In 1944, during the Bretton Woods conference British economist, John Maynard Keynes proposed BANCOR a new neutral reserve currency that would be used for settling international accounts. However, the US overruled this proposal in favor of a system of fixed exchange rates using the U.S. dollar (which was a gold standard currency for central banks) as a reserve currency.
Now if commodity-rich nations such as Saudi Arabia and Russia suddenly decide to not use the dollar for global trade, then the trillion-dollar question is that what would be the next global reserve currency? Looking back at the history over the past few centuries, one has seen that the global reserve currency has changed hands every ~80-100 years. The dollar is nearing the 80-year mark also so a change of the guard in the next few years would not mean a deviation from the historical norm.he global reserve currency has been closely aligned with the overarching power in the world at that moment in history. China being a rising power sees itself as a Great Power (in its own mind at least) and would be in the mind of many as “calling the shots” in what the next global currency would be. While in theory, China would not mind having most of the world trade be conducted in yuan but given the Triffin dilemma that the US faces today this would be an obstacle. The Triffin dilemma is the conflict of economic interests that arises between short-term domestic and long-term international objectives for countries whose currencies serve as global reserve currencies. The use of the US dollar for global trade creates a big demand for dollars from all around the world leading to the dollar strengthening relative to other global currencies. This dollar strength made US exports become uncompetitive compared to their peers overseas. This has led to the hollowing out of the US manufacturing sector and a flight of jobs over the past few decades. This has imposed heavy costs on those who worked in blue-collar jobs across many areas of the US including the so-called “Rust Belt”.
China being an export-led economy would not want to fall into the same trap as the United States. While they would like to have global trade denominated in yuan in principle (as a matter of national pride) one doubts if they want their exports (which are a big part of their economy) to become more expensive. Also, for all trade to settle in yuan China would have to export yuan to many other nations that would need yuan to settle trade with their trading partners. Given the strict capital controls in China, it would be surprising if China allows a lot of yuan to go out of the country to foreign shores.
China has benefitted from the dollar system (running up trade surpluses year after year) where they can have their exports cheaper due to dollar strength so they would not mind having the reserve currency as something other than their own currency. Even if China wanted to set up the yuan as a default reserve currency the question is would other states fully embrace it?Today due to tensions with the West, Russia is forced into a friendship with China but they were not on the best of terms always including a military skirmish in 1969. Chinese from time to time bring up their territorial claims in the Russian Far East including Vladivostok which they say were given up by China as part of unequal treaties during their “150 years of humiliation” with foreign powers and now they want it back. Many other Asian neighbors including India, Vietnam, South Korea, Japan, etc. with which China has adversarial relations would also be wary of adopting a yuan-based reserve currency where they would be dependent on China to obtain yuan for their trading.
Also, in event of military hostilities with China or its allies, they can (like what Russia is facing right now) could be “cut off” from the reserve currency yuan which would be determinantal to them.
A return to a system like BANCOR (neutral reserve currency) proposed by Keynes in 1944 would require active cooperation between many nations across the world. With active geopolitical tensions among various sets of nation pairs: Russia and USA, USA and China, Europe and Russia, Saudi Arabia/UAE and Iran, etc. the chances of another “Bretton Woods” kind of consensus are next to nil.
Be the first to like this.
89 comment(s).Last comment by IDQWE001 2023-03-29 22:13
I heard US dollar collapsed almost everyday for the past 20 years unfortunately it does not happen. It seems like this "news" will repeat over and over everywhere in the coming 20 years.
foongsh, sad though in the next 60-70 years maybe.
Assume Xi live to 85, then 15 years more of these bullshit will come up. Until China fell and want to stand up again.
In fact, this is the struggle between self-reliance and open to the world. Whenever China is open to the world, it will grow strong. When she is close, it will shrink. It has been this way for the last 400 years. So, China fell and stand up again, and again, and again. Its very sad for the China Chinese, but history repeats itself.
The last time, they had this fighters in the forest, this time they have "fighters" in the internet. Isn't that an improvement?
They are still people believe in AT and I respect that. Just hope that they vote with their money too.
Actually if those CCP supporters can support China with their money, then Huawei's sales won't drop 80%. They say Huawei no Google lah (now got back already), no 5G lah blah blah blah.
Actually they can order their custom made cloth using XinJiang cotton, but they will never do so. That's why China textiles struggling.
Actually they talk only, they won't support the china bamboo, china duck, china wine, china shoes, china refinery, that's why stock price of those china listed not so good.
On the contrary, they eat kfc, we eat kfc, everybody eat kfc. Starbucks, gillette, mcD, burger king, pepsi, coke, all doing so well. lol
keeping its economy open is a top priority ....the decoupling is not China's choice, it is forced upon it. China has been preparing for it a long long time.
China has many priorities and many problems to solve to get to where it wants to go.
top priorities include strengthening and expanding Brics+, self reliance in chips, keep the economy open, .................. and a very real possibility of a US led recession , US stealing its USD reserves like what they do to Putin.
China can achieve its targets only if global south do well, BRICS+ do well...............this assumption is already bakes in............there is too much risk if over reliance on the developed world not to make huge mistakes.
Won't collapse so fast.. china still holds a lot of assets and securities in USD. US + Europe still 2/3 of world GDP. Geographical restriction. It is always good to be friendly with neighbors because of the cost of shipping and etc. So far, South korea and Japan are Pro-US. It will happen over the course of 20 years starting with Middle East & Russia.. It just needs to make it happen with South East Asia (which I doubt due to the dispute of territory) and Europe (serious tie with US & UK) Once China overtook US in GDP, it will only be able to convince those 50 50 countries. 1. Yuan- global oil yuan 2. Hongkong - number 1 financial hub 3. Loosen the immigration rules. (I understand China want to prioritize their citizen first. But by opening the border, he will be attract more talent and money) It will take more than 20 years for this to finally happen. I know China military expenses are considered low. But they expand rapidly.. which causes concern there will be a small skirmish and their neighbors grew wary. Maybe can start making statements on the purpose of the military, for example, to protect china ships near Africa region etc..
I believe Africa has the capacity to learn.............and China has the capacity to teach..........and China has the money, the expertise, the history , the willingness to transform Africa.
education and mindset changing are important if they want to be richer. some country reluctant to do that because the leaders want to keep tight control of the country and pass it down to their son. like Tun M
Posted by supersaiyan3 > 2 hours ago | Report Abuse
foongsh, sad though in the next 60-70 years maybe.
Assume Xi live to 85, then 15 years more of these bullshit will come up. Until China fell and want to stand up again.
In fact, this is the struggle between self-reliance and open to the world. Whenever China is open to the world, it will grow strong. When she is close, it will shrink. It has been this way for the last 400 years. So, China fell and stand up again, and again, and again. Its very sad for the China Chinese, but history repeats itself.
The last time, they had this fighters in the forest, this time they have "fighters" in the internet. Isn't that an improvement?
Xi must an excuss to be the 3rd term of the leader, so he must get an enemy to unite all Citizens and oversea red army to support him ie. US. Difference from Deng, Jiang and HU, he was a red army before and practising Moa ways to carry on his political life. China citizens are too bad. You are right when china open, China wil be strong but when China constrain itself ...will be weak.
When Hong Kong lossing his No.1 financial hub to Singapore. Red army thought that Hong Kong is still the no.1. Forgot to remind u that it is UK administration to make Hong Kong No.1 financial hub in Asia and not communists.
In Hong Kong, around 40-50% of the housing is provided by the government, which is cheap and affordable. Another 55% or so is by private (which is really expensive).
Actually hong kong has plenty of land for its people, 1) But, not enough utilities. Unlike malaysia, Ecoworld can build a township over 3 years or so, but in hk the developer cannot do so. There is simply no road, no electricity, no water supply for new township even if you have land. (For me, hong kong government is simple lazy).
2) some say the nature lovers will protest to development, but i think that's nonsense.
3) now hk may face depeg of us dollar, losing its status as financial centre, etc. (Well, Hong Kong wants to be part of China and China insist Hong Kong is part of China, so there should be no special status given to Hong Kong. Can Kedah goes to Olympics under Kedah? No! So, the same apply to Hong Kong, Ng Ka Long represents China and not Hong Kong. Since China and Hong Kong government doesn't likes 願榮光歸香港 being confused as national song. )
4) Now China developers can go hong kong, so they can build township everywhere without considering nature lovers feeling. So, yes, hong kong property will go down very soon, good for hong kong young people.
From the ancient history of Korean, various ancient dynasty of China did invade ancient Korean. Western & Eastern races did invad other countries. The moral of the story is to avoid any war caused by whatever reason. Please read my writting.
From the ancient history of Vietnam , various ancient dynasty of China did invade ancient Korean. Western & Eastern races did invad other countries. The moral of the story is to avoid any war caused by whatever reason. Please read my writtin
there are lots of good info and good video about China from the internet................that is a much better way to spend some time than writing lies about China.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
Report Abuse
Please Sign In to report this post as abuse.
Market Buzz
No result.
Featured Posts
MQ Trader
Introducing MY's First IPO Fund for Sophisticated Investors!
MQ Chat
New Update. Discover investment communities that resonate with your ideas
MQ Trader
M & A Value Partners IPO Equity Fund has been launched - Targeted 13% Return p.a
Latest Videos
0:17
New IPO: A fertilizer formulating and blending company, Cropmate Berhad aims to list on the ACE Market!
MQ Trader 137 views | 17 h ago
0:17
New IPO: Supreme Consolidated Resources Berhad, a distributor and warehouser of F&B products, aims to list on the ACE Market!
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Posted by IDQWE001 > 2023-03-28 08:45 | Report Abuse
In 1944, during the Bretton Woods conference British economist, John Maynard Keynes proposed BANCOR a new neutral reserve currency that would be used for settling international accounts. However, the US overruled this proposal in favor of a system of fixed exchange rates using the U.S. dollar (which was a gold standard currency for central banks) as a reserve currency. Now if commodity-rich nations such as Saudi Arabia and Russia suddenly decide to not use the dollar for global trade, then the trillion-dollar question is that what would be the next global reserve currency? Looking back at the history over the past few centuries, one has seen that the global reserve currency has changed hands every ~80-100 years. The dollar is nearing the 80-year mark also so a change of the guard in the next few years would not mean a deviation from the historical norm.he global reserve currency has been closely aligned with the overarching power in the world at that moment in history. China being a rising power sees itself as a Great Power (in its own mind at least) and would be in the mind of many as “calling the shots” in what the next global currency would be. While in theory, China would not mind having most of the world trade be conducted in yuan but given the Triffin dilemma that the US faces today this would be an obstacle. The Triffin dilemma is the conflict of economic interests that arises between short-term domestic and long-term international objectives for countries whose currencies serve as global reserve currencies. The use of the US dollar for global trade creates a big demand for dollars from all around the world leading to the dollar strengthening relative to other global currencies. This dollar strength made US exports become uncompetitive compared to their peers overseas. This has led to the hollowing out of the US manufacturing sector and a flight of jobs over the past few decades. This has imposed heavy costs on those who worked in blue-collar jobs across many areas of the US including the so-called “Rust Belt”. China being an export-led economy would not want to fall into the same trap as the United States. While they would like to have global trade denominated in yuan in principle (as a matter of national pride) one doubts if they want their exports (which are a big part of their economy) to become more expensive. Also, for all trade to settle in yuan China would have to export yuan to many other nations that would need yuan to settle trade with their trading partners. Given the strict capital controls in China, it would be surprising if China allows a lot of yuan to go out of the country to foreign shores. China has benefitted from the dollar system (running up trade surpluses year after year) where they can have their exports cheaper due to dollar strength so they would not mind having the reserve currency as something other than their own currency. Even if China wanted to set up the yuan as a default reserve currency the question is would other states fully embrace it?Today due to tensions with the West, Russia is forced into a friendship with China but they were not on the best of terms always including a military skirmish in 1969. Chinese from time to time bring up their territorial claims in the Russian Far East including Vladivostok which they say were given up by China as part of unequal treaties during their “150 years of humiliation” with foreign powers and now they want it back. Many other Asian neighbors including India, Vietnam, South Korea, Japan, etc. with which China has adversarial relations would also be wary of adopting a yuan-based reserve currency where they would be dependent on China to obtain yuan for their trading. Also, in event of military hostilities with China or its allies, they can (like what Russia is facing right now) could be “cut off” from the reserve currency yuan which would be determinantal to them. A return to a system like BANCOR (neutral reserve currency) proposed by Keynes in 1944 would require active cooperation between many nations across the world. With active geopolitical tensions among various sets of nation pairs: Russia and USA, USA and China, Europe and Russia, Saudi Arabia/UAE and Iran, etc. the chances of another “Bretton Woods” kind of consensus are next to nil.