by the way why NTA suddenly become 3.15 from 3.48? the losses is only 0.058 right? there are no bonus issue or share split recently. why NTA suddenly diluted that much? can it be due to too many esos?
or is it due to amortization mentioned in the QR. I did notice change in non current aseets. but isn't that amortization loss already included in this QR and only cost - RM0.058. if no, the amortization is huge costing loss of RM0.33. if so then that should be reported as -33 EPS instead of merely -0.58 EPS calculated in the QR
It seems the adjustment is treated as an adjustment to the retained earnings but not via P&L. The important thing is that the financial statements of the Company is reflecting a true and fair view. Anyway, it is only a timing difference if one takes the view that the concession period has been effectively extended by 30 years to 2064 and it is only a matter of time all specifics will be nailed down.
In prior year, the Group had amortised the concession assets up to 2064 commencing from December 2022 pursuant to the approval given by the State Government for extension of the concession period for additional thirty (30) years from 1 September 2034 to 31 August 2064, subject to terms and conditions to be mutually agreed with the State Government of Sabah. After further assessment by the Group, the Group have to meet the condition required by the MFRS138 to have the terms of the extension agreed in order to recognize the extended lease in the useful lives of the concession assets. Accordingly, the amortisation period has been revised to 2034 which is the initial concession period. (source: page 10 of QR)
It seems some of these additional "provisions" made in the current QR may be reversed once all terms and conditions are agreed upon with the State Government..
Also see other PYAs under Note A4 which will have significant impacts on NTA. Is the earlier redesignation of principal officer a result of this blunder ?
not going to reenter this counter anytime soon. only consider *if* company chaos settled down and able to generate sustainable and consistent profits again, and also "if* price is discounted enough that time
@Believe3222 my TP now lower than RM1.50. if not this QR (fundamental still good) offer me RM1.50 I boleh accept la. but after this QR even RM1.0 I need to consider deep, even if buy also just a few, not like my previous profit run kind of capital investment
but of course la without this QR price really hardly fall because of that 1 single push force. but now that force support so hard for the sake of support only now. never catch falling knife you don't know how much low it can go. see RAPID
tadi 2k support block at RM1.88 also broken just like that. next huge support block still unseen. but this buyer got habit to push price without putting block at buy queue la from history. he will just buy up from the sell queue merely to push the price up regardless of his profit / loss. it is more like for the sake of push price only instead of collect some cheap stakes while also pushing up the price
next QR many uncertainty we don't know what going on inside, but from what can see is a few resignations after this QR announced. audit issue? I don't know also. just play by what info we get now. @snowball2000 seems to have much clearer insights
let's see how things unfold. I definitely liked SURIA's business (provided it still proven to be profitable in the future), now just following tight (one of my main watch list), while opportunity to reenter still haven't emerged for me
The deal between Suria and Exsim( Bedi ) was Suria contributed 35.2 Acres of land and Exsim provided financial for the construction. The share of Bedi and Suria is 50:50 and GDV was 4.2 billions Ringgit. We don't know the conditions of agreement and if we assume the project is build for sharing, Suria will get his portion of 2.1 billions which is few times of the market capital. Whom is buying into Suria is very obvious.
You may think that being a privatized port operator for the whole of Sabah would make Suria Capital a company with good returns. Unfortunately over the past 12 years, the company only achieved an average ROE of 6%. https://i.postimg.cc/4NqfFSsN/Suria-Cap-returns.png
In fact quite a substantial part of its profits came from non-port operations such as property and investments.
I think this is because the economic activities in Sabah is not as developed as those in Peninsular Malaysia. While it is a growing economy and it may some time before we see Suria Capital benefiting from this.
Moral of the story is those who's holding with generous profits are diamond hands with silent mouths (hands), while those who missed out or wants to enter cheap are coming out with ways to calm their unsettled minds.
still a very cornered counter, without any visible support at the market queue also price hardly go down further. still monitoring this 1 of my fav counter
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
SincereStock
2,380 posts
Posted by SincereStock > 2024-03-01 08:44 | Report Abuse
hopefully got chance to reenter after this QR
by the way
why NTA suddenly become 3.15 from 3.48? the losses is only 0.058 right? there are no bonus issue or share split recently. why NTA suddenly diluted that much? can it be due to too many esos?
or is it due to amortization mentioned in the QR. I did notice change in non current aseets. but isn't that amortization loss already included in this QR and only cost - RM0.058. if no, the amortization is huge costing loss of RM0.33. if so then that should be reported as -33 EPS instead of merely -0.58 EPS calculated in the QR