Now that Hevea is at all time high of $2.00 and still charging upward, Wikileaks must be making a killing in Hevea, considering he first called for buying of Hevea at $0.85 !
Mukah was correct that Xingquan registered heavy volumes the past weeks. Fortuneball mentioned that the guy who was selling like tomorrow never comes is Xie Zhidong. Fortuneball also added that Xie Zhidong average purchase price was RM1.30 and he is selling at RM0.60 which translated into a loss of RM0.70 per share. Well, Fortuneball said that Xie Zhidong sold his shares at a loss for reason(s) better known to him. Unless Xie Zhidong is so hard-up for money for other use(s), I do not see any palatable reasons for him to do that. Assuming he has 30,000,000 shares and he sells at a loss of RM0.70 per share, it would mean he dumped RM21,000,000 away. Ironically, he just got those shares like just 5 months ago. Obviously he is not a long term investor or he just found out the reason why he should just dump Xingquan.
I read Cariyoyo's comments and it sounds logical. But my view is that no one in Malaysia with the right frame of mind will buy Xingquan given the disturbing news on Chinese based stocks.
When you said...." no one in Malaysia with the right frame of mind will buy Xingquan given the disturbing news on Chinese based stock". If no one buy, then where come the volumes ?
@dlsh2, do not look at things on the surface only. Please note Xie Zhidong also received close to 15m WA because of the free warrants issued on the 1:2 basis. This itself is already worth a few million ringgit
Let us reconcile with two things here i.e. fact and fallacy and hope and false hope. In life, we will definitely meet up with people who will use facts to deduce issues and meanings while there are others who use fallacy. The fact put forth to us on Xingquan is the company has so much money but refuse to pay dividends to its shareholders which is the most important thing of investment. The fallacy to negate this fact is that the company wants to conserve cash for its future expansions. The second fact is that we have boozos buying Xingquan at RM1.30 and selling them by the drove at RM0.60. The fallacy to negate the second fact is that the shareholder wants to settle some personal committments with the sale proceeds. The third fact is that while the company has hundred of millions of cash it went ahead with a private placement which reduced shareholders value. The fallacy to negate the third fact the company executed the private placement to satisfy a shareholder. The fourth fact is that this shareholder dumped the shares after holding them for less than 5 months.
One can come up with all kind of excuses to justify an excuse. But no one can deny the fact that Ooi Guan Hoe being a director in Xingquan holds 35,000 shares only. If Xingquan is such a winner as some may want to believe it is, then why the hell Guan Hoe doesn't increase his stake to 35,000,000 at RM0.60 since he has all the information on Xingquan?
Let us not argue and produce false hopes to any potential investors.
Ooi Guan Hoe is only a director, that doesn't mean he has to buy 35m shares. This is hid personal matter,financially or private planning wise, whether the company is good or bad
Who know he is now getting someone who has the money (wikileaks in this case) to mop up all the cheap shares in the market, as well as forcing all of Xie Zhofong's 30m shares out?
This theory collaborated nicely with the increase trading volumes lately, as well as the selling out by Xie Zhidong's shares on a daily basis. For me, something big must be cooking for the better
I not worry as long as no other major shareholder besides this Xie is dumping stock. As the circumstances this Xie take up the private placement and then sell in such short period of time is suspicious. Who know he maybe in collaboration w the big boss to ramp up & down the share price.
Those who want play this stock better has good holding power.
Think of it this way, if boss Xing Quan himself want to sell shares he would offload it (>50%) after ramp up the share price first and not let this Xie sell down then he sell. He himself has invited this idiot to join the company just few months back
One scenario i can think of is that the sole purpose the boss invite this Xie to join is for him to throw the share (of course the majority is bought back by his proxy) to press down the price so that he can later privatise the undervalued company. He cant just throw his own share so he has to get this Xie to do the dirty work.
Possible, maybe the boss wanna push down the prices to RM0.20 or even Rm0.10 and then he will privatise the company together with KYY and share the cash among themselves....
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Fortuneball
796 posts
Posted by Fortuneball > 2014-09-19 00:08 | Report Abuse
Now that Hevea is at all time high of $2.00 and still charging upward, Wikileaks must be making a killing in Hevea, considering he first called for buying of Hevea at $0.85 !