Be the first to like this.
1 comment(s). Last comment by EngineeringProfit 1 week ago
Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 week ago | Report Abuse
No more letting T2-15 pay for their transport, Burbery and extravagant lifestyle. Let MPs pay for the actual cost of such living........WHY not be really functional Robin Hood?
No result.
1
2
3
BFM Podcast
4
Mercury Securities Research
6
BFM Podcast
7
BFM Podcast
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 weeks ago | Report Abuse
To foster a government driven by dedication rather than privilege, we should consider removing perks from political roles, ensuring that only those who genuinely love the work and care about the nation would take up such demanding positions. Unlike politicians, who receive taxpayer-funded benefits like housing, healthcare, transportation, and travel allowances, hardworking individuals in tax brackets T2-T15—the backbone of the tax base—do not have such privileges. These taxpayers work tirelessly to cover their living expenses, contribute to the economy, and support their families, balancing mortgages, education costs, and retirement savings without any state-backed safety net. Eliminating the perks associated with political office would level the playing field, putting political leaders in touch with the realities their constituents face. Many professionals in T2-T15 brackets bear a far greater financial burden than public officials, yet they remain committed to their responsibilities, demonstrating a work ethic grounded in personal responsibility and a desire to contribute positively to society. Politicians should experience the same pressures that ordinary citizens face, encouraging a government of genuinely committed leaders rather than careerists drawn by benefits. If the perks are removed, those entering politics would do so out of a deep sense of purpose and commitment to serve. This would attract individuals who prioritize public service and the nation's welfare, rather than those seeking a comfortable career path. It would also bridge the inequity in the current distribution of resources, as T2-T15 earners would no longer be funding an elite lifestyle for politicians. In turn, this might also lead to more responsible governance and a stronger alignment between policymakers and the citizens they represent, ultimately building a more committed and empathetic leadership class.