As mentioned by KYY last December, Jaks total debt is about 1.28 bil. This debts cannot be ignore and only focus on 40sen/share potential profit from power plant.
Philips...........more likely CFO sold to buy back under another name, not for tax reasons but to give himself flexibility in future.
He probably knows he cannot wait anymore as there are too many enquiries from the big boys already...........Andy probably ask him to do it now, to hold down the surge.
1) EXISITING RM421 MIL (RM48 MIL P.A) 2) NEW BORROWING FOR POWER PLANT USD400MIL @ 6% P.A AT 18 YEARS TENOR (RM144MIL P.A)
So it would be RM276- RM144- RM48= RM84 mil.
# Don't forget your 102 mil warrants which need to be included in the future upon full conversion. Let's make it conservative at 585 mil + 102 mil= 687 mil
(1) in latest Q, interest expense is RM8 mil. So if annualised, becomes RM32 mil. Not far from your RM48 mil (how do you get RM48 mil , btw ?)
(2) The profit of RM276 mil already factored in interest bearing debts at IPP level, consistent with how MFCB earnings are derived
(3) if loan stocks, I will usually assume fully diluted EPS based on full conversion. However, if Warrants, the standard practice in the financial industry is to ignore it for the following reason :- (a) unlike loan stocks, exercise is not 100% sure (never say never); (b) when warrants are exercised and proceeds flow in, on top of retiring borrowings, there is possibility that the cash proceeds will be used to invest in a new business venture that can generate business return (namely, return of 13% etc based on CAPM).
of course, you can choose to assume the way you assume. But my experience so many years in the financial industry is that being conservative is not 100% a good thing. The benefit is that you are likely to loss less if things turn sour, but the flip side is that you miss out opportunity unnecessarily. In Chinese, it is called 妄自菲薄
the best way to look at things is to take the middle path. Be conservative so as to tap the benefit of safety, but don't be overly conservative until you brute force transform a 40 sen EPS into 12 sen EPS. Because if you do that, you will become the biggest victim of your own conservatism as you will find the stock less appealing than it is. When the stock reach RM2.00, you will just stand there and watch while everybody else is singing karaoke and eating lobster.
newbie8080 ICON, DID YOU MISSED OUT THE BORROWINGS ?
1) EXISITING RM421 MIL (RM48 MIL P.A) 2) NEW BORROWING FOR POWER PLANT USD400MIL @ 6% P.A AT 18 YEARS TENOR (RM144MIL P.A)
So it would be RM276- RM144- RM48= RM84 mil.
# Don't forget your 102 mil warrants which need to be included in the future upon full conversion. Let's make it conservative at 585 mil + 102 mil= 687 mil
mfcb input cost is water. (FOC from mother nature). jaks if able to complete with smart CEEC Tianjin if correct, input cost is coal. (FOC in i3 only). Revenue -input cost = profit.
Yes for any ventures even buat kopitiam kecil b4 u start the figures and margin must b right with high degree of being attained before one shd proceed
IPP Vietnam tu dah di study for years dah and by financing banks too so Sarifah sikit pun x risau that the figures and margin are not
After figures and margin are right then it is proper execution
From the a picture paints a thousand words foto foto status update from CPECC give Sarifah the comfort that CPECC has the skills and competencies to finish the construction without masalah at all malah mungkin beres early
Financing to purchase materials and parts salaries etc also nampak in place
Based on my experience, To make money in stocks, you don't need to be correct right from beginning until end
I was wrong about jaks when I bought at RM1.10, it went down to RM0.45, and I lost RM100 (let's say, I choose this figure for ease of illustration)
But I didn't give up, I just watched and monitored intensely, because I believed in my own fundamental analysis
When the stock started showing positive signs and many indicators pointing towards right direction, I increased my exposure gradually (from my initial timid 4%). As per my latest disclosure (in Jaks thread), I have scaled up Jaks to 10% of my portfolio after purchasing final batches at RM0.79.
So my gain is now RM300
After netting off the initial RM100 lost, I am nett gain RM200
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
DK66
4,269 posts
Posted by DK66 > 2019-04-05 12:48 | Report Abuse
forever escape from poverty