? To help you push up the price? 04/05/2020 10:50 PM
The purpose of this i3 forum may for people with knowledge like Dk66 to share their research.
And for people like me ( without special knowledge) to find more information about the stock we bought.
I am sure it's not for attacking people. If someone want to attack people please do some research to prove their points of view. We will very appreciate. Tqvm
If you don't mind, I would like to ask here. I cannot get what you mean. Is it possible to add more colour as to why cannot get near Vinh Tan 1 result without debt capital? I simply tried with U$1.8b upfront capital, RM651m p.a. over 25 years BOT. It's a lot lower than 12% IRR.
________________________________ DK66 A lot of valuation methods were modified to suit each objective. There is no hard and fast rules. You should read Vietnam government's guideline on the parameters used to calculate the IRR for its BOT project.
You can try to do your calculation without debt capital and compare that with Vinh Tan 1's results. With 12% IRR, is it able to achieve Vinh Tan 1's results ? I can tell you off hand, your results won't even be near.
Btw, I read the parameter guideline. It's does say equity and debt capital plus repayment of original loan as part of "spending". Sound weird to double pay though.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
DK66
4,269 posts
Posted by DK66 > 2020-05-01 17:04 | Report Abuse
Probability, thanks for your "like"