No result.
1
BFM Podcast
2
BFM Podcast
4
5
6
BFM Podcast
7
BFM Podcast
8
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
WhatSayYou
31 posts
Posted by WhatSayYou > 2021-11-15 15:10 | Report Abuse
When questioning about others investigation, may be Mr Lim should also investigate DAP's Malacca Candidate, Mr Damian Yeo, who betrayed the Plaintiff, and helped Dr TCL to get away from very serious offense in:
"Dalam Negeri Melaka, Writ No: (2) A53KP-02-04/Tahun 2016"
Just pick up a few more important issues:
1. Mr Yeo get rid of Plaintiff’s Witness Doctor by telling Dr TCL’s Lawyer before 1st hearing that he was not going to call Doctor; and caused Plaintiff unable to testify in Court.
2. Mr Yeo failed to strike out Dr TCL’s untrue Witness Statements who stated that he asked for consent of operation on the 5th day morning; when in Case Note, he postponed operation waiting for Peritonitis to set in.
3. In re-examination, Mr Yeo's Assistant who did not follow the case allowed Dr TCL to invalidate a document, which contained solid proof of Dr TCL postponed operation beyond Patient's death, and was certified by Malaysia Medical Council, just because of an error in the Title.
4. Also Dr TCL was allowed to change his own earlier testimony of Bowel obstruction at mid Ileum to no obstruction, so as to change the Patient's Bowel Obstruction into Ischemic Bowel.
5. Dr TCL was allowed to take his own words of 'relative reluctant' and 'daughter refused' added in two Case Notes, where he had advised them to wait for Patient's Peritonitis, to pass the blame of delay in operation to them without documented proof of their refusal.
6. Mr Yeo did not point out that Dr TCL failed to go to the Hospital at night; when the Patient was Peritonitis with Septic Shock that needs immediate operation, and denied her of her last chance of survival.
7. He failed to tell the Judge that cancellation of Medications after it were noted were tampering of Medical Documents.
8. He justified Dr TCL’s operation on Patient whose blood system was bleeding due to DIVC and was inoperable.
9. He added a fault statement of family member refused operation in the Submission to kill of the Case beyond Appeal.