Good Articles to Share

Ekovest: seen many times funds vs owners & retailers - felicity

Tan KW
Publish date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017, 01:12 PM
Tan KW
0 499,811
Good.

Thursday, November 9, 2017 

 
First of all, I am not a trader. Hence, this post does not mean I mainly look at trades, however as an investor I have to be smart on short term movements, psychology in among traders especially funds.

Ekovest, if one notice its latest Annual Report has added on institutional investors. While many have opinions that institutional are good, to me IT DEPENDS. Ekovest's shares have been bought by institutionals especially when Datuk Haris sold his block. During then, Ekovest's shares have huge volatility and of course when there are huge swings, many retailers like to take part. Some are caught at around RM1.45 to RM1.50 (one has to note that Ekovest's shares have split from 1 to 2.5 early this year and has given 25 sen dividend after its sale of 40% of DUKE).

This time around, it seems (while I am positive or rather see very little impact), I think funds are negative on Ekovest's proposal to acquire as they deem it as a rescue of IWCITY. I obviously differ in my opinion.

To me, it is quite obvious - the owners and sponsors see this deal as positive for Ekovest. They have hence in the short period of time decided to buy more shares of the company they control. I see this as quite common actually. While funds are funds and they can impact the short term trade of the stocks they own, they however move in herds.

I have actually seen this in many strong fundamental stocks - Airasia, NTPM, Padini are among some of them. All of them have funds relinquishing and frankly Airasia was the classic. One guy from Hong Kong gave a negative comment and some of the large funds (in US) started to sell (strongly advice to read this link and reflect again) - at a period when the fundamentals actually turned to the positive. It is most of the time started with the same concern - gearing and gearing.

As long as the fundamental of the company is sound - the idealogy is when funds sell, we slowly pick. Again, as long as the fundamental is strong - this is important.

In Ekovest, I see that same. Ekovest is not used to funds investing in their stocks. One can run through their annual reports of yesteryears. This year is the difference where funds are started to pick up the stock.

As a small retail investor, I see these as opportunities - which is why I say, one can be small but we can actually perform better. Some people simply call this as "contrarian" strategy. 
 
http://www.intellecpoint.com/2017/11/ekovest-seen-many-times-funds-vs-owners.html

 

Related Stocks
Discussions
2 people like this. Showing 4 of 4 comments

speakup

someone must FREE all the uncles & aunties trapped inside ekovest above RM1, then only can go up.

RELEASE THE PRISONERS, OR ELSE..... NO SHOW!

2017-11-09 14:21

lizi

1 week 3 articles about ekovest. so hardworking.

2017-11-09 21:37

Jonathan Keung

you may be right (felicity) but perception is all that matters. you cannot blame minority holders feeling agast when their shares plummented down from 1.15 to 92 sen after the takeover announcement.

Everybody feels the takeover of IWH is bad for ekovest splashing out real money. whereas Botak Lim explanation is in years to come Ekovest would benefit from the rising property IWH values at iskander region.

Botak Lim may be right but only time will tells. 5-6 years is a long long time anything might happen. what the minority wants are to see their share values at pre takeover announcement or higher ( not going south with his plans ).

If Botak lim is so confident. he can used his other dormant companies to takeover IWH ( instead of Ekovest ). The bottom line is Ekovest has the cash he can used for IWH. Just my personal view

2017-11-10 09:38

ipomember

jonathan you might need to review back the situation, noone is taking over IWH.

2017-11-10 14:03

Post a Comment