Oh no... soon IT grads will b able to develop great stuff. Soon we will see more innovative startups, from these younger generation. Habis arbb....can start cutting trees Again.
Conclusion - LINE is keyboard warrior, random comment.
1) no patents yet it’s called tech company - FYI patent is not a nessasary for tech company. Software tech and EMS is two type of thing.
7 REASONS NOT TO PURSUE SOFTWARE PATENTS 1. THE PATENT PROCESS IS SLOW 2. THE COSTS DON’T ALWAYS JUSTIFY THE INVESTMENT 3. YOU CAN PURSUE LOWER-COST IP PROTECTIONS 4. IP MIGHT NOT BE YOUR MOST VALUABLE ASSET 5. SOFTWARE DOESN’T REQUIRE A HIGH R&D INVESTMENT 6. SOFTWARE PATENTABILITY ISN’T GUARANTEED 7. OPEN-SOURCE MODELS COULD UNDERMINE THE VALUE OF YOUR PATENTS
2) asking money to develop things - and no guarantee that it could be successfully commercialised Development fee is knowledge based thing. Why does it no guarantee ? Is based on development time.
3) if fail - won’t get any thing - cos Ip are just papers How does it failed ? Don't you know they are 1 thing in IT industry called [FIX BUG]
4) in the game of IOT - where giants like Google etc are competing In the Game of IoT, not only google, tencent, grab and meituan, microsoft, arb, censoft is having different type of playrole.
5) dropped nearly 70% from the peak and no one saw it as an opportunity I am not commenting on this, but IoT is future, Which is true, Else you won't see zoom, blockchain, metaverse, NFT in market.
6) small tech companies usually disappear very fast I guess you make some study on this, but small tech company dissapear is on US market, Not south east asia.
Conclusion - LINE is keyboard warrior, random comment.
no patents yet it’s called tech company - FYI patent is not a nessasary for tech company. Software tech and EMS is two type of thing.
7 REASONS NOT TO PURSUE SOFTWARE PATENTS 1. THE PATENT PROCESS IS SLOW 2. THE COSTS DON’T ALWAYS JUSTIFY THE INVESTMENT 3. YOU CAN PURSUE LOWER-COST IP PROTECTIONS 4. IP MIGHT NOT BE YOUR MOST VALUABLE ASSET 5. SOFTWARE DOESN’T REQUIRE A HIGH R&D INVESTMENT 6. SOFTWARE PATENTABILITY ISN’T GUARANTEED 7. OPEN-SOURCE MODELS COULD UNDERMINE THE VALUE OF YOUR PATENTS
This are Seven reasons for not pursuing patents: yet the funny faced director appeared and let the press publish:
ARB sets up R&D unit to commercialise research, patented technology.
Why suddenly want to patent? Contradicting Company? They should get a better keyboard warrior.
2) asking money to develop things - and no guarantee that it could be successfully commercialised Development fee is knowledge based thing. Why does it no guarantee ? Is based on development time.
ANY PROFIT GUARANTEE FOR THE MONEY TO BE RAISED? Just because Public no need to guarantee is it?
3) if fail - won’t get any thing - cos Ip are just papers How does it failed ? Don't you know they are 1 thing in IT industry called [FIX BUG] Reply: FAILED here MEANS cannot sell coz other Solutions appear la.
4) in the game of IOT - where giants like Google etc are competing In the Game of IoT, not only google, tencent, grab and meituan, microsoft, arb, censoft is having different type of playrole. Reply: ARBB attracted which VC or Fund manager? Any large Fund manager invested?
5) dropped nearly 70% from the peak and no one saw it as an opportunity I am not commenting on this, but IoT is future, Which is true, Else you won't see zoom, blockchain, metaverse, NFT in market.
Not for ARBB. No large Fund managers bothered.
6) small tech companies usually disappear very fast I guess you make some study on this, but small tech company dissapear is on US market, Not south east asia. Reply: So Many disappeared on bursa. Even today Many become goreng counters.
1) as for patent - their keyboard warior is contradicting themselves. 2) no profit guarantee. 3) earlier Solutions are not even patented. Low barrier of entry for competitors. 4) no large Fund managers interested to date. 5) stop using the term Iot n confusing ppl. 6) small tech companies are basically goreng counters.
HOPE BURSA question more of the new projects before approving the RI as the company has acquired many new projects in the past 2 years, spent off all cash including more than RM55 millions from conversion of PA.
The management should provide more details as to the new Gua Musang Projects, at least we need more info to digest prior to subscribe to RI, not by force due to dilution
The Public must be well educated. Bursa should be liable too. They should be sued If they fail to do their duty. Otherwise the gap of rich and poor will increase.
Bursa is not supposed to make free money. They have risk. The risk is: they fail to perform their duty, they will be sued. And they have to bear the loses due to their negligence. Not fair for the Public.
Among the minoriity shareholders group of lawyers should unite, and monitor How bursa manages the listed entities. If bursa fails, bursa should bear the loses.
If arbb wants real research they need to have strong network around the world. From my experience, without networking susah.... Talk Talk cannot. Locsl unis as they say in the news, wont have the capability.
Usually what Many companies do is: they get the lecturer in the local Uni.... Then they give grant to the Uni. The lecturer will use it to do research. (Hopefully he is honest)
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
line
1,684 posts
Posted by line > 2021-11-10 16:17 | Report Abuse
Tell me which point you hatr