Be the first to like this.
4 comment(s). Last comment by AREBEAR 2011-11-22 08:21
Posted by Roseeu > 2011-10-28 08:35 | Report Abuse
Yeah, I totally agree, what about future earnings?, so convenient just to ignore it. Rejecting the offer is the only way to go, unless they give a better pricing.
Posted by AREBEAR > 2011-11-22 08:21 | Report Abuse
AGREE;mclim another hanky panky take over
No result.
1
PublicInvest Research
2
save malaysia!
3
Good Articles to Share
HPB aims to reach out to all 110 hawker centres about lower-sodium options by mid-2025
4
Good Articles to Share
F&B outlets looking at measures to counter slow business during wet weather
5
6
Good Articles to Share
Filmmaker Yeo Siew Hua's 'Stranger Eyes' headlines Singapore International Film Festival
7
Good Articles to Share
New safety measures for firms handling combustible dust, higher-risk machinery
8
Good Articles to Share
Suspension of top Chinese military official shows anti-graft campaign far from over: Analyst
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
chuanho
3 posts
Posted by chuanho > 2011-10-27 21:59 | Report Abuse
I think this offer seriously undervalues the company. more striking is the simple arithmetic of using offer price less the exercise price to value the warrant. This method of calculating the price of warrants completely ignores the time component or the time value. Investing is all about buying for future value and this method of calculating warrant value cannot be accepted and should not be approved.