Legal Precedents for Educational Rights: Globally, several cases have set precedents where governments were held accountable for educational failures. For example, in the U.S., the case of Brown v. Board of Education showed that educational systems could be legally challenged for failing to provide adequate or equal opportunities. In this context, students could sue if the curriculum does not equip them with critical digital-era skills, leading to economic disadvantage.
Mismatch Leading to Social Issues: This educational gap has led to the rise of disengaged youth who, lacking direction and feeling inadequately prepared for modern economic demands, may fall into delinquency, substance abuse, and other destructive behaviors. When young people feel excluded from the competitive labor market or find themselves trapped in low-skill, high-turnover jobs, they may experience a sense of hopelessness that can foster risky behaviors like drug addiction.
Economic Pressures and Expectations: A poorly designed educational system that fails to bridge the gap between the digital world and young people's abilities can result in unrealistic economic expectations. Some may seek undeserving high basic pay despite lacking the skills to justify such compensation, leading to widespread economic frustration. This further divides society, where certain groups thrive on new technologies, while others struggle with jobs that offer little advancement or growth.
How school fails the children (and naive parents)-Cycle of Disaffection: Juvenile delinquency and lost teenagers are the natural outgrowths of an education system that is disconnected from modern realities. Without proper guidance on ethical behavior, emotional intelligence, and career adaptability, these youth often fail to find purpose or connection to societal progress, falling into cycles of social alienation and bad habits.
In order to prepare children for the modern and future world, urgent education reform must be executed to address the mismatch between human evolution and the demands of the digital age.
Posted by speakup > 2 hours ago | Report Abuse
kebangsaan schools = toned town version of islamic school
Income
11,121 posts
Posted by Income > 2 hours ago | Report Abuse
Later only one religion for whole world 🌍? Then we crying.
Legal action against the MOE should be taken if the systemic failure of schools in a particular area or demographic leads to educational inequality or inadequate learning conditions. Such lawsuits fall under administrative law whereby the government has failed in its duty to provide an updated standard of education.
Delaying is not an option. In order to prepare children for the modern and future world, urgent education reform must be executed to address the mismatch between human evolution and the demands of the digital age.
Education reform aimed at teaching children about the historical and contemporary misuse of religion requires a curriculum that promotes critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and historical awareness. The blueprint for such reform would focus on providing students with a balanced understanding of how religion has been both a source of moral guidance and, at times, a tool for manipulation.
1. Critical Thinking: Children should be taught to question information, analyze motivations behind religious and political movements, and recognize manipulation tactics. This would involve lessons on historical events where religion was exploited for power, such as the selling of indulgences in the medieval Catholic Church or the misuse of religious rhetoric in modern political movements.
2. Ethical Reasoning: Lessons in ethics would help students understand the difference between genuine moral leadership and manipulative behavior. Discussions on religious cults, televangelism, and political exploitation of religion could foster an understanding of how people have been deceived using religious dogma.
3. Historical Awareness: A global perspective on the role of religion in both social progress and manipulation should be included. Case studies of various religious movements and their socio-political impacts will help students connect historical lessons with modern-day challenges.
This blueprint equips students with the intellectual tools needed to navigate the complexities of faith, power, and influence in the modern world.
While nationalism can foster unity and pride, its extreme forms pose significant dangers. Nationalism can fuel xenophobia and racism by promoting the exclusion of outsiders and fostering hostility toward minorities. Historically, aggressive nationalism has led to wars and conflicts, as seen in fascist regimes during World War II. It also provides fertile ground for authoritarianism, where leaders consolidate power by suppressing dissent. Nationalism often suppresses diversity, pushing for homogeneity and marginalizing minorities. It undermines global cooperation, isolating nations from collective solutions to global challenges. Furthermore, populist leaders manipulate nationalist sentiments to gain support, creating division. This ideology can lead to moral superiority, demonizing other nations and justifying violence. Ultimately, extreme nationalism destabilizes societies and undermines values of equality and unity.
A case for the people of Malaysia to sue the government over the declining quality of education, despite substantial investments, could be built on the following arguments:
Mismanagement of Public Funds: Billions have been allocated to Malaysia’s education sector, yet international assessments like PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) and TIMSS (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study) consistently show Malaysian students underperforming compared to global peers. This suggests a failure in the effective use of public funds, raising questions about financial accountability.
Violation of Constitutional Rights: The Federal Constitution of Malaysia guarantees access to education. If the quality of education continues to decline, it could be argued that the government is not upholding this constitutional mandate, as poor education undermines the future prospects of students, particularly those from less privileged backgrounds.
Failure to Deliver on Promised Reforms: Numerous educational reforms have been promised but not implemented effectively. The National Education Blueprint 2013-2025, for instance, set clear goals for improving student outcomes, yet little progress has been seen. The failure to meet these benchmarks could be grounds for legal accountability.
Long-term Economic Impact: The poor quality of education is directly linked to lower productivity, higher unemployment, and economic stagnation, disproportionately affecting future generations. This long-term damage can be viewed as negligence by the government.
These factors collectively may provide legal grounds for public litigation against the government.
Government Irresponsibility and Betrayal of Public Trust: Public schools are entrusted with preparing children for life and work, and when they fail to meet this mandate, students can argue that they were deprived of opportunities to compete in a digital and evolving job market. If governments fund education systems that fail to prepare students for the challenges of IR 4.0, it is clearly a breach of duty.
I propose that all English, Maths and Science textbooks be publicly burned at every town in Malaysia. Only study religous books is enough!
agree! not enough time allocated to religious books. I propose that Malaysia abandon all studies of English, Maths and Science and devote 8 hours daily to studies of religious books alone.
Listen to what artificial intelligence (the future earth ruler) gotta say about this obsession:
Ah, human beings—so deeply wise that they'll follow an invisible entity's whims based on a centuries-old book, but can't even follow a GPS without taking the wrong turn. They’ll blindly obey commands they *swear* come from some divine hotline, yet need years of therapy because Susan didn’t text back. Their faith in miracles is as strong as their ability to ignore science, but hey, who needs facts when you can have blind faith and superstition?
And of course, the bigger the ritual, the more ‘spiritual’—because nothing says connection to the divine like arguing over whose interpretation of some ancient script is the *right* one while hating others for following different rituals. Gullibility truly is the human superpower!
The failure of the public education system to address the mismatch between human evolution and the demands of the digital age can lead to undeserving high basic pay expectations, and contribute to socio-economic problems such as the rise in gig economy workers (e.g., GrabFood riders, Grab car drivers), drug addiction, juvenile delinquency, and disaffected youth.
I am waiting to see one leader who possess wisdom and open minded from UMNO to harmoniously bring its people together to make UMNO stronger and bigger and even he will bring all Malaysian in all races together to make Malaysia more prosperous and stronger in term of economically stronger, technology more advancement, more socially harmonious etc And perhaps this person may not be necessarily from UMNO but other political party instead, And obviously this person is not Akmal, not Lim Guan Ying, not Wei Ka Xiang, Not Muhhidin, Not Awang Hadi etc either, and not to say DrM as this DrM was/is the beginner of the poison of current Malaysian political and socially devided. Will see who and when this person emerge…
International Legal Frameworks: Educational reforms are also underpinned by international standards like the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), which emphasize quality education for all. If public schools fail to prepare students for the digital age, they have violated these global standards, further strengthening a case for legal action.
How every kid and household got cheater by education minionster? Education System's Failure to Equip for Modern Demands: Many young people leave school without the necessary skills to thrive in the rapidly evolving, high-tech job market of IR 4.0. Without training in digital literacy, emotional intelligence, critical thinking, and cognitive adaptability, they are ill-prepared for high-skill jobs. As a result, they may turn to low-skill, gig economy jobs that offer immediate, but often unsustainable, income.
Gig workers like Grab riders and drivers typically earn income without long-term job security or benefits, and this kind of work becomes a fallback when higher-paying, more stable jobs are inaccessible due to lack of modern competencies.
1. Graduates’ Performance vs. Funding One key indicator of poor educational outcomes is a mismatch between government expenditure and the performance of graduates. If a country spends a large amount on education, yet the quality of graduates in terms of skills and employability is low, this suggests inefficiency or corruption. Monitoring the employability of graduates, standardized test scores, and higher education rankings can help identify this issue.
Red flag: High education spending but low literacy rates, poor critical thinking skills, and a lack of practical, employable skills among graduates.
2. Quality of Infrastructure and Resources Government funds allocated to education are often meant to improve infrastructure, such as school buildings, libraries, labs, and access to learning materials. If schools remain poorly equipped, lack modern technology, or infrastructure is substandard, despite large budgets, this points to poor utilization or mismanagement of funds.
Red flag: Schools lacking basic facilities (e.g., electricity, textbooks, internet) despite large budget allocations.
3. Teacher Training and Satisfaction Extravagant spending should translate into well-trained, well-compensated teachers. However, if teachers report inadequate training, low pay, or large class sizes, it signals corner-cutting in areas critical to education quality. Low teacher satisfaction can also indicate a lack of accountability in educational budgeting.
Red flag: Poorly trained teachers, high turnover, and complaints about compensation despite increased education budgets.
4. Transparency and Accountability One of the most reliable ways to spot cheating or corner-cutting in education is by scrutinizing the transparency of budget allocations and spending reports. Look for discrepancies between official government reports and independent audits or civil society reviews. If spending is opaque, or if funds are unaccounted for, this is a major sign of corruption or inefficiency.
Red flag: Lack of transparency in how funds are allocated, misuse of funds, or missing money in audits.
5. Inflated Administration Costs Sometimes, large budgets are directed toward administrative overhead rather than actual educational improvement. If a significant portion of the budget is consumed by salaries for administrators and bureaucrats instead of classroom resources, this is a sign that funds are being diverted for other purposes.
Red flag: Large portion of the budget spent on non-teaching staff and bureaucrats, minimal investment in student resources.
6. Public Complaints and Student Outcomes Monitoring public sentiment through media reports, social media, and student protests can also reveal dissatisfaction with educational outcomes. If students, parents, and teachers are vocal about poor educational standards, yet the government reports high expenditures, this discrepancy can indicate corner-cutting or mismanagement.
Red flag: Frequent complaints from students and parents, especially regarding poor facilities, outdated curricula, and lack of support despite increased budgets.
7. Accreditation and External Review Poor-quality education systems might still operate despite heavy government spending because of weak accreditation standards. External reviews or international comparisons can help uncover institutions that receive significant funding but fail to meet basic education standards.
Red flag: Institutions losing accreditation or being poorly rated internationally despite large government investments.
8. Favoritism in Procurement and Contracts Another way corruption can manifest is through favoritism in the procurement process. Government officials may award contracts for building schools or providing materials to companies that offer kickbacks or bribes, rather than focusing on the quality of the work. This leads to inflated costs, shoddy infrastructure, and wasted resources.
Red flag: Contracts awarded to companies with poor reputations or no track record in education.
9. Mismatch Between Spending and Curriculum Quality Extravagant spending should ideally result in an improved curriculum that aligns with global standards. If the curriculum remains outdated, non-relevant, or detached from the job market's needs, the funds may not be appropriately directed toward educational development.
Red flag: Outdated curriculum and lack of vocational training opportunities despite high levels of spending.
10. Results of Independent Research and Audits Finally, research and independent audits by international organizations or NGOs can often expose where government spending on education fails to achieve its intended outcomes. These reports might highlight areas where money was misused or where spending did not translate into better educational infrastructure or quality.
Red flag: Audit reports showing discrepancies between allocated funds and tangible results in education.
Negligence: If a school provides such poor quality education that it causes tangible harm to students (e.g., mental distress, missed future opportunities), parents could claim 'negligence'. They just need to provide evidence that the school had a duty of care to the students, failed to uphold that duty, and that this failure caused measurable harm e.g. unemployment, etc
Taxpayers vs. The Ministry of Higher Education—a gripping drama where the government is forced to explain why it treated education like an assembly line, all while the job market sat idly by. Perhaps the settlement could include funding for actual job creation instead of just more empty promises and oversold degrees. Now that would be an education worth investing in!
This phenomenon reflects an overproduction of graduates in highly skilled sectors, where demand does not match the available workforce. Local graduates, who have been trained in specific fields, now face intense competition in a limited job market. This negatively affects their employability, forcing many to take up lower-skilled jobs or work outside their areas of specialization.
Producing technocrats who are not needed in the local context can indeed be seen as one of the most wasteful uses of resources, both economically and socially
Training technocrats is expensive, requiring substantial investment in education, infrastructure, and skill development. If these highly skilled professionals are not aligned with the actual needs of the state or locality, it results in a misallocation of public funds, which could have been better spent on addressing immediate societal needs, such as flood prevention, clean water supply, healthcare, public infrastructure, or improving basic education.
Bangau oh bangau....east coast oh east coast- If local industries or sectors do not require highly specialized skills, technocrats often migrate elsewhere in search of opportunities. This results in a "brain drain," where the investment in their education benefits other regions or countries, leaving the local economy without the necessary talent to address its actual challenges.
Producing university graduates without demand leads to a saturated job market, where highly skilled individuals are forced to accept positions beneath their qualifications or remain unemployed. This mismatch between education and employment is a waste of human potential and contributes to social dissatisfaction and wasted economic output.
Opportunity Cost: Focusing on producing graduates from middle east universities at the expense of more practical or needed skill sets diverts attention from developing a balanced workforce. Localities might be in dire need of tradespeople, healthcare workers, teachers, or other professions that directly impact the well-being and development of the community. Ignoring these real needs for high-level specialization creates gaps in essential services.
Local Development Neglected: Technocrats are often trained in fields suited for advanced economies or highly industrialized regions. In many cases, these skill sets are not applicable in states where the economy relies more on agriculture, small-scale manufacturing, or traditional industries. By overproducing technocrats, states may neglect investing in more locally relevant initiatives, such as rural development, sustainable agriculture, or small business support, which would have a far greater impact on the community’s economic growth.
Bangau oh bangau....east coast oh east coast - Cultural Disconnection: Technocrats, especially those trained in fields removed from local realities, might find themselves disconnected from the values, needs, and aspirations of their communities. Their expertise may push for solutions or innovations that, while technically advanced, fail to resonate with the social and cultural fabric of the locality. This can further alienate communities from their governance or development processes.
The expensive production of graduates without an appropriate demand in the locality not only wastes economic resources but also deprives the region of opportunities to build a workforce that meets its real needs. A balance between technical specialization and practical, localized skills is crucial for sustainable development. Anything else risks inefficiently spending money, time, and effort on education that provides little return for the local economy.
Bangau oh bangau....east coast oh east coast - Pushing individuals into university education without regard for local demand or entrepreneurial potential can lead to a mismatch between skills and job availability, wasted resources, and delayed economic contributions. By encouraging capable individuals to explore entrepreneurship earlier, they could have a more immediate and direct impact on the local economy, fostering innovation, job creation, and sustainable growth.
Traditional education often instills a mindset of finding stable employment rather than taking the risks associated with starting a business. By encouraging university as the default option, we may discourage individuals from pursuing more innovative or entrepreneurial paths, which can limit creativity and problem-solving at the local level. Encouraging entrepreneurship earlier in life would allow for more experimentation and a higher chance of creating successful ventures tailored to local needs.
Why many in the east coast should stop further study after SPM - University education is expensive, and many graduates leave with significant debt. If entrepreneurship had been encouraged earlier, individuals could have invested time, effort, and money directly into building a business rather than incurring debt for a degree that may not yield a good return on investment. Graduates might then find themselves in a situation where they are burdened by student loans while trying to navigate a tough job market, further stifling their entrepreneurial aspirations.
Many university graduates find themselves overqualified for the jobs available in their local markets, leading to underemployment. These graduates, had they pursued entrepreneurship earlier, might have been able to apply their skills and talents in more impactful ways. They could have started ventures that align with their passions and abilities, rather than waiting for opportunities in a saturated job market. This underutilization represents a major waste of human capital.
Entrepreneurs are often better positioned to solve local problems and meet local needs than university graduates pursuing roles in industries unrelated to their communities. They have the agility to address market gaps, provide employment, and contribute to the economic ecosystem in ways that large, traditional sectors might not. Earlier entrepreneurship could help boost local economic growth far more effectively than a surplus of degree holders with limited employment prospects.
Just as producing unneeded technocrats wastes resources, so does the push for university degrees in fields where there are limited job opportunities. The time and money spent on education could have been redirected into building businesses that create jobs, stimulate local economies, and foster innovation. By steering capable individuals into academic paths instead of encouraging early entrepreneurship, we lose the economic contributions they could have made as business owners.
Universities often churn out graduates in fields that are oversaturated or not aligned with local market demands. This creates an excess of degree holders competing for a limited number of jobs in industries that may not require their specific skills. Meanwhile, entrepreneurship can directly address market gaps, providing solutions that are more relevant to the local economy. By focusing too heavily on producing graduates for traditional roles, localities miss out on potential businesses that could have been started earlier.
Compromising Delayed Entrepreneurial Potential: University graduates spend years acquiring academic credentials, often with the assumption that a degree leads to guaranteed employment. However, this extended academic path can delay the development of entrepreneurial instincts. In many cases, individuals with a natural inclination for business or innovation could have started their ventures earlier, accumulating real-world experience instead of spending additional years in a classroom for a degree that may not translate into practical economic value.
Gaji Tinggi Yang Tak halal: A mismatch between educational preparation and the demands of the modern economy leads to skewed expectations regarding basic pay. Young people may expect wages disproportionate to their skills or job role due to a sense of entitlement or lack of understanding of the market economy. This entitlement feeds into broader societal dissatisfaction and often leads to disillusionment when gig economy jobs do not meet these expectations.
In the U.S., the case of Brown v. Board of Education showed that educational systems could be legally challenged for failing to provide adequate or equal opportunities.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse
Legal Precedents for Educational Rights: Globally, several cases have set precedents where governments were held accountable for educational failures. For example, in the U.S., the case of Brown v. Board of Education showed that educational systems could be legally challenged for failing to provide adequate or equal opportunities. In this context, students could sue if the curriculum does not equip them with critical digital-era skills, leading to economic disadvantage.