Ha Ha steve, if i want to reveal my portfolio, I may hv joined the i3 portfolio group :-)
i come to this forum, mainly for fun loh ... ha ha, besides see what other ppl say and absorb infos. i also refer to other ppl portfolio, but not take it without review. like this morning i left a posting in AEMULUS, bcos i found this ctr in TanKW portfolio, leave mssg there is fun, but i don own a single stock :-)
keep some cash for next yr bargain ... look for those earning USD!
for active managed ctrs, now my main holdings are Armada and KPS.
for Armada, i start buying last month @.62, I choose Armada, bcos i'm quite sure it will turnaround + is owned by Ananda (i feel like didn't hv any ctr Ananda failed, do u remember any? do u know Ananda even has satellite business? very long time ago, there was a ctr called Measat, Ananda taken it private, and i'm one of the offeree ;-) since Ananda has vast experiences, quite sure he can solve the crooked-up, yesterday I left a mssg in Armada forum, saying, PNB selling @.62 could be proven wrong, in contrast, i could be wrong, some more, it is PNB, who dare to say so, i said it is very fun ... let time tells .....
after i bot, Armada dropped, even to 50sen (how many %? i think >20%), i bot a few batches more, now, is bouncing back ......
for KPS, i trade from the beginning of this year (i come in a bit late), for 9 mths, i even can achieve the return of 44% (bcos i buy and sell). To my surprise, those talking puncak, puncak, puncak .... don bother about KPS, but this is a related counter! and can give very good return. so, steve, if u r not in KPS now, no harm to study about the story behind, u will find it very interesting .... bcos there is a theme about Ongkili gives ang pao next year! :-)
steve, i bot my 2nd. batch @1.44, after i bot ... there was one day, at the last trading period, a big bunch (>1000 lots) of buying @1.53, i sold it, i think many also had a chance to sell, bcos the buying is waiting there for ppl sell to him .... then i bot back @1.43 ....
this buying incident confirm my suspicion he manipulate the price!
Jay, if the deal is so good, Puncak share price will not be as low as 0.89. In addition, if the board is so firm on the value creation, why not roll out a cash out option to minority shareholder like me who is pissed off over the board's inaction for the past few months after AGM? I am not expecting much, just 2.50 per share, Puncak's current cash per share, a shy off the 3.41 net asset per share Puncak is holding now.
rojakinvestor,i never said this world is fair, but it will be worse if minority shareholders keep silence and never fight back... BTW, I am only asking for 2.50 and its NA is 3.41
steveooikp, Puncak is valued at 36% cash! Any of WTK, OSK, coastal, pantech, or mmode having the same problem? Don't cite me China companies listed in Malaysia, I am not holding a China company in my portfolio and the China companies have core businesses while Puncak doesn't have one...
Puncak proposes to buy TRIPLC at 210 million, yet TRIPLC's market cap is ONLY 135 million, wonder why? If Puncak traded at 36% cash, will TRIPLC share the same fate pre- or post- deal?
Today's announcement is another big joke! Director Jumsi selling at discount?!? Wonder another why...
Jay: U dont understand the whole scenario. This is only ur research. U dont know anything in Triplc. Is good for Triplc to sell off the company. Triplc already got its new business... High dividend will be paid in triplc and bought the new business with borrowing. This is the usual tactic used by Rzl. If minority of shareholders dont wan to sell. They will got nothing. The share price will remain at between 1.50-2.00 for many years. No dividend will pay. Get the special dividend and get the new business. After the special dividend, the price will still remain at between 1.50-2.00. After that hold or not the PEB is depended on u. Worth to accept the offer?
@rogers123 I'm afraid you are the one who don't know anything.
from my first article I already mentioned Puncak is the key to unlock the value in Triplc. No dividend has been proposed so far so I won't go ahead and assume special dividend. The reason why Rozali offer RM210m is that he is also betting it is a sufficient premium over current price to entice Triplc shareholders to sell.
But you can't deny that it is not the best offer, land value alone is RM258m, borrowings is not a problem unless you assume the concession is a loss making biz (which by track record is not).
I'm not saying that Triplc shareholders should vote against, just be mindful of what could happen in both scenarios. Triplc got a decent offer but I still think Puncak got a better deal to appease their bitter shareholders
One common trait among most companies trading below net cash or significant discount to net asset value is erratic profit or even losses. Without profit, there is no real method of valuation for a minority shareholders because cash is something you can't access. Net cash looks good on paper, but when you assume even 4% FD return, you will see how little value idle cash actually creates for a company.
What Puncak needs now is to get back on its feet and start return to profitability. Then only market will give it a proper value. If you can put aside your huge unrealised losses in Puncak and actually analyse the deal thoroughly, you will see that the acquisition is actually a good thing for Puncak. in fact, it's even better than the plantation deal, in my opinion.
One contribute earnings from day 1 and don't need any additional financing. In fact, if Puncak wants, it can get rid of all the land bank instantly get back RM258m it'll more than cover the aquisiton cost. while the plantation needs to wait for a few years and require significant planting cost.
@kahhoeng I'm afraid there's no concrete wrongdoings from Puncak so there is actually no case for complaint.
For corporate deals, those are not under SC jurisdiction unless they requires SC approval. There's nothing they can do. There is also no violation of any securities law. Not paying dividend, not doing share buyback etc. or shares being undervalued below net cash does not violate any law, no regulators would even give a second look
If that is the case China stocks also no wrong doing even if we complain to SC?
Posted by Jay > Dec 23, 2016 11:03 PM | Report Abuse
@kahhoeng I'm afraid there's no concrete wrongdoings from Puncak so there is actually no case for complaint.
For corporate deals, those are not under SC jurisdiction unless they requires SC approval. There's nothing they can do. There is also no violation of any securities law. Not paying dividend, not doing share buyback etc. or shares being undervalued below net cash does not violate any law, no regulators would even give a second look
No one will share with u. But just guess. If u r RZL, wat will u do next? The company value is RM3.50, have RM2.50++ n the market price is RM0.90. WIll u buy it? Will u buy the price at RM3.50 or rm1.20?
I think many people in puncak were stuck at 2.80++ pre dividend paid, too greedy to have rm1.00 dividend and 2.50 cash. I don't think have many people will buy puncak now even such a low price, as they cant see the future earning.
I have presented my case with the SC. Will they take action or my arguments strong enough for them to investigate? That, I don't know. At least I know I have taken my duty as minority shareholder to do what I believe is right. During a conversation with the SC, I was asked if I have approached Puncak investor relation first and if I have written them letter... I told them, I have raised my concern to Rozali during AGM, and my emails to Puncak website was bounced back. These have shown has well received minority shareholders are already. I suppose, fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.
Will I vote against the TRIPLC deal? Of course I will. Will my vote be sufficient to halt the deal? Again, I don't know. But, at least I know I have taken my duty as minority shareholder to fight against a deal that I believe do not benefit minority shareholders, well, me in this case.
Cant you see...... rosali... using PEB... has in effect privatised the 137m (even way lower prior) listed TRIplc..... so that he can sell an unlisted TRIplc to Puncak at 210m immediately?!!
The process..... the PEB.... clearly and solely..... to circumvent to hinder to obstruct the proper operation of the MTM policy
With PEB... Rosali... is at least guilty.... of circumventing hindering obstructing the proper operation of a well established well regulated open market for price discovery...
Agree that triplc shareholder objective diff from puncak shareholder objective but put it this way.....the deal must be ur benefit loh;
Triplc The rm 3.00 deal looks reasonable, but Rozali wants to keep, it all for himself by creating listed PEB under his control, without paying a single cent of div to shareholders, u agree ?
Of course not, u want a substantial part of the rm 3.00 to be paid to shareholder mah....!!
U must fight loh comprises of; 1. Complaining to SC & Bursa 2. Complaining to Minority Watchdog group 3. Complain to Press 4 Complain to Triplc and Puncak independent Directors, put them on notice ,they must act for the benefit of company and not Rozali mah!! 5 attend the egm
Next be prepare for self help, vote against the deal if they is no proper dividend payout despite your demand above :
As a minority u hold alot of power, bcos Rozali cannot vote & he needs 75% of the balance independent shareholding and 75% of the shareholders number to support....not an easy feat to achieve loh..!!
Do not worry, u may kill the deal loh....bcos Rozali as a businessman, he will always comeback with another better proposal to please the shareholders to get shareholders support mah...!!
Show that, u are not being bullied & taking advantage loh...!! Don be cheap, Lets fight for the shareholder benefits loh...!!
Raider advice u, to go to SC office after u had send your complain, u approach the reception section, u tell them u want to see the officer in charge loh....!!
If u do that, they will open a file with a number for u loh....!!
It can be done, Raider had done it b4, in fact raider just walk in the SC office and ask to see to the officer loh!!.....Sc is quite professional, u can say & explain ur case to them.
It is really worthwhile to do it, raider got a good outcome too & Sc thank Raider for alerting them too loh....!!
ya. go there and see En. A... En. A will say...see En. B... Then En B not in, come back 2 hrs later.... then after 2 hours.... En. B will say see Pn. C. Pn. C will say..... submit your doc to me.... Then after 1 wk pass... 2 wk pass.... no news.... You go back and see Pn. C.... then Pn. C said the case now is handled by Pn D.... Then you go and see Pn. D.... then you find out that Pn, D is on maternity leave, asked you to come back after 2 mths.... Then you will ask other than Pn D... who else in charge.... Then Pn C will say.... Pn. E can also handle.... Then you see Pn. E ..... then Pn E will ask you to re-submit the document again... Ok ok ... after 2 days.,, you re-submit the doc to Pn. E .... then Pn. E will say they will contact you if any news... 2 weeks pass... 3 weeks pass... no news.... Then you go and see Pn. E.... you found out that Pn. E is on annual leave for 2 weeks... Then u go back and ask Pn. C.... how? Pn. C will say you can either wait for Pn. D or Pn. E to come back...
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
steveooikp
4,689 posts
Posted by steveooikp > 2016-12-22 13:30 | Report Abuse
firehawk - may I know your portfoilos and the entry price? do u mind?
I would like to know what counters I can hold now.