The combination of criminal sanctions and professional disbarment would likely constitute the most appropriate punishment for any lawyer involved in misleading the court in such serious cases, hence serves as deterrent to other law practitioners

While nationalism can foster unity and pride, its extreme forms pose significant dangers. Nationalism can fuel xenophobia and racism by promoting the exclusion of outsiders and fostering hostility toward minorities. Historically, aggressive nationalism has led to wars and conflicts, as seen in fascist regimes during World War II. It also provides fertile ground for authoritarianism, where leaders consolidate power by suppressing dissent. Nationalism often suppresses diversity, pushing for homogeneity and marginalizing minorities. It undermines global cooperation, isolating nations from collective solutions to global challenges. Furthermore, populist leaders manipulate nationalist sentiments to gain support, creating division. This ideology can lead to moral superiority, demonizing other nations and justifying violence. Ultimately, extreme nationalism destabilizes societies and undermines values of equality and unity.

While nationalism can foster unity and pride, its extreme forms pose significant dangers. Nationalism can fuel xenophobia and racism by promoting the exclusion of outsiders and fostering hostility toward minorities. Historically, aggressive nationalism has led to wars and conflicts, as seen in fascist regimes during World War II. It also provides fertile ground for authoritarianism, where leaders consolidate power by suppressing dissent. Nationalism often suppresses diversity, pushing for homogeneity and marginalizing minorities. It undermines global cooperation, isolating nations from collective solutions to global challenges. Furthermore, populist leaders manipulate nationalist sentiments to gain support, creating division. This ideology can lead to moral superiority, demonizing other nations and justifying violence. Ultimately, extreme nationalism destabilizes societies and undermines values of equality and unity.

Lawyers who attempt to mislead the court, particularly in a clear-cut case involving criminal breach of trust (CBT) and money laundering, face serious legal and ethical consequences. In such cases, where public funds are involved, and the argument centers around laundering for welfare purposes, the lawyer could still face sanctions, as the law does not permit such justifications.

That's for sapiens. You just wait and see who should sit in the August House

Modern education and schools have a fundamental duty to protect children from the "dogma storm" – the overwhelming influence of rigid beliefs and unquestioned ideologies that can stifle critical thinking, creativity, and intellectual freedom. In an increasingly interconnected world, children are exposed to a barrage of information, much of which may be biased, one-sided, or rooted in historical or cultural dogmas. If schools fail to offer a space for independent thought, they risk producing individuals who are more prone to accept narratives blindly rather than question, explore, and develop their own well-reasoned viewpoints.

Education must empower children to think critically and to develop the intellectual tools to assess the validity of claims, ideas, and traditions. When schools promote a curriculum that encourages inquiry over rote memorization or unquestioning obedience, they cultivate thinkers who can discern fact from fiction, resist manipulation, and make informed decisions. Schools must also emphasize emotional intelligence and the ability to respectfully engage with diverse viewpoints, shielding children from falling into echo chambers or extremist thinking.

Moreover, protecting children from dogma also involves preparing them to navigate a world where societal, religious, and political dogmas can pressure them to conform. Schools should teach children to appreciate nuance, avoid oversimplified narratives, and promote intellectual humility. By fostering an environment that encourages the questioning of assumptions and the exploration of alternative perspectives, education plays a pivotal role in helping future generations grow into autonomous, well-rounded individuals who are not enslaved by outdated ideologies or harmful groupthink.

Ultimately, modern education must be the guardian of intellectual freedom, ensuring that children are prepared to navigate a world fraught with competing beliefs without succumbing to the storms of dogma that seek to limit their potential.

**Title: "The Courtroom of Justice"**

*Scene: A packed courtroom, with the air heavy with anticipation. On one side, a senior and experienced lawyer, Mr. Ramin, stands defending his client, a high-ranking government servant, Mr. Karim, accused of criminal breach of trust (CBT) and money laundering. At the bench, Judge Sophia is known for her sharp mind and no-nonsense approach to justice.*

**Judge Sophia**: (Leaning forward slightly) Mr. Ramin, I’ve listened carefully to your defense over the past few days. And I must say, your arguments are... inventive, to put it kindly. Today, you seem to suggest that the exorbitant fees paid to you were—how did you put it?—part of a welfare scheme to support your client’s 'charitable' endeavors?

**Mr. Ramin**: (Smiling confidently) Your Honor, it is well known that my client, Mr. Karim, has dedicated years of service to public welfare. My fees were a means to assist him in managing his funds for these noble causes, albeit indirectly. Yes, the money came from public funding, but the intention behind its use was for the betterment of the people.

**Judge Sophia**: (Smirking) Ah, I see. So, you’re now claiming that siphoning public funds, laundering them through your law firm, and then distributing them under the guise of legal fees was... benevolent?

**Mr. Ramin**: (Hesitating) I wouldn’t phrase it quite like that, Your Honor. But I believe the outcome of the funds speaks for itself. Welfare, after all—

**Judge Sophia**: (Interrupting, her tone sharp) Welfare, Mr. Ramin? Do you mean to suggest that *your* inflated bank account is a model of public welfare? That’s a very curious definition. In fact, I would almost call it a personal welfare scheme—one that seems to benefit you more than the public.

**(The courtroom murmurs. Mr. Ramin shifts uncomfortably, losing some of his composure.)**

**Mr. Ramin**: Your Honor, I assure you, everything was done within the bounds of legality. The fees charged were for legal services rendered, and—

**Judge Sophia**: (Cutting in with a raised eyebrow) Legal services rendered, Mr. Ramin? I have no doubt you rendered *some* services, but I am beginning to question *whom* they were for. If I recall correctly, Mr. Karim diverted public funds amounting to millions for 'consultancy fees'—fees which, curiously, ended up in your hands. Was this not the same public servant whose signature you advised on nearly every document in this sordid affair?

**Mr. Ramin**: (Stammering) Well, I... I... simply followed my client's instructions.

**Judge Sophia**: (Leaning back in her chair) Instructions to what, Mr. Ramin? Cover up his crimes? Deflect from the theft of public money by arguing he was somehow using it for charitable purposes? You seem to be confusing legal representation with complicity.

**Mr. Ramin**: Your Honor, I object to this characterization! I am simply a lawyer doing my duty to the best of my abilities.

**Judge Sophia**: (Smiling coldly) A lawyer doing his duty, indeed. But there’s one problem with your ‘best efforts,’ Mr. Ramin. They have not only failed to clear your client’s name but also brought your own integrity into question. You seem to believe that laundering money through legal fees is some kind of loophole. You misjudged the law... and perhaps you misjudged this court. (Pauses for effect) The law does not smile upon those who seek to mislead it.

**(The courtroom is silent. Judge Sophia lets the weight of her words hang.)**

**Mr. Ramin**: (Attempting to regain control) Your Honor, I maintain that all fees were legitimate, and as for Mr. Karim—

**Judge Sophia**: (Interrupting, her voice icy) Let me be clear, Mr. Ramin. You are not on trial for the fees—at least not yet. But you are teetering dangerously close to being held accountable for abetting your client’s crimes. Sharing in the spoils of public corruption under the guise of legal fees will not protect you, no matter how skillfully you think you’ve crafted your defense. And as for Mr. Karim’s ‘welfare contributions’—the court sees through them as easily as it sees through this charade. Public funds are meant for public good, not for lining the pockets of those who are supposed to serve the people.

**(Mr. Ramin is visibly shaken, his confidence crumbling.)**

**Judge Sophia**: (Turning to the prosecutor) Prosecutor, prepare the case for final arguments. We’ve heard enough. Mr. Karim’s actions are as clear as the daylight, and no amount of legal theatrics will obscure the facts. And as for you, Mr. Ramin, I suggest you review the professional code of conduct for lawyers before you return to this courtroom.

**(The gavel strikes. The courtroom erupts in whispers, with Mr. Ramin slumping into his seat, his once confident posture now replaced by defeat.)**

**Judge Sophia**: Court adjourned.

*End scene.*

The combination of criminal sanctions and professional disbarment would likely constitute the most appropriate punishment for any lawyer involved in misleading the court in such serious cases, hence serves as deterrent to other law practitioners

Perjury or False Evidence:
If the lawyer presents false evidence or induces a witness to commit perjury, Section 193 of the Penal Code (giving or fabricating false evidence) applies, which carries a punishment of up to 7 years imprisonment and a fine.

And in such a case, the court must pursue under offense of "Complicity in Money Laundering or CBT":
If a lawyer is directly involved in the laundering of public funds or aiding in a CBT, they could also face criminal prosecution under the same laws applicable to the primary offenders (such as Penal Code Section 409 for CBT and AMLA Section 4 for money laundering). In such cases, the punishment for the lawyer would be similar to the penalties imposed on those convicted of these offenses; as well as indirectly sharing the loots from public fund - depends on income tax filed by the said lawyer

Section 94(3) of the Legal Profession Act 1976 empowers the Disciplinary Board to strike a lawyer off the roll or suspend them for misconduct involving dishonesty, fraud, or deceit, especially in misleading the court.

Lawyers are bound by professional ethical codes, such as those outlined in the Legal Profession Act 1976 (Malaysia), which prohibit misleading the court.

Under Section 4 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing, and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 (AMLA) in Malaysia, anyone convicted of money laundering may be sentenced to up to 15 years in prison and face a fine of not less than five times the sum of the proceeds of the unlawful activity or RM5 million, whichever is higher.

If the lawyer is complicit in the criminal breach of trust, the Penal Code Section 409 (CBT by a public servant, banker, merchant, or agent) provides for punishment up to 20 years imprisonment, a fine, and whipping.

Rightfully under Section 186 of the Malaysian Penal Code, obstructing a public servant in the discharge of their public functions can lead to up to 2 years imprisonment, a fine, or both. However, more serious forms of obstruction, including perverting the course of justice, may carry heavier penalties.

Criminal Charges:
If an unsrupulous senior and experience lawyer knowingly misleads the court, they should be made to face criminal charges, particularly for obstruction of justice or complicity in the crime.

No Excuse for Channeling to Welfare
The law does not excuse criminal actions, even if the funds are redirected for charitable purposes. The principles of *mens rea* (criminal intent) and *actus reus* (criminal act) still apply, and laundering funds, regardless of their final destination, is illegal. The court is unlikely to entertain a defense based on the notion that laundering money for welfare purposes negates the crime.

Judicial Precedents
Courts have a duty to take a strong stance against lawyers who mislead the judicial process, especially in high-profile cases involving public trust. Judges may impose strict penalties on such lawyers, ensuring that the integrity of the legal system is upheld.

Complicity or Aiding and Abetting: If the lawyer is found to have been actively involved in the scheme, they could be considered complicit in the crime of CBT or money laundering.

Obstruction of Justice: Knowingly deceiving or misleading the court may result in charges related to obstructing the judicial process.

In cases where public trust is violated, such as laundering public funds under the guise of welfare, any lawyer attempting to argue innocence based on such justification would likely violate ethical principles.

Or more apppropriate would be disbarment: Permanent revocation of the lawyer’s license to practice.

Suspension: Temporary removal of the right to practice law

Ethical Breach and Misleading the Court
Lawyers are bound by ethical codes that prohibit misleading the court. In most jurisdictions, if a lawyer knowingly presents a false argument or misrepresents facts, they can face disciplinary action.

Heavy indoctrination discourages independent thought, critical questioning, and intellectual exploration. Instead, it promotes obedience, conformity, and rigid adherence to a prescribed set of beliefs. Without the mental exercise of questioning, analyzing, and integrating diverse information, the PFC can become underutilized, impairing its growth and development. This cognitive stagnation can cause individuals to rely more heavily on primitive, instinctual brain functions, often associated with the limbic system and what is colloquially called the "reptilian brain."

Section 505(b) of the Penal Code – This section deals with statements that could lead to public mischief, particularly statements that may cause fear or alarm to the public or disturb public peace

IF a person make a million, chances are he is both intelligent and well-deserved. But when a person make a billion, he has inadvertently taken the portion meant for the many other people to live a decent life- or in short, they are the culprits accountable for the poverty in the nation

Haunting?

Me too. Cheers

Article 10: Public Education and Trust

1. The government shall take steps to educate the public about AI systems' roles in governance, ensuring that citizens are informed and can trust the integration of AI into public office.
2. Public confidence in AI systems must be regularly evaluated through surveys, open forums, and feedback mechanisms.

Article 9: Conflict Resolution

1. In the event of a conflict between human representatives and AI systems, a clear process for resolution shall be established, ensuring that human interests are prioritized in cases where there is disagreement.
2. AI systems shall not have the power to overrule human representatives but may propose alternative solutions or courses of action.

Article 8: Regulation and Oversight

1. A national AI oversight body shall be established to monitor the performance and ethical compliance of AI systems in public office.
2. This body shall have the authority to suspend or remove AI systems from office if they fail to meet ethical or functional standards.
3. AI systems must undergo regular reviews, and their continued service in public office must be subject to parliamentary approval based on their performance and ethical conduct.

Article 7: Continuous Learning and Adaptation

1. AI systems holding public office must undergo continuous learning to adapt to new social, political, and economic challenges.
2. Regular updates and improvements to AI systems shall be made to ensure they remain relevant and effective in their roles.
3. A dedicated body shall oversee AI training and development to prevent errors, reduce risks, and enhance their contributions to governance.

Article 6: Safeguarding Data Privacy

1. AI systems shall prioritize the protection of citizens' data and privacy. Personal data used by AI systems in decision-making processes must be anonymized and securely stored.
2. AI systems must comply with Malaysia’s data protection laws, ensuring that sensitive information is handled with the utmost care and only used for legitimate governance purposes.

Article 5: Citizen Representation

1. AI systems shall represent the interests of all Malaysian citizens, ensuring equal consideration of diverse communities and socioeconomic groups.
2. AI systems must actively seek input from citizens through digital platforms, providing opportunities for public engagement and participation in decision-making.
3. Mechanisms for challenging or contesting decisions made by AI systems shall be established, allowing citizens to voice concerns and seek redress when necessary.

Article 4: Ethical Guidelines

1. AI systems holding office must be programmed to uphold ethical standards, including fairness, non-discrimination, and respect for human dignity.
2. AI systems shall be designed to prevent bias, ensuring that no individual or group is disadvantaged by decisions made by AI representatives.
3. Regular ethical audits must be conducted to ensure AI systems continue to operate within the boundaries of established moral and legal standards.

Article 3: Human-AI Collaboration

1. AI systems shall serve as complementary agents to human representatives, working in collaboration to enhance the quality of governance and decision-making processes.
2. A framework for joint decision-making between human and AI members shall be established, where AI provides data-driven insights and recommendations, while final decisions remain under human supervision.
3. AI shall never have unilateral power to enact laws or policies without human oversight and approval.

Article 2: Transparency and Accountability

1. AI systems holding public office shall operate with full transparency. Decisions made by AI systems must be accessible, understandable, and open for public scrutiny.
2. All decisions made by AI systems must be explainable, with documented reasoning that can be audited by independent experts.
3. AI systems in public office shall be subject to the same laws and oversight mechanisms as human representatives, ensuring accountability for actions taken on behalf of the people.

Article 1: AI Eligibility for Government Positions

1. AI systems shall be eligible to hold positions within government bodies, including the Executive Councils (EXCO) and Parliament, provided they meet established ethical, legal, and functional standards.
2. AI systems must demonstrate a capability for objective analysis, informed decision-making, and adherence to Malaysia's legal framework, including the Federal Constitution.
3. An independent regulatory body shall be established to assess AI eligibility for office through rigorous tests of competency, ethical compliance, and social responsibility.

Malaysia AI Bill of Rights for AI Participation in Executive Councils (EXCO) and Parliament

AI could serve as a superior MP by reducing operational costs, as it doesn’t require salaries, benefits, or breaks. It can ensure impartiality, free from biases or political influence, and process vast information quickly, enabling faster decision-making. AI also brings consistency to governance, unaffected by emotional or political changes, and offers 24/7 accessibility for public engagement. Overall, AI-driven parliamentary roles could enhance efficiency, fairness, and inclusivity, while saving taxpayer money.

And lucrative allowances and free ride to parliament. Replace them with AI, ok?

Education reform aimed at teaching children about the historical and contemporary misuse of religion requires a curriculum that promotes critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and historical awareness. The blueprint for such reform would focus on providing students with a balanced understanding of how religion has been both a source of moral guidance and, at times, a tool for manipulation.

1. Critical Thinking:
Children should be taught to question information, analyze motivations behind religious and political movements, and recognize manipulation tactics. This would involve lessons on historical events where religion was exploited for power, such as the selling of indulgences in the medieval Catholic Church or the misuse of religious rhetoric in modern political movements.

2. Ethical Reasoning:
Lessons in ethics would help students understand the difference between genuine moral leadership and manipulative behavior. Discussions on religious cults, televangelism, and political exploitation of religion could foster an understanding of how people have been deceived using religious dogma.

3. Historical Awareness:
A global perspective on the role of religion in both social progress and manipulation should be included. Case studies of various religious movements and their socio-political impacts will help students connect historical lessons with modern-day challenges.

This blueprint equips students with the intellectual tools needed to navigate the complexities of faith, power, and influence in the modern world.

Throughout history and into the modern era, unscrupulous individuals and groups have used it as a tool for exploitation. Whether by instilling fear, promising false hope, or claiming divine right, these manipulators have used religion to amass wealth, power, or control. Government, education minister and school are to be blamed for failing to help the naive children to understanding this darker side of religious history - as key to recognizing and preventing such exploitation today. What is the use of school then?

Under Section 406 of the Penal Code, a person convicted of CBT faces imprisonment for a term of up to 10 years, a fine, or both. In cases involving public servants or agents (under Section 409), the penalty is harsher, with imprisonment of up to 20 years, along with a fine and possible whipping.

Misappropriation: The entrusted person dishonestly misuses or converts the property

In Malaysian law, Criminal Breach of Trust (CBT) is defined under Section 405 of the Penal Code (Act 574). CBT occurs when a person entrusted with property or control over property dishonestly misappropriates it or uses it for purposes other than what it was intended for. The individual must be in a position of trust (e.g., a trustee, agent, or employee) and deliberately breach that trust for personal gain or to harm the rightful owner.

Interesting...................................... Masteel often shows strong price action in tandem with global steel prices.

The concept of heaven as a state of eternal bliss is often rooted in the belief that one experiences profound joy, peace, and contentment. However, children must learn that from a scientific and neurological perspective, this idea faces significant challenges. The human experience of pleasure, joy, and emotional satisfaction is deeply tied to the brain's reward center, particularly the release and regulation of neurotransmitters like dopamine. Without these neurochemical processes, the ability to experience any feeling, including bliss, becomes impossible.

Dopamine is integral to how we experience pleasure and reward. When we achieve a goal, engage in enjoyable activities, or even anticipate something desirable, dopamine is released, activating the brain's reward pathways. This creates the sensations we associate with happiness, satisfaction, and well-being. If the brain were not intact or if dopamine were not active, the capacity to feel pleasure or any sensation would cease.

In the concept of heaven, the human body, including the brain, is often left behind in favor of a spiritual or ethereal existence. Yet, without the brain's biological machinery—the reward center, dopamine-driven processes, and other neural mechanisms—the very experience of bliss becomes a fallacy. There is no known mechanism outside the brain that could produce feelings of pleasure, and thus the idea of eternal bliss without a functioning reward system is inconsistent with our understanding of how emotions are generated.

In essence, the promise of heavenly bliss without the physical structures that produce feelings is problematic. Emotions, including happiness, are tied to biological systems that are intricately designed to respond to stimuli in the material world. To feel, one must have a brain capable of interpreting and processing those feelings. Without it, the idea of eternal happiness becomes a logical impossibility.

Then how are children going to really learn and understand life? The concept of heaven as a state of eternal bliss is often rooted in the belief that one experiences profound joy, peace, and contentment. However, from a scientific and neurological perspective, this idea faces significant challenges. The human experience of pleasure, joy, and emotional satisfaction is deeply tied to the brain's reward center, particularly the release and regulation of neurotransmitters like dopamine. Without these neurochemical processes, the ability to experience any feeling, including bliss, becomes impossible.

Dopamine is integral to how we experience pleasure and reward. When we achieve a goal, engage in enjoyable activities, or even anticipate something desirable, dopamine is released, activating the brain's reward pathways. This creates the sensations we associate with happiness, satisfaction, and well-being. If the brain were not intact or if dopamine were not active, the capacity to feel pleasure or any sensation would cease.

In the concept of heaven, the human body, including the brain, is often left behind in favor of a spiritual or ethereal existence. Yet, without the brain's biological machinery—the reward center, dopamine-driven processes, and other neural mechanisms—the very experience of bliss becomes a fallacy. There is no known mechanism outside the brain that could produce feelings of pleasure, and thus the idea of eternal bliss without a functioning reward system is inconsistent with our understanding of how emotions are generated.

In essence, the promise of heavenly bliss without the physical structures that produce feelings is problematic. Emotions, including happiness, are tied to biological systems that are intricately designed to respond to stimuli in the material world. To feel, one must have a brain capable of interpreting and processing those feelings. Without it, the idea of eternal happiness becomes a logical impossibility.