Posted by Stock Kingdom > 2021-06-29 19:07 | Report Abuse

That small step was 100km wide

Posted by stockraider > 2021-06-29 19:08 | Report Abuse

Whether it is EY or KPMG the outcome & findings will be likely to be the same mah, Do not believe in false hope mah!

Posted by Parksonguy > 2021-06-30 07:49 | Report Abuse

If something are real no need explain much. This company with ceo attitude already know 100% fake account, still can buy time play show. Epf should have file police report already for fraudary. What wrong with this world? Rich people can play game, and poor people loosing money?

Posted by Parksonguy > 2021-06-30 07:52 | Report Abuse

If customer are real just make them a call and sent representative come Malaysia. Why change auditor and many more gangster tactic and call people shop lot auditor? Cheat people money still can hire lawyer?

Posted by Parksonguy > 2021-06-30 07:53 | Report Abuse

Bubble are blowed if still buy into the company that person truly ponzi guy. Buy at risk.

Posted by OrlandoOilSemiconIoT > 2021-06-30 10:30 | Report Abuse

The terms set by EY r pretty standard

Posted by OrlandoOilSemiconIoT > 2021-06-30 10:32 | Report Abuse

Unless u wrongly read the following...



1. EY need to have full and unfettered access to KPMG PLT for information and confirmation for the purpose of analysing the transactions and concerns highlighted;

Posted by OrlandoOilSemiconIoT > 2021-07-01 10:31 | Report Abuse

EY wil b appointed independent reviewer

It is really one small step away

Posted by ykloh > 2021-07-01 14:55 | Report Abuse

Has KPMG agreed to render the assistance to EY?

Posted by OrlandoOilSemiconIoT > 2021-07-01 16:04 | Report Abuse

Tis term is not directed at KPMG

Tis term is EY telling Serbadk u cannot in anyways whatsoever stop us from communicating with KPMG.... we must hv total full unfettered access to KOMG to communication wit KPMG.


So it is basically EY telling Serbadk u cannot limit our scope of work... no limitation of scope

So KPMG can or cannot accept tis term is irrelevant coz it is not directed to KPMG


Haiz u stock kingdom



1. EY need to have full and unfettered access to KPMG PLT for information and confirmation for the purpose of analysing the transactions and concerns highlighted;





OrlandoOilSemiconIoT stock kingdom to interpret tis again carefully tis time


U hv got it wrong again


1. EY need to have full and unfettered access to KPMG PLT for information and confirmation for the purpose of analysing the transactions and concerns highlighted;





Posted by Stock Kingdom > Jun 28, 2021 7:15 PM | Report Abuse 

I have never heard one audit firm can have “full and unfettered access” on the working papers of another audit firm. Never in the history locally & internationally.

Some more that one is KPMG.

Haha, forget the appointment.


Some may think what about apply & get court order to command KPMG handover.

but at what basis? Will KPMG just sit quietly & do nothing letting Serba get the order? By then MIA will jump in to defend for KPMG.


———-++++++———
myinvesting I expect it will be rejected by kp&g due to resigned (no more relationship), confidential and suit case (how to give hold harmless?)

————+++++++———-
1. EY need to have full and unfettered access to KPMG PLT for information and confirmation for the purpose of analysing the transactions and concerns highlighted;

However, in light of the recent resignation of KPMG PLT as the Company’s external auditors, EY required assurance that the above requirements remain in place prior to executing the engagement letter and commencing the review, including a written confirmation from KPMG PLT that co-operation in the form of access and information will be provided to EY for the purpose of understanding the alleged irregularities and anomalies identified, such as

30/06/2021 10:21 AM

Posted by OrlandoOilSemiconIoT > 2021-07-01 16:16 | Report Abuse

Haiz stock kingdom u n ur dogs