Posted by shinado > 2016-05-27 08:36 | Report Abuse
Charlie Munger once said this about EBITDA:
“I think that, every time you see the word EBITDA, you should substitute the word ‘bullshit’ earnings.”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/brentbeshore/2014/11/13/ebitda-is-bs-earnings/#2c216cb1494c
Nonetheless, your article here is a good read. Thanks.
Posted by Ricky Yeo > 2016-05-27 09:46 | Report Abuse
It depends what you want to measure. For example if you want to measure how a company can serve interest payment when it is not reinvesting money into the business, EBITDA to interest coverage is what ppl look at.
Posted by Wan Zuhdi > 2016-05-27 12:18 | Report Abuse
thanks for the link shinado. good read as well.
No result.
3
save malaysia!
4
5
Good Articles to Share
BlackRock's Rieder: The technicals are 'crazy good' for stocks
6
Good Articles to Share
Germany's Scholz defends call to Putin ahead of snap elections
7
8
Good Articles to Share
Nigeria and India agree deeper ties in maritime security, counter-terrorism
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
HakchainFrens
55 posts
Posted by HakchainFrens > 2016-05-27 05:56 | Report Abuse
Use ebit better than ebitda. Depreciation and amortization is part of operation so ebit is better