Posted by firehawk > 2016-12-28 14:38 | Report Abuse

some are not appreciate ... bcos puncak price doesn't go up after the announcement, so, is not a good deal ...

they hope the 210m given to them as special dividend or use it for share buy back ....

Posted by Jay > 2016-12-28 15:53 | Report Abuse

puncak could have pay some dividend with so much cash. but shareholders also should have expected that cash will be used to buy assets to generate earnings. Triplc fits that profile.

many people look at Triplc's current P/L and jump to the conclusion that it is a low profit, high gearing company. that's why you see Triplc shareholders jumping saying that Rm210m is too low while Puncak shareholder jumping saying that Rm210m is too high

Posted by firehawk > 2016-12-28 16:11 | Report Abuse

for those suffer tremendous loss, they don care about all these ... what they hope is to recover the loss (at least part of it) ... any thing can't help to recover loss, is no good!

Posted by valuelurker > 2017-01-03 11:24 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by Up_down > 2017-01-03 11:33 | Report Abuse

I think shareholders of both companies would say the deal deemed fair if Rozali is willing offered cash dividend RM 1.00 for both sides. Waiting Triplc to drop below 1.7 for accumulating again if possible.

Posted by pineapple123 > 2017-02-05 22:45 | Report Abuse

puncak 95 cts ...dirt cheap