No one is blaming accounting for the losses. It’s interpreting the numbers which is related to the one off disposal of aircraft. Aax is not in the business of disposal air craft. At such it would cause significant drop in Non current asset, increase in depreciation and lease obligation for this quarter only. The financial statements is structured to provide detailed information to readers. Detailed information includes operating, financing and investing activities of a company.
AAX states that "In 2Q19, on a normalised basis, excluding the impact of an one-off adjustment for the disposal of the three aircraft via sale and leaseback in April 2019 ...". May I know where can I get more info on the disposal of the aircraft? Don't believe they've made any major announcement on that...
Is that why the "non-current assets held for sale" has dropped? if that's the case, wouldn't the sale result in again which should be booked? Perhaps to be booked in parts over the course of the lease?
Can somebody explain/teach me that why the accumulate depreciation of 2018 (end of june) is 54m but 2019 is 446m, why the different is so huge? the aircraft is older for 1 year and depreciation can be so much different? thanks.
I have queries but i usually cannot find time to attend the AGM and some more the venue is around KLIa area, so far away : 1) Why is it that after disposal of aircraft, AirAsia made so much money; but AAX suffered great loss ? 2) Is there some accounting gimmick where AAX is made to bear the bad disposals & AirAsia bear the good ones ? 3) With AirAsia making profit every year & gave good dividends; and AAX losing big money most years, no dividends since listing, Is AAX made the whipping boy every year by the parents ( like the step father who dislike the step son AAX born by the previous father) ? 4) Meaning, all bad loss in the AirAsia Group is transferred to AAX and made AirAsia looks good & gave handsome dividend but AAX to bleed to death ?
Destinations more than 4 hours will be under AAX instead of AA. I have booked some flights of more than 4 hours before and noted that AAX price isn't really a lot more cheaper compared to other full service carrier. If' it's only 10% cheaper, I will rather go for full service carrier. So this long haul flight is not easy to compete. In addition, there are many national carriers that are subsidized and can afford to provide competitive air ticket price.
InvestWin I have queries but i usually cannot find time to attend the AGM and some more the venue is around KLIa area, so far away : 1) Why is it that after disposal of aircraft, AirAsia made so much money; but AAX suffered great loss ? 2) Is there some accounting gimmick where AAX is made to bear the bad disposals & AirAsia bear the good ones ? 3) With AirAsia making profit every year & gave good dividends; and AAX losing big money most years, no dividends since listing, Is AAX made the whipping boy every year by the parents ( like the step father who dislike the step son AAX born by the previous father) ? 4) Meaning, all bad loss in the AirAsia Group is transferred to AAX and made AirAsia looks good & gave handsome dividend but AAX to bleed to death ? 23/08/2019 11:08 AM
2Q19 core net loss was MYR185m (+151% YoY, +513% QoQ) after adjusting for non-cash items. This was well below our and consensus expectations, as yields and costs moved in a negative direction. Our revised FY19E loss forecast swells by 6.5x from our previous forecast and we now think FY20E will be loss-making as well.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
freddiehero
16,722 posts
Posted by freddiehero > 2019-08-23 05:37 | Report Abuse
dept too high.. very high