"PRASARANA Malaysia Bhd has appointed Malaysian Resources Corp Bhd (MRCB) and George Kent (M) Bhd as the project delivery partner (PDP) for the light rail transit three (LRT3), which is estimated to cost RM9bil."
"The PDP for the LRT3 project will earn a management fee of 6%".
SIMPLE CALCULATION:
Project shared equally with MRCB = 9bil divided by 2 = 4.5bil
Management fee = 6% of 4.5bil = 270mil
CORRECTION:
RM270 million- LRT3 RM494 million - MRT2 RM642 million - Hospital in Putrajaya and Selangor
You sure of your calculation what about additional work of lrt2. I suggest you attend the agm and clarify with the management. Don’t just talk here and try to assume that your view is correct.
It depends on which perspective we are looking for... If we take RM4.5bil as the LRT3 revenue, then the net profit from this LRT3 will be 6%, which is RM270mil. But if we only recognise RM270mil as the revenue, then the net profit will be almost 100%, because this RM270mil is the management fee, there is no cost that Gkent need to bear. Even got, it will be minimal only.
please go study what do you mean by PROJECT DELIVERY PARTNER.
When your billing should be the Management Fee, then your order book should be based on the amount of management fee, not the project value.
Like Quantity Surveyor, your job is to QS on the project, not building the project, so your unbilled order book should be the FEE. The project cost should be belong to the contractors that building the project.
Can anyone mind to share if the management fee will be the nett nett amount to be received by GKent?
Because someone claimed that PRASARANA Malaysia Bhd will absorb the staff costs & other running costs incurred by the PDP when PDP doing their management stuff
erkongseng klci king LRT3中45亿订单净赚6%=270m 别把270m混为订单來算。 01/06/2018 03:58
I am not here to make any judgement on the valuation, but just to highlight on the basis on how to get things right & from there work out your own judgement based on the correct calculation.
With earning RM1, some think the company should worth RM10, some say RM20, that's subjective thing that no right or wrong.
But the estimation of earning RM1 must be calculated based on the correct basis, not simply said or handam.
KLCI King had lumped up the PDP fees of LRT3 of RM270 which is almost net income , with the Project cost of RM494 and RM642 where GK may earn only 9% Confusion !!
I think the author is correct. PDP stands for Project Delivery Partner. They are more like a project management & earning the fees to manage the projects. The project value belonged to the appointed contractors not the PDP entity.
The fees for the PDP is not equal to net income. It need to less the management teams ( office + site consultant team ) overhead, the printing cost for tender evaluation & award, utility for operation & etc. The highest cost for the PDP entity is actually the overhead of the management team / human resources. Imagine each station you have 1 team from Arch, C&S , M&E, QS, Landscape, ID, Planner, etc.
6% for this size I think is fair, this is not normal building but infrastructure. They need to handle all level of counterparts. In fact, there are provision in PDP which stated that any delay or cost overrun. PDP need to dapao themselves without any cost incur to government. PDP entity have to borne all the cost overrun & liable for the late delivery.
why 6% is fair ? Because as PDP, they are not only reviewing the design, they need to do coordination across the trades.
For normal residential building . The P&A rate for coordination normally range around 2.5% to 3%. For a more complex building like mall, the P&A will go up to 3.5% to 4%. For healthcare, it will reached 4.5%. It all depends on the degree of difficulty of the coordination. The P&A scope in building contract is almost identical to the PDP role function in railway jobs.
Hence, for railways with multiple disciplines & multiple stations, 6% is a fair rate.
Based on annual report, the order book reflect the RM4.5 bil as the PDP 6% fee is based on project progress billing. Thus, GKENT include it into its order book.
However, you're right that this figure inflated the actual order book value needed to be delivered by GKENT.
Good eye! Hopefully, IB and analyst will highlight this clearly in their future analysis.
Thank you, Mr Sami, your comment make sense to me. Learn something today.
Sami_Value why 6% is fair ? Because as PDP, they are not only reviewing the design, they need to do coordination across the trades.
For normal residential building . The P&A rate for coordination normally range around 2.5% to 3%. For a more complex building like mall, the P&A will go up to 3.5% to 4%. For healthcare, it will reached 4.5%. It all depends on the degree of difficulty of the coordination. The P&A scope in building contract is almost identical to the PDP role function in railway jobs.
Hence, for railways with multiple disciplines & multiple stations, 6% is a fair rate. 01/06/2018 17:52
Are you kidding? Do you know what are you talking? I don't need to go anywhere but just to point out how contradict you are in your comment。
Not only you don't know what is written in the newspaper: "The PDP for the LRT3 project will earn a management fee of 6%"
You try to said apple is actually orange:
1st, you mention what is in 5.6bil order book Then you said construction revenue 80% meter supply 20%
Can you justify or explain your own comment?
---------------below----------------------- Nikmon @KLCI King, the first assumption made by you are totally wrong, so eventually the rest of the article can be ignore...lol...wrong lah
the 5.6 billion order book inclusive of 1. LRT extension 2. Hospital construction 3. LRT 3 4. Provision of water meter to Hong Kong, Singapore 5. water construction 6. MRT2
construction revenue around 80% and meter supply around 20%
the next will be share bonus and final dividend.... 01/06/2018 23:51
The owner also said very clearly PDP will earn a management fee only, still so many people get cheated by the GKent Chairman, Bankers, GKent's AR.....blah blah
haha, so funny, good that many got confused, if not, how to make money in stock market?
Totally misleading, please check analyst report on gamuda, they were the pdp of mrt1 and 2, orderbook means orderbook, not fees of orderbook, dont find it meaningful to even post this blog
Your level of intelligence can be seen from your comment, if you think I am wrong, so be it. It is up to you to see whatever you want to see.
If you stand firm to say it is order book, then order book loh. I am done with all my explanation & opinion, GKent is gone case anyway.
Primeinvestor Totally misleading, please check analyst report on gamuda, they were the pdp of mrt1 and 2, orderbook means orderbook, not fees of orderbook, dont find it meaningful to even post this blog 02/06/2018 02:33
It is obviously your first time in looking at construction stock. Please download analyst reports for Gamuda here, http://gamuda.com.my/analyst-reports/
looks like you have alot to learn about order book classification, but it does not matter, i am not promoting gkent, i am only disgusted by your misleading blog
HSR order book for Gamuda consortium is RM20b, not 6% of RM20b, or you could refer to ytl's news and reports
KLCI King Your level of intelligence can be seen from your comment, if you think I am wrong, so be it. It is up to you to see whatever you want to see.
If you stand firm to say it is order book, then order book loh. I am done with all my explanation & opinion, GKent is gone case anyway.
Primeinvestor Totally misleading, please check analyst report on gamuda, they were the pdp of mrt1 and 2, orderbook means orderbook, not fees of orderbook, dont find it meaningful to even post this blog 02/06/2018 02:33 02/06/2018 10:11
please call up analysts and tell them your intelligence is higher than them and ask them to resign because you deserves to be the most intelligent order book estimator, LOL, what a rubbish article, you are lucky because you can be sued for defamation for your sub par intel
Tan Sri KH Tan and hos family should use his personal money to buy back the shates if he think the value of the shates still worth 3 times of the current price closed 1/6. Tan Sri has no balls because he worry margin call if personal money use. That clearly shown non of the major shareholders got the courage to use their personal money to buy back. If so confident the share price will go up, why not earn easy money to your own bank account rather than give back the gain to the company! Think rationally before investing....
from:635789 Let examine the track record of this company why the share price plunged 75% from year high of RM4.52 to year low of 1.12. This company had been accumulating profits every quarter since 31.10.2003 with unbroken profits for 15 years. Latest audited report as at 31.1.2018 had shown that it had accumulated profit of RM265m, cash of RM511m and borrowing of RM56m. This is a solid listed company with very good track records and is competitive to win big projects for open tendering. It is hard to believe the share price will be falling forever and in fact is a Good time to accumulate buying after plunging 75%.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
KLCI King
3,220 posts
Posted by KLCI King > 2018-06-01 01:08 | Report Abuse
"PRASARANA Malaysia Bhd has appointed Malaysian Resources Corp Bhd (MRCB) and George Kent (M) Bhd as the project delivery partner (PDP) for the light rail transit three (LRT3), which is estimated to cost RM9bil."
"The PDP for the LRT3 project will earn a management fee of 6%".
SIMPLE CALCULATION:
Project shared equally with MRCB = 9bil divided by 2 = 4.5bil
Management fee = 6% of 4.5bil = 270mil
CORRECTION:
RM270 million- LRT3
RM494 million - MRT2
RM642 million - Hospital in Putrajaya and Selangor
Total Order Book in Hand = 1.4 billion only