Regarding the penalty on late submission of audit report, it is unfair if the penalty amount is bared by entire shareholders! Really need to question the director about it!
I'm 1 of the shareholder of Finspark, we having a brief gathering by tmr night. Shall I bring out the question according to the open suggestion letter?
aiyor no problem occured yet no one report SC wont take action against these See how many forex trading platform not recognized by any bodies in Malaysia yet so many youngsters jump inside? You trade in this kind of platform without any guarantees ppl just one word : platform collapsed bye bye all your money gone cry here cry there no use they not responsible for this
Spark promoting eToro without knowing if it is illegal and Alvin took public money to personal account without knowing if it is criminal breach of trust. They have serious question to answer to public and DONT' dodge bullets anymore.
Seriously? Penalty can up to RM500k due to late submission of audit report to SSM? Sure Director wouldn't bare for it! Investors rugilah if kena penalty!
The content of the reply is shown at below "Hi Grey Yap,
After days of investigation with relevant stakeholders, our management team has discovered that this forum thread wasn't posted on behalf of our investor, Lee Seng Wah which means we certainly confirm the user who published the post was faking the identity of Lee Seng Wah. It has significantly impact our investor personal privacy. This is a serious crime and he has made a police report on this matter. You may refer the police report at the link below. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1l-1WIWbMushJcBgU51cijAcbvPnVdXOz/view?usp=sharing
We do not know if you're the fake Lee Seng Wah as the forum thread was released from your account or you received the news from any particular source. We suspect the reliability of the source.
To whoever are creating and spreading unreliable rumours and fake news, our legal advisory team is closely monitoring every news and messages spreading across all online and offline medium. With that, we reserved our right to take legal action.
Spark paid RM500k to buy out Stanley shares and kept all investors in the dark. So that No Audit No CBT , all settled. Can spark answer investor is this correct?
lawyer is reading this..... 1. CBT is so dead serious, how can spark associated with a tainted alvin if the story is true? 2. if untrue, just denied it publicly wont waste any your legal team time to check the announcement, right? 3. if CBT is true, then spark must be also involved or abide of the action.
PDRM also reading this, hello this is public money!!!
is 消失的子弹 an investor? So pity, invest in equity crowd funding is a wrong move. Malaysia is not mature like the western, this Finspark was setup to CON the easily be conned 1st time investor. Dont ever invest in seed fund or be an angel to this unmatured company claimed that they will go for IPO !!
I believe, the open letter is to educate minority shareholders to protect their interest, there is no defamatory element in the content. how Finspark take action? Even a real shareholder turn up, will Finspark sue the shareholder to ask such question publicly? listen to link below of what lawyer said BELOW:
Any listed company, a CFO resigned need to have clear announcements or leaving with golden handshake. If not it will affected the investor relation and worst created unnecessary doubts. So either finspark have something to hide or their PR are really sucks. Simple as that....
sparkliang is such Innocent dude, his vision to share finance knowledge widely and affordable!!! It was the CFO who betrayed them and go do his own private new funding project using sparkliang name without consent while left them do the hard work. Even a sleeping partner dont take 30% cut, it was so unfair.
CFO refuse to reduce share to 5%, and Alvin no choice also have to teaching Funding "GetFunded" and become Businessman Youtuber, As you can see who is the Blood sucker?
Audit report 31 July 2018 of finspark stated loss of 500K, OMG. The more damaging point, the directors took 350k out from the company as finance to spark liang. The bank left of RM500k on that day, now i think should be less than this amount.
Did Spark Liang took money and invested in eTORO or other money game? ???? Investor will cry baby soon
Look like PDRM already have solid evidence that Alvin is confirmed criminal breach of trust, auditor already signed his dead warrant. 7 month after raised 1.5 million, now all gone with the wind.
Why the investor received this kind of audit report and remain silent, dumb or what?
Fei Yang, not all investors knew the truth! To me, this audited report is absolutely unacceptable & the directors oso unwilling to carry out a Special Audit as agreed during last EGM! The directors seems like challenging all the minority shareholders!
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Posted by 104168397359501 > 2019-01-27 12:53 | Report Abuse
由于最近网络上一直有围绕着FinSpark的话题,先有出乎意料的公开道歉启示,后有冒用股东身份向该公司发出的公开信函,现在连大马著名的财经报《资汇》也报导有关FinSpark公司的领导人不断推广在大马不受证券委员会(SC)承认的交易平台eToro,咳醒了我这颗沉睡已久的子弹。本人外号消失的子弹,对于FinSpark事件来说是个局外人,但随着事情的进展引起了我的好奇,故此公开发表我个人的看法及给于建议,希望对FinSpark的股东/投资者们有所帮助。 首先,如果我是小股东,我会要求董事们给于清楚交代为何要向前任财务总监兼董事公开道歉及撤回言论,此举很重要,因为这间接说明董事当中有人公开撒谎,导致外界会质疑你们投资的这家公司的诚信而选择不与此公司合作,大众更怀疑你们的领导人自导自演而不再追看公司的理财教育节目,最终影响的便是投资人的回酬。 此外,对于公开信里询问有关董事涉及失信案(CBT)而被警方调查一事,虽然我不知真伪,但身为小股东的你们理应关心此事,一旦确认此事属实,后果会是非常严重! 怎么说呢? 根据我在商场多年的经验,没有商家敢与曾涉及失信案的人交涉,更不用谈合作。因此,身为小股东的你们应该拟清事情,如果证实此言不实,纯属污蔑,理应要求公司即刻在各大报章公开声明没有任何董事成员涉及失信案并对造谣者采取法律追究,从而挽回公司的声誉! 针对信函中询问公司为何迟迟不向全体股东发出特别股东大会的秘书报告一事,让我产生了很大的想象空间。这也许是公司秘书不够专业,所以无法完成此报告。如果不是,那极有可能有关报告一早就完成了,但由于董事们不小心当众承认制作了一个假视频,欺骗了全世界而事后要求公司秘书篡改会议记录,却遭到拒绝,导致此报告迟迟无法出炉。当然,这只是我的想象,如有雷同,纯属巧合。 另外,由于信函中清楚注明该公司的未审计财务报告是由本地一家相当有名气的会计公司Cheng & Co呈现的,所以我在想如果信函中提到的所有数据并非属实,该会计公司理应第一时间作出公开声明,以维护该公司良好的声誉。奇怪的是,到目前为止,只见FinSpark公司作出公开声明,而Cheng & Co却一直保持沉默。我个人觉得身为小股东的你们有责任去探索,并找出真相。 至于董事张开亮Spark是否有向小股东承诺会委任第三方审计机构对FinSpark公司进行特别审计(Special Audit)一事,或许只有出席特别股东大会的股东才知晓。果真如此,而董事们又迟迟不执行,这便间接说明该公司的账有不可见人之秘密,或许是有董事监守自盗,又或者董事们利用公司资源为自己制造利润。以上纯粹是我个人的分析和推测,如有雷同,纯属巧合。 根据信函中提及未审计财务报告是到去年9月截止,虽然我无法确认此事,但我有必要提醒身为小股东/投资者的你们,万一,我只是说万一,这个时候有人举报或者不小心被大马公司注册局(SSM)发现有关公司的审计报告未在限期内成交至SSM,那小股东们只好自求多福!因为SSM会引用公司法令2016第248(1)条文,对FinSpark公司进行可高达RM500,000的罚款! 因此,你们应该问问董事们一旦发生此事,有关的罚款是由董事们个人承担呢,还是由全体股东承担? 最后也顺便提醒一下小股东们,由于你们的领导人Spark不断地推广不受马来西亚证券委员会(SC)管制的eToro交易平台,一旦该平台发生事情,是否会影响你们在FinSpark的投资? 答案就留给精明的你们去寻找吧!祝你们好 From消失的子弹